Mutualism and division of labour: a mutual expansion of concepts
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
380(1922)
Published: March 20, 2025
Division
of
labour
within
social
groups
and
the
interspecific
relationships
mutualisms
have
traditionally
been
treated
as
separate
research
areas.
In
this
opinion,
we
align
terminologies
concepts
between
two
fields,
by
comparing
within-group
division
to
outsourcing
functions
in
mutualisms.
share
fundamental
similarities.
Both
are
built
from
specialization
some
individuals
relationship
on
tasks
or
required
for
survival,
growth
reproduction.
also
generate
variable
fitness
outcomes.
A
key
difference
is
that
generally
direct
gain,
while
benefits
cooperative
sociality
often
accrue
a
mix
indirect
fitness.
Additionally,
levels
physical
physiological
many
expand
far
beyond
differentiation
seen
groups,
with
exception
reproductive
labour.
The
consideration
between-species
context
allows
expansion
our
understanding
both
fields
beyond,
consider
general
principles
drivers
labour,
role
differences
more
broadly
across
complexity.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Division
driver
evolution’.
Language: Английский
Division of labour as key driver of social evolution
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
380(1922)
Published: March 20, 2025
The
social
division
of
labour
(DoL)
has
been
renowned
as
a
key
driver
the
economic
success
human
societies
dating
back
to
ancient
philosophers
such
Plato
(in
Republic
,
ca
380
BCE),
Xenophon
Cyropaedia
370
BCE)
and
Aristotle
Politics
350
BCE,
Nicomachean
Ethics
340
BCE).
Over
time,
this
concept
evolved
into
cornerstone
political
thought,
most
prominently
expressed
in
Smith
Wealth
Nations
1776).
In
his
magnum
opus,
Adam
posited
that
DoL
caused
greater
increase
production
than
any
other
factor
history.
There
is
little
doubt
immensely
increases
productive
output,
both
humans
organisms,
but
it
less
clear
how
comes
about,
organized
what
biological
roots
are
‘turbo
enhancer’.
We
address
these
questions
here
using
results
from
studies
wide
range
organisms
various
modelling
approaches.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Division
evolution’.
Language: Английский
Impact of Individual Host Characteristics on Host Selection in Oxpeckers
African Journal of Ecology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
63(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Symbiotic
interactions
between
oxpeckers
(
Buphagus
spp.)
and
African
buffalo
Syncerus
caffer
)
are
influenced
by
both
host
characteristics
ectoparasite
load.
This
study
investigates
how
individual
traits,
such
as
body
size,
age
tick
load,
impact
oxpecker
foraging
decisions.
To
investigate
what
impacts
whether
or
not
choose
to
forage
on
a
buffalo,
we
used
candidate
generalised
linear
models.
Our
results
show
that
preferentially
select
larger
with
higher‐than‐expected
loads,
particularly
in
the
perianal
region.
These
findings
highlight
role
of
size
parasite
abundance
shaping
behaviour
within
savannah
ecosystem.
Language: Английский
Navigating the microalgal maze: a comprehensive review of recent advances and future perspectives in biological networks
Bahman Panahi,
No information about this author
Robab Khalilpour Shadbad
No information about this author
Planta,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
260(5)
Published: Oct. 5, 2024
Language: Английский
A simple model of population dynamics with beneficial and harmful interaction networks for empirical applications.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 18, 2024
Abstract
Population
dynamic
models
can
forecast
changes
in
the
abundances
of
multiple
interconnected
species,
which
makes
them
potentially
powerful
tools
for
managing
ecological
communities,
yet
they
remain
largely
under-utilised
applied
settings.
High
data
requirements
and
ability
to
only
model
a
narrow
range
interactions
and/or
trophic
levels
together
limits
their
usefulness
when
faced
with
complex
data-poor
systems,
where
beneficial
(e.g.
mutualism)
harmful
competition)
may
operate
simultaneously
within
between
species.
We
present
population
dynamics
that
describe
wide
interaction
outcomes
simple,
unified
structure.
Species
growth
rates
are
constrained
by
maximum
rate
parameter
prevents
risk
explosions
even
case
mutualism.
defined
two,
not
mutually-exclusive
matrices
effects
respectively,
providing
potential
net
effect
one
species
another
switch
from
as
density
increases.
This
recreates
classic
two-species
mutualistic,
competitive,
predator-prey
scenarios,
allowing
us
types
same
equation.
The
parameter,
theoretically
based
intrinsic
constraints
on
reproduction,
be
parameterised
sources
including
natural
history,
historical
data,
breeding
programs.
illustrate
this
study
threatened
two
interacting
predators.
new
is
generaliseable
communities.
Its
structure
lowers
whilst
remaining
intuitive
biologically
realistic,
making
it
an
accessible
option
predicting
community-wide
contexts
sparse
uncertain.
Language: Английский
Connected interactions: enriching food web research by spatial and social interactions
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
379(1909)
Published: July 22, 2024
This
theme
issue
features
18
papers
exploring
ecological
interactions,
encompassing
metabolic,
social,
and
spatial
connections
alongside
traditional
trophic
networks.
integration
enriches
food
web
research,
offering
insights
into
dynamics.
By
examining
links
across
organisms,
populations,
ecosystems,
a
hierarchical
approach
emerges,
connecting
horizontal
effects
within
organizational
levels
vertically
biological
organization
levels.
The
inclusion
of
interactions
involving
humans
is
key
focus,
highlighting
the
need
for
their
ecology
given
complex
between
human
activities
systems
in
Anthropocene.
comprehensive
exploration
this
sheds
light
on
interconnectedness
importance
considering
diverse
understanding
ecosystem
article
part
‘Connected
interactions:
enriching
research
by
social
interactions’.
Language: Английский