Why experimental variation in neuroimaging should be embraced DOI Creative Commons
Gregory Kiar, Jeanette A. Mumford, Ting Xu

et al.

Nature Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Oct. 31, 2024

In a perfect world, scientists would develop analyses that are guaranteed to reveal the ground truth of research question. reality, there countless viable workflows produce distinct, often conflicting, results. Although reproducibility places necessary bound on validity results, it is not sufficient for claiming underlying validity, eventual utility, or generalizability. this work we focus how embracing variability in data analysis can improve generalizability We contextualize design decisions brain imaging be made capture variation, highlight examples, and discuss may quality Brain lacks accessible ground-truth approaches, leading varied results across field. Embracing analytical allow researchers enhance findings accelerate progress.

Language: Английский

Opaque Ontology: Neuroimaging Classification of ICD-10 Diagnostic Groups in the UK Biobank DOI Creative Commons
Ty Easley, Xiaoke Luo, Kayla Hannon

et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 19, 2024

1.The use of machine learning to classify diagnostic cases versus controls defined based on ontologies such as the ICD-10 from neuroimaging features is now commonplace across a wide range fields. However, transdiagnostic comparisons classifications are lacking. Such important establish specificity classification models, set benchmarks, and assess value ontologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Impact of analytic decisions on test-retest reliability of individual and group estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a multiverse analysis using the monetary incentive delay task DOI Creative Commons
Michael I. Demidenko, Jeanette A. Mumford, Russell A. Poldrack

et al.

Imaging Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 2, P. 1 - 26

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Abstract Empirical studies reporting low test–retest reliability of individual blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have resurrected interest among cognitive neuroscientists methods that may improve fMRI. Over the last decade, several reported modeling decisions, such as smoothing, motion correction, and contrast selection, BOLD estimates. However, it remains an empirical question whether certain analytic decisions consistently individual- group-level fMRI task across multiple large, independent samples. This study used three samples (Ns: 60, 81, 119) collected same (Monetary Incentive Delay task) two runs sessions to evaluate effects on (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(3,1)]) group (Jaccard/Spearman rho) activity data. The this vary four categories: smoothing kernel (five options), correction (four parameterizing (three contrasts totaling 240 different pipeline permutations. Across all pipelines, median ICC are low, with a maximum estimate .43 – .55 3 greatest impact similarity Implicit Baseline contrast, Cue Model parameterization, larger kernel. Using condition meaningfully increased compared using Neutral cue. effect was largest for parameterization; however, improvements came at cost interpretability. illustrates MID variable small samples, higher not always interpretability estimated signal.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Current best practices and future opportunities for reproducible findings using large-scale neuroimaging in psychiatry DOI Creative Commons
Neda Jahanshad, Petra Lenzini, Janine Bijsterbosch

et al.

Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 50(1), P. 37 - 51

Published: Aug. 8, 2024

Abstract Research into the brain basis of psychopathology is challenging due to heterogeneity psychiatric disorders, extensive comorbidities, underdiagnosis or overdiagnosis, multifaceted interactions with genetics and life experiences, highly multivariate nature neural correlates. Therefore, increasingly larger datasets that measure more variables in cohorts are needed gain insights. In this review, we present current “best practice” approaches for using existing databases, collecting sharing new repositories big data analyses, future directions neuroimaging psychiatry an emphasis on contributing collaborative efforts challenges multi-study analysis.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Using precision approaches to improve brain-behavior prediction DOI
Hyejin J. Lee,

Ally Dworetsky,

Nathan Labora

et al.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Why experimental variation in neuroimaging should be embraced DOI Creative Commons
Gregory Kiar, Jeanette A. Mumford, Ting Xu

et al.

Nature Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(1)

Published: Oct. 31, 2024

In a perfect world, scientists would develop analyses that are guaranteed to reveal the ground truth of research question. reality, there countless viable workflows produce distinct, often conflicting, results. Although reproducibility places necessary bound on validity results, it is not sufficient for claiming underlying validity, eventual utility, or generalizability. this work we focus how embracing variability in data analysis can improve generalizability We contextualize design decisions brain imaging be made capture variation, highlight examples, and discuss may quality Brain lacks accessible ground-truth approaches, leading varied results across field. Embracing analytical allow researchers enhance findings accelerate progress.

Language: Английский

Citations

1