Open science interventions proposed or implemented to assess researcher impact: a scoping review DOI Creative Commons
Mona Ghannad, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Jeremy Y. Ng

et al.

F1000Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 1396 - 1396

Published: Oct. 23, 2023

Background Several open science-promoting initiatives have been proposed to improve the quality of biomedical research, including for assessing researchers’ science behaviour as criteria promotion or tenure. Yet there is limited evidence judge whether interventions are effective. This review aimed summarise literature, identifying practices related researcher assessment, and map extent existing implemented assess researchers research impact. Methods A scoping using Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology was conducted. We included all study types that described any practice-promoting impact, in health sciences, biomedicine, psychology, economics. Data synthesis quantitative descriptive. Results Among 18,020 identified documents, 27 articles were selectedfor analysis. Most publications field sciences (n = 10), indicated culture, perspective, commentary, essay, proceedings a workshop, article, world view, opinion, note, editorial, report, policy 22). The majority studies recommendations address problems regarding threats rigour reproducibility multi-modal 20), targeting several practices. Some based their on further evaluation extension previous initiatives. 20) did not discuss implementation intervention. Of articles, 10 cited with Leiden Manifesto being most (104 citations). Conclusion provides an overview proposals integrate into assessment. more promising ones need and, where appropriate, implementation. Study registration https://osf.io/ty9m7

Language: Английский

Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey DOI Creative Commons
Daniel G. Hamilton, Matthew J. Page, Sarah Everitt

et al.

Accountability in Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 28

Published: Feb. 1, 2024

Background: Despite wide recognition of the benefits sharing research data, public availability rates have not increased substantially in oncology or medicine more broadly over last decade. Methods: We surveyed 285 cancer researchers to determine their prior experience with data and views on known drivers inhibitors. Results: found that 45% respondents had shared some from most recent empirical publication, who typically studied non-human participants, routinely worked human genomic likely share than those did not. A third added they previously privately, 74% indicating doing so also led authorship opportunities future collaborations for them. Journal funder policies were reported be biggest general toward sharing, whereas commercial interests, agreements industrial sponsors institutional prohibitors. show researchers' decisions about whether are influenced by participants' desires. Conclusions: Our survey suggests promotion support institutions, alongside greater championing journals funders, may motivate data.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation DOI
Daniel G. Hamilton, Sarah Everitt, Matthew J. Page

et al.

BMJ evidence-based medicine, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 29(1), P. 64 - 66

Published: Sept. 1, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Open science interventions proposed or implemented to assess researcher impact: a scoping review DOI Creative Commons
Mona Ghannad, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Jeremy Y. Ng

et al.

F1000Research, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 1396 - 1396

Published: Oct. 23, 2023

Background Several open science-promoting initiatives have been proposed to improve the quality of biomedical research, including for assessing researchers’ science behaviour as criteria promotion or tenure. Yet there is limited evidence judge whether interventions are effective. This review aimed summarise literature, identifying practices related researcher assessment, and map extent existing implemented assess researchers research impact. Methods A scoping using Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology was conducted. We included all study types that described any practice-promoting impact, in health sciences, biomedicine, psychology, economics. Data synthesis quantitative descriptive. Results Among 18,020 identified documents, 27 articles were selectedfor analysis. Most publications field sciences (n = 10), indicated culture, perspective, commentary, essay, proceedings a workshop, article, world view, opinion, note, editorial, report, policy 22). The majority studies recommendations address problems regarding threats rigour reproducibility multi-modal 20), targeting several practices. Some based their on further evaluation extension previous initiatives. 20) did not discuss implementation intervention. Of articles, 10 cited with Leiden Manifesto being most (104 citations). Conclusion provides an overview proposals integrate into assessment. more promising ones need and, where appropriate, implementation. Study registration https://osf.io/ty9m7

Language: Английский

Citations

0