Sustainable Computing Informatics and Systems, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 101117 - 101117
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 30(3), P. 1473 - 1494
Published: Dec. 8, 2022
Abstract Although Industry 4.0 was believed to promote sustainable development, it has ignored or misunderstood many prevailing sustainability concerns, which led the emergence of 5.0 agenda. While desirable values are widely acknowledged, knowledge how this agenda can deliver transformation is lacking. The present study addresses gap, explaining should be managed facilitate development. Therefore, strives model underlying mechanism for enabling such transformation. conducted a content‐centric review literature and identified 11 actions approaches that serve as enablers further interpretive structural modeling structured an steps needed 5.0. Finally, developed strategy roadmap Results emphasized stakeholder salience, highlighting role integration collaboration in Proactive governmental support most driving enabler 5.0, whereas eco‐innovation value network reformation among complex hard‐to‐develop enablers. offer several implications policymakers practitioners, functionality each approach necessary determines sequential relationships these strategies identifies their optimal development sequence synergistically. identify codependences transition highlight interactions complementarities.
Language: Английский
Citations
106
The TQM Journal, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 34(7), P. 179 - 202
Published: Sept. 16, 2022
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions and revealed the fragilities in supply chains. This crisis re-opened debate on chain resilience sustainability. paper aims to investigate distinct impacts of It identifies both short- medium-to-long-term measures taken mitigate different effects highlights potential transformations their sustainability resilience. Design/methodology/approach To address purpose study, a qualitative research approach based case studies semi-structured interviews with 15 practitioners from various types sectors was conducted. Studied organizations included necessary non-necessary sectors, which are differently impacted by pandemic. Findings study reveals five main challenges facing chains during COVID-19, including uncertain demand supply, suppliers' concentration specific regions, globalized chains, reduced visibility network, limited supplier capacity. help these develop resilience, this some mitigating actions focusing promotion health wellbeing employees stabilization. Further, post-COVID era, sustainable resilient should consider regionalization chain, diversification agility, collaboration, visibility, transparency; accelerate use smart technologies circular economy practices as dynamic capabilities improve Originality/value contributes exploring sustainability- resilience-related posed Its findings can be used researchers decision-makers limit responsiveness, sustainability, restoration results support benchmarking through sharing best also integrate discussed into processes selection auditing suppliers.
Language: Английский
Citations
67
Annals of Operations Research, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 322(1), P. 217 - 240
Published: June 24, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
65
Food Control, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 137, P. 108940 - 108940
Published: March 2, 2022
Language: Английский
Citations
51
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 42(8), P. 1109 - 1145
Published: May 16, 2022
Purpose While various supply chain (SC) sustainability investigations exist, their connection to resilience (SCRes) remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, the authors answer question: “How do firms' actions affect SCs' and trajectories in turbulent environments?" by exploring context of COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach The conducted 10 case studies five industries located six European countries. A total 19 semi-structured interviews relevant secondary data were collected analyzed reference SC learning literature on SCRes approaches (i.e. engineering, ecological social-ecological). Findings 31 referring different dimensions identified map through a temporal, spatial functional scale analysis. cases are related an engineering approach focused “bouncing back” pre-pandemic goals, three forward” as part approach. Moreover, existence two social-ecological which developed long-term actions, updating set-ups transcending level. results furthermore illustrate influence learning, generating paths: flat, flat ascending trajectories. Research limitations/implications study develops overview adoption due scales, effect exploitation exploration capabilities. Future research should elaborate potential moderators proposed relationships. Practical implications better understanding link between will help practitioners make informed decisions environments. Originality/value Unlike previous research, paper provides empirical evidence approaches, well
Language: Английский
Citations
40
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 5(10), P. 463 - 486
Published: Dec. 7, 2023
This study delves into the intricate dynamics of supply chain resilience amidst backdrop ongoing geopolitical disruptions, offering a comprehensive analysis how modern chains can adapt and thrive in an environment characterized by uncertainty volatility. review aims to thoroughly examine impact disruptions on dynamics, define essence resilience, explore strategies that fortify against such disruptions. Employing meticulous literature methodology, synthesizes findings from range recent, peer-reviewed sources. approach facilitates multi-dimensional understanding volatility, drawing historical perspectives, current trends, forward-looking insights. The methodically addresses role components resilient chains, effectiveness various strategies. main reveal is dynamic capability, heavily influenced factors as diversification sources, technological innovation, adaptive policy frameworks. highlights necessity proactive, anticipatory management, emphasizing agility strategic foresight. Conclusively, underscores imperative for evolve continuously, integrating their core Recommendations include adopting holistic focusing sustainability, embracing advancements. contributes significantly discourse valuable insights practical guidance navigating complexities global era marked uncertainty. Keywords: Supply Chain Resilience, Geopolitical Disruptions, Management, Resilience Strategies, Technological Innovation, Global Chains.
Language: Английский
Citations
32
Systems and Soft Computing, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 6, P. 200156 - 200156
Published: Oct. 6, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
12
International Journal of Production Economics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 273, P. 109280 - 109280
Published: May 13, 2024
Language: Английский
Citations
11
Businesses, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(1), P. 1 - 17
Published: Jan. 24, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for a paradigm shift in supply chain and logistics operations to respond myriad disruptions. However, this changed be more resilient, agile, flexible, adaptable upcoming Hence, comprehensive guide understanding, implementing, harnessing power of digitization face disruption, leading resilient adaptive global community, is greatly appreciated. Thus, study aims identify strategies used complex dynamic nature contemporary landscape these Among several adopted proposed, systematic review examines overall efficiency operational resilience, particularly supplier diversification, investment digital technology, adopting flexible manufacturing models. Following rigorous four-step identification, screening, qualification, inclusion process, focuses on real-time visibility, robust risk management, data-driven decision making determine whether future disruptions under are conducive. Therefore, review, along with enhanced resilience strategies, will provide resource practitioners, policymakers, researchers seeking navigate improve
Language: Английский
Citations
10
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 44(5), P. 877 - 899
Published: March 21, 2024
Purpose The purpose of this article is to discuss how the mastery resilience in operations and supply chains plays a significant role transition more sustainable future. Furthermore, it supposed propose avenues for future research on operational chain resilience, interacting with sustainability literature our field. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual review themes within management conducted. Reflections topic are informed by relevant published over last decade. Findings major contributions threefold: (1) This elaborates understanding concepts reviews their respective primary streams. (2) It proposes as missing element pursuit excellence organizations that want contribute (3) offers framework provides agenda at intersection research. Originality/value highlights gaps current illustrates further areas need be addressed maximize contribution supporting practitioners achieve
Language: Английский
Citations
8