Hybrid Renewable Systems for Small Energy Communities: What Is the Best Solution? DOI Creative Commons
João S. T. Coelho, Modesto Pérez‐Sánchez, Óscar E. Coronado-Hernández

et al.

Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(21), P. 10052 - 10052

Published: Nov. 4, 2024

This research developed smart integrated hybrid renewable systems for small energy communities and applied them to a real system achieve self-sufficiency promote sustainable decentralized generation. It compares stand-alone (SA) grid-connected (GC) configurations using optimized mathematical model data-driven optimization, with economic analysis of various combinations (PV, Wind, PHS, BESS, Grid) search the optimal solution. Four cases were developed: two (SA1: PV + Wind SA2: PHS BESS) (GC1: Grid, GC2: Grid). GC2 shows most economical stable cash flow (−€123.2 annually), low CO2 costs (€367.2), 91.7% grid independence, requiring 125 kW installed power. While GC options had lower initial investments (between €157k €205k), SA provided levelized (LCOE) ranging from €0.039 €0.044/kWh. The integration pumped hydropower storage enhances supporting peak loads up days capacity 2.17 MWh.

Language: Английский

Promoting net-zero carbon in the Vietnamese construction sector: potential benefits and challenges identified by key stakeholders DOI
Nguyễn Văn Tâm

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 24, 2025

Purpose Achieving net-zero carbon in construction offers immense environmental and economic benefits, but its widespread adoption developing countries faces unique challenges. While research exists on construction, the specific context of economies like Vietnam remains under-researched. This study bridges this gap by investigating potential benefits challenges related to promoting as perceived key stakeholders sector. Design/methodology/approach Employing a rigorous methodology with four main phases, data collected from professionals was analyzed using various statistical techniques. ANOVA Tukey’s post-hoc analyses were employed identify differences stakeholders’ perceptions, while identified evaluated ranked based their mean scores. Findings The results highlight significant difference perception among stakeholders, including policymakers, contractors, suppliers architects/designers. In addition, all acknowledge social particularly improved air quality, climate change mitigation enhanced corporate responsibility; persist, high initial costs, inadequate business models lack clear standards. Practical implications contributes significantly Vietnamese sector providing valuable recommendations tailored address faced each stakeholder group. These efforts can not only contribute Vietnam’s national goals also serve model for other emerging seeking transition towards more sustainable built environment. Originality/value body knowledge offering comparative analysis how perceive countries. stakeholder-centered approach enhances practical relevance initiatives, effective inclusive pathways toward practices markets.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Improving decision-making and stakeholder engagement at project governance using digital technology for sustainable infrastructure projects DOI
Roksana Jahan Tumpa, Leila Moslemi Naeni

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 1, 2025

Purpose Achieving sustainable development goals requires efficient decision-making and stakeholder engagement in infrastructure projects. This research aims to investigate how at the project governance level can be advanced using digital technology improve sustainability performance Design/methodology/approach Grounded acceptance model, this qualitative study explored perceptions of professionals facilitating within Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected data analyzed inductive thematic analysis. Findings Digital enables evidence-based aligned by providing real-time data, optimizing analysis enhancing authenticity while reducing resource time pressure. It promotes offering integrated, collaborative centralized platforms which foster transparency, collaboration, mitigate risk greenwashing modern slavery streamlining communication siloed engagement. However, human oversight remains essential prevent technological misinterpretation. Practical implications provides valuable insights for management seeking integrate into demonstrates enhance environmental, social economic dimensions projects, helping them remain competitive a dynamic environment. Social presents reliable, up date required informed decision-making, enabling socially choices. reduces risks erroneous decision benefit broader communities addressing challenges, fostering resilience well-being. Originality/value Despite slow adoption Australian crucial. addresses gap comprehensive understanding level.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

The role of metaverse technologies in energy systems towards sustainable development goals DOI
Raghu Raman, Pradeep Kautish, Aaliyah Siddiqui

et al.

Energy Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 13, P. 4459 - 4476

Published: April 14, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Smart Feasibility Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Water Supply Systems by Digital Twin Technologies: A Multicriteria Approach Applied to Isolated Cities DOI Creative Commons

Miguel Tavares,

Modesto Pérez‐Sánchez, Armando Carravetta

et al.

Sustainable Cities and Society, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105834 - 105834

Published: Sept. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Hybrid Renewable Systems for Small Energy Communities: What Is the Best Solution? DOI Creative Commons
João S. T. Coelho, Modesto Pérez‐Sánchez, Óscar E. Coronado-Hernández

et al.

Applied Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(21), P. 10052 - 10052

Published: Nov. 4, 2024

This research developed smart integrated hybrid renewable systems for small energy communities and applied them to a real system achieve self-sufficiency promote sustainable decentralized generation. It compares stand-alone (SA) grid-connected (GC) configurations using optimized mathematical model data-driven optimization, with economic analysis of various combinations (PV, Wind, PHS, BESS, Grid) search the optimal solution. Four cases were developed: two (SA1: PV + Wind SA2: PHS BESS) (GC1: Grid, GC2: Grid). GC2 shows most economical stable cash flow (−€123.2 annually), low CO2 costs (€367.2), 91.7% grid independence, requiring 125 kW installed power. While GC options had lower initial investments (between €157k €205k), SA provided levelized (LCOE) ranging from €0.039 €0.044/kWh. The integration pumped hydropower storage enhances supporting peak loads up days capacity 2.17 MWh.

Language: Английский

Citations

0