Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
289(1971)
Published: March 23, 2022
All
species
inevitably
leave
genetic
traces
in
their
environments,
and
the
resulting
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
reflects
present
a
given
habitat.
It
remains
unclear
whether
eDNA
signals
can
provide
quantitative
metrics
of
abundance
on
which
human
livelihoods
or
conservation
successes
depend.
Here,
we
report
results
large
ocean
survey
(spanning
86
000
km
2
to
depths
500
m)
understand
distribution
Pacific
hake
(
Merluccius
productus
),
target
largest
finfish
fishery
along
west
coast
USA.
We
sampled
parallel
with
traditional
acoustic-trawl
assess
value
surveys
at
scale
relevant
fisheries
management.
Despite
local
differences,
two
methods
yield
comparable
information
about
broad-scale
spatial
abundance.
Furthermore,
find
depth
patterns
closely
correspond
estimates
for
hake.
demonstrate
power
efficacy
sampling
estimating
move
analysis
data
beyond
sample-to-sample
comparisons
management
scales.
posit
that
are
capable
providing
general
applications
will
prove
especially
valuable
data-
resource-limited
contexts.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
286(1915), P. 20191409 - 20191409
Published: Nov. 20, 2019
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
applications
are
transforming
the
standard
of
characterizing
aquatic
biodiversity
via
presence,
location
and
abundance
collected
from
environmental
samples.
As
eDNA
studies
use
fragments
as
a
proxy
for
presence
organisms,
ecological
properties
complex
dynamic
environments
which
is
sampled
need
to
be
considered
accurate
biological
interpretation.
In
this
review,
we
discuss
role
that
differing
play
on
major
processes
undergoes
between
organism
collection,
including
shedding,
decay
transport.
We
focus
mechanistic
understanding
these
highlight
how
transport
models
being
developed
towards
more
robust
predictions
fate
eDNA.
conclude
with
five
recommendations
researchers
practitioners,
advance
current
best
practices,
well
support
future
model
spatio-temporal
persistence.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
10(11), P. 1985 - 2001
Published: Aug. 2, 2019
Abstract
Metabarcoding
extra‐organismal
DNA
from
environmental
samples
is
now
a
key
technique
in
aquatic
biomonitoring
and
ecosystem
health
assessment.
Of
critical
consideration
when
designing
experiments,
especially
so
developing
community
standards
legislative
frameworks,
the
choice
of
genetic
marker
primer
set.
Mitochondrial
cytochrome
c
oxidase
subunit
I
(COI),
standard
barcode
for
animals,
with
its
extensive
reference
library,
taxonomic
discriminatory
power
predictable
sequence
variation,
natural
many
metabarcoding
applications.
However,
targeting
specific
groups
samples,
utility
COI
has
yet
to
be
fully
scrutinized.
Here,
by
using
case
study
marine
freshwater
fishes
British
Isles,
we
quantify
silico
performance
twelve
pairs
four
mitochondrial
loci
–
COI,
b
,
12S
16S
terms
library
coverage,
universality.
We
subsequently
test
vitro
three
one
their
specificity,
reproducibility,
congruence
independent
datasets
derived
traditional
survey
methods
at
five
estuarine
coastal
sites
around
English
Channel
North
Sea.
Our
results
show
that
aqueous
low
template
concentrations,
both
metazoan‐targeted
fish‐targeted
primers
perform
poorly
comparison
12S,
exhibiting
levels
reproducibility
due
non‐specific
amplification
prokaryotic
non‐target
eukaryotic
DNAs.
An
ideal
metabarcode
would
have
an
upon
which
custom
could
designed,
either
broad
assessments
biodiversity,
or
taxon
surveys.
Such
database
available
but
specificity
hinders
practical
application,
while
conversely,
offer
high
lack
adequate
references.
The
latter,
however,
can
mitigated
expanding
concept
barcodes
include
whole
genomes
generated
genome‐skimming
existing
tissue
collections.
Molecular Ecology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
29(6), P. 1069 - 1086
Published: Feb. 11, 2020
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
metabarcoding,
a
technique
for
retrieving
multispecies
from
environmental
samples,
can
detect
diverse
array
of
marine
species
filtered
seawater
samples.
There
is
growing
potential
to
integrate
eDNA
alongside
existing
monitoring
methods
in
order
establish
or
improve
the
assessment
diversity.
Remote
island
reefs
are
increasingly
vulnerable
climate-related
threats
and
as
such
there
pressing
need
cost-effective
whole-ecosystem
surveying
baseline
biodiversity,
study
assemblage
changes
ultimately
develop
sustainable
management
plans.
We
investigated
utility
metabarcoding
high-resolution,
multitrophic
biomonitoring
tool
at
Cocos
(Keeling)
Islands,
Australia
(CKI)-a
remote
tropical
coral
reef
atoll
situated
within
eastern
Indian
Ocean.
Metabarcoding
assays
targeting
mitochondrial
16S
rRNA
CO1
genes,
well
18S
nuclear
gene,
were
applied
252
surface
samples
collected
42
sites
140
km2
area.
Our
successfully
detected
wide
range
bony
fish
elasmobranchs
(244
taxa),
crustaceans
(88),
molluscs
(37)
echinoderms
(7).
Assemblage
composition
varied
significantly
between
sites,
reflecting
habitat
partitioning
across
ecosystem
demonstrating
localisation
signals,
despite
extensive
tidal
oceanic
movements.
In
addition,
we
document
putative
new
occurrence
records
46
taxa
compare
efficiency
our
approach
visual
survey
techniques
CKI.
demonstrates
multimarker
capturing
biodiversity
an
entire
sets
important
ongoing
management.
Genes,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 192 - 192
Published: March 1, 2019
Population
genetic
data
underpin
many
studies
of
behavioral,
ecological,
and
evolutionary
processes
in
wild
populations
contribute
to
effective
conservation
management.
However,
collecting
samples
can
be
challenging
when
working
with
endangered,
invasive,
or
cryptic
species.
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
offers
a
way
sample
material
non-invasively
without
requiring
visual
observation.
While
eDNA
has
been
trialed
extensively
as
biodiversity
biosecurity
monitoring
tool
strong
taxonomic
focus,
it
yet
fully
explored
means
for
obtaining
population
information.
Here,
we
review
current
research
that
employs
approaches
the
study
populations.
We
outline
challenges
facing
eDNA-based
methodologies,
suggest
avenues
future
developments.
advocate
further
optimizations,
this
emergent
field
holds
great
potential
part
genetics
toolkit.
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(9), P. 4803 - 4815
Published: March 18, 2021
Decades
of
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
method
application,
spanning
a
wide
variety
taxa
and
habitats,
has
advanced
our
understanding
eDNA
underlined
its
value
as
tool
for
conservation
practitioners.
The
general
consensus
is
that
methods
are
more
accurate
cost-effective
than
traditional
survey
methods.
However,
they
formally
approved
just
few
species
globally
(e.g.,
Bighead
Carp,
Silver
Great
Crested
Newt).
We
conducted
meta-analysis
studies
directly
compare
with
surveys
to
evaluate
the
assertion
consistently
"better."Environmental
publications
multiple
or
single
macro-organism
detection
were
identified
using
Web
Science,
by
searching
"eDNA"
"environmental
DNA"
across
papers
published
between
1970
2020.
used,
focal
taxa,
habitats
surveyed,
quantitative
categorical
results
collated
analyzed
determine
whether
under
what
circumstances
outperforms
surveys.Results
show
cheaper,
sensitive,
detect
This
is,
however,
taxa-dependent,
amphibians
having
highest
potential
survey.
Perhaps
most
strikingly,
535
reviewed
49
quantified
probability
both
three
times
likely
give
qualitative
statements
performance.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
9(1)
Published: Aug. 9, 2019
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
surveys
are
increasingly
being
used
for
biodiversity
monitoring,
principally
because
they
sensitive
and
can
provide
high
resolution
community
composition
data.
Despite
considerable
progress
in
recent
years,
eDNA
studies
examining
how
different
environmental
sample
types
affect
species
detectability
remain
rare.
Comparisons
of
samples
especially
important
providing
best
practice
guidance
on
early
detection
subsequent
mitigation
non-indigenous
species.
Here
we
metabarcoding
COI
(cytochrome
c
oxidase
subunit
I)
18S
(nuclear
small
ribosomal
DNA)
genes
to
compare
between
sediment
water
artificial
coastal
sites
across
the
United
Kingdom.
We
first
detected
markedly
communities
a
consistently
greater
number
distinct
operational
taxonomic
units
compared
water.
then
our
datasets
with
previously
published
rapid
assessment
found
excellent
concordance
among
survey
techniques.
Finally,
many
species,
including
several
newly
introduced
highlighting
utility
both
temporal
/
spatial
monitoring
conclude
that
careful
consideration
type
is
needed
when
conducting
surveys,
assessing
change.
Annual Review of Marine Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
14(1), P. 161 - 185
Published: Aug. 5, 2021
Environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
is
genetic
material
that
has
been
shed
from
macroorganisms.
It
received
increased
attention
as
an
indirect
marker
for
biodiversity
monitoring.
This
article
reviews
the
current
status
of
eDNA
metabarcoding
(simultaneous
detection
multiple
species)
a
noninvasive
and
cost-effective
approach
monitoring
marine
fish
communities
discusses
prospects
this
growing
field.
coamplifies
short
fragments
across
wide
variety
taxa
and,
coupled
with
high-throughput
sequencing
technologies,
allows
massively
parallel
to
be
performed
simultaneously
dozens
hundreds
samples.
can
predict
species
richness
in
given
area,
detect
habitat
segregation
biogeographic
patterns
small
large
spatial
scales,
monitor
spatiotemporal
dynamics
communities.
In
addition,
it
anthropogenic
impact
on
through
evaluation
their
functional
diversity.
Recognizing
strengths
limitations
will
help
ensure
continuous
at
sites
useful
ecosystem
conservation
sustainable
use
fishery
resources,
possibly
contributing
achieving
targets
United
Nations'
Sustainable
Development
Goal
14
2030.
Frontiers in Marine Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
8
Published: March 16, 2021
Coastal
countries
have
traditionally
relied
on
the
existing
marine
resources
(e.g.,
fishing,
food,
transport,
recreation,
and
tourism)
as
well
tried
to
support
new
economic
endeavors
(ocean
energy,
desalination
for
water
supply,
seabed
mining).
Modern
societies
lifestyle
resulted
in
an
increased
demand
dietary
diversity,
better
health
well-being,
biomedicines,
natural
cosmeceuticals,
environmental
conservation,
sustainable
energy
sources.
These
societal
needs
stimulated
interest
of
researchers
diverse
underexplored
environments
promising
sources
biomolecules
biomass,
they
are
addressed
by
emerging
field
(blue)
biotechnology.
Blue
biotechnology
provides
opportunities
a
wide
range
initiatives
commercial
pharmaceutical,
biomedical,
cosmetic,
nutraceutical,
feed,
agricultural,
related
industries.
This
article
synthesizes
essence,
opportunities,
responsibilities,
challenges
encountered
outlines
attainment
valorization
directly
derived
or
bio-inspired
products
from
organisms.
First,
concept
bioeconomy
is
introduced.
Then,
diversity
bioresources
including
overview
most
prominent
organisms
their
potential
biotechnological
uses
described.
followed
introducing
methodologies
exploration
these
main
use
case
scenarios
food
agronomy,
bioremediation
climate
change,
materials,
healthcare,
well-being
sectors.
The
key
aspects
fields
legislation
funding
provided,
with
emphasis
importance
communication
stakeholder
engagement
at
all
levels
development.
Finally,
vital
overarching
concepts,
such
quadruple
helix
Responsible
Research
Innovation
principle
highlighted
important
follow
within
field.
authors
this
review
collaborating
under
European
Commission-funded
Cooperation
Science
Technology
(COST)
Action
Ocean4Biotech
–
transdisciplinary
networking
platform
focus
study
state
affairs.
Pensoft Publishers eBooks,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 2, 2021
DNA-based
methods
for
species
detection
and
identification
have
revolutionised
our
ability
to
assess
biodiversity
in
terrestrial,
freshwater
marine
ecosystems.
Starting
from
the
seminal
study
that
used
eDNA
detect
invasive
american
bullfrogs
France
(Gentile
Francesco
Ficetola
et
al.
2008)),
research
conducted
over
last
decade
has
demonstrated
power
of
these
approaches
surveying
a
wide
range
groups.
Early
applications
included
use
monitor
Asian
Carp
USA
(Jerde
2013).
Following
heavy
scrutiny,
method
was
eventually
adopted,
is
still
employed
today
by
United
States
Geological
Survey
(USGS).
A
flurry
followed,
with
tests
designed
many
threatened
including
New
zealand
mudsnails
(Goldberg
2013),
crayfish
(Geerts
2018),
gammarids
(R.
Blackman
2017),
great
crested
newts
(Biggs
2015).
The
newt
test
been
regulatory
monitoring
UK
since
2014.
During
same
time
period,
there
proliferation
studies
high-throughput
sequencing
describe
whole
communities
organisms
mixed
environmental
samples,
using
an
approach
termed
DNA
metabarcoding
(Taberlet
2012).