Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Dec. 13, 2023
Abstract
Food
authentication
using
molecular
techniques
is
of
great
importance
to
fight
food
fraud.
Metabarcoding,
based
on
the
next‐generation
sequencing
(NGS)
technologies,
allowing
large‐scale
taxonomic
identification
complex
samples
via
massive
parallel
fragments
(called
DNA
barcodes)
simultaneously,
has
become
increasingly
popular
in
many
scientific
fields.
A
systematic
review
answer
question
“Is
metabarcoding
ripe
enough
be
applied
foodstuff
animal
origin?”
presented.
The
inclusion
criteria
were
focused
selection
papers
(SPs)
only
applying
origin
collected
market.
23
included
SPs
first
analyzed
with
respect
phases:
library
preparation
(target
genes,
primer
pairs,
and
fragment
length),
(NGS
platforms),
final
data
analysis
(bioinformatic
pipelines).
Given
selection,
coverage
used
primers
was
also
evaluated.
In
addition,
scored
use
quality
control
measures
(procedural
blanks,
positive
controls,
replicates,
curated
databases,
thresholds
filter
data).
lack
standardized
protocols,
especially
target
barcode/s
universal
primer/s,
infrequent
application
measures,
leads
that
not
for
authenticating
origin.
However,
observed
trend
SP
improvement
over
years
encouraging.
Concluding,
a
proper
protocol
standardization
would
allow
wider
by
both
official
private
laboratories,
enabling
this
method
primary
foodstuffs
Molecular Ecology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
31(10), P. 2769 - 2795
Published: April 8, 2022
The
development
of
high-throughput
sequencing
(HTS)
technologies
has
greatly
improved
our
capacity
to
identify
fungi
and
unveil
their
ecological
roles
across
a
variety
ecosystems.
Here
we
provide
an
overview
current
best
practices
in
metabarcoding
analysis
fungal
communities,
from
experimental
design
through
molecular
computational
analyses.
By
reanalysing
published
data
sets,
demonstrate
that
operational
taxonomic
units
(OTUs)
outperform
amplified
sequence
variants
(ASVs)
recovering
diversity,
finding
is
particularly
evident
for
long
markers.
Additionally,
the
full-length
ITS
region
allows
more
accurate
placement
other
eukaryotes
compared
ITS2
subregion.
Finally,
show
specific
methods
compositional
analyses
reliable
estimates
shifts
community
structure.
We
conclude
are
especially
promising
integrating
into
full
microbiome
broader
ecosystem
functioning
context,
recovery
novel
lineages
ancient
organisms
as
well
barcoding
old
specimens
including
type
material.
Current Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
32(3), P. 701 - 707.e5
Published: Jan. 6, 2022
Biodiversity
monitoring
at
the
community
scale
is
a
critical
element
of
assessing
and
studying
species
distributions,
ecology,
diversity,
movements,
it
key
to
understanding
tracking
environmental
anthropogenic
effects
on
natural
ecosystems.1Navarro
L.M.
Fernández
N.
Guerra
C.
Guralnick
R.
Kissling
W.D.
Londoño
M.C.
Muller-Karger
F.
Turak
E.
Balvanera
P.
Costello
M.J.
et
al.Monitoring
biodiversity
change
through
effective
global
coordination.Curr.
Opin.
Environ.
Sustain.
2017;
29:
158-169Crossref
Scopus
(89)
Google
Scholar,
2Xu
H.
Cao
Y.
Yu
D.
M.
He
Gill
Pereira
H.M.
Ensuring
implementation
post-2020
targets.Nat.
Ecol.
Evol.
2021;
5:
411-418Crossref
PubMed
(30)
3(2021).
High
time
invest
in
biodiversity.
Nat.
5,
263.Google
4Seibold
S.
Gossner
M.M.
Simons
N.K.
Blüthgen
Müller
J.
Ambarli
al.Arthropod
decline
grasslands
forests
associated
with
landscape-level
drivers.Nature.
2019;
574:
671-674Crossref
(391)
Scholar
Vertebrates
terrestrial
ecosystems
are
experiencing
extinctions
declines
both
population
numbers
sizes
due
increasing
threats
from
human
activities
change.5Almond
R.E.A.
Grooten
Petersen
T.
Living
Planet
Report
2020:
Bending
Curve
Loss.
WWF,
2020Google
6Ceballos
G.
Ehrlich
P.R.
Dirzo
Biological
annihilation
via
ongoing
sixth
mass
extinction
signaled
by
vertebrate
losses
declines.Proc.
Natl.
Acad.
Sci.
USA.
114:
E6089-E6096Crossref
(1031)
7Hughes
J.B.
Daily
G.C.
Population
diversity:
its
extent
extinction.Science.
1997;
278:
689-692Crossref
(381)
8Gaston
K.J.
Fuller
R.A.
Commonness,
depletion
conservation
biology.Trends
2008;
23:
14-19Abstract
Full
Text
PDF
(361)
Terrestrial
using
existing
methods
generally
costly
laborious,
although
DNA
(eDNA)
becoming
tool
choice
assess
biodiversity,
few
sample
types
effectively
capture
diversity.
We
hypothesized
that
eDNA
captured
air
could
allow
straightforward
collection
characterization
communities.
filtered
three
localities
Copenhagen
Zoo:
stable,
outside
between
outdoor
enclosures,
Rainforest
House.
Through
metabarcoding
airborne
eDNA,
we
detected
49
spanning
26
orders
37
families:
30
mammal,
13
bird,
4
fish,
1
amphibian,
reptile
species.
These
spanned
animals
kept
zoo,
occurring
zoo
surroundings,
used
as
feed
zoo.
The
comprise
range
taxonomic
families,
sizes,
behaviors,
abundances.
found
shorter
distance
sampling
device
higher
animal
biomass
increase
probability
detection.
hereby
show
can
offer
fundamentally
new
way
Pensoft Publishers eBooks,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 2, 2021
DNA-based
methods
for
species
detection
and
identification
have
revolutionised
our
ability
to
assess
biodiversity
in
terrestrial,
freshwater
marine
ecosystems.
Starting
from
the
seminal
study
that
used
eDNA
detect
invasive
american
bullfrogs
France
(Gentile
Francesco
Ficetola
et
al.
2008)),
research
conducted
over
last
decade
has
demonstrated
power
of
these
approaches
surveying
a
wide
range
groups.
Early
applications
included
use
monitor
Asian
Carp
USA
(Jerde
2013).
Following
heavy
scrutiny,
method
was
eventually
adopted,
is
still
employed
today
by
United
States
Geological
Survey
(USGS).
A
flurry
followed,
with
tests
designed
many
threatened
including
New
zealand
mudsnails
(Goldberg
2013),
crayfish
(Geerts
2018),
gammarids
(R.
Blackman
2017),
great
crested
newts
(Biggs
2015).
The
newt
test
been
regulatory
monitoring
UK
since
2014.
During
same
time
period,
there
proliferation
studies
high-throughput
sequencing
describe
whole
communities
organisms
mixed
environmental
samples,
using
an
approach
termed
DNA
metabarcoding
(Taberlet
2012).
Environmental DNA,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
4(4), P. 790 - 807
Published: March 11, 2022
Abstract
Biodiversity
is
in
decline
due
to
human‐induced
pressures
on
ecosystems
around
the
world.
To
be
able
counteract
this
alarming
trend,
it
paramount
closely
monitor
biodiversity
at
global
scales.
Because
practically
impossible
with
traditional
methods,
last
decade
has
seen
a
strong
push
for
new
solutions.
In
aquatic
ecosystems,
monitoring
of
species
from
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
emerged
as
one
most
powerful
tools
our
disposal,
but
terrestrial
power
eDNA
so
far
been
hampered
by
local
scale
samples.
study,
we
report
successful
detection
insects
airborne
samples
taken
field.
We
compare
results
two
insect
methods
(1)
light
traps
moth
and
(2)
transect
walks
butterflies
wild
bees.
Airborne
metabarcoding
revealed
six
classes
arthropods,
twelve
order
insects—including
representatives
four
largest
orders:
Diptera
(flies),
Lepidoptera
(butterflies
moths),
Coleoptera
(beetles),
Hymenoptera
(bees,
wasps,
ants).
did
not
detect
all
observed
using
suggest
further
directions
development
metabarcoding.
also
recovered
nine
vertebrates,
including
frogs,
birds,
mammals
well
12
other
phyla.
potential
become
tool
monitoring,
many
impactful
applications
pests,
invasive,
or
endangered
disease
vectors.
Molecular Ecology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33(11)
Published: April 16, 2024
Abstract
Molecular
tools
are
an
indispensable
part
of
ecology
and
biodiversity
sciences
implemented
across
all
biomes.
About
a
decade
ago,
the
use
implementation
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
to
detect
signals
extracted
from
samples
opened
new
avenues
research.
Initial
eDNA
research
focused
on
understanding
population
dynamics
target
species.
Its
scope
thereafter
broadened,
uncovering
previously
unrecorded
via
metabarcoding
in
both
well‐studied
understudied
ecosystems
taxonomic
groups.
The
application
rapidly
became
established
research,
field
by
its
own.
Here,
we
revisit
key
expectations
made
land‐mark
special
issue
Ecology
2012
frame
development
six
areas:
(1)
sample
collection,
(2)
primer
development,
(3)
biomonitoring,
(4)
quantification,
(5)
behaviour
environment
(6)
reference
database
development.
We
pinpoint
success
eDNA,
yet
also
discuss
shortfalls
not
met,
highlighting
areas
priority
identify
unexpected
developments.
In
parallel,
our
retrospective
couples
screening
peer‐reviewed
literature
with
survey
users
including
academics,
end‐users
commercial
providers,
which
address
focus
efforts
advance
eDNA.
With
rapid
ever‐increasing
pace
technical
advances,
future
looks
bright,
successful
applications
best
practices
must
become
more
interdisciplinary
reach
full
potential.
Our
retrospect
gives
towards
concretely
moving
forward.
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: Jan. 10, 2025
DNA
metabarcoding
of
benthic
diatoms
has
been
successfully
applied
for
biomonitoring
at
the
national
scale
and
can
now
be
considered
technically
ready
routine
application.
However,
protocols
methods
still
vary
between
within
countries,
limiting
their
transferability
comparability
results.
In
order
to
overcome
this,
use
diatom
requires
knowledge
sources
variability
introduced
by
different
steps
procedure.
Here,
we
examine
how
elements
procedures
contribute
European
laboratories.
A
set
four
experiments
were
performed
focusing
on
extraction
PCR
amplification
evaluate
reproducibility
laboratories
currently
scientific
community.
Under
guidance
a
reference
laboratory,
17
participants
from
14
countries
in
parallel,
using
same
fixed
protocol
own
choice
protocol.
Experiments
each
participant
standardised
biofilm
samples
(river,
lake
mock
community)
investigate
potential
systematic
random
errors.
Our
results
revealed
successful
amongst
labs
highly
similar
consistent
ecological
assessment
outcome
obtained
regardless
used
participant.
We
propose
an
“all
one
but
prove
them
all”
strategy,
suggesting
that
distinct
community,
as
long
consistency
is
proven
following
minimum
standard
requirements.
Molecular Ecology Resources,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
22(4), P. 1231 - 1246
Published: Sept. 22, 2021
Abstract
Metabarcoding
of
DNA
extracted
from
environmental
or
bulk
specimen
samples
is
increasingly
used
to
profile
biota
in
basic
and
applied
biodiversity
research
because
its
targeted
nature
that
allows
sequencing
genetic
markers
many
parallel.
To
achieve
this,
PCR
amplification
carried
out
with
primers
designed
target
a
taxonomically
informative
marker
within
taxonomic
group,
sample‐specific
nucleotide
identifiers
are
added
the
amplicons
prior
sequencing.
The
latter
enables
assignment
sequences
back
they
originated
from.
Nucleotide
can
be
during
metabarcoding
“library
preparation”,
is,
when
prepared
for
Different
strategies
this
labelling
exist.
All
have
advantages,
challenges
limitations,
some
which
lead
misleading
results,
worst
case
compromise
fidelity
data.
Given
range
questions
addressed
using
metabarcoding,
ensuring
data
generation
robust
fit
chosen
purpose
critically
important
practitioners
seeking
employ
assessments.
Here,
we
present
an
overview
three
main
workflows
library
preparation
studies
on
Illumina
platforms;
one‐step
PCR,
two‐step
tagged
PCR.
Further,
distill
key
considerations
researchers
select
appropriate
strategy
their
specific
study.
Ultimately,
by
gaining
insights
into
consequences
different
workflows,
hope
further
consolidate
power
as
tool
assess
across
applications.
Cladistics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
40(2), P. 192 - 203
Published: Dec. 2, 2023
Abstract
Most
arthropod
species
are
undescribed
and
hidden
in
specimen‐rich
samples
that
difficult
to
sort
using
morphological
characters.
For
such
samples,
sorting
putative
with
DNA
barcodes
is
an
attractive
alternative,
but
needs
cost‐effective
techniques
suitable
for
use
many
laboratories
around
the
world.
Barcoding
portable
inexpensive
MinION
sequencer
produced
by
Oxford
Nanopore
Technologies
(ONT)
could
be
useful
presorting
because
it
requires
little
space
inexpensive.
However,
similarly
important
user‐friendly
reliable
software
analysis
of
ONT
data.
It
here
provided
form
ONTbarcoder
2.0
all
commonly
used
operating
systems
includes
a
Graphical
User
Interface
(GUI).
Compared
earlier
version,
has
three
key
improvements
related
higher
read
quality
obtained
ONT's
latest
flow
cells
(R10.4),
chemistry
(V14
kits)
basecalling
model
(super‐accuracy
model).
First,
improved
(R10.4)
allows
primers
shorter
indices
than
those
previously
needed
(9
bp
vs.
12–13
bp).
This
decreases
primer
cost
can
potentially
improve
PCR
success
rates.
Second,
now
delivers
real‐time
barcoding
complement
sequencing.
means
first
within
minutes
starting
sequencing
run;
i.e.
cell
optimized
terminating
runs
when
most
have
already
been
obtained.
The
only
input
demultiplexing
sheet
data
(raw
or
basecalled)
generated
either
Mk1B
Mk1C.
Thirdly,
we
demonstrate
availability
R10.4
low‐cost
Flongle
option
users
who
require
200–250
at
time.
Environmental DNA,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5(1), P. 3 - 11
Published: Nov. 22, 2022
Abstract
Forest
canopies
are
highly
diverse
ecosystems,
but
despite
several
decades
of
intense
research,
there
remain
substantial
gaps
in
our
knowledge
their
biodiversity
and
ecological
interactions.
One
fundamental
challenge
canopy
research
is
the
limited
accessibility
ecosystem.
Consequently,
previous
studies
have
relied
on
application
either
invasive
methods
such
as
chemical
knockdown,
or
time‐consuming
expensive
setups
walkways
cranes.
Therefore,
time‐
cost‐efficient,
ideally
minimally
yet
comprehensive
applications
required
to
help
close
this
gap.
High‐throughput
metabarcoding
environmental
DNA
(eDNA)
collected
from
water,
soil,
air
provides
a
method
for
assessment,
its
potential
monitoring
has
not
been
explored.
Herein,
we
conducted
eDNA
washed
off
via
rainwater
explore
research.
We
placed
four
1
m
2
rain
samplers
beneath
different
trees
(beech,
oak,
larch,
pine)
prior
major
event,
filtered
rainwater,
performed
cytochrome
c
oxidase
subunit
I
(COI)
gene
profile
invertebrate
community.
Additionally,
identified
all
specimens
present
assess
if
only
came
physically
rainwater.
detected
50
species
by
metabarcoding,
which
43
were
water
sample,
thus
likely
representing
true
signals.
Furthermore,
observed
distinct
occurrence
patterns
corresponding
trees,
suggesting
that
host
specificity
can
potentially
be
assessed
using
method.
In
conclusion,
study
proof
principle
rainwash
offers
tree
canopies.