Landscape and Urban Planning,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
248, P. 105071 - 105071
Published: April 11, 2024
Loneliness
is
increasingly
recognized
as
an
urgent
public
health
issue
due
to
its
impact
on
mental
and
physical
health,
well-being.
Yet,
we
lack
comprehensive,
proven
strategies
for
confronting
this
global
problem.
There
evidence
that
contact
with
nature
greenspace
reduces
loneliness
by
facilitating
belonging,
social
connections,
cohesion.
This
review
aimed
explore
whether
such
positive
outcomes
can
be
enhanced
via
group-based
interventions
in
nature.
We
used
a
mixed-methods
systematic
approach
evaluate
characterize
literature
nature-based
their
effectiveness
reducing
loneliness.
included
all
age
groups,
populations
or
without
reported
problems.
Using
the
Mixed
Methods
Appraisal
Tool,
assessed
quality
of
qualitative,
quantitative
mixed
methods
studies.
The
38
studies
identified
describe
wide
variety
target
groups.
mostly
small
sample
sizes
moderate
effects.
qualitative
studies,
however,
showed
more
clearly
these
reduce
Group-based
activities
including
natural
elements
cultivated
connectedness
which
are
key
mechanisms
Specifically,
longer
greater
promise.
Policy
practice
recommendations
include
screening,
need
precisely,
intervention
over
time.
provides
perspectives
inform
policymakers,
urban
planners,
researchers
how
alleviate
feelings
By
linking
landscapes
concerns,
municipalities
further
promote
amplify
value
public.
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
38, P. 101275 - 101275
Published: Feb. 15, 2024
Interventions
to
reduce
loneliness
in
older
adults
usually
do
not
show
sustained
effects.
One
potential
way
combat
is
offer
meaningful
social
activities.
Volunteering
has
been
suggested
as
one
such
activity
–
however,
its
effects
on
remain
be
tested
a
randomized
controlled
trial
(RCT).
This
planned
Dual-RCT
aims
recruit
experiencing
loneliness,
with
subsequent
randomization
either
volunteering
condition
(6
weeks
of
training
before
delivering
three
tele-based
interventions
intervention
recipients
twice
week
for
6
months)
or
an
active
control
(psycho-education
gatherings
six
months).
Power
analyses
require
the
recruitment
N
=
256
detect
differences
between
and
(128
each)
primary
outcome
(UCLA
Loneliness
Scale).
Secondary
outcomes
comprise
network
engagement,
perceived
support,
anxiety
depressive
symptoms,
self-rated
health,
cognitive
stress,
sleep
quality,
diurnal
cortisol
(1/3
sample).
The
main
will
(volunteering
vs.
no-volunteering)
×
time
(baseline,
6-,
12-,
18-,
24-months
follow-ups)
interactions
test
secondary
outcomes.
Effects
are
expected
mediated
via
frequency,
involvement
volunteering.
If
our
can
that
volunteers
telephone-based
lonely
benefit
from
volunteer
work
themselves,
this
might
encourage
more
volunteer,
helping
solve
some
societal
issues
involved
rapid
demographic
changes.
Healthcare,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11(11), P. 1647 - 1647
Published: June 4, 2023
(1)
Background:
Social
isolation
and
loneliness
are
determinants
of
healthy
longevity.
However,
previous
research
has
focused
on
either
social
or
not
considered
household
types.
This
study
sought
to
clarify
among
older
adults
using
single-person
(ST)
multi-person
(MT)
(2)
Methods:
We
administered
a
national,
anonymous,
self-administered
survey
5351
Japanese
aged
65
years
older.
The
included
subjects'
demographic
characteristics
scores
for
(University
California
Los
Angeles
(UCLA)
Loneliness
Scale
version
3
(Cronbach's
α
=
0.790)),
(Lubben
Network
(LSNS-6)
0.82)),
self-efficacy
(GSES).
(3)
Results:
After
adjusting
age
gender,
ST
individuals
had
significantly
lower
LSNS-6
higher
UCLA
than
MT
(p
<
0.001).
Lower
were
associated
with
GSES
scores,
the
effect
was
greater
(LSNS-6,
(β
0.358,
p
0.001);
0.295,
0.001))
(UCLA,
-0.476,
-0.381,
0.001)).
(4)
Conclusions:
Specific
healthcare
systems
programs
based
should
be
developed
by
type
reduce
both
loneliness.
Environment and Social Psychology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
9(6)
Published: March 12, 2024
In
this
paper,
through
a
thematic
literature
review
of
recent
studies,
our
objective
was
to
explore
the
impact
loneliness
and
its
effects
on
health.
We
emphasize
human
need
for
sense
belonging
societal
inclusion.
further
discuss
link
physiological
alterations,
development
exacerbation
mental
health
conditions,
influence
it
has
cognitive
processes,
role
plays
in
contributing
maladaptive
coping
strategies.
Contrary
feelings
loneliness,
solitude
benefits
self-reflection
personal
growth
are
explored.
The
prevalence
cultural
similarities
differences
discussed
at
global
level.
Moreover,
explores
intricate
relationship
between
various
outcomes,
including
chronic
illness
mortality
risks.
It
emphasizes
importance
acknowledging
as
public
concern
interventions
individual
level
mitigate
adverse
effects.
Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37, P. 100758 - 100758
Published: March 18, 2024
The
COVID-19
pandemic
emphasized
the
pivotal
role
of
social
environment,
prompting
a
surge
in
research
on
its
impact
well-being
and
health.
This
article
aims
to
examine
link
between
immune
system,
health
outcomes,
with
particular
focus
positive
aspects
like
support
prosocial
behaviors
that
are
under-explored.
Different
environment
examined:
negative
effects
loneliness
adverse
conditions,
contrasted
benefits
behaviors.
While
mechanisms
behind
partially
studied,
those
driving
remain
elusive.
Understanding
lack
connection
their
will
allow
us
explore
connections
whether
they
can
reverse
outcomes.
Potential
psychoneuroimmunology
proposed,
highlighting
promotion
'safe'
state
by
vagus
nerve,
oxytocin
circuits,
additional
contribution
reward
pathways.
reviews
need
bridge
knowledge
gaps,
urging
further
study
causal
interactions
response
outcomes
raise
clinical
awareness
interventions.
Such
interventions
may
include
integrating
lonely
individuals
activities,
thereby
improving
physical
mental
There
is
growing
potential
harness
power
for
betterment
individual
society
as
whole.