Nursing Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 3847 - 3863
Published: Dec. 6, 2024
Background:
Loneliness
can
occur
at
any
age,
but
it
is
more
prevalent
among
older
adults
due
to
the
associated
risk
factors.
Various
interventions
exist
improve
this
situation,
little
known
about
their
long-term
effects.
Our
aims
were
determine
if
these
have
long-lasting
effects
and
for
how
long
they
be
sustained.
Additionally,
we
aimed
analyze
carried
out
by
volunteers
affected
outcomes
regarding
loneliness
psychological
impact.
Methods:
A
systematic
review
was
performed
searching
literature
in
MEDLINE
PubMed,
SCOPUS,
Web
of
Science,
PsycINFO,
Science
databases
focused
on
lonely
population.
The
inclusion
criteria
assessment
using
a
validated
tool,
being
primary
or
secondary
outcome.
CASPe
checklist
used
assess
bias
selected
studies,
PRISMA-ScR
recommendations
followed
present
synthesize
results.
Results:
Thirty
articles
included.
identified
classified
into
five
categories:
psychosocial,
technological,
health
promotion,
physical
exercise,
multicomponent
interventions.
improved
24
studies
during
post-intervention
analysis.
Social
connectivity
depressive
symptoms
also
most
Long-term
follow-ups
conducted
with
positive
results
total
16
Depressive
social
improved.
Eight
showed
good
loneliness.
Conclusions:
obtained
work
suggested
that
multidisciplinary
reduce
loneliness,
controlled
clinical
are
needed.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: Nov. 30, 2023
Abstract
There
is
little
empirical
data
on
the
heightened
risk
of
loneliness
among
individuals
residing
in
COVID-19
epicenter
or
those
who
have
recently
left.
This
study
compared
Wuhan,
China,
and
had
left
during
initial
outbreak
period
to
living
non-epicenter
regions.
During
China
2020,
three
samples
were
obtained
using
snowball
sampling.
The
included
2882
residents,
1028
2963
residents.
Loneliness
was
assessed
six-item
De
Jong
Gierveld
Scale,
with
a
score
two
more
indicating
presence
loneliness.
53.5%
55.2%
respectively,
experienced
loneliness,
which
significantly
higher
than
43.9%
observed
After
adjusting
for
covariates,
remained
statistically
significant
both
residents
(OR
=
1.35,
P
<
0.001
OR
1.20,
0.017,
respectively),
when
Individuals
epicenter,
as
well
left,
are
at
outbreak.
These
need
psychosocial
support
mitigate
their
promote
psychological
wellbeing.
Depression and Anxiety,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
2024(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Loneliness
has
long
been
a
significant
psychosocial
problem
for
migrant
children
in
urban
China.
In
recent
years,
social
changes
and
enhancements
welfare
equity
have
lessened
the
disadvantages
faced
by
these
children.
The
current
study
investigated
time-trend
of
loneliness
levels
among
from
2006
to
2019.
A
literature
search
was
performed
within
major
Chinese-
English-language
databases,
studies
that
reported
means
standard
deviations
Children's
Scale
(CLS)
scores
Chinese
were
included
this
cross-temporal
meta-analysis.
Weighted
linear
regression
conducted
examine
trend
mean
CLS
over
survey
year,
Cohen's
d
value
calculated
assess
magnitude
change.
total,
40
cross-sectional
between
2019
(published
2022),
consisting
47
cohorts
total
sample
size
17,090,
included.
Overall,
there
downward
year
score
(unstandardized
coefficient
[β]
=
-0.342,
P
<
0.001),
decline
0.411.
Similar
declining
time-trends
also
observed
subgroups
when
broken
down
sex,
school
type,
geographic
regions
(β
-0.182
-0.589,
0.001,
0.222-0.719).
China
decreased
Nevertheless,
sustained
measures
inclusive
policies
are
still
needed
mitigate
Nursing Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 3847 - 3863
Published: Dec. 6, 2024
Background:
Loneliness
can
occur
at
any
age,
but
it
is
more
prevalent
among
older
adults
due
to
the
associated
risk
factors.
Various
interventions
exist
improve
this
situation,
little
known
about
their
long-term
effects.
Our
aims
were
determine
if
these
have
long-lasting
effects
and
for
how
long
they
be
sustained.
Additionally,
we
aimed
analyze
carried
out
by
volunteers
affected
outcomes
regarding
loneliness
psychological
impact.
Methods:
A
systematic
review
was
performed
searching
literature
in
MEDLINE
PubMed,
SCOPUS,
Web
of
Science,
PsycINFO,
Science
databases
focused
on
lonely
population.
The
inclusion
criteria
assessment
using
a
validated
tool,
being
primary
or
secondary
outcome.
CASPe
checklist
used
assess
bias
selected
studies,
PRISMA-ScR
recommendations
followed
present
synthesize
results.
Results:
Thirty
articles
included.
identified
classified
into
five
categories:
psychosocial,
technological,
health
promotion,
physical
exercise,
multicomponent
interventions.
improved
24
studies
during
post-intervention
analysis.
Social
connectivity
depressive
symptoms
also
most
Long-term
follow-ups
conducted
with
positive
results
total
16
Depressive
social
improved.
Eight
showed
good
loneliness.
Conclusions:
obtained
work
suggested
that
multidisciplinary
reduce
loneliness,
controlled
clinical
are
needed.