FACETS,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
6, P. 1266 - 1284
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
The
resource
extraction
that
powers
global
economies
is
often
manifested
in
Indigenous
Peoples’
territories.
Peoples
living
on
the
land
are
careful
observers
of
resulting
biodiversity
changes,
and
Indigenous-led
research
can
provide
evidence
to
inform
conservation
decisions.
In
Nearctic
western
boreal
forest,
landscape
change
from
forest
harvesting
petroleum
intensive
extensive.
A
First
Nations
community
Canadian
oil
sands
co-created
camera-trap
explore
observations
presumptive
species
declines,
seeking
identify
relative
contributions
different
industrial
sectors
changes
mammal
distributions.
Camera
data
were
analyzed
via
generalized
linear
models
a
model-selection
approach.
Multiple
forestry
features
positively
negatively
affected
species.
Pipelines
had
greatest
negative
effect
size
(for
wolves),
whereas
well
sites
large
positive
for
multiple
species,
suggesting
energy
sector
as
target
co-management.
Co-created
reveals
spatial
relationships
disturbance,
prey,
predators
traditional
It
provides
hypotheses,
tests,
interpretations
unique
outside
perspectives;
participation
management
their
territories
scales
up
benefit
conservation.
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
35(1), P. 88 - 100
Published: April 16, 2020
The
rapid
improvement
of
camera
traps
in
recent
decades
has
revolutionized
biodiversity
monitoring.
Despite
clear
applications
conservation
science,
have
seldom
been
used
to
model
the
abundance
unmarked
animal
populations.
We
sought
summarize
challenges
facing
estimation
animals,
compile
an
overview
existing
analytical
frameworks,
and
provide
guidance
for
practitioners
seeking
a
suitable
method.
When
records
multiple
detections
animal,
one
cannot
determine
whether
images
represent
mobile
individuals
or
single
individual
repeatedly
entering
viewshed.
Furthermore,
movement
obfuscates
definition
sampling
area
and,
as
result,
which
estimate
corresponds.
Recognizing
these
challenges,
we
identified
6
approaches
reviewed
927
camera-trap
studies
published
from
2014
2019
assess
use
prevalence
each
Only
about
5%
any
abundance-estimation
methods
identified.
Most
estimated
local
covariate
relationships
rather
than
predicting
density
over
broader
areas.
Next,
approach,
compiled
data
requirements,
assumptions,
advantages,
disadvantages
help
navigate
landscape
methods.
appropriate
method,
should
evaluate
life
history
focal
taxa,
carefully
define
frame,
consider
what
types
collection
are
possible.
challenge
estimating
populations
persists;
although
exist,
no
method
is
optimal
under
all
circumstances.
As
frameworks
continue
evolve
animals
becomes
increasingly
common,
will
become
even
more
important
informing
decision-making.Estimación
de
la
Abundancia
Animales
No
Marcados
con
Base
en
Datos
Cámaras
Trampa
Resumen
La
rápida
mejoría
las
cámaras
trampa
décadas
recientes
ha
revolucionado
el
monitoreo
biodiversidad.
A
pesar
su
clara
aplicación
ciencias
conservación,
han
sido
utilizadas
pocas
veces
para
modelar
abundancia
poblaciones
animales
marcados.
Buscamos
resumir
los
retos
que
enfrenta
estimación
marcados,
compilar
una
perspectiva
general
marcos
analíticos
trabajo
existentes
y
proporcionar
guía
aquellos
practicantes
buscan
un
método
adecuado.
Cuando
cámara
registra
múltiples
detecciones
se
puede
determinar
si
imágenes
representan
diferentes
individuos
movimiento
o
solo
individuo
entra
repetidamente
zona
visión
cámara.
Sumado
esto,
ofusca
definición
del
área
muestreo
y,
como
resultado,
cual
corresponde
estimado
abundancia.
Después
reconocer
estos
retos,
identificamos
seis
estrategias
analíticas
revisamos
estudios
publicados
entre
evaluar
uso
prevalencia
cada
método.
Solamente
usó
cualquiera
métodos
identificamos.
mayoría
estimaron
relaciones
covarianza
lugar
predecir
densidad
lo
largo
áreas
más
amplias.
Después,
estrategia
analítica,
recopilamos
requerimientos
datos,
suposiciones,
ventajas
desventajas
ayudar
navegar
paisaje
busquen
apropiado
deberán
historia
vida
taxón
focal,
definir
cuidadosamente
marco
considerar
cuáles
tipos
recolección
datos
son
posibles.
El
reto
estimar
marcados
persiste;
aunque
existan
muchos
métodos,
hay
único
óptimo
cumpla
todas
circunstancias.
Mientras
sigan
evolucionando
sea
vez
común,
serán
todavía
importantes
informar
toma
decisiones
conservación.近几十年来红外相机陷阱技术的快速发展已经彻底改变了生物多样性监测的现状。尽管红外相机陷阱法在动物保护科学中有明确的应用,
但它很少被用来模拟无标记动物的种群数量。本研究旨在总结无标记动物的丰度估计所面临的挑战,
总结现有的分析框架并为寻求合适方法的实践者提供指导意见。当红外相机多次记录到无标记的动物时,
人们无法确定这些图像代表的是多个个体还是一个重复进入相机拍摄范围的个体。此外,
动物的运动导致不能清晰地划定采样区域,
因此也模糊了所对应区域的丰度估计。面对这些挑战,
我们确定了六种分析方法,
并综述了
年至
年发表的
项红外相机陷阱研究,
以评估每种方法的使用情况和流行程度。结果发现,
只有约
的研究使用了至少一种我们确定的丰度估计方法。这些研究大多是估计局部丰度或协变量关系,
而不是预测更大范围内的动物丰度或密度。接下来,
我们总结了每种分析方法的数据需求、假设、优点和缺点,
以帮助实践者了解丰度估计方法的总体情况。实践者在寻找合适的方法时,
应评估研究所关注类群的生活史,
谨慎地确定采样范围,
并考虑可能收集到的数据类型。无标记动物的种群数量估计仍面临挑战,
虽然已存在多种方法,
但没有一种方法对于所有红外相机陷阱数据都是最优的。随着分析框架的不断发展和对无标记动物数量估计变得越来越普遍,
红外相机陷阱法在为指导保护决策中也将更加重要。【翻译:
胡怡思;
审校:
聂永刚】.
Biological Conservation,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
232, P. 194 - 207
Published: Feb. 16, 2019
Quantifying
both
the
lethal
and
non-lethal
(or
“risk”)
effects
of
predation
has
emerged
as
a
major
research
focus
in
carnivore-ungulate
systems.
While
numerous
studies
have
examined
risk
recent
decades,
lack
standardization
approaches
impeded
progress
field.
We
provide
an
overview
five
study
design
considerations
involved
assessing
responses
prey
systems,
highlighting
how
different
choices
can
impact
strength
scope
inference.
First,
we
stress
importance
distinguishing
measures
(probability
being
killed)
from
(costs
antipredator
behaviors
response
to
risk).
Second,
recommend
explicit
consideration
spatial
temporal
scales
using
standardized
framework
facilitate
cross-study
comparisons.
Third,
ungulates
use
visual,
auditory,
olfactory
sensory
pathways
evaluate
risk.
Experiments
that
manipulate
signals
(e.g.,
auditory
playbacks
or
application
predator
scent)
be
powerful
approaches,
but
dosages
types
cues
need
carefully
considered.
Fourth,
usually
face
threats
multiple
predators
simultaneously,
highlight
potential
for
remote
cameras
structural
equation
modeling
help
address
this
challenge.
Fifth,
emerging
technologies
may
substantially
improve
our
ability
assess
discuss
several
promising
technologies,
such
animal-borne
video,
unmanned
aerial
vehicles,
physiological
sensors.
conclude
with
general
recommendations
design,
which
utility
conservation
management
Earth stewardship.,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Abstract
Indigenous
knowledge
and
governance
are
critical
to
successful
conservation
Peoples'
ability
live
sustainably
on
their
lands.
However,
various
industrial
land
use
practices
impact
the
value
traditional
resources
these
lands
provide.
Here,
we
evaluated
effects
of
harvest,
glyphosate
application,
fire
51
edible
medicinal
plant
species
identified
by
Peoples
in
western
boreal
forest
Canada,
a
landscape
rapid
industrialized
change.
We
collected
vegetation
data
between
2007
2020
used
linear
models
machine
learning
model
richness
abundance
species.
Glyphosate
application
harvest
best
explained
Despite
our
models'
indication
that
were
higher
harvested
treated
study
sites,
detailed
qualitative
based
local
suggest
forestry
negatively
impacted
plants.
Importantly,
plants
areas
with
unsuitable
for
human
consumption
exhibited
abnormal
color
flavor
presentations.
Concerns
over
access
increasingly
important
as
impacts
continue
expand
globally.
Thus,
hope
this
Indigenous‐led
design
leveraging
both
quantitative
can
result
partnerships
better
reflect
environmental
concerns
Peoples.
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
9(24), P. 14031 - 14041
Published: Nov. 22, 2019
Abstract
Camera
traps
(CTs)
are
an
increasingly
popular
tool
for
wildlife
survey
and
monitoring.
Estimating
relative
abundance
in
unmarked
species
is
often
done
using
detection
rate
as
index
of
abundance,
which
assumes
that
has
a
positive
linear
relationship
with
true
abundance.
This
assumption
may
be
violated
if
movement
behavior
varies
density,
but
the
degree
to
density‐dependent
across
taxa
unclear.
The
potential
confounding
population‐level
indices
by
would
depend
on
how
regularly,
what
magnitude,
home‐range
size
vary
density.
We
conducted
systematic
review
meta‐analysis
quantify
relationships
between
rate,
size,
terrestrial
mammalian
taxa.
then
simulated
animal
movements
CT
sampling
test
effect
contrasting
scenarios
indices.
Overall,
were
negatively
correlated
density
positively
one
another.
strength
varied
significantly
populations.
In
simulations,
rates
related
underestimated
change,
particularly
slower
moving
small
home
ranges.
situations
where
space
use
changes
markedly
we
estimate
up
thirty
percent
change
missed
due
movement,
making
trend
estimation
more
difficult.
common
remains
constant
densities
therefore
wide
range
mammal
species.
When
studying
rates,
researchers
managers
should
explicitly
consider
such
reflect
both
movement.
Practitioners
interpreting
camera
aware
observed
differences
biased
low
Further
information
or
methods
do
not
assumptions
density‐independent
required
make
robust
inferences
population
trends.
Global Ecology and Conservation,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
51, P. e02872 - e02872
Published: March 1, 2024
Currently,
human
activities
are
among
the
most
important
factors
affecting
distribution
of
wildlife,
and
conservationists
around
world
working
to
uncover
true
impact
on
wildlife.
With
rapid
disappearance
tigers
wolves
in
North
China
recent
decades,
leopards
have
become
only
top
predators.
However,
responses
including
leopards,
leopard
areas
remain
unknown.
This
study
systematically
quantified
disturbance
village
distance
as
gradient
variables
measure
intensity
activities,
community
threshold
analysis
was
used
analyze
response
wildlife
communities
area.
The
results
showed
that
had
effects
community.
There
were
different
thresholds
for
19
species,
activities.
findings
show
reasonable
control
activity
according
(0.14
times/day)
may
be
beneficial
result
will
help
clarify
role
umbrella
species
conservation.
ecological
can
provide
reliable
development
scientific
management
policies
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
2(4)
Published: March 14, 2020
Abstract
Many
caribou
populations
in
Canada
face
extirpation
despite
dozens
of
provincial
and
federal
legislative
instruments
designed
to
protect
them.
How
are
industrial
developments
that
impact
justified
permitted
governments'
commitments
protection?
Toward
an
answer,
this
paper
scrutinizes
approval
process
for
major
projects
Canada:
environmental
assessment
(EA).
We
identify
65
EAs
with
potentially
significant
adverse
impacts
caribou—all
but
one
were
approved.
The
results
show
most
approved
on
the
basis
proposed
mitigation
measures
promise
render
effects
“insignificant”;
yet
effectiveness
is
largely
unknown.
Further,
several
even
though
insufficient,
citing
public
or
national
interest.
Finally,
some
projects'
rested
part
scientific
claims
project
area
already
degraded
absent
caribou.
Based
these
findings,
EA
failing
caribou,
acting
as
a
means
by
which
state
licenses
pretense
protection.
failure
stems
from
broader
tension
within
manifests
EA:
between
state's
roles
promoting
economic
growth
protecting
against
growth's
negative
effects.
Recognition
needs
be
more
central
conservation
biology.
Oikos,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2022(8)
Published: May 13, 2022
Predator
control
remains
one
of
the
most
common
strategies
for
conservation
threatened
prey
species.
Despite
significant
and
ongoing
efforts
to
reduce
predator
populations,
little
is
known
about
impacts
on
behaviour
interactions
target
non‐target
species
following
numerical
potentially
behavioural
suppression
predators.
We
used
camera‐trap
data
collected
before
after
an
intensive
wolf
program
in
northeastern
Alberta's
boreal
forest
evaluate
changes
activity
patterns
overlap
wolves,
competitors
prey.
hypothesized
wolves
would
shift
their
toward
increased
nocturnality
avoid
diurnal
efforts,
thereby
cause
a
cascade
where
other
maintain
temporal
segregation
from
wolves.
Wolves
shifted
into
nighttime
control,
reducing
with
other,
mostly
diurnal,
members
community.
Decreases
between
indicates
reduced
potential
ungulate
large
competitor
may
therefore
not
only
release
top
down
regulation
competition
predators,
but
also
through
de‐coupling
overlap,
effects
interactions.
Understanding
indirect
such
as
both
provides
insight
disruptions
top–down
associated
that
shape
community
structure.
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
10(3), P. 1678 - 1691
Published: Jan. 30, 2020
Abstract
Interspecific
interactions
are
an
integral
aspect
of
ecosystem
functioning
that
may
be
disrupted
in
increasingly
anthropocentric
world.
Industrial
landscape
change
creates
a
novel
playing
field
on
which
these
take
place,
and
key
question
for
wildlife
managers
is
whether
how
species
able
to
coexist
such
working
landscapes.
Using
camera
traps
deployed
northern
Alberta,
we
surveyed
boreal
predators
determine
interspecific
affected
occurrences
black
bears
(
Ursus
americanus
),
coyotes
Canis
latrans
lynx
Lynx
canadensis
)
within
disturbed
by
networks
seismic
lines
(corridors
cut
exploration
oil
gas
reserves).
We
tested
hypotheses
across
one
spatial‐only
two
spatiotemporal
(daily
weekly)
scales.
Specifically,
hypothesized
(1)
avoid
competition
with
the
apex
predator,
gray
wolf
lupus
(2)
they
each
other
as
intraguild
competitors,
(3)
overlap
their
prey.
All
three
overlapped
wolves
at
least
scale,
although
models
daily
weekly
scale
had
substantial
unexplained
variance.
None
showed
avoidance
competitors
or
These
results
show
patterns
predator
space
use
consistent
both
facilitative
shared
responses
unmeasured
ecological
cues.
Our
study
provides
insight
into
relation
other,
highlights
management
indirectly
influence
multiple
through
interactions.