Global Ecology and Conservation,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
51, P. e02872 - e02872
Published: March 1, 2024
Currently,
human
activities
are
among
the
most
important
factors
affecting
distribution
of
wildlife,
and
conservationists
around
world
working
to
uncover
true
impact
on
wildlife.
With
rapid
disappearance
tigers
wolves
in
North
China
recent
decades,
leopards
have
become
only
top
predators.
However,
responses
including
leopards,
leopard
areas
remain
unknown.
This
study
systematically
quantified
disturbance
village
distance
as
gradient
variables
measure
intensity
activities,
community
threshold
analysis
was
used
analyze
response
wildlife
communities
area.
The
results
showed
that
had
effects
community.
There
were
different
thresholds
for
19
species,
activities.
findings
show
reasonable
control
activity
according
(0.14
times/day)
may
be
beneficial
result
will
help
clarify
role
umbrella
species
conservation.
ecological
can
provide
reliable
development
scientific
management
policies
Mammal Review,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
51(1), P. 95 - 108
Published: Sept. 20, 2020
Abstract
High‐density
populations
of
large
ungulates
are
now
widespread.
However,
the
perception
overabundance
only
appears
when
it
produces
a
problem
for
humans,
such
as
loss
plant
diversity,
damage
to
agricultural
crops
and
forestry,
ungulate‐vehicle
collisions,
nuisance
disease
transmission
livestock
or
changes
in
habitat
other
species.
The
admissible
level
density
depends
on
ecological
socio‐economic
context
which
population
is
located,
defining
this
important,
order
determine
management
strategies
actions.
We
describe
main
contexts
ungulate
occurs
Europe,
record
causes
evaluate
set
indicators
change
most
appropriate
monitoring
diagnosing
each
scenario.
Our
review
318
published
papers
revealed
six
wild
Europe
(protected
areas,
hunting
arable
farming,
farming
[peri]urban
areas).
In
addition
abundance,
four
sets
environmental
could
be
used
monitor
within
these
(impacts
habitats,
impact
animal
performance,
increments
diseases
parasite
loads,
humans).
Nine
species
were
found
overabundant.
Red
deer
Cervus
elaphus
was
likely
overabundant
protected
areas
(detailed
27%
that
context)
(38%);
roe
Capreolus
capreolus
forestry
(28%);
boar
Sus
scrofa
(60%),
(29%)
(peri)urban
(38%).
evidence
shows
diagnosis
via
change,
actions
required
control
undesirable
situations,
strongly
context‐dependent.
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
35(3), P. 784 - 793
Published: Oct. 12, 2020
Although
coexistence
with
wildlife
is
a
key
goal
of
conservation,
little
known
about
it
or
how
to
study
it.
By
we
mean
sustainable
though
dynamic
state
in
which
humans
and
coadapt
sharing
landscapes,
where
human
interactions
are
effectively
governed
ensure
populations
persist
socially
legitimate
ways
that
tolerable
risk
levels.
Problems
arise
from
current
conflict-oriented
framing
human-wildlife
include
reinforcing
human-nature
dichotomy
as
fundamentally
oppositional,
suggesting
requires
the
absence
conflict,
skewing
research
management
toward
direct
negative
impacts
over
indirect
positive
aspects
living
wildlife.
Human
behavior
framed
rational
calculus
costs
benefits,
sidelining
emotional
cultural
dimensions
these
interactions.
Coexistence
less
studied
due
unfamiliarity
relevant
methodologies,
including
qualitative
methods,
self-reflexivity
ethical
rigor,
constraints
on
funding
time.
These
challenges
illustrated
examples
fieldwork
India
Africa.
We
recommend
basic
approach
case
studies
aimed
at
expanding
scope
inquiries
into
relations
beyond
quantification
benefits
humans.Replanteamiento
del
Estudio
de
la
Coexistencia
Humano-Fauna
Resumen
A
pesar
que
coexistencia
con
fauna
es
una
meta
suma
importancia
para
conservación,
todavía
se
conoce
muy
poco
sobre
ella
y
cómo
estudiarla.
Cuando
hablamos
nos
referimos
un
estado
sustentable,
pero
vez
dinámico
en
el
cual
los
humanos
están
coadaptados
compartir
paisajes
las
interacciones
entre
animales
regidas
manera
efectiva
asegurar
poblaciones
persistan
maneras
socialmente
legítimas
aseguren
niveles
tolerables
riesgo.
Los
problemas
surgen
actuales
estructuraciones
orientadas
hacia
resolución
conflictos
humano-fauna
incluyen
reforzamiento
dicotomía
humano-naturaleza
como
fundamentalmente
opositora,
lo
sugiere
requiere
ausencia
conflicto
desviación
investigación
manejo
impactos
negativos
directos
por
encima
indirectos
aspectos
positivos
convivencia
fauna.
El
comportamiento
humano
está
conceptualizado
cálculo
racional
costos
beneficios,
haciendo
lado
dimensiones
emocionales
culturales
estas
interacciones.
La
estudiada
debido
poca
familiarización
metodologías
relevantes,
incluyendo
métodos
cualitativos,
rigor
ético
autorreflexivo
restricciones
al
financiamiento
tiempo.
Estos
retos
encuentran
ilustrados
mediante
ejemplos
tomados
trabajo
campo
África.
Recomendamos
enfoque
básico
estudios
caso
centrado
expansión
espectro
indagaciones
relaciones
más
allá
cuantificación
beneficios
humanos.
BMC Ecology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
20(1)
Published: Sept. 14, 2020
Abstract
Human–wildlife
conflict
occurs
when
the
needs
and
behavior
of
wildlife
impact
negatively
on
humans
or
affect
wildlife.
To
explore
nature,
causes
mitigations
human
conflict,
coexistence
between
assessment
was
conducted
around
Bale
Mountains
National
Park.
Data
were
collected
by
means
household
questionnaires,
focus
group
discussion,
interview,
field
observation
secondary
sources.
The
nature
extent
in
study
area
profoundly
impacted
humans,
wild
animal
environment
through
crop
damage,
habitat
disturbance
destruction,
livestock
predation,
killing
human.
major
manifested
that
agricultural
expansion
(30%),
settlement
(24%),
overgrazing
(14%),
deforestation
(18%),
illegal
grass
collection
(10%)
poaching
(4%).
defend
raider,
farmers
have
been
practiced
guarding
(34%),
live
fencing
(26%),
scarecrow
(22%),
chasing
smoking
(5%).
However,
(38%),
(24%)
(8%)
controlling
techniques
to
predator
animals.
As
emphasized
this
study,
human–wildlife
conflicts
are
negative
impacts
both
Accordingly,
possible
mitigate
possibilities
for
peaceful
co-existence
should
be
create
awareness
training
local
communities,
identifying
clear
border
closure
land
owned
residents,
formulate
rules
regulation
performed
equal
benefit
sharing
communities
reduction
encroachment
into
national
park
range.
Generally,
researcher
recommended
stakeholders
concerned
bodies
creating
community
use
mitigation
strategies.
FACETS,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. 252 - 271
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Conservation
relies
on
cooperation
among
different
interest
groups
and
appropriate
use
of
evidence
to
make
decisions
that
benefit
people
biodiversity.
However,
misplaced
conservation
occurs
when
are
impeded
by
polarization
misinformation.
This
impedance
influences
actions
directly
harm
biodiversity,
alienate
partners
disrupt
partnerships,
waste
resources,
misinform
the
public,
(or)
delegitimize
evidence.
As
a
result
these
actions,
outcomes
emerge,
making
it
more
difficult
have
positive
for
Here
we
describe
cases
where
failed
appreciation
cooperation,
evidence,
or
both
eroded
efforts
conserve
Generally,
case
studies
illustrate
averting
requires
greater
adherence
processes
elevate
role
in
decision-making
place
collective,
long-term
benefits
biodiversity
over
short-term
gains
individuals
groups.
Efforts
integrate
human
dimensions,
into
will
increase
efficacy
success
global
while
benefiting
humanity.
Frontiers in Conservation Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
2
Published: Oct. 14, 2021
Over
the
last
decade,
there
has
been
a
remarkable
increase
in
scientific
literature
addressing
human–wildlife
interactions
(HWI)
and
associated
concepts,
such
as
coexistence,
tolerance,
acceptance.
Despite
increased
attention,
these
terms
are
rarely
defined
or
consistently
applied
across
publications.
Indeed,
meaning
of
especially
is
frequently
assumed
left
for
reader
to
interpret,
making
it
hard
compare
studies,
test
metrics,
build
upon
previous
HWI
research.
To
work
toward
better
understanding
terms,
we
conducted
two
World
Café
sessions
at
international
conferences
Namibia,
Africa
Ontario,
Canada.
Here,
present
array
perspectives
revealed
workshops
results
describe
coexistence
currently
by
conservation
scientists
practitioners.
Although
focus
on
imperative
understand
term
relation
tolerance
acceptance,
many
cases
latter
used
express,
measure,
define
coexistence.
Drawing
findings,
discuss
whether
common
definition
possible
how
field
might
move
clarifying
operationalizing
concept
human-wildlife
Ecological Applications,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
32(5)
Published: March 27, 2022
The
wildland-urban
interface
(WUI)
is
the
focus
of
many
important
land
management
issues,
such
as
wildfire,
habitat
fragmentation,
invasive
species,
and
human-wildlife
conflicts.
Wildfire
an
especially
critical
issue,
because
housing
growth
in
WUI
increases
wildfire
ignitions
number
homes
at
risk.
Identifying
for
assessing
mitigating
impacts
development
on
wildlands
protecting
from
natural
hazards,
but
data
large
areas
are
often
coarse.
We
created
new
maps
conterminous
United
States
based
125
million
individual
building
locations,
offering
higher
spatial
precision
compared
to
existing
U.S.
census
data.
Building
point
locations
were
a
footprint
set
Microsoft.
classified
across
30-m
resolution
using
circular
neighborhood
mapping
algorithm
with
variable
radius
determine
thresholds
density
vegetation
cover.
used
our
(1)
total
area
buildings
included,
(2)
assess
sensitivity
included
pattern
choice
size,
(3)
regional
differences
between
building-based
census-based
maps,
(4)
how
location
accuracy
affected
map
accuracy.
Our
identified
5.6%-18.8%
being
WUI,
larger
neighborhoods
increasing
excluding
isolated
clusters.
Building-based
more
relative
all
smallest
neighborhoods,
particularly
north-central
states,
attributable
high
numbers
non-housing
structures
rural
areas.
Overall
classification
was
98.0%.
For
risk
general
purposes,
500-m
represent
original
Federal
Register
definition
WUI;
these
include
clusters
adjacent
exclude
remote,
buildings.
approach
offers
flexibility
detail
can
be
widely
applied
take
advantage
growing
availability
high-resolution
sets
methods.
Frontiers in Conservation Science,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
2
Published: Sept. 28, 2021
This
perspective
essay
considers
ethical
and
conceptual
questions
around
who
coexistence
is
for,
it
affects,
to
make
happen.
The
introduction
some
approaches
thinking
about
human-wildlife
coexistence,
debates
on
the
utility
of
concept
reasons
for
its
current
emergence
into
mainstream.
It
next
outlines
preliminary
conception
informing
this
essay.
discussion
challenges
a
narrow
conservation-oriented
framing
offers
insights
from
literatures
stewardship
relational
values
tackling
these.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
21(8), P. 380 - 387
Published: Feb. 6, 2023
In
an
era
of
rapid
environmental
change,
human–wildlife
interactions
(HWIs)
are
increasingly
complex
and
pervasive
across
ecosystems.
Negative
outcomes
from
such
continue
to
warrant
much
attention,
given
their
implications
for
conservation
human
livelihoods.
However,
framing
HWIs
solely
along
a
coexistence–conflict
continuum
is
overly
simplistic
because
coexistence
not
devoid
conflict
negates
the
temporal
dynamics
potential
outcomes.
Furthermore,
without
thorough
consideration
governing
principles,
will
persistently
result
in
negative
skewed
perspective
within
scientific
community
among
public.
Here
we
argue
that
incorporating
principles
responsibility,
equity,
justice,
inclusion
(REJI)
into
conservation‐oriented
activities
can
influence
intensity,
severity,
duration
throughout
HWI
life
cycle.
The
conceptual
framework
present
both
complements
expands
assessment
anticipation
outcomes,
which
inherently
contingent
on
practice,
cultural
sensitivity,
interdisciplinary
approaches.
Nature Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(7), P. 1365 - 1377
Published: June 12, 2024
Abstract
Understanding
species
distributions
is
a
global
priority
for
mitigating
environmental
pressures
from
human
activities.
Ample
studies
have
identified
key
(climate
and
habitat)
predictors
the
spatial
scales
at
which
they
influence
distributions.
However,
regarding
influence,
such
understandings
are
largely
lacking.
Here,
to
advance
knowledge
concerning
on
distributions,
we
systematically
reviewed
distribution
modelling
(SDM)
articles
assessed
current
efforts.
We
searched
12,854
found
only
1,429
using
within
SDMs.
Collectively,
these
of
>58,000
used
2,307
unique
predictors,
suggesting
that
in
contrast
there
no
‘rule
thumb’
predictor
selection
The
number
across
also
varied
(usually
one
four
per
study).
Moreover,
nearly
half
projecting
future
climates
held
constant
over
time,
risking
false
optimism
about
effects
activities
compared
with
climate
change.
Advances
SDMs
paramount
accurately
informing
advancing
policy,
conservation,
management
ecology.
show
considerable
gaps
including
understand
Anthropocene,
opening
opportunities
new
inquiries.
pose
15
questions
ecological
theory,
methods
real-world
applications.
People and Nature,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6(2), P. 800 - 817
Published: Feb. 20, 2024
Abstract
Wildlife
might
be
important
to
psychologically
restorative
values
and
disvalues
of
nature,
as
interactions
with
wildlife
could
trigger
both
positive
negative
feelings.
Research
on
experiences
human–wildlife
has
largely
involved
participants
who
voluntarily
sought
out
or
it
addressed
encounters
non‐threatening
animals
in
urban
green
spaces.
Less
is
known
about
the
opportunities
for
psychological
restoration
landscapes
shared
mammals
that
are
perceived
pose
a
threat
human
activities
health.
This
study
provides
nuanced
understanding
role
public
perceptions
potential
experience
local
natural
settings.
Twenty‐eight
(15
women,
13
men,
18–75
years)
took
part
focus
group
interviews
subject
reflexive
thematic
analysis.
As
an
analytical
framework,
we
used
theoretical
model
how
people
appraise
relevance,
implications,
coping
norm
congruence
such
appraisals
may
support
hinder
experienced
Relevance
revealed
shifts
consideration
presence
from
integrated
scenery
(background)
distinct
figure
(foreground).
Implication
would
if
animal
was
appraised
dangerous,
disgusting,
causing
nuisance
destructive.
promote
displayed
attractive
traits,
features
fascinating
behaviour
movements,
opened
engaging
interaction
situations.
Coping
strategies
feasible
deal
implications
avoidance
setting,
preparatory
before
visit
precautionary
during
visit.
Important
health
effects
gained
policy
management
explicitly
consider
what
mean
Read
free
Plain
Language
Summary
this
article
Journal
blog.