Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study DOI Creative Commons

Sanne Fisker,

Mia Christensen, Ermina Bach

et al.

Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8(3)

Published: April 8, 2025

ABSTRACT Aims To compare glycaemic outcomes for two automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the Tandem Control IQ (CIQ) and MiniMed 780G (MM780G). Material Methods In this observational study, we evaluated 60 days of data from 139 persons with type 1 diabetes (CIQ: 79 persons, MM780G: persons), who had an active glucose sensor time ≥ 85%. Results The AID was median 620 (IQR, 439–755) CIQ users 509 (429–744) MM780G ( p = 0.26). last HbA1c before initiation 59.7 mmol/mol in 60.1 0.88). higher than (median 98.5 (97.4–98.0)% vs. 96.5 (94.9–97.0)%, < 0.001). Time range (TIR, 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) lower (mean 68.9% ± 11.4% 73.7% 12.0%, 0.02) as tight (TITR) (glucose 3.9–7.8 (43.0% 12.2% 48.4% 12.7%, 0.01). difference TIR (4.2 (95% CI 1.0–7.5)%, 0.01) TITR (5.0 (1.4–8.6)%, remained statistically significant a multiple regression model controlling various baseline variables. absolute rate change > 1.5 mmol/L/15 min (9.4 7.2–13.3)% 7.4 (5.2–10.4)%, Conclusions system but TIR, TITR, rapid system.

Language: Английский

Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study DOI Creative Commons

Sanne Fisker,

Mia Christensen, Ermina Bach

et al.

Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8(3)

Published: April 8, 2025

ABSTRACT Aims To compare glycaemic outcomes for two automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the Tandem Control IQ (CIQ) and MiniMed 780G (MM780G). Material Methods In this observational study, we evaluated 60 days of data from 139 persons with type 1 diabetes (CIQ: 79 persons, MM780G: persons), who had an active glucose sensor time ≥ 85%. Results The AID was median 620 (IQR, 439–755) CIQ users 509 (429–744) MM780G ( p = 0.26). last HbA1c before initiation 59.7 mmol/mol in 60.1 0.88). higher than (median 98.5 (97.4–98.0)% vs. 96.5 (94.9–97.0)%, < 0.001). Time range (TIR, 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) lower (mean 68.9% ± 11.4% 73.7% 12.0%, 0.02) as tight (TITR) (glucose 3.9–7.8 (43.0% 12.2% 48.4% 12.7%, 0.01). difference TIR (4.2 (95% CI 1.0–7.5)%, 0.01) TITR (5.0 (1.4–8.6)%, remained statistically significant a multiple regression model controlling various baseline variables. absolute rate change > 1.5 mmol/L/15 min (9.4 7.2–13.3)% 7.4 (5.2–10.4)%, Conclusions system but TIR, TITR, rapid system.

Language: Английский

Citations

0