Ecography,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
42(1), P. 45 - 54
Published: May 22, 2018
An
important
factor
that
hinders
the
management
of
non‐native
species
is
a
general
lack
information
regarding
biogeography
non‐natives,
and,
in
particular,
their
rates
turnover.
Here,
we
address
this
research
gap
by
analysing
differences
temporal
beta‐diversity
(using
both
pairwise
and
multiple‐time
dissimilarity
metrics)
between
native
species,
using
novel
time‐series
dataset
arthropods
sampled
forest
fragments
Azores.
We
use
null
model
approach
to
determine
whether
was
due
deterministic
processes
or
stochastic
colonisation
extinction
events,
linear
modelling
selection
assess
factors
driving
variation
plots.
In
accordance
with
our
predictions,
found
much
greater
for
than
analyses
indicated
turnover
events.
No
predictor
variables
were
explain
species.
attribute
source‐sink
close
proximity
anthropogenic
habitats
fragmented
plots
study.
Thus,
findings
point
ways
which
study
can
be
adapted
future
applications
habitat
island
systems.
The
implications
biodiversity
conservation
are
significant.
high
rate
indicates
attempts
simply
reduce
populations
situ
within
may
not
successful.
A
more
efficient
strategy
would
interrupt
dynamics
improving
harsh
boundaries
adjacent
habitats.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
24(10), P. 4521 - 4531
Published: July 22, 2018
Abstract
Animal
populations
have
undergone
substantial
declines
in
recent
decades.
These
occurred
alongside
rapid,
human‐driven
environmental
change,
including
climate
warming.
An
association
between
population
and
change
is
well
established,
yet
there
has
been
relatively
little
analysis
of
the
importance
rates
warming
its
interaction
with
conversion
to
anthropogenic
land
use
causing
declines.
Here
we
present
a
global
assessment
impact
rapid
on
987
481
species
terrestrial
birds
mammals
since
1950.
We
collated
spatially
referenced
trends
at
least
5
years’
duration
from
Living
Planet
database
used
mixed
effects
models
assess
these
observed
warming,
use,
body
mass,
protected
area
coverage.
found
that
abundance
for
both
are
greater
areas
where
mean
temperature
increased
more
rapidly,
this
effect
pronounced
birds.
However,
do
not
find
strong
or
Our
results
identify
link
declines,
thus
supporting
notion
threat
biodiversity.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
98(4), P. 1388 - 1423
Published: April 18, 2023
ABSTRACT
Biotic
homogenisation
is
defined
as
decreasing
dissimilarity
among
ecological
assemblages
sampled
within
a
given
spatial
area
over
time.
differentiation,
in
turn,
increasing
Overall,
changes
the
dissimilarities
(termed
‘beta
diversity’)
an
increasingly
recognised
feature
of
broader
biodiversity
change
Anthropocene.
Empirical
evidence
biotic
and
differentiation
remains
scattered
across
different
ecosystems.
Most
meta‐analyses
quantify
prevalence
direction
beta
diversity,
rather
than
attempting
to
identify
underlying
drivers
such
changes.
By
conceptualising
mechanisms
that
contribute
or
composition
space,
environmental
managers
conservation
practitioners
can
make
informed
decisions
about
what
interventions
may
be
required
sustain
predict
potential
outcomes
future
disturbances.
We
systematically
reviewed
synthesised
published
empirical
for
terrestrial,
marine,
freshwater
realms
derive
conceptual
models
explain
diversity.
pursued
five
key
themes
our
review:
(
i
)
temporal
change;
ii
disturbance
regime;
iii
connectivity
alteration
species
redistribution;
iv
habitat
v
trophic
interactions.
Our
first
model
highlights
how
occur
function
local
(alpha)
diversity
regional
(gamma)
independently
invasions
losses
due
occurrence
assemblages.
Second,
magnitude
depends
on
interaction
between
variation
(patchiness)
(synchronicity)
events.
Third,
context
redistribution,
divergent
have
dispersal
characteristics,
associated
with
also
strongly
alpha
gamma
prior
invasion.
Fourth,
positively
linked
variability,
when
heterogeneity
decreases
increases,
respectively.
Fifth,
interactions
influence
via
modification,
disease,
consumption
(trophic
dynamics),
competition,
by
altering
ecosystem
productivity.
synthesis
multitude
cause
more
less
spatially
similar
(taxonomically,
functionally,
phylogenetically)
through
consider
studies
should
aim
enhance
collective
understanding
systems
clarifying
driving
focusing
only
reporting
per
se
.
Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
26(1), P. 76 - 92
Published: Oct. 22, 2019
Abstract
Aim
Climate
and
land‐use
change,
the
greatest
pressures
on
biodiversity,
can
directly
influence
each
other.
One
key
case
is
impact
change
has
local
climatic
conditions:
human‐altered
areas
are
often
warmer
drier
than
natural
habitats.
This
have
multiple
impacts
biodiversity
a
rapidly
developing
field
of
research.
Here,
we
summarize
current
state
understanding
that
changes
responses
to
in
particular
looking
at
whether
land
uses
favour
species
with
certain
niches.
Location
Global.
Methods
We
review
studies
identified
links
between
species'
niches
habitats/land‐use
types
they
inhabit.
also
critically
discuss
methods
used
explore
this
topic
(such
as
estimation
fundamental
vs.
realized
niches),
identify
knowledge
gaps
by
reference
related
macroecological
literature
make
suggestions
for
further
work.
Results
Assemblages
vertebrate
invertebrate
numerous
human‐dominated
been
found
higher
proportions
individuals
affiliated
temperatures
lower
precipitation
levels
assemblages
within
However,
uncertainty
surrounds
mechanisms
underlie
these
observed
differences
communities
across
types,
it
remains
unexplored
trends
differ
geographically
or
taxonomically.
Main
conclusion
Shifts
being
with,
average,
A
better
effects
associated
will
enhance
our
ability
predict
future
most
risk
from
interactions
climate
set
up
suitable
management
conservation
plans.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
28(3), P. 797 - 815
Published: Nov. 26, 2021
Rapid
human-driven
environmental
changes
are
impacting
animal
populations
around
the
world.
Currently,
land-use
and
climate
change
two
of
biggest
pressures
facing
biodiversity.
However,
studies
investigating
impacts
these
on
population
trends
often
do
not
consider
potential
interactions
between
change.
Further,
a
population's
climatic
position
(how
close
ambient
temperature
precipitation
conditions
to
species'
tolerance
limits)
is
known
influence
responses
but
has
yet
be
investigated
with
regard
its
over
time.
Consequently,
important
variations
across
ranges
in
may
being
overlooked.
Here,
we
combine
data
from
Living
Planet
BioTIME
databases
carry
out
global
analysis
exploring
land
use,
habitat
loss,
position,
variables,
vertebrate
trends.
By
bringing
datasets
together,
analyse
7,000
42
countries.
We
find
that
interacting
rates
Moreover,
features
local
landscape
(such
as
surrounding
cover)
play
roles
interactions.
For
example,
agricultural
uses
where
maximum
temperatures
were
closer
their
hot
thermal
limit,
declined
at
faster
when
there
had
also
been
rapid
losses
semi-natural
habitat.
The
complex
variables
highlight
importance
taking
intraspecific
variation
into
account.
Understanding
how
drivers
populations,
this
varies
spatially,
critical
if
identify
risk,
predict
future
produce
suitable
conservation
strategies.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
28(7), P. 2221 - 2235
Published: Jan. 21, 2022
One
of
the
most
pressing
questions
in
ecology
and
conservation
centers
on
disentangling
relative
impacts
concurrent
global
change
drivers,
climate
land-use/land-cover
(LULC),
biodiversity.
Yet
studies
that
evaluate
effects
both
drivers
species'
winter
distributions
remain
scarce,
hampering
our
ability
to
develop
full-annual-cycle
strategies.
Additionally,
understanding
how
groups
species
differentially
respond
versus
LULC
is
vital
for
efforts
enhance
bird
community
resilience
future
environmental
change.
We
analyzed
long-term
changes
occurrence
89
across
nine
over
a
90-year
period
within
eastern
United
States
using
Audubon
Christmas
Bird
Count
(CBC)
data.
estimated
variation
probability
each
group
as
function
spatial
temporal
(minimum
temperature,
cumulative
precipitation)
(proportion
group-specific
anthropogenic
habitats
CBC
circle).
reveal
was
consistently
explained
by
all
groups.
Conversely,
more
than
twice
(i.e.,
decadal
changes)
average
This
pattern
largely
driven
habitat-constrained
(e.g.,
grassland
birds,
waterbirds),
whereas
probabilities
habitat-unconstrained
forest
passerines,
mixed
habitat
birds)
were
equally
last
century.
conclude
has
generally
governed
avifauna
space
time,
while
played
pivotal
role
driving
distributional
dynamics
with
limited
declining
availability.
Effective
land
management
will
be
critical
improving
change,
especially
during
season
resource
scarcity
energetic
trade-offs.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
24(5), P. 1904 - 1918
Published: Feb. 12, 2018
Abstract
Anthropogenic
activities
have
led
to
the
biotic
homogenization
of
many
ecological
communities,
yet
in
coastal
systems
this
phenomenon
remains
understudied.
In
particular,
that
locally
affect
marine
habitat‐forming
foundation
species
may
perturb
habitat
and
promote
with
generalist,
opportunistic
traits,
turn
affecting
spatial
patterns
biodiversity.
Here,
we
quantified
fish
diversity
seagrass
communities
across
89
sites
spanning
6°
latitude
along
Pacific
coast
Canada,
test
hypothesis
anthropogenic
disturbances
homogenize
(i.e.,
lower
beta‐diversity)
assemblages
within
ecosystems.
We
for
at
different
disturbance
categories
(low,
medium,
high)
two
scales
(within
regions)
using
both
abundance‐
incidence‐based
beta‐diversity
metrics.
Our
models
provide
clear
evidence
high
areas
are
homogenized
relative
those
low
areas.
These
results
were
consistent
within‐region
comparisons
measures
beta‐diversity,
across‐region
measures.
Physical
characteristics
meadows
also
influenced
beta‐diversity.
Biotic
including
biomass
shoot
density
more
differentiated
among
sites,
potentially
indicative
a
perturbed
environment.
Indicator
trait
analyses
revealed
fishes
associated
had
stenotopy,
swimming
ability,
egg
guarding
behavior.
study
is
first
show
relatively
human
impact.
support
importance
targeting
conservation
efforts
land‐
seascapes,
as
well
managing
impacts
activity