Carbon Neutrality,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: Feb. 7, 2023
Abstract
The
large-scale
vegetation
restoration
project
on
the
Loess
Plateau
increased
ecosystem
carbon
(C)
stocks
and
affected
C
budget
in
arid
semi-arid
ecosystems.
specific
details
affecting
stocks,
their
distribution,
dependence
land
use
climate
were
never
presented
generalized.
We
assessed
effects
of
factors
soil
properties
through
field
investigation
across
Plateau.
total
four
ecosystems:
forestlands
[0.36],
shrublands
[0.24],
grasslands
[1.18],
farmlands
[1.05]
was
2.84
Pg
(1
=
10
15
g),
among
which
30%
stored
topsoil
(0–20
cm),
53%
above-ground
biomass,
17%
roots.
density
decreased
according
to
from
southeast
(warm
dry)
northwest
(cold
moist)
with
increasing
temperature
(from
5
°C),
but
precipitation
200
700
mm).
Variation
partitioning
analysis
structural
equation
models
indicated
that
more
explained
by
compared
properties.
This
supports
theory
empirical
findings
large
scale
pattern
is
predominantly
regulated
Our
results
highlight
are
predestined
store
other
ecosystems,
roots
substantial
should
be
considered
when
assessing
strongly
contributes
organic
matter
formation.
suggest
investing
can
an
effective
strategy
for
meeting
part
reduction
goals
mitigate
change,
necessary
validating
parameterizing
worldwide.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
29(9), P. 2384 - 2398
Published: Jan. 16, 2023
Abstract
The
role
of
soil
organic
carbon
(SOC)
sequestration
as
a
‘win‐win’
solution
to
both
climate
change
and
food
insecurity
receives
an
increasing
promotion.
opportunity
may
be
too
good
missed!
Yet
the
tremendous
complexity
two
issues
at
stake
calls
for
detailed
nuanced
examination
any
potential
solution,
no
matter
how
appealing.
Here,
we
critically
re‐examine
benefits
global
SOC
strategies
on
mitigation
production.
While
estimated
contributions
vary,
almost
none
take
saturation
into
account.
show
that
including
in
estimations
decreases
contribution
by
53%–81%
towards
2100.
In
addition,
reviewing
more
than
21
meta‐analyses,
found
observed
yield
effects
are
inconsistent,
ranging
from
negative
neutral
positive.
We
find
promise
win‐win
outcome
is
confirmed
only
when
specific
land
management
practices
applied
under
conditions.
Therefore,
argue
existing
knowledge
base
does
not
justify
current
trend
set
agendas
focusing
first
foremost
sequestration.
Away
climate‐smart
soils
,
need
shift
soil‐smart
agriculture
adaptative
adapted
each
local
context,
where
multiple
functions
quantified
concurrently.
Only
such
comprehensive
assessments
will
allow
synergies
sustainability
maximised
agronomic
requirements
security
fulfilled.
This
implies
moving
away
targets
agricultural
soils.
occur
along
this
pathway
contribute
should
regarded
co‐benefit.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
118(28)
Published: June 21, 2021
Plants
remove
carbon
dioxide
from
the
atmosphere
through
photosynthesis.
Because
agriculture’s
productivity
is
based
on
this
process,
a
combination
of
technologies
to
reduce
emissions
and
enhance
soil
storage
can
allow
sector
achieve
net
negative
while
maintaining
high
productivity.
Unfortunately,
current
row-crop
agricultural
practice
generates
about
5%
greenhouse
gas
in
United
States
European
Union.
To
these
emissions,
significant
effort
has
been
focused
changing
farm
management
practices
maximize
carbon.
In
contrast,
potential
largely
neglected.
Through
innovations
digital
agriculture,
crop
microbial
genetics,
electrification,
we
estimate
that
71%
(1,744
kg
CO
2
e/ha)
reduction
row
agriculture
possible
within
next
15
y.
Importantly,
emission
lower
barrier
broad
adoption
by
proceeding
multiple
stages
with
meaningful
improvements
gradually
facilitate
transition
practices.
Emerging
voluntary
regulatory
ecosystems
services
markets
will
incentivize
progress
along
pathway
guide
public
private
investments
toward
technology
development.
difficult
quest
for
all
tools,
including
storage,
must
be
developed
maintain
its
critical
societal
function
provisioning
society
while,
at
same
time,
generating
environmental
benefits.
Geoderma,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
416, P. 115810 - 115810
Published: March 15, 2022
How
much
C
can
be
stored
in
agricultural
soils
worldwide
to
mitigate
rising
carbon
dioxide
(CO2)
concentrations,
and
at
what
cost?
This
question,
because
of
its
critical
relevance
climate
policy,
has
been
a
focus
soil
science
for
decades.
The
amount
additional
organic
(SOC)
that
could
estimated
various
ways,
most
which
have
taken
the
as
starting
point:
projecting
how
SOC
previously
lost
restored,
example,
or
calculating
cumulative
effect
multiple
management
strategies.
Here,
we
take
different
approach,
recognizing
photosynthesis,
source
input
soil,
represents
fundamental
constraint
sequestration.
We
follow
simple
“Fermi
approach”
derive
rough
but
robust
estimate
by
reducing
our
problem
series
approximate
relations
parameterized
using
data
from
literature.
distinguish
two
forms
C:
‘ephemeral
C’,
denoting
recently-applied
plant-derived
is
quickly
decayed
CO2,
‘lingering
C,’
remains
long
enough
serve
lasting
repository
derived
atmospheric
CO2.
First,
global
net
inputs
into
lingering
croplands
primary
production,
biomass
removal
humans
short-term
decomposition.
Next,
storage
cropland
globally
inputs,
accounting
also
decomposition
already
present.
Our
results
suggest
maximum
rate
pool
0.44
Pg
yr−1,
sequestration
0.14
yr−1
–
significantly
less
than
previous
estimates,
even
allowing
acknowledged
uncertainties.
More
importantly,
argue
re-orientation
emphasis
processes
towards
wider
ecosystem
perspective,
with
photosynthesis.
Carbon Neutrality,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: Feb. 7, 2023
Abstract
The
large-scale
vegetation
restoration
project
on
the
Loess
Plateau
increased
ecosystem
carbon
(C)
stocks
and
affected
C
budget
in
arid
semi-arid
ecosystems.
specific
details
affecting
stocks,
their
distribution,
dependence
land
use
climate
were
never
presented
generalized.
We
assessed
effects
of
factors
soil
properties
through
field
investigation
across
Plateau.
total
four
ecosystems:
forestlands
[0.36],
shrublands
[0.24],
grasslands
[1.18],
farmlands
[1.05]
was
2.84
Pg
(1
=
10
15
g),
among
which
30%
stored
topsoil
(0–20
cm),
53%
above-ground
biomass,
17%
roots.
density
decreased
according
to
from
southeast
(warm
dry)
northwest
(cold
moist)
with
increasing
temperature
(from
5
°C),
but
precipitation
200
700
mm).
Variation
partitioning
analysis
structural
equation
models
indicated
that
more
explained
by
compared
properties.
This
supports
theory
empirical
findings
large
scale
pattern
is
predominantly
regulated
Our
results
highlight
are
predestined
store
other
ecosystems,
roots
substantial
should
be
considered
when
assessing
strongly
contributes
organic
matter
formation.
suggest
investing
can
an
effective
strategy
for
meeting
part
reduction
goals
mitigate
change,
necessary
validating
parameterizing
worldwide.