South African Journal of Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
120(5/6)
Published: May 27, 2024
A
key
global
change
challenge
is
to
significantly
reduce
the
risks
of
alien
taxa
causing
harmful
impacts
without
compromising
rights
citizens.
As
part
efforts
address
this
challenge,
South
Africa
promulgated
comprehensive
regulations
and
lists
in
2014.
In
paper,
we
review
how
developed,
changed
over
time,
they
have
been
implemented.
March
2021,
560
were
listed
under
four
broad
regulatory
categories,
between
2014
2020,
almost
3000
permits
issued
regulate
continued
use
taxa.
The
full
regulated
taxa,
issued,
corresponding
are
available
Supplementary
material.
proposed
standardised,
transparent,
science-informed
process
revise
also
presented
–
as
30
April
2024,
risk
analyses
developed
for
140
using
Risk
Analysis
Alien
Taxa
(RAAT)
framework
reviewed
by
an
independent
scientific
body
[the
Species
Review
Panel
(ASRARP)]
with
input
from
taxon-specific
experts.
These
recommendations
being
considered
interdepartmental
governmental
decision-making
established
2023
Committee
(RARC)].
Finally,
issues
listing
that
remain
be
resolved
presented.
Africa’s
continues
develop,
regulating
will,
believe,
become
more
consistent,
acceptable
stakeholders,
ultimately
facilitate
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
95(6), P. 1511 - 1534
Published: June 25, 2020
ABSTRACT
Biological
invasions
are
a
global
consequence
of
an
increasingly
connected
world
and
the
rise
in
human
population
size.
The
numbers
invasive
alien
species
–
subset
that
spread
widely
areas
where
they
not
native,
affecting
environment
or
livelihoods
increasing.
Synergies
with
other
changes
exacerbating
current
facilitating
new
ones,
thereby
escalating
extent
impacts
invaders.
Invasions
have
complex
often
immense
long‐term
direct
indirect
impacts.
In
many
cases,
such
become
apparent
problematic
only
when
invaders
well
established
large
ranges.
Invasive
break
down
biogeographic
realms,
affect
native
richness
abundance,
increase
risk
extinction,
genetic
composition
populations,
change
animal
behaviour,
alter
phylogenetic
diversity
across
communities,
modify
trophic
networks.
Many
also
ecosystem
functioning
delivery
services
by
altering
nutrient
contaminant
cycling,
hydrology,
habitat
structure,
disturbance
regimes.
These
biodiversity
accelerating
will
further
future.
Scientific
evidence
has
identified
policy
strategies
to
reduce
future
invasions,
but
these
insufficiently
implemented.
For
some
nations,
notably
Australia
New
Zealand,
biosecurity
national
priority.
There
been
successes,
as
eradication
rats
cats
on
islands
biological
control
weeds
continental
areas.
However,
countries,
receive
little
attention.
Improved
international
cooperation
is
crucial
biodiversity,
services,
livelihoods.
Countries
can
strengthen
their
regulations
implement
enforce
more
effective
management
should
address
interact
invasions.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
26(9), P. 4880 - 4893
Published: July 14, 2020
Abstract
Understanding
the
likely
future
impacts
of
biological
invasions
is
crucial
yet
highly
challenging
given
multiple
relevant
environmental,
socio‐economic
and
societal
contexts
drivers.
In
absence
quantitative
models,
methods
based
on
expert
knowledge
are
best
option
for
assessing
invasion
trajectories.
Here,
we
present
an
assessment
drivers
potential
alien
species
under
contrasting
scenarios
socioecological
through
mid‐21st
century.
Based
responses
from
36
experts
in
invasions,
moderate
(20%–30%)
increases
compared
to
current
conditions,
expected
cause
major
biodiversity
most
contexts.
Three
main
invasions—transport,
climate
change
change—were
predicted
significantly
affect
even
a
best‐case
scenario.
Other
(e.g.
human
demography
migration
tropical
subtropical
regions)
were
also
high
importance
specific
global
individual
taxonomic
groups
or
biomes).
We
show
that
some
can
substantially
reduce
invasions.
However,
rapid
comprehensive
actions
necessary
use
this
achieve
goals
Post‐2020
Framework
Convention
Biological
Diversity.
Soil Biology and Biochemistry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
148, P. 107874 - 107874
Published: June 25, 2020
Non-target
effects
of
deliberately
released
organisms
into
a
new
environment
are
great
concern
due
to
their
potential
impact
on
the
biodiversity
and
functioning
ecosystems.
Whereas
these
studies
often
focus
invasive
species
macro-organisms,
use
microbial
inoculants
is
expected
have
specific
particular
functions
but
negligible
overall
resident
communities.
Here,
we
posit
that
such
introductions
native
communities,
which
might
influence
ecosystem
processes.
Focusing
soil
used
literature
search
examine
inoculation
(often
release
beneficial
microorganisms
in
agricultural
systems)
Of
108
analyzed,
86%
showed
modify
communities
short
or
long
term.
In
addition,
for
analyzing
consequences
longer
term,
80%
did
not
observe
resilience
(return
initial
state)
community
following
inoculation.
Through
knowledge
gathered
from
each
study,
propose
synthetic
mechanistic
framework
explaining
how
may
alter
We
also
identify
challenges
as
well
future
approaches
shed
more
light
this
unseen
reality.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
25(3), P. 1032 - 1048
Published: Dec. 12, 2018
Abstract
The
European
Union
(
EU
)
has
recently
published
its
first
list
of
invasive
alien
species
IAS
concern
to
which
current
legislation
must
apply.
comprises
known
pose
great
threats
biodiversity
and
needs
be
maintained
updated.
Horizon
scanning
is
seen
as
critical
identify
the
most
threatening
potential
that
do
not
yet
occur
in
Europe
subsequently
risk
assessed
for
future
listing.
Accordingly,
we
present
a
systematic
consensus
horizon
procedure
derive
ranked
likely
arrive,
establish,
spread
have
an
impact
on
region
over
next
decade.
approach
unique
continental
scale
examined,
breadth
taxonomic
groups
environments
considered,
methods
data
sources
used.
International
experts
were
brought
together
address
five
broad
thematic
.
For
each
group
independently
assembled
lists
established
but
potentially
if
introduced.
Experts
asked
score
within
their
separate
likelihoods
i)
arrival,
ii)
establishment,
iii)
spread,
iv)
magnitude
negative
then
convened
2‐day
workshop
applying
compile
From
initial
working
329
species,
66
considered
very
high
(8
species),
(40
species)
or
medium
(18
was
derived.
Here,
these
highlighting
impacts
biogeographic
regions
affected
by
IAS.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
26(4), P. 2702 - 2716
Published: Jan. 13, 2020
The
Antarctic
is
considered
to
be
a
pristine
environment
relative
other
regions
of
the
Earth,
but
it
increasingly
vulnerable
invasions
by
marine,
freshwater
and
terrestrial
non-native
species.
Peninsula
region
(APR),
which
encompasses
Peninsula,
South
Shetland
Islands
Orkney
Islands,
far
most
invaded
part
Antarctica
continent.
risk
introduction
invasive
species
APR
likely
increase
with
predicted
increases
in
intensity,
diversity
distribution
human
activities.
Parties
that
are
signatories
Treaty
have
called
for
regional
assessments
risk.
In
response,
taxonomic
experts
undertook
horizon
scanning
exercise
using
expert
opinion
consensus
approaches
identify
present
highest
biodiversity
ecosystems
within
over
next
10
years.
One
hundred
three
species,
currently
absent
APR,
were
identified
as
relevant
review,
13
presenting
high
invading
APR.
Marine
invertebrates
dominated
list
flowering
plants
also
represented;
however,
vertebrate
thought
unlikely
establish
year
timeframe.
We
recommend
(a)
further
development
application
biosecurity
measures
all
stakeholders
active
including
surveillance
such
those
during
this
exercise,
(b)
use
methodology
across
Antarctica.
Without
appropriate
measures,
rates
introductions
increase,
resulting
negative
consequences
whole
continent,
introduced
spread
due
climate
change
increasing
activity.
Environmental Reviews,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
31(2), P. 310 - 326
Published: Jan. 11, 2023
The
Emergency
Recovery
Plan
for
freshwater
biodiversity
recognizes
that
addressing
nonnative
species
is
one
of
six
principal
actions
needed
to
bend
the
curve
in
loss.
This
because
introduction
rates
continue
accelerate
globally
and
where
these
develop
invasive
populations,
they
can
have
severe
impacts
on
biodiversity.
most
effective
management
measure
protect
prevent
introductions
species.
Should
a
be
introduced,
however,
then
its
early
detection
implementation
rapid
reaction
measures
avoid
it
establishing
dispersing.
If
are
unsuccessful
becomes
invasive,
control
containment
minimize
further
spread
impact.
Minimizing
impact
includes
methods
reduce
invader
abundance
such
as
screening
invaded
sites
strict
biosecurity
dispersing
neighbouring
basins.
These
benefitted
from
developments
invasion
risk
assessment
prioritize
according
their
and,
already
ensure
commensurate
with
assessed
risk.
successful
still
requires
overcoming
some
challenges,
including
often
being
symptom
degraded
habitats
rather
than
main
driver
ecological
change,
eradication
nonspecies
specific.
Given
multiple
anthropogenic
stressors
freshwaters,
must
work
other
restoration
strategies
if
deliver
Frontiers in Plant Science,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Sept. 3, 2020
Invasive
alien
species
(IAS)
are
one
of
the
major
threats
to
global
and
local
biodiversity.
In
forest
ecosystems,
caused
by
IAS
include
hybridization,
transmission
diseases
competition.
This
review
sets
out
analyse
impact
plant
on
regeneration,
which
we
consider
be
key
stages
in
tree
ecology
for
survival
ecosystems
future.
The
focus
study
is
directly
relevant
practitioners,
managers
conservation
management
forests.
With
this
systematic
review,
aim
provide
an
overview
48
research
studies
reporting
and/or
European
temperate
We
followed
a
multi-step
protocol
compiling
publications
literature
with
nine
search
queries
producing
total
3,825
hits.
After
several
reduction
rounds,
ended
up
grand
papers.
identified
53
vascular
having
negative
influence
regeneration
Central
total,
21
reported
impacted
24
studies.
results
synthesis
show
that
five
mechanisms
affect
success
native
species:
competition
resources,
chemical
physical
structural
indirect
through
interaction
other
species.
our
measures
have
been
recommended
application
at
different
biological
invasions.
associated
costs
required
resources
under-reported
or
not
accessible
reviewing
scientific
literature.
can
thus
conclude
it
very
import
improve
links
between
science
practical
management.
expect
will
direction
invasive
aimed
protecting
biodiversity
ecosystems.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
30(4), P. 794 - 845
Published: March 7, 2020
Abstract
The
disproportionately
low
presence
of
marine
species
in
the
list
invasive
alien
(IAS)
Union
concern
European
(EU)
Regulation
1143/2014
does
not
fully
acknowledge
threat
they
pose
to
EU
environment.
In
this
study,
first
EU‐scale
Horizon
Scanning
(HS)
focusing
on
was
performed,
aiming
deliver
a
ranked
that
should
be
high
priority
for
risk
assessment
(Article
5
IAS
Regulation).
Species
absent
from
or
with
limited
distribution
waters
were
targeted.
total,
363
initially
screened
HS
by
panel
experts,
including
broad
range
taxonomic
groups.
scored
their
likelihood
arrival,
establishment,
spread,
and
impact
waters.
A
consensus
workshop
267
species,
subset
26
prioritized
species.
These
are
considered
mainly
introduced
shipping
(fouling
ballast
water),
via
Suez
Canal,
aquaculture
activities.
also
scrutinized
terms
feasibility
management;
18
them
suggested
performing
assessments
basis
Regulation.
Since
biological
invasions
dynamic
connected
accelerated
globalization
diversified
human
activities,
we
recommend
repeated
periodically
review
already
listed
assess
new
ones.