Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
17(11), P. 3941 - 3953
Published: Sept. 21, 2021
This
study
examines
people's
intention
to
get
COVID-19
vaccines
and
some
of
the
psychological
factors,
that
can
facilitate
vaccination
process.
Using
theory
planned
behavior
(TPB)
as
a
theoretical
framework,
we
hypothesized
key
constructs
TPB
(attitudes,
subjective
norms
perceived
behavioral
control)
would
explain
vaccines.
Belief
in
COVID-19-related
misinformation
vaccine
confidence
were
added
framework
order
comprehensively
assess
predictors
intentions.
Data
was
collected
from
400
Indian
respondents
electronically
during
Feb-March,
2021.
Hierarchical
regression
analysis
used
analyze
data.
The
Three
components
collectively
explained
41%
variance
confidence,
on
other
hand,
had
no
significant
impact
We
discuss
practical
implications
these
results.
Future Virology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
18(4), P. 261 - 273
Published: March 1, 2023
A
fundamental
basis
for
effective
health-related
policymaking
of
any
democratic
nation
should
be
open
and
transparent
communication
between
a
government
its
citizens,
including
scientists
healthcare
professionals,
to
foster
climate
trust,
especially
during
the
ongoing
COVID-19
mass
vaccination
campaign.
Since
misinformation
is
leading
cause
vaccine
hesitancy,
data
sharing
through
an
evidence-based
approach
may
render
health
strategies
developed
by
policymakers
with
public
more
effective,
allowing
claims
that
are
not
backed
scientific
evidence
tackled.
In
this
narrative
review,
we
debate
possible
causes
hesitancy
links
epidemic.
We
also
put
forward
plausible
solutions
as
recommended
in
literature.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(4), P. e0298407 - e0298407
Published: April 19, 2024
Introduction
Vaccination
during
pregnancy
protects
both
the
mother
and
foetus
from
vaccine-preventable
diseases.
However,
uptake
of
recommended
vaccines
(influenza,
pertussis,
COVID-19)
by
pregnant
women
remains
low
in
Europe
USA.
Understanding
reasons
for
this
is
crucial
to
inform
strategies
increase
vaccination
rates
women.
This
qualitative
systematic
review
aimed
identify
barriers
facilitators
against
influenza,
pertussis/whooping
cough
COVID-19
possible
rates.
Methods
We
conducted
a
comprehensive
search
electronic
databases,
including
Medline,
PsycINFO,
CINAHL,
Web
Science,
WHO
database,
Embase
grey
literature
studies
that
explored
vaccine
among
(PROSPERO
CRD42023399488).
The
was
limited
published
between
2012
2022
high-income
countries
with
established
programmes
pregnancy.
Studies
were
thematically
analysed
underwent
quality
assessment
using
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
validated
critical
appraisal
tool
research.
Results
Out
2681
articles
screened,
28
(n
=
1573
participants)
eligible
inclusion.
Five
overarching
themes
emerged
relating
personal,
provider
systemic
factors.
Barriers
included
concerns
about
safety
efficacy,
lack
knowledge
vaccines’
benefits
necessity,
fear
adverse
effects
on
or
perception
disease
severity.
Facilitators
recommendations
trusted
healthcare
providers,
easy
access
vaccination,
clear
communication
positive
social
influences
family
friends.
Strategies
increasing
strong
proactive
professionals,
provision
routine
antenatal
care,
consistent
addressing
women’s
concerns.
Conclusion
highlights
need
interventions
address
identified
Recommendation
can
play
significant
role
promoting
uptake,
as
risk/benefit
convenient
vaccination.
Addressing
providing
accurate
information
also
important.
Future,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
3(1), P. 2 - 2
Published: Feb. 3, 2025
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
the
confinement
experience
have
significantly
affected
relationship
between
young
adults
their
parents.
present
study
focuses
on
design
validation
of
Perceived
Young
Adult
Lockdown
Parental
Relationship
Scale
(PYALPRS),
a
measure
assessing
two
dimensions
child–parent
associated
with
lockdown
period:
Oppression-Conflict
Closeness-Support.
After
phase
construct
definition
item
purification,
100
Italian
(M
=
24;
SD
3.9)
were
recruited
to
explore
factor
structure
scale.
Then,
sample
259
(aged
18–35;
M
3.8)
was
used
demonstrate
psychometric
validity
results
our
confirmatory
analysis,
which
resulted
in
high
goodness
fit
scores,
support
identifiable
factors
reflecting
theory-based
constructs
PYALPRS.
Moreover,
internal
consistency
convergent
divergent
analyses
show
that
PYALPRS
can
be
considered
reliable
valid
instrument.
ANOVA
demonstrated
there
significant
differences
being
cohabitant
or
single
as
well
different
perceptions
home
space
during
dimension,
while
larger
perception
Closeness-Support
dimension.
Belief
in
COVID-19
conspiracy
theories
can
have
severe
consequences;
it
is
therefore
crucial
to
understand
this
phenomenon.
We
present
a
narrative
synthesis
of
belief
research
from
85
international
articles,
identified
and
appraised
through
systematic
review.
identify
number
significant
antecedents
beliefs
(individual
differences,
personality
traits,
demographic
variables,
attitudes,
thinking
styles
biases,
group
identity,
trust
authorities,
social
media
use)
their
consequences
(protective
behaviours,
self-centred
misguided
behaviours
such
as
hoarding
pseudoscientific
health
practices,
vaccination
intentions,
mental
health,
other
negative
discrimination
violence).
conclude
that
understanding
both
the
highly
important
tackle
them,
whether
pandemic
or
future
threats,
climate
change.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
17(11), P. 3941 - 3953
Published: Sept. 21, 2021
This
study
examines
people's
intention
to
get
COVID-19
vaccines
and
some
of
the
psychological
factors,
that
can
facilitate
vaccination
process.
Using
theory
planned
behavior
(TPB)
as
a
theoretical
framework,
we
hypothesized
key
constructs
TPB
(attitudes,
subjective
norms
perceived
behavioral
control)
would
explain
vaccines.
Belief
in
COVID-19-related
misinformation
vaccine
confidence
were
added
framework
order
comprehensively
assess
predictors
intentions.
Data
was
collected
from
400
Indian
respondents
electronically
during
Feb-March,
2021.
Hierarchical
regression
analysis
used
analyze
data.
The
Three
components
collectively
explained
41%
variance
confidence,
on
other
hand,
had
no
significant
impact
We
discuss
practical
implications
these
results.