Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth DOI Creative Commons
Maria Regina Torloni,

Lucia F. Campos,

Arantza Coullaut

et al.

Health Expectations, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 27(3)

Published: June 1, 2024

Abstract Introduction Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process ensure that both technical experts women had a voice defining the gaps needs increase or reintroduce use assisted vaginal birth (AVB) settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable underused. Methods We describe methods outcomes online workshops led WHO obtain representatives' perspectives about AVB needs. Results After created list questions based on various evidence syntheses, organised four with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low‐ middle‐income (LMIC) countries. Women rated importance priority proposed experts, improving broadening some them, added new questions, voiced their main concerns views AVB. helped put into context communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions influence practices affect experience during labour childbirth, underscored less salient consequences AVB, consolidated vision resulted brief published WHO. expected stimulate global action closely aligned priorities. Conclusions successful engaging women, LMICs, identification use. This contributed better aligning views, concerns, Given scarcity reports LMICs research, serve as inspiration for future work. Patient Contribution were involved at every stage described full manuscript.

Language: Английский

Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth DOI Creative Commons
Maria Regina Torloni,

Lucia F. Campos,

Arantza Coullaut

et al.

Health Expectations, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 27(3)

Published: June 1, 2024

Abstract Introduction Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process ensure that both technical experts women had a voice defining the gaps needs increase or reintroduce use assisted vaginal birth (AVB) settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable underused. Methods We describe methods outcomes online workshops led WHO obtain representatives' perspectives about AVB needs. Results After created list questions based on various evidence syntheses, organised four with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low‐ middle‐income (LMIC) countries. Women rated importance priority proposed experts, improving broadening some them, added new questions, voiced their main concerns views AVB. helped put into context communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions influence practices affect experience during labour childbirth, underscored less salient consequences AVB, consolidated vision resulted brief published WHO. expected stimulate global action closely aligned priorities. Conclusions successful engaging women, LMICs, identification use. This contributed better aligning views, concerns, Given scarcity reports LMICs research, serve as inspiration for future work. Patient Contribution were involved at every stage described full manuscript.

Language: Английский

Citations

1