Journal of Biogeography,
Journal Year:
2007,
Volume and Issue:
35(3), P. 483 - 500
Published: Aug. 8, 2007
Abstract
The
development
of
a
more
synthetic
approach
to
understanding
spatial
patterns
in
biogeography,
particularly
the
way
which
these
interact,
constitutes
major
challenge
for
field.
Here
we
propose
some
key
elements
such
synthesis
what
can
broadly
be
termed
‘ecogeographical
rules’,
that
is
biological
traits.
These
include
understanding:
(1)
different
kinds
(intraspecific,
interspecific
and
assemblage),
distinctions
between
them;
(2)
unifying
role
geographical
ranges
play
linking
together;
(3)
this
unification
obscured
by
methodological
assumptions
made
documenting
(e.g.
assuming
intraspecific
variation
does
not
significantly
influence
assemblage
traits);
(4)
implications
other
issues
nature
observed
how
are
located
on
positional
or
environmental
axes
patterns);
(5)
need
further
models
types
traits;
(6)
generality
documented
at
all
levels,
difference
frequency
with
literature
variety
extant
species;
(7)
constraints
form
place
patterns,
patterns.
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment,
Journal Year:
2006,
Volume and Issue:
30(6), P. 751 - 777
Published: Dec. 1, 2006
Potential
impacts
of
projected
climate
change
on
biodiversity
are
often
assessed
using
single-species
bioclimatic
‘envelope’models.
Such
models
a
special
case
species
distribution
in
which
the
current
geographical
is
related
to
climatic
variables
so
enable
projections
distributions
under
future
scenarios.
This
work
reviews
number
critical
methodological
issues
that
may
lead
uncertainty
predictions
from
modelling.
Particular
attention
paid
recent
developments
modelling
address
some
these
as
well
topics
where
more
progress
needs
be
made.
Developing
and
applying
informative
way
requires
good
understanding
wide
range
methodologies,
including
choice
technique,
model
validation,
collinearity,
autocorrelation,
biased
sampling
explanatory
variables,
scaling
non-climatic
factors.
A
key
challenge
for
research
integrating
factors
such
land
cover,
direct
CO
2
effects,
biotic
interactions
dispersal
mechanisms
into
species-climate
models.
We
conclude
that,
although
envelope
have
important
advantages,
they
need
applied
only
when
users
thorough
their
limitations
uncertainties.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2008,
Volume and Issue:
105(supplement_1), P. 11505 - 11511
Published: Aug. 12, 2008
The
study
of
elevational
diversity
gradients
dates
back
to
the
foundation
biogeography.
Although
patterns
plant
and
animal
have
been
studied
for
centuries,
such
not
reported
microorganisms
remain
poorly
understood.
Here,
in
an
effort
assess
generality
patterns,
we
examined
soil
bacterial
along
elevation
gradient.
To
gain
insight
into
forces
that
structure
these
adopted
a
multifaceted
approach
incorporate
information
about
structure,
diversity,
spatial
turnover
montane
communities
phylogenetic
context.
We
found
observed
were
fundamentally
different.
While
taxon
richness
decreased
monotonically
from
lowest
highest
elevations,
plants
followed
unimodal
pattern,
with
peak
at
mid-elevations.
At
all
elevations
had
tendency
be
phylogenetically
clustered,
containing
closely
related
taxa.
In
contrast,
did
exhibit
uniform
across
gradient:
they
became
more
overdispersed
increasing
elevation,
distantly
Finally,
metric
beta-diversity
showed
lineages
randomly
distributed,
but
rather
exhibited
significant
gradient,
whereas
signal.
Quantifying
influence
sample
scale
intertaxonomic
comparisons
remains
challenge.
Nevertheless,
our
findings
suggest
structuring
microorganism
macroorganism
differ.
Journal of Biogeography,
Journal Year:
2008,
Volume and Issue:
36(1), P. 132 - 147
Published: Sept. 10, 2008
Abstract
Aim
We
surveyed
the
empirical
literature
to
determine
how
well
six
diversity
hypotheses
account
for
spatial
patterns
in
species
richness
across
varying
scales
of
grain
and
extent.
Location
Worldwide.
Methods
identified
393
analyses
(‘cases’)
297
publications
meeting
our
criteria.
These
criteria
included
requirement
that
more
than
one
hypothesis
was
tested
its
relationship
with
richness.
grouped
variables
representing
into
following
‘correlate
types’:
climate/productivity,
environmental
heterogeneity,
edaphics/nutrients,
area,
biotic
interactions
dispersal/history
(colonization
limitation
or
other
historical
evolutionary
effect).
For
each
case
we
determined
‘primary’
variable:
most
strongly
correlated
taxon
defined
‘primacy’
as
proportion
cases
which
correlate
type
represented
by
primary
variable,
relative
number
times
it
studied.
differences
both
primacy
mean
coefficient
determination
variable
between
categories
five
grouping
variables:
grain,
extent,
(animal
vs.
plant),
habitat
medium
(land
water)
insularity
(insular
connected).
Results
Climate/productivity
had
highest
overall
primacy,
heterogeneity
lowest.
Primacy
climate/productivity
much
higher
large‐grain
large‐extent
studies
at
smaller
scales.
It
also
on
land
water,
connected
systems
insular
ones.
hypotheses,
were
less
pronounced.
Throughout,
plants
animals
showed
similar
patterns.
Coefficients
differed
little
variables,
strongest
effects
being
low
means
smallest
class
edaphics/nutrients
a
water
but
vice
versa
systems.
highlight
areas
data
deficiency.
Main
conclusions
Our
results
support
notion
climate
productivity
play
an
important
role
determining
large
scales,
particularly
non‐insular,
terrestrial
habitats.
At
extents
sizes,
different
types
correlates
appears
differ
from
null
expectation.
In
analysis,
is
rarely
best
richness,
this
may
reflect
difficulty
incorporating
factors
regression
models,
collinearity
past
current
climates.
findings
are
consistent
view
determines
capacity
However,
influence
evident
probably
because
(1)
small
extent
tend
sample
climatic
range,
(2)
grains
some
influences
vary
mainly
within
sampling
unit.
Science,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
333(6050), P. 1755 - 1758
Published: Sept. 22, 2011
Understanding
spatial
variation
in
biodiversity
along
environmental
gradients
is
a
central
theme
ecology.
Differences
species
compositional
turnover
among
sites
(β
diversity)
occurring
are
often
used
to
infer
the
processes
structuring
communities.
Here,
we
show
that
sampling
alone
predicts
changes
β
diversity
caused
simply
by
sizes
of
pools.
For
example,
forest
inventories
sampled
latitudinal
and
elevational
well-documented
pattern
higher
tropics
at
low
elevations.
However,
after
correcting
for
pooled
richness
(γ
diversity),
these
differences
disappear.
Therefore,
there
no
need
invoke
mechanisms
community
assembly
temperate
versus
tropical
systems
explain
global-scale
patterns
diversity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2007,
Volume and Issue:
104(33), P. 13384 - 13389
Published: Aug. 9, 2007
Most
studies
examining
continental-to-global
patterns
of
species
richness
rely
on
the
overlaying
extent-of-occurrence
range
maps.
Because
a
does
not
occur
at
all
locations
within
its
geographic
range,
range-map-derived
data
represent
actual
distributional
only
some
relatively
coarse
and
undefined
resolution.
With
increasing
availability
high-resolution
climate
land-cover
data,
broad-scale
are
increasingly
likely
to
estimate
high
resolutions.
scale
dependence
most
ecological
phenomena,
significant
mismatch
between
presumed
may
arise.
This
affect
conclusions
regarding
basic
drivers
diversity
lead
errors
in
identification
hotspots.
Here,
we
examine
avian
maps
834
bird
conjunction
with
geographically
extensive
survey
sets
two
continents
determine
spatial
resolutions
which
range-map
actually
characterize
occurrences
richness.
At
less
than
2°
(≈200
km),
overestimate
area
occupancy
individual
mischaracterize
richness,
resulting
up
two-thirds
biodiversity
hotspots
being
misidentified.
The
accuracy
poses
clear
limitations
analyses
conservation
assessments.
We
suggest
that
contain
information
is
generally
assumed
provide
guidance
about
appropriate
their
use.
Global Ecology and Biogeography,
Journal Year:
2006,
Volume and Issue:
15(4), P. 321 - 327
Published: May 8, 2006
ABSTRACT
Because
most
macroecological
and
biodiversity
data
are
spatially
autocorrelated,
special
tools
for
describing
spatial
structures
dealing
with
hypothesis
testing
usually
required.
Unfortunately,
of
these
methods
have
not
been
available
in
a
single
statistical
package.
Consequently,
using
is
still
challenge
ecologists
biogeographers.
In
this
paper,
we
present
sam
(Spatial
Analysis
Macroecology),
new,
easy‐to‐use,
freeware
package
analysis
macroecology
biogeography.
Through
an
intuitive,
fully
graphical
interface,
allows
the
user
to
describe
patterns
variables
provides
explicit
framework
standard
techniques
regression
correlation.
Moran's
I
autocorrelation
coefficient
can
be
calculated
based
on
range
matrices
relationships,
original
as
well
residuals
models,
which
also
include
filtering
components
(obtained
by
trend
surface
or
principal
coordinates
neighbour
matrices).
offers
correcting
number
degrees
freedom
when
calculating
significance
correlation
coefficients.
Explicit
modelling
several
forms
autoregression
generalized
least‐squares
models
available.
We
believe
new
tool
will
provide
researchers
basic
resolve
problems
and,
simultaneously,
explore
biogeographical
data.
Although
program
was
designed
primarily
applications
biogeography,
's
useful
all
kinds
pattern
analysis.
The
freely
at
http://www.ecoevol.ufg.br/sam
(permanent
URL
http://purl.oclc.org/sam/
).
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics,
Journal Year:
2013,
Volume and Issue:
44(1), P. 261 - 280
Published: Nov. 23, 2013
Community
structure
and
ecosystem
processes
often
vary
along
elevational
gradients.
Their
responses
to
elevation
are
commonly
driven
by
changes
in
temperature,
many
community-
ecosystem-level
variables
therefore
frequently
respond
similarly
across
contrasting
There
also
exceptions,
sometimes
because
other
factors
such
as
precipitation
can
with
elevation.
Given
this
complexity,
our
capacity
predict
when
why
the
same
variable
responds
differently
among
disparate
gradients
is
limited.
Furthermore,
there
utility
using
for
understanding
community
global
climate
change
at
much
larger
spatial
temporal
scales
than
possible
through
conventional
ecological
experiments.
However,
future
studies
that
integrate
gradient
approaches
experimental
manipulations
will
provide
powerful
information
improve
predictions
of
impacts
within
ecosystems.
Encyclopedia of Life Sciences,
Journal Year:
2010,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 15, 2010
Abstract
The
abiotic
and
biotic
gradients
on
mountains
have
enormous
potential
to
improve
our
understanding
of
species
distributions,
richness
patterns
conservation.
Here
we
describe
how
factors
change
with
elevation,
flora
fauna
respond
these
changes
elevational
been
studied
uncover
drivers
biodiversity.
There
are
four
main
trends
in
richness:
decreasing
increasing
plateaus
across
low
elevations
then
or
without
a
mid‐elevation
peak
unimodal
pattern
mid‐elevational
peak.
We
discuss
the
history
studies
overview
various
hypotheses
thought
be
important
trends,
including
climatic,
spatial,
evolutionary
factors.
Key
Concepts:
Elevational
exhibit
complex
variation
conditions
over
short
distances.
Patterns
follow
common
patterns:
peaks,
decreasing,
low‐elevation
peaks.
vary
between
taxonomic
groups.
A
combination
water
availability
temperature
is
often
found
related
patterns.
No
consistent
support
for
importance
area
mid‐domain
effects
Support
mechanisms
underlying
tends
ecology
group
interest.
valuable
task
disentangle
causes
behind
broad‐scale
biodiversity,
quest
understand
threats
biodiversity
climatic
change.
Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2005,
Volume and Issue:
9(2), P. 215 - 227
Published: Nov. 24, 2005
Abstract
Species–area
relationships
(SAR)
are
fundamental
in
the
understanding
of
biodiversity
patterns
and
critical
importance
for
predicting
species
extinction
risk
worldwide.
Despite
enormous
attention
given
to
SAR
form
many
individual
analyses,
little
attempt
has
been
made
synthesize
these
studies.
We
conducted
a
quantitative
meta‐analysis
794
SAR,
comprising
wide
span
organisms,
habitats
locations.
identified
factors
reflecting
both
pattern‐based
dynamic
approaches
tested
whether
leave
significant
imprints
on
slope
strength
SAR.
Our
analysis
revealed
that
significantly
affected
by
variables
characterizing
sampling
scheme,
spatial
scale,
types
organisms
or
involved.
found
steeper
generated
at
lower
latitudes
larger
organisms.
varied
between
nested
independent
schemes
major
ecosystem
types,
but
not
generally
terrestrial
aquatic
realm.
Both
fit
were
scale‐dependent.
conclude
dynamically
regulating
richness
different
scales
strongly
affect
shape
highlight
important
consequences
this
systematic
variation
ecological
theory,
conservation
management
predictions.