From bias to balance: Testing the effect of feedback on ideological bias expression. A registered report DOI Creative Commons
Carolin‐Theresa Ziemer, Christine Finn, Tobias Rothmund

et al.

Political Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 15, 2024

Abstract Motivated reasoning posits that ideological beliefs and goals bias individuals' information processing particularly regarding socio‐political information. However, most individuals are unaware shapes their perception judgment making them easy targets for political polarization. This leads to the strong need address mitigate this bias. Utilizing an task assesses degree of expressing one's in estimation facts, we test effects feedback on reduction With a three between‐factor design (feedback‐only vs. + social norm nudge no control), representative German sample at two time points ( N t 1 = 1229, 2 1001). Participants who received extent displayed significant between compared control group. An additional emphasizing societal value unbiased decision‐making did not result stronger Moreover, general awareness moderate effect reduction. Our findings contribute growing understanding about suggestibility illuminate (limited) potential mitigating biased processing.

Language: Английский

Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos that prebunk manipulation tactics and logical fallacies in misinformation DOI Creative Commons
Mikey Biddlestone, Jon Roozenbeek, Jane Suiter

et al.

Political Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 27, 2025

Abstract Meta‐analyses have demonstrated how inoculation interventions increase the detection of misinformation, but their scalability has remained elusive. To address this, Study 1 (pre‐registered; N = 1,583) tested efficacy three short videos (prebunks) against common manipulation tactics used in misinformation: (1) polarization, (2) conspiracy theories, and (3) fake experts. Results indicated that all (vs. control) increased relevant manipulative content without altering perceptions non‐manipulative content, only polarization video discernment (i.e., ability to distinguish between content). In 2 1,603), we more containing logic‐based prebunks logical fallacies commonly whataboutism, moving goalposts fallacy, strawman fallacy. Detection fallacious was higher conditions control), fallacy discernment. The appeared overall distrust whereas other two did not alter non‐fallacious content. We discuss implications limitations these findings.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Media Literacy Interventions Improve Resilience to Misinformation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Overall Effect and Moderating Factors DOI
Guanxiong Huang, Wufan Jia, Wenting Yu

et al.

Communication Research, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 4, 2024

The widespread dissemination of misinformation has become a global concern. A recommended solution is to improve people’s ability discern true from false information through appropriate media literacy education programs. This meta-analysis quantitatively synthesized the results 49 experimental studies ( N = 81,155) that examined efficacy interventions in mitigating misinformation. study finds generally resilience d 0.60). Specifically, reduce belief 0.27), discernment 0.76), and decrease sharing 1.04). Moreover, have stronger effects (1) when multiple sessions rather than single session are implemented, (2) high (vs. low) uncertainty avoidance cultures, (3) among college students adults recruited online crowdsourcing platforms (e.g., Amazon Mechanical Turk). These findings enrich our understanding inoculation theory provide valuable guidance for design future intervention

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Exposure to detectable inaccuracies makes children more diligent fact-checkers of novel claims DOI
Evan Orticio,

Martin Meyer,

Celeste Kidd

et al.

Nature Human Behaviour, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 10, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

From bias to balance: Testing the effect of feedback on ideological bias expression. A registered report DOI Creative Commons
Carolin‐Theresa Ziemer, Christine Finn, Tobias Rothmund

et al.

Political Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 15, 2024

Abstract Motivated reasoning posits that ideological beliefs and goals bias individuals' information processing particularly regarding socio‐political information. However, most individuals are unaware shapes their perception judgment making them easy targets for political polarization. This leads to the strong need address mitigate this bias. Utilizing an task assesses degree of expressing one's in estimation facts, we test effects feedback on reduction With a three between‐factor design (feedback‐only vs. + social norm nudge no control), representative German sample at two time points ( N t 1 = 1229, 2 1001). Participants who received extent displayed significant between compared control group. An additional emphasizing societal value unbiased decision‐making did not result stronger Moreover, general awareness moderate effect reduction. Our findings contribute growing understanding about suggestibility illuminate (limited) potential mitigating biased processing.

Language: Английский

Citations

0