The toxicity of heavy metals and plant signaling facilitated by biochar application: Implications for stress mitigation and crop production DOI
Zaid Khan,

Xianting Fan,

Mohammad Nauman Khan

et al.

Chemosphere, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 308, P. 136466 - 136466

Published: Sept. 16, 2022

Language: Английский

Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality DOI
Fang Wang, Jean Damascene Harindintwali, Zhizhang Yuan

et al.

The Innovation, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 2(4), P. 100180 - 100180

Published: Oct. 30, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

978

How biochar works, and when it doesn't: A review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar DOI Creative Commons
Stephen Joseph, Annette Cowie, Lukas Van Zwieten

et al.

GCB Bioenergy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 13(11), P. 1731 - 1764

Published: July 27, 2021

Abstract We synthesized 20 years of research to explain the interrelated processes that determine soil and plant responses biochar. The properties biochar its effects within agricultural ecosystems largely depend on feedstock pyrolysis conditions. describe three stages reactions in soil: dissolution (1–3 weeks); reactive surface development (1–6 months); aging (beyond 6 months). As ages, it is incorporated into aggregates, protecting carbon promoting stabilization rhizodeposits microbial products. Biochar persists for hundreds thousands years. By increasing pH, porosity, water availability, biochars can create favorable conditions root functions. Biochars catalyze biotic abiotic reactions, particularly rhizosphere, increase nutrient supply uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate development, resilience disease environmental stressors. Meta‐analyses found that, average, P availability a factor 4.6; decrease tissue concentration heavy metals 17%–39%; build organic through negative priming 3.8% (range −21% +20%); non‐CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions from 12%–50%. show average crop yield increases 10%–42% with addition, greatest low‐nutrient P‐sorbing acidic soils (common tropics), sandy drylands due retention holding capacity. Studies report wide range diversity contexts which have been applied. Crop yields strongly if site‐specific constraints limitations are mitigated appropriate formulations. be tailored address site selection, modifying conditions, pre‐ or post‐production treatments, co‐application mineral fertilizers. demonstrate how, when used wisely, mitigates climate change supports food security circular economy.

Language: Английский

Citations

606

Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy DOI Creative Commons
Wulf Amelung, Déborah Bossio, W. de Vries

et al.

Nature Communications, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Oct. 27, 2020

Abstract Sustainable soil carbon sequestration practices need to be rapidly scaled up and implemented contribute climate change mitigation. We highlight that the major potential for is in cropland soils, especially those with large yield gaps and/or historic organic losses. The implementation of measures requires a diverse set options, each adapted local conditions management opportunities, accounting site-specific trade-offs. propose establishment information system containing localised on group, degradation status, crop gap, associated carbon-sequestration potentials, as well provision incentives policies translate options into region- soil-specific practices.

Language: Английский

Citations

571

Biochar in climate change mitigation DOI
Johannes Lehmann, Annette Cowie, Caroline A. Masiello

et al.

Nature Geoscience, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 14(12), P. 883 - 892

Published: Dec. 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

547

Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage DOI
Nanthi Bolan, Son A. Hoang, Jingzi Beiyuan

et al.

International Materials Reviews, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 67(2), P. 150 - 200

Published: May 7, 2021

Biochar is produced as a charred material with high surface area and abundant functional groups by pyrolysis, which refers to the process of thermochemical decomposition organic at elevated temperatures in absence oxygen. The carbon component biochar relatively stable, and, hence, was originally proposed soil amendment store soil. has multifunctional values that include use it for following purposes: improve health, nutrient microbial carrier, immobilising agent remediation toxic metals contaminants water, catalyst industrial applications, porous mitigating greenhouse gas emissions odorous compounds, feed supplement animal health intake efficiency thus, productivity. This article provides first time an overview unintended consequences applications.

Language: Английский

Citations

471

Biochar in agriculture – A systematic review of 26 global meta‐analyses DOI Creative Commons
Hans‐Peter Schmidt, Claudia Kammann, Nikolas Hagemann

et al.

GCB Bioenergy, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 13(11), P. 1708 - 1730

Published: Sept. 1, 2021

Abstract Biochar is obtained by pyrolyzing biomass and is, definition, applied in a way that avoids its rapid oxidation to CO 2 . Its use agriculture includes animal feeding, manure treatment (e.g. as additive for bedding, composting, storage or anaerobic digestion), fertilizer component direct soil application. Because the feedstock carbon photosynthetically fixed from atmosphere, producing applying biochar essentially dioxide removal (CDR) technology, which has high‐technology readiness level. However, swift implementation of pyrogenic capture (PyCCS), needs deliver co‐benefits, example, improving crop yields ecosystem services and/or climate change resilience ameliorating key properties. Agronomic research rapidly evolving field moving less than 100 publications 2010 more 15,000 end 2020. Here, we summarize 26 rigorously selected meta‐analyses published since 2016 investigated multitude properties agronomic performance parameters impacted application, effects on yield, root biomass, water efficiency, microbial activity, organic greenhouse gas emissions. All show compelling evidence overall beneficial effect all parameters. One remaining challenges standardization basic analysis, still lacking many studies. Incomplete characterization increases uncertainty because adverse individual studies included might be related low‐quality biochars, would not qualify certification subsequent high content contaminants, salinity, incomplete pyrolysis, etc.). In summary, our systematic review suggests potential combine CDR with significant environmental co‐benefits.

Language: Английский

Citations

290

Sustainable soil use and management: An interdisciplinary and systematic approach DOI Open Access
Deyi Hou, Nanthi Bolan, Daniel C.W. Tsang

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 729, P. 138961 - 138961

Published: April 24, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

274

Iron-modified biochar and water management regime-induced changes in plant growth, enzyme activities, and phytoavailability of arsenic, cadmium and lead in a paddy soil DOI

Ergang Wen,

Xing Yang, Hanbo Chen

et al.

Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 407, P. 124344 - 124344

Published: Oct. 22, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

237

A review of green remediation strategies for heavy metal contaminated soil DOI Creative Commons
Liuwei Wang,

Jörg Rinklebe,

Filip Tack

et al.

Soil Use and Management, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 37(4), P. 936 - 963

Published: March 8, 2021

Abstract Heavy metals and metalloids can accumulate in soil, with potentially toxic effects to human health ecosystems, threatening the sustainable use management of soil resources. Although a number remediation technologies, such as Solidification/Stabilization (S/S), washing, electrokinetic chemical oxidation/reduction be applied for immobilization, removal or detoxification heavy environmental, social economic impacts associated these conventional approaches hinder their overall sustainability. More attempts have been made maximize ‘net environmental benefit’ various ways, including recovering resources, embracing nature‐based solutions (NBS), saving energy emergence development ‘green remediation’ (GSR) movement. This review critically discusses green strategies, novel amendments being utilized approaches. Iron‐based are most promising candidates due highest stabilization performances both oxyanions metallic cations well relatively low disturbance soil. In comparison, waste‐derived materials suffer from risks contaminant release long run, reducing sustainability despite costs. It has found that phytoremediation amendment‐based S/S typically ‘greenest’ but wise decisions should on basis case‐specific assessment results. Finally, it is proposed integration several techniques may synergistic effect efficiency.

Language: Английский

Citations

208

Effects of different feedstocks-based biochar on soil remediation: A review DOI

Mengyuan Ji,

Xiaoxia Wang, Muhammad Usman

et al.

Environmental Pollution, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 294, P. 118655 - 118655

Published: Dec. 8, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

202