Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe DOI Creative Commons
Francesco Sabatini, William S. Keeton, Marcus Lindner

et al.

Diversity and Distributions, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 26(12), P. 1646 - 1662

Published: Sept. 15, 2020

Abstract Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these particularly scarce it is unclear whether they sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand extant primary representative of the range naturally occurring types, (b) identify types which host enough under strict protection to meet conservation targets (c) highlight areas where restoration needed feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase with maps cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions protected quantify proportion across Europe's gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions locations account underreporting forests, then highlighted could complement Results found substantial bias distribution types. Of 54 assessed, six had no at all, two‐thirds less than 1% was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten more half their strictly Protecting all documented requires expanding area networks by 1,132 km 2 (19,194 when including also predicted forests). Encouragingly, large non‐primary existed inside most thus presenting opportunities. Main conclusion perilous state, as acknowledged EU's “Biodiversity Strategy 2030.” Yet, there considerable opportunities ensuring better restoring structure, composition functioning, least partially. advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly irreplaceable nature ramp up efforts alike.

Language: Английский

Monthly microclimate models in a managed boreal forest landscape DOI Creative Commons
Caroline Greiser, Éric Meineri, Miska Luoto

et al.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 250-251, P. 147 - 158

Published: Dec. 27, 2017

The majority of microclimate studies have been done in topographically complex landscapes to quantify and predict how near-ground temperatures vary as a function terrain properties. However, forests understory can be strongly influenced also by vegetation. We quantified the relative influence vegetation features physiography (topography moisture-related variables) on managed boreal central Sweden. used multivariate regression approach relate temperature 203 loggers over snow-free seasons an area ∼16,000 km2 remotely sensed on-site measured variables forest structure physiography. produced climate grids monthly minimum maximum at 25 m resolution using only mapped predictors. quality predictions models containing predictors (MAP models) were compared with (OS models). Our data suggest that during warm season, where landscape variability is largest, canopy cover basal most important microclimatic drivers for both temperatures, while physiographic (mainly elevation) dominated autumn early winter. MAP able reproduce findings from OS but tended underestimate high overestimate low temperatures. Including drivers, particularly soil moisture, are yet lacking form should improve maps. Because dynamic nature forests, continuous updates parameters needed accurately results management (e.g. stand size, composition) conservation may play key role amplifying or impeding effects climate-forcing factors locally modify impact global warming.

Language: Английский

Citations

116

Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest DOI Creative Commons
David J. Mildrexler, Logan T. Berner, B. E. Law

et al.

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 3

Published: Nov. 5, 2020

Large-diameter trees store disproportionally massive amounts of carbon and are a major driver cycle dynamics in forests worldwide. In the temperate western U.S., proposed changes to Forest Plans would significantly weaken protections for large portion greater than 53 cm (21 inches) diameter (herein referred as "large-diameter trees") across 11.5 million acres (⁓4.7 ha) National lands. This study is among first report how storage forest ecosystems be affected by policy. We examined proportion large-diameter on lands east Cascade Mountains crest Oregon Washington, their contribution overall aboveground (AGC) storage, potential reduction stocks resulting from widespread harvest. analyzed inventory data collected 3,335 plots found that play role accumulated stock these forests. Tree AGC (kg) increases sharply with tree at breast height (DBH; cm) five dominant species. Large accounted 2.0 3.7% all stems (DBH ≥ 1" or 2.54 species; but held 33 46% total stored each Pooled species, 3% 636,520 occurring 42% AGC. A recently large-scale vegetation management project involved harvest trees, mostly grand fir, have removed ~44% released amount dioxide atmosphere. Given urgency keeping additional out atmosphere continuing accumulation protect climate system, it prudent continue protecting stores, also co-benefits habitat biodiversity, resilience drought fire, microclimate buffering under future extremes.

Language: Английский

Citations

91

Maintaining forest cover to enhance temperature buffering under future climate change DOI
Emiel De Lombaerde, Pieter Vangansbeke, Jonathan Lenoir

et al.

The Science of The Total Environment, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 810, P. 151338 - 151338

Published: Nov. 5, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

88

High ecosystem service delivery potential of small woodlands in agricultural landscapes DOI
Alicia Valdés, Jonathan Lenoir, Pieter De Frenne

et al.

Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 57(1), P. 4 - 16

Published: Dec. 1, 2019

Abstract Global forest loss and fragmentation have strongly increased the frequency of patches smaller than a few hectares. Little is known about biodiversity ecosystem service supply potential such small woodlands in comparison to larger forests. As it widely recognized that high levels increase functionality delivery multiple services, small, isolated are expected lower for large forests hosting more species. We collected data on diversity six taxonomic groups covering invertebrates, plants fungi, five services one disservice within 224 distributed across temperate Europe. related their ability simultaneously provide (multiservice potential) at different performance all studied (multidiversity), patch size age, as well habitat availability connectivity landscape, while accounting macroclimate, soil properties structure. Unexpectedly, despite multidiversity, had deliver higher per area similar probably due positive edge effects several services. Biodiversity only affected multiservice low level some individual The importance other drivers by agricultural landscapes also depended varied with considered. Synthesis applications . Large, ancient host can therefore number In contrast, landscapes, especially woodlands, basis. Despite important contribution landscape multifunctionality, not currently considered public policies. There thus an urgent need targeted policy instruments ensure adequate management future conservation order either achieve or maximize specific

Language: Английский

Citations

82

Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe DOI Creative Commons
Francesco Sabatini, William S. Keeton, Marcus Lindner

et al.

Diversity and Distributions, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 26(12), P. 1646 - 1662

Published: Sept. 15, 2020

Abstract Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these particularly scarce it is unclear whether they sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand extant primary representative of the range naturally occurring types, (b) identify types which host enough under strict protection to meet conservation targets (c) highlight areas where restoration needed feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase with maps cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions protected quantify proportion across Europe's gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions locations account underreporting forests, then highlighted could complement Results found substantial bias distribution types. Of 54 assessed, six had no at all, two‐thirds less than 1% was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten more half their strictly Protecting all documented requires expanding area networks by 1,132 km 2 (19,194 when including also predicted forests). Encouragingly, large non‐primary existed inside most thus presenting opportunities. Main conclusion perilous state, as acknowledged EU's “Biodiversity Strategy 2030.” Yet, there considerable opportunities ensuring better restoring structure, composition functioning, least partially. advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly irreplaceable nature ramp up efforts alike.

Language: Английский

Citations

79