This
study
investigates
the
impact
of
news
media
framing
and
institutional
trust
on
attitudes
vaccinated
individuals
toward
unvaccinated
during
COVID-19
pandemic
in
Finland.
Using
a
survey
experiment
with
455
participants,
we
analyze
both
episodic
thematic
frames,
specifically
focusing
vaccination-related
side
effects.
Episodic
framing,
which
includes
individual-specific
narratives,
significantly
reduces
support
for
additional
restrictions
counters
outgroup
perceptions.
In
contrast,
relying
statistics
expert
opinions
does
not
yield
similar
effect.
The
also
emphasizes
moderating
role
trust,
low
intensifying
high
political
negating
influence
framing.
essence,
this
research
provides
insights
into
how
citizens'
levels
shape
related
to
health
risks
non-compliant
groups.
World Medical & Health Policy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 460 - 470
Published: April 17, 2024
Abstract
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
pandemic
ignited
heated
discussions
on
social
media
as
well
in
the
medical,
legal,
and
political
communities,
about
whether
health‐care
providers
should
have
right
to
refuse
see
unvaccinated
patients.
Another
discussed
idea
during
pandemic,
though
it
attracted
less
attention,
was
patients'
learn
vaccination
status
of
their
providers.
In
this
paper,
we
examined
public
attitudes
toward
these
two
rights
using
data
from
a
cross‐sectional
survey
conducted
South
Dakota
summer
2021.
We
utilized
registration‐based
sampling
recruit
participants.
collected
some
most
significant
variables
reported
literature
that
shape
people's
COVID‐19
vaccines.
Specifically,
participants
provided
information
age,
gender,
educational
level,
household
income,
status,
stress
induced
by
partisan
identification.
providers'
were
gauged
with
one
item
each
five‐point
Likert
scale.
analyzed
573
respondents
(
M
age
=
56.6
years,
SD
16.48),
which
showed
older
participants,
those
higher
levels
COVID‐19‐related
stress,
vaccinated
individuals
expressed
support,
while
Republicans
lower
support
for
policies.
Gender,
education,
income
did
not
influence
participants'
attitudes.
Although
findings
might
limited
generalizability
populations
outside
Dakota,
they
offer
valuable
insights
developing
comprehensive
ethical
codes
where
be
at
center
stage
clinician‐patient
relationships
future
responses.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(11), P. e0311962 - e0311962
Published: Nov. 26, 2024
COVID-19
prevention
measures
and
vaccine
policies
have
led
to
substantial
polarization
across
the
world.
I
investigate
whether
how
vaccination
status
identification
affect
sympathy
prejudice
for
vaccinated
unvaccinated
individuals.
Drawing
on
a
preregistered
vignette
survey
experiment
in
large
representative
sample
from
Germany
(n
=
6,100)
December
2021,
show
that
was
greater
among
towards
than
vice
versa.
Furthermore,
find
differences
ratings
are
strongly
subject
identification.
If
individuals
do
not
identify
with
their
status,
there
no
evaluation
of
in-
outgroups.
Stronger
is,
however,
associated
but
vaccinated.
The
results
therefore
stronger
side
increases
one’s
status.
A
recent
publication
defined
lockdown
“revisionism”
as
“the
spread
of
misinformation
on
lockdowns
and
other
public
health
measures.”
We
used
this
to
analyze
the
claim
that
questioning
or
interventions
mandates
amounts
“misinformation”.
suggest
term
‘revisionism’,
like
‘misinformation’
contained
in
its
definition,
were
merely
labels
denigrate
evidence-based
contrary
conclusions
so
avoid
having
critically
appraise
best
evidence
itself.
aim
describe
how,
by
glossing
over
topics
without
fully
engaging
with
available,
assertions
made
do
not
withstand
critical
scrutiny.
that,
ensure
lessons
are
learned
for
future,
we
must
be
willing
engage
rigorous
open
debate
–
calling
reasonable
scrutiny
‘misinformation’,
‘disinformation’,
‘revisionism’
is
supportive
goal.
Finally,
a
main
lesson
from
COVID-19
pandemic
have
an
increased
focus
so-called
but
rather
re-discover
emergency
management
process
making
decisions
multidisciplinary
representation,
transparency,
cost-benefit
analyses
courses
using
protects
against
censorship
groupthink.
This
study
investigates
the
impact
of
news
media
framing
and
institutional
trust
on
attitudes
vaccinated
individuals
toward
unvaccinated
during
COVID-19
pandemic
in
Finland.
Using
a
survey
experiment
with
455
participants,
we
analyze
both
episodic
thematic
frames,
specifically
focusing
vaccination-related
side
effects.
Episodic
framing,
which
includes
individual-specific
narratives,
significantly
reduces
support
for
additional
restrictions
counters
outgroup
perceptions.
In
contrast,
relying
statistics
expert
opinions
does
not
yield
similar
effect.
The
also
emphasizes
moderating
role
trust,
low
intensifying
high
political
negating
influence
framing.
essence,
this
research
provides
insights
into
how
citizens'
levels
shape
related
to
health
risks
non-compliant
groups.
