Higher Learning Research Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(2)
Published: Nov. 12, 2024
Objective:
The
purpose
of
the
study
was
to
clarify,
through
lenses
experts
and
frontline
publishers,
ethical
dilemmas
related
use
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
in
research
writing.
Method:
We
conducted
a
rapid
review
expert
opinions
publishers’
policy
statements
on
considerations
using
AI
for
included
articles
published
journals
indexed
by
academic
databases
that
met
criteria.
also
guidelines
seven
reputable
publishers.
Result:
scientific
writing
is
acceptable,
contingent
addressing
bordering
plagiarism,
transparency,
disclosure.
While
should
not
be
listed
as
an
author
or
co-author
its
own,
development
work
deserves
acknowledgment.
Authors
must
substantially
rephrase
AI-generated
content
their
own
words,
properly
citing
sources
avoid
claims
plagiarism.
Transparency
regarding
usage
oversight
drafts
are
necessary,
there
risks
inaccuracy
bias
if
supervised
human
experts.
Conclusion:
can
deployed
support
writing,
provided
users
carefully
abide
standards
uphold
integrity.
Implications:
findings
offer
valuable
guidance
researchers,
students,
emerging
publishers
how
AI’s
capabilities
ethically
responsibly
leveraged
By
establishing
clear
principles,
equips
these
stakeholders
with
means
incorporate
judiciously
into
knowledge
production
practices.
Forum for Linguistic Studies,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
7(1)
Published: Jan. 13, 2025
In
this
study,
the
authors
take
presented
pedagogical
approach,
Digital
Narratives
in
Translation
Training
(DNTT),
as
starting
point
to
promote
innovative
thinking
translation
education.
Specifically,
it
evaluates
framework’s
impact
on
three
dimensions
of
cognitive
creativity:
associative
reasoning,
visual
structuring,
and
ideational
fluency.
present
a
quasi-experimental
research
design
was
employed,
participants
were
63,
divided
into
two
experimental
control
groups
assess
integrating
digital
storytelling
training.
The
results
have
revealed
relatively
significant
improvement,
particularly
conceptual
fluency
that
has
dramatically
enhanced
generation
multiple
novel
ideas.
This
means
performance
reasoning
moderately
improved
support
creative
ideas
connected
tasks.
Visual
however,
only
needed
moderate
advance,
indicating
specific
problems
transferring
spatial
factors
processes
interpretation.
quantitative
data
graphical
illustrations
serve
evidence
those
outcomes
underscore
value
DNTT
framework
for
developing
mental
skills.
All
these
show
integration
use
stories
is
strategic
factor
training
translators.
study
encourages
higher
learning
institutions
embrace
progressive,
creativity-based
strategies
alongside
mainstream
train
students
attempts
contribute
reducing
creativity
gaps
enhance
field's
educational
model.
This
work
sheds
light
on
whether
and
how
creative
writers'
needs
are
met
by
existing
research
commercial
writing
support
tools
(WST).
We
conducted
a
need
finding
study
to
gain
insight
into
the
process
during
through
qualitative
analysis
of
response
from
an
online
questionnaire
Reddit
discussions
r/Writing.
Using
systematic
115
67
papers,
we
map
out
landscape
digital
facilitate
process.
Our
triangulation
data
reveals
that
predominantly
focuses
activity
overlooks
pre-writing
activities
importance
visualization.
distill
10
key
takeaways
inform
future
WST
point
opportunities
surrounding
underexplored
areas.
offers
holistic
up-to-date
account
have
transformed
process,
guiding
design
address
evolving
unmet
needs.
