Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
99(3), P. 820 - 836
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
As
we
enter
the
UN
Decade
on
Ecosystem
Restoration
(2021-2030)
and
address
urgent
need
to
protect
restore
ecosystems
their
ecological
functions
at
large
scales,
rewilding
has
been
brought
into
limelight.
Interest
in
this
discipline
is
thus
increasing,
with
a
number
of
conceptual
scientific
papers
published
recent
years.
Increasing
enthusiasm
led
discussions
debates
community
about
differences
between
restoration
rewilding.
The
main
goal
review
compare
clarify
position
each
field.
Our
results
show
that
despite
some
(e.g.
top-down
versus
bottom-up
functional
taxonomic
approaches)
notably
distinct
goals
-
recovery
defined
historically
determined
target
ecosystem
natural
processes
often
no
endpoint
have
common
scope:
following
anthropogenic
degradation.
expanded
progress
However,
it
unclear
whether
there
paradigm
shift
moving
towards
or
vice
versa.
We
underline
complementarity
time
space
To
conclude,
argue
reconciliation
these
two
fields
nature
conservation
ensure
could
create
synergy
achieve
scope.
Environmental Values,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
27(4), P. 331 - 350
Published: July 8, 2018
In
this
paper,
I
(1)
offer
a
general
introduction
of
rewilding
and
(2)
situate
the
concept
in
environmental
philosophy.
first
part
work
from
definitions
typologies
that
have
been
put
forth
academic
literature.
To
these,
add
secondary
notions
outside
scientific
literature
are
pertinent
to
meanings
motivations
beyond
its
use
context.
defend
continued
as
single
term,
despite
seemingly
disparate
usages,
advance
clustered
eight
overlapping
characteristics
way
conceptualise
these.
argue
breadth
helps
understanding
wider
interest
an
emerging
phenomenon.
paper's
second
part,
turn
three
key
issues
philosophy
order
connect
with
historic
themes
of:
exclusion
humans
wild
or
wilderness
places,
ontological
purity
areas
through
their
non-human
origins
history,
(3)
cultural
landscapes
place.
suggest
carries
on
some
main
debate,
but
considering
broadly
allows
tensions
novel
questions
manifest
important
how
should
be
discussed
understood
going
forward.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
375(1794), P. 20190122 - 20190122
Published: Jan. 27, 2020
Natural
climate
solutions
(NCS)
in
the
Arctic
hold
potential
to
be
implemented
at
a
scale
able
substantially
affect
global
climate.
The
strong
feedbacks
between
carbon-rich
permafrost,
and
herbivory
suggest
an
NCS
consisting
of
reverting
current
wet/moist
moss
shrub-dominated
tundra
sparse
forest–tundra
ecotone
grassland
through
guild
large
herbivores.
Grassland-dominated
systems
might
delay
permafrost
thaw
reduce
carbon
emissions—especially
Yedoma
regions,
while
increasing
capture
increased
productivity
grass
forb
deep
root
systems.
Here
we
review
environmental
context
megafaunal
ecological
engineering
Arctic;
explore
mechanisms
which
it
can
help
mitigate
change;
estimate
its
potential—based
on
bison
horse,
with
aim
evaluating
feasibility
generating
ecosystem
shift
that
is
economically
viable
terms
benefits
sufficient
play
significant
role
change
mitigation.
Assuming
megafaunal-driven
find
support
for
megafauna-based
arctic
yielding
substantial
income
markets.
However,
scaling
up
such
projects
have
effect
challenging
given
number
animals
required
over
short
period
time.
A
first-cut
business
plan
presented
based
practical
information—costs
infrastructure—from
Pleistocene
Park
(northeastern
Yakutia,
Russia).
10
yr
experimental
phase
incorporating
three
separate
introductions
herds
approximately
1000
individuals
each
costed
US$114
million,
returns
0.3–0.4%
−1
towards
end
period,
greater
than
1%
after
it.
Institutional
friction
new
technologies
reintroductions
are
discussed.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Climate
ecosystems:
threats,
opportunities
solutions'.
Ecological Applications,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
33(3)
Published: Jan. 25, 2023
Trophic
rewilding
aims
to
promote
biodiverse
self-sustaining
ecosystems
through
the
restoration
of
ecologically
important
taxa
and
trophic
interactions
cascades
they
propagate.
How
effects
manifest
across
broad
temporal
scales
will
determine
ecosystem
states;
however,
our
understanding
post-rewilding
dynamics
longer
time
periods
is
limited.
Here
we
show
that
a
megaherbivore,
African
savannah
elephant
(Loxodonta
africana),
promotes
landscape
openness
(i.e.,
various
measures
vegetation
composition/complexity)
modifies
fauna
habitat
these
continue
up
92
years
after
reintroduction.
We
conducted
space-for-time
floristic
survey
assessment
17
attributes
(e.g.,
diversity
cover,
ground
wood,
tree
hollows)
five
comparable
nature
reserves
in
South
savannah,
where
elephants
were
reintroduced
between
1927
2003,
finding
reintroduction
was
positively
correlated
with
some
large-sized
but
negatively
associated
others
coarse
woody
debris).
then
indexed
site
occurrence
2006
2018
using
telemetry
data
found
positive
associations
plant
densities.
Taken
alongside
longer-term
survey,
this
suggests
are
attracted
dense
short
term
behavior
increases
long
term.
Our
results
suggest
helps
semi-open
structure
high
importance
for
biodiversity.
More
generally,
megafauna
represents
promising
tool
curb
Earth's
recent
ecological
losses
highlights
considering
long-term
responses
when
designing
managing
projects.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
99(3), P. 820 - 836
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
As
we
enter
the
UN
Decade
on
Ecosystem
Restoration
(2021-2030)
and
address
urgent
need
to
protect
restore
ecosystems
their
ecological
functions
at
large
scales,
rewilding
has
been
brought
into
limelight.
Interest
in
this
discipline
is
thus
increasing,
with
a
number
of
conceptual
scientific
papers
published
recent
years.
Increasing
enthusiasm
led
discussions
debates
community
about
differences
between
restoration
rewilding.
The
main
goal
review
compare
clarify
position
each
field.
Our
results
show
that
despite
some
(e.g.
top-down
versus
bottom-up
functional
taxonomic
approaches)
notably
distinct
goals
-
recovery
defined
historically
determined
target
ecosystem
natural
processes
often
no
endpoint
have
common
scope:
following
anthropogenic
degradation.
expanded
progress
However,
it
unclear
whether
there
paradigm
shift
moving
towards
or
vice
versa.
We
underline
complementarity
time
space
To
conclude,
argue
reconciliation
these
two
fields
nature
conservation
ensure
could
create
synergy
achieve
scope.