Smoking and vaping alter genes related to mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and severity
Rachel Bowsher,
No information about this author
Timothy H. Marczylo,
No information about this author
Karen E. Gooch
No information about this author
et al.
European Respiratory Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
64(1), P. 2400133 - 2400133
Published: July 1, 2024
Background
Evidence
for
the
impact
of
smoking
on
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
is
contradictory,
and
there
little
research
vaping.
Here
we
provide
greater
clarity
mechanisms
perturbed
by
tobacco
cigarette,
electronic
cigarette
nicotine
exposures
that
may
risks
infection
and/or
severity.
Methods
Following
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-Analyses
(PRISMA)
guidelines,
Ovid
Web
Science
databases
were
searched.
Study
design
exposure-induced
gene
expression
changes
extracted.
Each
study
was
quality
assessed
higher
confidence
scores
assigned
to
genes
consistently
changed
across
multiple
studies
following
same
exposure.
These
used
explore
pathways
significantly
altered
Results
125
provided
data
480
exposure
cigarettes,
e-cigarettes,
or
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
2
(SARS-CoV-2).
Genes
involved
in
both
SARS-CoV-2
viral-entry
inflammation
Pathway
analysis
revealed
many
those
with
high
are
common
cellular
processes
relating
hyperinflammatory
immune
responses.
Conclusion
Exposure
e-cigarettes
therefore
initial
host–pathogen
interactions
Smokers
vapers
could
potentially
be
at
increased
risk
infection,
associated
cytokine
storm,
distress
syndrome.
However,
further
required,
particularly
determine
biological
perturbation
subsequent
responses
within
tract.
This
will
improve
our
physiological
understanding
vaping
COVID-19,
informing
public
health
advice
providing
improved
guidance
management
other
viruses.
Language: Английский
E-cigarettes are not associated with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome among US adults
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Jan. 22, 2025
Language: Английский
Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic (“So Much Contradictory Evidence”): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums
Shannon Lea Watkins,
No information about this author
Katherine Snodgrass,
No information about this author
Lexi Fahrion
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
27, P. e66010 - e66010
Published: March 20, 2025
Background
Understanding
how
social
media
platforms
facilitate
information
exchange
and
influence
behavior
during
health
crises
can
enhance
public
responses
times
of
uncertainty.
While
some
risk
factors
for
COVID-19
susceptibility
severity
(eg,
old
age)
were
clear,
whether
e-cigarette
use
increased
was
not
clear.
People
who
used
e-cigarettes
had
to
navigate
both
the
infodemic
a
conflicting,
politicized,
changing
environment
about
interaction
between
use.
Objective
This
study
aims
characterize
contextualize
e-cigarette–related
changes
early
pandemic
illuminate
role
that
played
in
decision-making.
Methods
We
conducted
qualitative
analysis
COVID-19–related
discussions
on
3
Reddit
forums
e-cigarettes.
collected
189
relevant
discussion
threads
made
first
6
months
(collected
from
June
27,
2020,
July
3,
2020).
Threads
included
3155
total
comments
(mean
17
comments)
approximately
1200
unique
Redditors.
developed
applied
emergent
codes
related
perceptions
behaviors
nicotine
do-it-yourself
narratives)
web-based
community
interactions
advice),
identified
thematic
patterns
across
codes,
model
synthesize
socioecological
context
behaviors.
Results
e-Cigarette
subreddits
provided
platform
Redditors
discuss
experiences
with
e-cigarettes,
make
sense
information,
provide
emotional
support.
Discussions
reflected
an
array
behavioral
responses,
including
increases
decreases
intensity,
purchasing
practices
stockpiling),
vaping
reusing
disposable
pods).
presented
theoretically
empirically
informed
circumstances
created
by
activity
space
product
shortages)
compelled
changes.
drew
their
existing
perceptions,
intentions,
tobacco
products;
personal
experiences;
participation
decide
change
pandemic.
Forums
uncertainty,
stress,
debate
rapidly
evolving
complicated
information.
Consumption
news
articles
peer-reviewed
publications)
Decisions
distrust
media.
Conclusions
Variations
individual
traits
environmental
why
there
no
unified
direction
this
period.
Information
also
decisions
Social
is
effective
important
place
communicate
particularly
crisis
or
disaster
situations.
Moving
forward,
transparent,
accurate,
specific
message
development
should
consider
struggles,
stigma
people
address
roles
mistrust
misinformation
play
decisions.
Language: Английский
Challenges in current inhalable tobacco toxicity assessment models: A narrative review
Tobacco Induced Diseases,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
22(June), P. 1 - 17
Published: June 10, 2024
1.
Glasser
AM,
Collins
L,
Pearson
JL,
et
al.
Overview
of
electronic
nicotine
delivery
systems:
a
systematic
review.
Am
J
Prev
Med.
2017;52(2):e33-e66.
doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036
CrossRef
Google
Scholar
Language: Английский
Dual tobacco smoking, electronic cigarette use and COVID-19 outcomes
European Journal of Internal Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
128, P. 156 - 157
Published: May 28, 2024
Language: Английский
A cross-sectional study on the perceived risk of COVID-19 and its association with the usage patterns of e-cigarettes among adolescents and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria
Deleted Journal,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: Oct. 28, 2024
Language: Английский
Impacto de los nuevos dispositivos de suministro de nicotina en las tendencias de consumo y en la salud
Jane Kelli Jacinto da Costa,
No information about this author
E Otero,
No information about this author
Vanesa Hidalgo Sierra
No information about this author
et al.
Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
51(5), P. 102413 - 102413
Published: Dec. 18, 2024
Language: Английский
Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic (“So Much Contradictory Evidence”): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums (Preprint)
Shannon Lea Watkins,
No information about this author
Katherine Snodgrass,
No information about this author
Lexi Fahrion
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
BACKGROUND
Understanding
how
social
media
platforms
facilitate
information
exchange
and
influence
behavior
during
health
crises
can
enhance
public
responses
times
of
uncertainty.
While
some
risk
factors
for
COVID-19
susceptibility
severity
(eg,
old
age)
were
clear,
whether
e-cigarette
use
increased
was
not
clear.
People
who
used
e-cigarettes
had
to
navigate
both
the
infodemic
a
conflicting,
politicized,
changing
environment
about
interaction
between
use.
OBJECTIVE
This
study
aims
characterize
contextualize
e-cigarette–related
changes
early
pandemic
illuminate
role
that
played
in
decision-making.
METHODS
We
conducted
qualitative
analysis
COVID-19–related
discussions
on
3
Reddit
forums
e-cigarettes.
collected
189
relevant
discussion
threads
made
first
6
months
(collected
from
June
27,
2020,
July
3,
2020).
Threads
included
3155
total
comments
(mean
17
comments)
approximately
1200
unique
Redditors.
developed
applied
emergent
codes
related
perceptions
behaviors
nicotine
do-it-yourself
narratives)
web-based
community
interactions
advice),
identified
thematic
patterns
across
codes,
model
synthesize
socioecological
context
behaviors.
RESULTS
e-Cigarette
subreddits
provided
platform
Redditors
discuss
experiences
with
e-cigarettes,
make
sense
information,
provide
emotional
support.
Discussions
reflected
an
array
behavioral
responses,
including
increases
decreases
intensity,
purchasing
practices
stockpiling),
vaping
reusing
disposable
pods).
presented
theoretically
empirically
informed
circumstances
created
by
activity
space
product
shortages)
compelled
changes.
drew
their
existing
perceptions,
intentions,
tobacco
products;
personal
experiences;
participation
decide
change
pandemic.
Forums
uncertainty,
stress,
debate
rapidly
evolving
complicated
information.
Consumption
news
articles
peer-reviewed
publications)
Decisions
distrust
media.
CONCLUSIONS
Variations
individual
traits
environmental
why
there
no
unified
direction
this
period.
Information
also
decisions
Social
is
effective
important
place
communicate
particularly
crisis
or
disaster
situations.
Moving
forward,
transparent,
accurate,
specific
message
development
should
consider
struggles,
stigma
people
address
roles
mistrust
misinformation
play
decisions.
Language: Английский
Endocytosis inhibitors block SARS-CoV-2 pseudoparticle infection of mink lung epithelium
Ann Song,
No information about this author
Rattapol Phandthong,
No information about this author
Prue Talbot
No information about this author
et al.
Frontiers in Microbiology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: Nov. 14, 2023
Introduction
Both
spill
over
and
back
of
SARS-CoV-2
virus
have
been
reported
on
mink
farms
in
Europe
the
United
States.
Zoonosis
is
a
public
health
concern
as
dangerous
mutated
forms
could
be
introduced
into
human
population
through
spillback.
Methods
The
purpose
our
study
was
to
determine
entry
mechanism
using
lung
epithelial
cell
line
(Mv1Lu)
block
with
drug
inhibitors.
Results
Mv1Lu
cells
were
susceptible
viral
pseudoparticle
infection,
validating
them
suitable
disease
model
for
COVID-19.
Inhibitors
TMPRSS2
endocytosis,
two
pathways
entry,
tested
identify
those
that
blocked
infection.
inhibitors
had
minimal
impact,
which
can
explained
by
apparent
lack
activity
this
enzyme
its
localization
within
cell,
not
surface.
Discussion
Dyngo4a,
small
molecule
endocytosis
inhibitor,
significantly
reduced
supporting
conclusion
occurs
primarily
endocytosis.
effective
potentially
used
therapeutically
prevent
infection
populations.
This
will
facilitate
development
therapeutics
zoonotic
transmission
variants
other
animals,
including
humans.
Language: Английский