The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
20(9), P. 1108 - 1117
Published: Jan. 1, 2019
Aim:
To
evaluate
the
role
of
socket-shield
technique
for
ridge
preservation
in
immediate
implant
placement
sites.Background:
The
seems
to
be
beneficial
despite
its
insufficient
documentation.In
this
case
report
series,
implants
were
placed
immediately
after
extracting
a
hopeless
teeth
using
and
then
followed
up
1
year
document
functional
esthetic
outcomes.Cases
description:
Five
patients
presented
with
non-restorable
treated
protocol
placement.Roots
dissected
mesiodistal
direction
along
long
axis
down
apex;
periotome
was
later
used
detach
palatal
fragment
root,
while
keeping
buccal
one.Following
sequential
osteotomy
drilling,
placed.The
gap
between
shield
filled
synthetic
bone
grafting
material.A
customized
healing
abutment
an
S-shaped
emergence
profile
prepared
support
coronal
tooth.Patients
had
follow-up
visits
6
weeks
5
or
months
before
proceeding
prosthetic
reconstruction
phase.Screw-retained
porcelain
fused
metal
crowns
titanium
abutments
inserted
intraorally
35
N
cm
torque
screw-access
holes
restored.
Conclusion:The
is
minimally
invasive
approach
that
can
preserve
hard
soft
tissue
contour
implemented
areas
high
demands
better
outcomes.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
22(5), P. 602 - 611
Published: Aug. 5, 2020
Abstract
Background
Alveolar
bone
resorption
and
labial
plate
reduction
follow
teeth
extraction
due
to
the
deficiency
of
blood
supply,
derived
from
loss
periodontal
ligaments,
hence
socket
shield
technique
was
introduced
preserve
ligaments
related
perfusion.
Purpose
The
study
aimed
compare
vertical
horizontal
changes
buccal
cortical
plates,
encountered
after
utilizing
with
immediate
temporization
vs
an
implant
placement
temporization,
analyzing
differences
stability
pink
esthetic
score
evaluation
between
both
techniques.
Materials
Methods
A
total
40
dental
implants
were
placed
in
maxillary
zone,
20
using
temporization;
group
immediately
control
group.
All
patients
received
6
months
postoperative
CBCT
assess
dimensional
plates.
Implant
quotients
(ISQs)
scores
measured
at
time
postoperatively.
Results
loss;
ranged
0
to0.26
(0.15)
mm
0.03
to0.44
(0.32)
for
groups,
respectively.
0.11
0.55
(0.31)
0.25
1.51
(0.7)
ISQ
increased
68.6
±
3.81
76.7
3.49,
while
it
66.4
5.64
75
4.4.
PES
11
12,
decreased
13
9.
Conclusion
is
a
reliable
method
reduce
following
extraction.
However,
further
studies
are
required
investigate
effect
grafting
jumping
gaps,
evaluate
graft
contribution
loss.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
29(8), P. 2247 - 2254
Published: March 21, 2018
Objective:
In
the
anterior
regions,
resorption
of
buccal
bone
after
tooth
extraction
leads
to
a
contraction
overlying
soft
tissues,
resulting
in
an
esthetic
problem,
particularly
with
immediate
implant
placement.
socket
shield
technique,
root
section
is
maintained,
preserve
for
The
aim
this
prospective
study
was
investigate
survival,
stability,
and
complication
rates
implants
placed
using
“modified”
technique.
Methods:
Over
2-year
period,
all
patients
referred
dental
clinic
treatment
oral
were
considered
inclusion
study.
Inclusion
criteria
healthy
adult
who
presented
nonrestorable
single
teeth
intact
periodontal
tissues
regions
both
jaws.
Exclusion
present/past
disease,
vertical
fractures
on
aspect,
horizontal
below
level,
external/internal
resorptions.
portion
retained
prevent
bone;
1.5
mm
thick
most
coronal
at
crest
level.
All
then
underwent
implants.
patient
gap
between
shield,
no
graft
material
placed.
immediately
restored
crowns
followed
1
year.
main
outcomes
complications.
Results:
Thirty
(15
males,
15
females;
mean
age
48.2
±
15.0
years)
enrolled
installed
40
After
year,
functioning,
survival
rate
100%;
excellent
stability
reported
(mean
quotient
placement:
72.9
5.9;
year:
74.6
2.7).
No
biologic
complications
reported,
incidence
prosthetic
low
(2.5%).
Conclusions:
technique
seems
be
successful
procedure
when
combined
placement,
because
fragment
does
not
interfere
osseointegration
may
beneficial
esthetics,
protecting
from
resorption.
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
10(4)
Published: Aug. 21, 2019
Abstract
The
aim
of
the
present
study
was
to
establish
efficacy
socket‐shield
technique
(SST)
for
stabilization
facial
gingival
and
osseous
architecture.
An
electronic
search
including
Cochrane
databases,
EBSCOhost,
Medline/PubMed
Web
Science
performed.
Articles
related
SST
placing
dental
implants
were
included.
abstracts
not
written
in
English
excluded.
initial
literature
resulted
113
articles
questions
raised.
Hand
searching
journals
cross‐referencing
within
selected
1
more
paper.
Finally,
20
full
texts
abstract
article
included
systematic
review:
11
case
reports,
6
series,
human
randomized
control
trial
(RCT),
technical
report
2
animal
RCT.
Recent
modifications
SST,
along
with
long
follow‐up
studies
increased
sample
size,
provided
promising
results.
This
review
still
recommends
that
should
be
used
routine
clinical
practise
until
a
higher
level
evidence
established.
Further
RCT
on
are
required
this
technique.
BMC Oral Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: March 21, 2024
Abstract
Background
The
success
of
implants
in
the
socket
shield
technique
relies
on
stress
experienced
by
root
fragments
within
socket.
Although
there
is
no
consensus
optimal
fragment
thickness,
varying
thicknesses
and
dynamic
implant
placement
induce
various
directions
degrees.
This
study
aimed
to
assess
biomechanical
response
distribution
across
different
procedure.
Methods
vitro
was
conducted
compare
residual
structures
positioned
labial
aspect
maxillary
incisor
during
immediate
standard
dimensions.
procedure
involved
applying
an
insertional
torque
40
Ncm,
analysis
using
finite
element
software.
Results
Utilizing
Numerical
Technique
with
Abaqus
software
for
explicit
dynamics,
von
Mises
principal
strain
were
analyzed
structure
bone
under
nonlinear
contact
conditions
application.
For
Model
A,
a
loading
Ncm
applied
vertically
implant,
along
horizontal
force
20
N
bone.
indicated
maximum
12.68
MPa
thickness
0.5
mm
5.61
bone,
strains
6.82E-03
4.10E-03,
respectively.
In
B,
1.0
mm,
increased
19.70
MPa,
while
rose
9.51
1.03E-02
6.09E-03.
C,
1.5
exhibited
21.58
10.12
1.16E-02
6.10E-03.
Lastly,
D,
2.0
escalated
28.74
11.38
respectively,
1.55E-02
8.31E-03.
Conclusions
As
increases
(ranging
from
2
mm)
procedures
placement,
both
micro-strain
escalate.
However,
employing
range
does
not
lead
any
adverse
generation
fragment.
enhanced
safety,
it
recommended
restrict
diameter
extension
when
considering
sizes
technique.
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
22(3), P. 266 - 266
Published: Jan. 1, 2018
The
extraction
of
a
tooth
leads
to
cascade
events
which
results
in
resorption
the
alveolar
bone
around
socket.
buccal
loss
that
occurs
postextraction
vertical
and
horizontal
loss.
It
requires
complex
hard
soft-tissue
reconstruction
achieve
esthetically
pleasing
such
cases.
In
socket-shield
technique
(SST)
root
is
bisected,
two-third
preserved
socket
so
periodontium
along
with
bundle
remains
intact.
A
classification
SST
proposed
depending
on
position
shield
This
required
as
help
understanding
preparation
design
role
maximizing
usage
best
possible
esthetics
immediate
implant
placement
sites.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
27(5), P. 1220 - 1227
Published: June 15, 2016
Objective:
The
aim
of
the
present
study
was
to
compare
survival,
stability,
and
complications
immediately
loaded
implants
placed
in
postextraction
sockets
healed
sites.
Methods:
Over
a
2-year
period,
all
patients
presenting
with
partial
or
complete
edentulism
maxilla
and/or
mandible
(healed
site
group,
at
least
4
months
healing
after
tooth
extraction)
need
replacement
nonrecoverable
failing
teeth
(postextraction
group)
were
considered
for
inclusion
this
study.
Tapered
featuring
nanostructured
calcium-incorporated
surface
immediately.
prosthetic
restorations
comprised
single
crowns,
fixed
dentures,
full
arches.
Primary
outcomes
implant
complications.
Implant
stability
assessed
placement
each
follow-up
evaluation
(1
week,
3
months,
1
year
placement):
an
insertion
torque
(IT)
<45
N·cm
quotient
(ISQ)
<70
failed
immediate
loading.
A
statistical
analysis
performed.
Results:
Thirty
17
patients,
32
sites
22
patients.
There
no
statistically
significant
differences
ISQ
values
between
2
groups,
assessment.
In
total,
60
(96.8%)
had
IT
≥45
≥70
control:
these
successfully
loaded.
Only
socket
site,
3.2%)
could
not
achieve
over
time:
accordingly,
as
they
be
subjected
One
implants,
posterior
maxilla,
removed,
yielding
overall
1-year
survival
rate
98.4%.
No
reported.
reported
groups
respect
failures
Conclusion:
Immediately
similar
high
Further
long-term
studies
on
larger
samples
are
needed
confirm
results.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
29(2), P. 93 - 101
Published: Feb. 12, 2017
Extraction-socket
resorption
is
considered
a
major
problem
that
can
limit
implantological
rehabilitation
options
and
compromise
the
esthetic
outcome.
Surgical
techniques
to
reduce
remodeling
are
of
restricted
predictability
commonly
require
several
surgical
interventions
grafting.
This
increases
treatment
cost
places
physical
psychological
strain
on
patient.
clinical
case
report
presents
replacement
an
upper
canine
using
socket-shield
technique
(SST)
with
CAD/CAM
guide,
resulting
in
predictable,
high
esthetic,
functional
result.The
SST
alternative
approach
curbing
by
retaining
facial
part
root
during
tooth
extraction.
An
immediately
placed
implant
supports
fragment,
preventing
collapse
buccal
wall.
The
digital
precision
planning
combination
guide
benefits
patients
preserving
their
tissue
architecture
causing
only
insignificant
trauma.
Furthermore,
reduces
number
prosthetic
required
one
each
for
pre-operative
planning,
procedures,
rehabilitation.The
socket
shield
minimally
invasive
offers
clinicians
multiple
benefits.The
represents
intervene
processes
maintenance
immediate
placement
fragment
thereby
prevents
associated
fabricated
amount
appointments,
due
fabrication
definitive
restoration
existing
model.
Therefore,
no
further
necessary
appointments
apart
from
first
second
treatment,
third
rehabilitation.
(J
Esthet
Restor
Dent
29:93-101,
2017).
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
33(1), P. e19 - e23
Published: Jan. 1, 2018
The
socket-shield
technique
described
7
years
ago
has
since
grown
in
its
reporting
the
literature
as
a
valid
method
of
ridge
preservation
at
immediate
implant
placement.
To
date,
large
clinical
cohorts
with
up-to-4-year
follow-up
have
been
reported.
Additionally,
evidence
tissue
histology
dental
and
demonstrated
animal
model.
However,
human
histologic
not
yet
available,
clinician's
uncertainty
regarding
tissues
that
may
form
between
remain
unanswered
until
now.
This
case
report
presents
first
bone
entirely
fill
space
root
dentin
an
osseointegrated
surface.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
23(3), P. 456 - 465
Published: May 24, 2021
Abstract
Objective
Compare
the
dimensional
changes
of
peri‐implant
soft
and
hard
tissues
clinically
radiographically
around
single
immediate
implants
in
esthetic
zone
with
socket
shield
technique
versus
filling
buccal
gap
xenograft.
Materials
methods
Forty‐two
patients
a
non‐restorable
tooth
replaced
an
implant
were
randomly
assigned
either
to
(test)
or
grafting
xenograft
(control).
The
vertical
horizontal
bone
resorption
measured
6‐months
following
placement.
outcomes
evaluated
by
assessing
Pink
Esthetic
Score
(PES)
amount
midfacial
mucosal
alteration,
addition
patient
satisfaction
assessment
through
Visual
Analogue
Scale
(VAS)
based
questionnaire
1‐year
restoration.
Results
present
study
showed
that
group
yielded
significantly
less
0.35
(±0.62)
mm
0.29
(±0.34)
compared
1.71
(±1.02)
1.45
(±0.72)
respectively.
Also,
there
was
greater
recession
0.466
(±0.58)
coronal
migration
0.45
(±0.75)
group.
However,
no
statistically
significant
difference
regarding
total
PES
both
treatment
groups.
Conclusion
can
preserve
(
ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier:
NCT03684356).
International Journal of Implant Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: Sept. 6, 2020
Dental
implants
have
become
a
standard
treatment
in
the
replacement
of
missing
teeth.
After
tooth
extraction
and
implant
placement,
resorption
buccal
bundle
bone
can
pose
significant
complication
with
often
very
negative
cosmetic
impacts.
Studies
shown
that
if
dental
root
remains
alveolar
process,
is
minimal.
However,
to
date,
deliberate
retention
roots
preserve
has
not
been
routinely
used
implantology.This
study
aims
collect
evaluate
present
knowledge
regard
socket-shield
technique
as
described
by
Hurzeler
et
al.
(J
Clin
Periodontol
37(9):855-62,
2010).
A
PubMed
database
search
(
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
)
was
conducted
identify
relevant
publication.The
initial
returned
229
results.
screening
abstracts,
13
articles
were
downloaded
further
scrutinised.
Twelve
studies
found
meet
inclusion
exclusion
criteria.Whilst
potentially
offers
promising
outcomes,
reducing
need
for
invasive
grafts
around
aesthetic
zone,
clinical
data
support
this
limited.
The
limited
available
compromised
lack
well-designed
prospective
randomised
controlled
studies.
existing
case
reports
are
scientific
value.
Retrospective
exist
numbers
but
inconsistent
design.
At
stage,
it
unclear
whether
will
provide
stable
long-time
outcome.