Socket-shield Technique and Immediate Implant Placement for Ridge Preservation: Case Report Series with 1-year Follow-up DOI Open Access

Rola Al Habashneh,

Maher Abdullatif Walid,

Tahani Abualteen

et al.

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 20(9), P. 1108 - 1117

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Aim: To evaluate the role of socket-shield technique for ridge preservation in immediate implant placement sites.Background: The seems to be beneficial despite its insufficient documentation.In this case report series, implants were placed immediately after extracting a hopeless teeth using and then followed up 1 year document functional esthetic outcomes.Cases description: Five patients presented with non-restorable treated protocol placement.Roots dissected mesiodistal direction along long axis down apex; periotome was later used detach palatal fragment root, while keeping buccal one.Following sequential osteotomy drilling, placed.The gap between shield filled synthetic bone grafting material.A customized healing abutment an S-shaped emergence profile prepared support coronal tooth.Patients had follow-up visits 6 weeks 5 or months before proceeding prosthetic reconstruction phase.Screw-retained porcelain fused metal crowns titanium abutments inserted intraorally 35 N cm torque screw-access holes restored. Conclusion:The is minimally invasive approach that can preserve hard soft tissue contour implemented areas high demands better outcomes.

Language: Английский

Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial DOI
Ahmed Reda Abdelrahman, Mostafa Shaheen,

Niveen Askar

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 22(5), P. 602 - 611

Published: Aug. 5, 2020

Abstract Background Alveolar bone resorption and labial plate reduction follow teeth extraction due to the deficiency of blood supply, derived from loss periodontal ligaments, hence socket shield technique was introduced preserve ligaments related perfusion. Purpose The study aimed compare vertical horizontal changes buccal cortical plates, encountered after utilizing with immediate temporization vs an implant placement temporization, analyzing differences stability pink esthetic score evaluation between both techniques. Materials Methods A total 40 dental implants were placed in maxillary zone, 20 using temporization; group immediately control group. All patients received 6 months postoperative CBCT assess dimensional plates. Implant quotients (ISQs) scores measured at time postoperatively. Results loss; ranged 0 to0.26 (0.15) mm 0.03 to0.44 (0.32) for groups, respectively. 0.11 0.55 (0.31) 0.25 1.51 (0.7) ISQ increased 68.6 ± 3.81 76.7 3.49, while it 66.4 5.64 75 4.4. PES 11 12, decreased 13 9. Conclusion is a reliable method reduce following extraction. However, further studies are required investigate effect grafting jumping gaps, evaluate graft contribution loss.

Language: Английский

Citations

58

The Modified Socket Shield Technique DOI

Chang-Hun Han,

Kwang-Bum Park,

Francesco Mangano

et al.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 29(8), P. 2247 - 2254

Published: March 21, 2018

Objective: In the anterior regions, resorption of buccal bone after tooth extraction leads to a contraction overlying soft tissues, resulting in an esthetic problem, particularly with immediate implant placement. socket shield technique, root section is maintained, preserve for The aim this prospective study was investigate survival, stability, and complication rates implants placed using “modified” technique. Methods: Over 2-year period, all patients referred dental clinic treatment oral were considered inclusion study. Inclusion criteria healthy adult who presented nonrestorable single teeth intact periodontal tissues regions both jaws. Exclusion present/past disease, vertical fractures on aspect, horizontal below level, external/internal resorptions. portion retained prevent bone; 1.5 mm thick most coronal at crest level. All then underwent implants. patient gap between shield, no graft material placed. immediately restored crowns followed 1 year. main outcomes complications. Results: Thirty (15 males, 15 females; mean age 48.2 ± 15.0 years) enrolled installed 40 After year, functioning, survival rate 100%; excellent stability reported (mean quotient placement: 72.9 5.9; year: 74.6 2.7). No biologic complications reported, incidence prosthetic low (2.5%). Conclusions: technique seems be successful procedure when combined placement, because fragment does not interfere osseointegration may beneficial esthetics, protecting from resorption.

Language: Английский

Citations

49

Socket‐shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review DOI
Akanksha Mourya, Sunil Kumar Mishra, Reetika Gaddale

et al.

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 10(4)

Published: Aug. 21, 2019

Abstract The aim of the present study was to establish efficacy socket‐shield technique (SST) for stabilization facial gingival and osseous architecture. An electronic search including Cochrane databases, EBSCOhost, Medline/PubMed Web Science performed. Articles related SST placing dental implants were included. abstracts not written in English excluded. initial literature resulted 113 articles questions raised. Hand searching journals cross‐referencing within selected 1 more paper. Finally, 20 full texts abstract article included systematic review: 11 case reports, 6 series, human randomized control trial (RCT), technical report 2 animal RCT. Recent modifications SST, along with long follow‐up studies increased sample size, provided promising results. This review still recommends that should be used routine clinical practise until a higher level evidence established. Further RCT on are required this technique.

Language: Английский

Citations

43

Finite element analysis of stress distribution on residual root structure in socket shield procedure following immediate dental implant placement: an in vitro study DOI Creative Commons

Aniket Shinde,

Venu Madhav,

Ravinder Saini

et al.

BMC Oral Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: March 21, 2024

Abstract Background The success of implants in the socket shield technique relies on stress experienced by root fragments within socket. Although there is no consensus optimal fragment thickness, varying thicknesses and dynamic implant placement induce various directions degrees. This study aimed to assess biomechanical response distribution across different procedure. Methods vitro was conducted compare residual structures positioned labial aspect maxillary incisor during immediate standard dimensions. procedure involved applying an insertional torque 40 Ncm, analysis using finite element software. Results Utilizing Numerical Technique with Abaqus software for explicit dynamics, von Mises principal strain were analyzed structure bone under nonlinear contact conditions application. For Model A, a loading Ncm applied vertically implant, along horizontal force 20 N bone. indicated maximum 12.68 MPa thickness 0.5 mm 5.61 bone, strains 6.82E-03 4.10E-03, respectively. In B, 1.0 mm, increased 19.70 MPa, while rose 9.51 1.03E-02 6.09E-03. C, 1.5 exhibited 21.58 10.12 1.16E-02 6.10E-03. Lastly, D, 2.0 escalated 28.74 11.38 respectively, 1.55E-02 8.31E-03. Conclusions As increases (ranging from 2 mm) procedures placement, both micro-strain escalate. However, employing range does not lead any adverse generation fragment. enhanced safety, it recommended restrict diameter extension when considering sizes technique.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Shield the socket: Procedure, case report and classification DOI Creative Commons
PayalRajender Kumar, Udatta Kher

Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 22(3), P. 266 - 266

Published: Jan. 1, 2018

The extraction of a tooth leads to cascade events which results in resorption the alveolar bone around socket. buccal loss that occurs postextraction vertical and horizontal loss. It requires complex hard soft-tissue reconstruction achieve esthetically pleasing such cases. In socket-shield technique (SST) root is bisected, two-third preserved socket so periodontium along with bundle remains intact. A classification SST proposed depending on position shield This required as help understanding preparation design role maximizing usage best possible esthetics immediate implant placement sites.

Language: Английский

Citations

46

Immediate Loading of Tapered Implants Placed in Postextraction Sockets and Healed Sites DOI

Chang-Hun Han,

Francesco Mangano, Carmen Mortellaro

et al.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 27(5), P. 1220 - 1227

Published: June 15, 2016

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare survival, stability, and complications immediately loaded implants placed in postextraction sockets healed sites. Methods: Over a 2-year period, all patients presenting with partial or complete edentulism maxilla and/or mandible (healed site group, at least 4 months healing after tooth extraction) need replacement nonrecoverable failing teeth (postextraction group) were considered for inclusion this study. Tapered featuring nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface immediately. prosthetic restorations comprised single crowns, fixed dentures, full arches. Primary outcomes implant complications. Implant stability assessed placement each follow-up evaluation (1 week, 3 months, 1 year placement): an insertion torque (IT) <45 N·cm quotient (ISQ) <70 failed immediate loading. A statistical analysis performed. Results: Thirty 17 patients, 32 sites 22 patients. There no statistically significant differences ISQ values between 2 groups, assessment. In total, 60 (96.8%) had IT ≥45 ≥70 control: these successfully loaded. Only socket site, 3.2%) could not achieve over time: accordingly, as they be subjected One implants, posterior maxilla, removed, yielding overall 1-year survival rate 98.4%. No reported. reported groups respect failures Conclusion: Immediately similar high Further long-term studies on larger samples are needed confirm results.

Language: Английский

Citations

45

Clinical Benefits of the Immediate Implant Socket Shield Technique DOI

Reza Saeidi Pour,

Otto Zuhr,

Markus B. Hürzeler

et al.

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 29(2), P. 93 - 101

Published: Feb. 12, 2017

Extraction-socket resorption is considered a major problem that can limit implantological rehabilitation options and compromise the esthetic outcome. Surgical techniques to reduce remodeling are of restricted predictability commonly require several surgical interventions grafting. This increases treatment cost places physical psychological strain on patient. clinical case report presents replacement an upper canine using socket-shield technique (SST) with CAD/CAM guide, resulting in predictable, high esthetic, functional result.The SST alternative approach curbing by retaining facial part root during tooth extraction. An immediately placed implant supports fragment, preventing collapse buccal wall. The digital precision planning combination guide benefits patients preserving their tissue architecture causing only insignificant trauma. Furthermore, reduces number prosthetic required one each for pre-operative planning, procedures, rehabilitation.The socket shield minimally invasive offers clinicians multiple benefits.The represents intervene processes maintenance immediate placement fragment thereby prevents associated fabricated amount appointments, due fabrication definitive restoration existing model. Therefore, no further necessary appointments apart from first second treatment, third rehabilitation. (J Esthet Restor Dent 29:93-101, 2017).

Language: Английский

Citations

43

Human Histologic Evidence of New Bone Formation and Osseointegration Between Root Dentin (Unplanned Socket-Shield) and Dental Implant: Case Report DOI

Charles Schwimer,

Gregory A Pette,

Howard Gluckman

et al.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 33(1), P. e19 - e23

Published: Jan. 1, 2018

The socket-shield technique described 7 years ago has since grown in its reporting the literature as a valid method of ridge preservation at immediate implant placement. To date, large clinical cohorts with up-to-4-year follow-up have been reported. Additionally, evidence tissue histology dental and demonstrated animal model. However, human histologic not yet available, clinician's uncertainty regarding tissues that may form between remain unanswered until now. This case report presents first bone entirely fill space root dentin an osseointegrated surface.

Language: Английский

Citations

43

Comparison of the soft and hard peri‐implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial DOI
Mohamed Atef, Ahmed El Barbary,

Mona Salah El‐D Dahrous

et al.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 23(3), P. 456 - 465

Published: May 24, 2021

Abstract Objective Compare the dimensional changes of peri‐implant soft and hard tissues clinically radiographically around single immediate implants in esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus filling buccal gap xenograft. Materials methods Forty‐two patients a non‐restorable tooth replaced an implant were randomly assigned either to (test) or grafting xenograft (control). The vertical horizontal bone resorption measured 6‐months following placement. outcomes evaluated by assessing Pink Esthetic Score (PES) amount midfacial mucosal alteration, addition patient satisfaction assessment through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) based questionnaire 1‐year restoration. Results present study showed that group yielded significantly less 0.35 (±0.62) mm 0.29 (±0.34) compared 1.71 (±1.02) 1.45 (±0.72) respectively. Also, there was greater recession 0.466 (±0.58) coronal migration 0.45 (±0.75) group. However, no statistically significant difference regarding total PES both treatment groups. Conclusion can preserve ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03684356).

Language: Английский

Citations

28

The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review DOI Creative Commons
Christian Blaschke, Donald R. Schwass

International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 6(1)

Published: Sept. 6, 2020

Dental implants have become a standard treatment in the replacement of missing teeth. After tooth extraction and implant placement, resorption buccal bundle bone can pose significant complication with often very negative cosmetic impacts. Studies shown that if dental root remains alveolar process, is minimal. However, to date, deliberate retention roots preserve has not been routinely used implantology.This study aims collect evaluate present knowledge regard socket-shield technique as described by Hurzeler et al. (J Clin Periodontol 37(9):855-62, 2010). A PubMed database search ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed ) was conducted identify relevant publication.The initial returned 229 results. screening abstracts, 13 articles were downloaded further scrutinised. Twelve studies found meet inclusion exclusion criteria.Whilst potentially offers promising outcomes, reducing need for invasive grafts around aesthetic zone, clinical data support this limited. The limited available compromised lack well-designed prospective randomised controlled studies. existing case reports are scientific value. Retrospective exist numbers but inconsistent design. At stage, it unclear whether will provide stable long-time outcome.

Language: Английский

Citations

28