AI-driven education: a comparative study on ChatGPT and Bard in supply chain management contexts DOI Creative Commons
Raghu Raman, Aswathy Sreenivasan,

M. Suresh

et al.

Cogent Business & Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Oct. 18, 2024

This study conducts a comparative analysis of two prominent generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, ChatGPT and Bard, specifically in the context supply chain management. Using dataset 150 certified professional questions, models are evaluated on basis accuracy, relevance, clarity, t tests employed to assess differences between tools. outperforms Bard both accuracy with statistically significant results, whereas demonstrated slight edge readability, scoring higher Flesch readability ease scale. Both exhibited moderate high cosine similarity for majority indicating closely aligned outputs. However, variations their performance arose from underlying architectures – ChatGPT's iterative improvement process balances utility safety, is designed stricter safeguards minimize misuse. These findings have important implications integration GAI tools educational settings, such as developing curricula training materials requiring relevance. Additionally, results suggest broader applications decision-making, operational efficiency improvements, enhanced stakeholder communication. The also highlights importance continuous model adaptation ensure ethical, safe, effective use AI technologies settings. Future research could explore how real-time feedback loops impact diverse datasets influence relevance across different industries, further advancing role complex domains

Language: Английский

U.S. College Students’ Acceptability and Educational Benefits of ChatGPT from a Digital Divide Perspective (CAEAI-D-24-00352R2) DOI Creative Commons
Xinyi Zhang, Laurent H. Wang, Ronald E. Rice

et al.

Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100385 - 100385

Published: March 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Unlocking ChatGPT’s potential: a comparative study of student adoption intentions in higher education across India and Poland DOI
Gaurav Chopra, Preeti Bhaskar, Ajay Purohit

et al.

Education and Information Technologies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Adoption of AI in Construction Design: Insights from UTAUT2 and TOE Frameworks DOI Creative Commons
Ali Katebi,

Mahdi Tehrani

Results in Engineering, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 104981 - 104981

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Integrated Technological Approaches to Academic Success: Mobile Learning, Social Media, and AI in Higher Education DOI Creative Commons
Abeer S. Almogren, Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, Nisar Ahmed Dahri

et al.

IEEE Access, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12, P. 175391 - 175413

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Anxiety among Medical Students Regarding Generative Artificial Intelligence Models: A Pilot Descriptive Study DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam,

Kholoud Al-Mahzoum,

Yousef Almutairi

et al.

International Medical Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 3(4), P. 406 - 425

Published: Oct. 9, 2024

Despite the potential benefits of generative artificial intelligence (genAI), concerns about its psychological impact on medical students, especially job displacement, are apparent. This pilot study, conducted in Jordan during July–August 2024, aimed to examine specific fears, anxieties, mistrust, and ethical students harbor towards genAI. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 164 studying across various academic years, employing structured self-administered questionnaire with an internally consistent FAME scale—representing Fear, Anxiety, Mistrust, Ethics—comprising 12 items, 3 items for each construct. Exploratory confirmatory factors analyses assess construct validity scale. The results indicated variable levels anxiety genAI among participating students: 34.1% reported no genAI‘s role their future careers (n = 56), while 41.5% slightly anxious 61), 22.0% somewhat 36), 2.4% extremely 4). Among constructs, Mistrust was most agreed upon (mean: 12.35 ± 2.78), followed by Ethics 10.86 2.90), Fear 9.49 3.53), Anxiety 8.91 3.68). Their sex, level, Grade Point Average (GPA) did not significantly affect students’ perceptions However, there notable direct association between general elevated scores constructs Prior exposure previous use modify These findings highlight critical need refined educational strategies address integration into training. demonstrate anxiety, fear, regarding deployment healthcare, indicating necessity curriculum modifications that focus specifically these areas. Interventions should be tailored increase familiarity competency genAI, which would alleviate apprehensions equip physicians engage this inevitable technology effectively. study also highlights importance incorporating discussions courses mistrust human-centered aspects In conclusion, calls proactive evolution education prepare new AI-driven healthcare practices ensure well prepared, confident, ethically informed professional interactions technologies.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Towards informed policy decisions: assessing student perceptions and intentions to use ChatGPT for academic performance in higher education DOI
Fiaz Hussain, Muhammad Shahzad Anwar

Journal of Asian Public Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 28

Published: Nov. 4, 2024

Artificial Intelligence holds vast potential in academia, yet concerns arise regarding its usage. This study examines students' perceptions and intentions to use ChatGPT through the signalling elaboration likelihood model, which offers valuable insights into transmission procession of information. Two adoption approaches are considered: peripheral route involves utilization simple cues requiring less cognitive effort, such as credibility, content quality, critical mass, while central requires a person critically evaluate information rooted perceived usefulness technical advantages. Critical reasoning digital efficacy examined moderating variables. Using convenience sampling, data from 694 respondents collected via WeChat www.wjx.cn China. Structural Equation Modeling reveals significant positive impact usefulness, advantages, mass on student for academic performance. The findings inform policymakers educators AI tool integration higher education, stressing importance understanding intentions. ChatGPT's benefits challenges underscore influence performance educational practices. advocates ethical guidelines support systems address concerns, emphasizing proficiency pivotal factors.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Disciplinary differences in undergraduate students' engagement with generative artificial intelligence DOI Creative Commons

Yao Qu,

Michelle Tan,

Jue Wang

et al.

Smart Learning Environments, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Nov. 11, 2024

Abstract The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies has sparked widespread discussions about their potential applications in higher education. However, little is known how students from various disciplines engage with GenAI tools. This study explores undergraduate students' knowledge, usage intentions, and task-specific engagement across academic disciplines. Using a disciplinary categorization framework, we examine the hard/soft pure/applied dimensions relate to interactions GenAI. We surveyed 193 undergraduates diverse at university Singapore. questionnaire assessed for cognitive routine tasks against background. results indicate substantial disparities level Compared pure fields, applied fields (both hard soft) consistently exhibit levels knowledge utilization intentions. Furthermore, relatively consistent disciplines; however, there are tasks, exhibiting engagement. These suggest that practical orientation drives adoption settings. emphasizes considering differences better integrate into education calls tailored approaches align each field's unique epistemological methodological traditions balance GenAI's benefits preservation core skills.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Embracing generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education: a survey study at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology DOI Creative Commons
Alex Jingwei He, Zhuoni Zhang, Pritish Anand

et al.

Journal of Asian Public Policy, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 25

Published: Dec. 28, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful technological innovation that is exerting sweeping influence in the education sector. The rapid diffusion of ChatGPT universities worldwide presents both opportunities and challenges to higher policy administration. This study seeks examine students' behavioural perceptual experiences with use at Hong Kong University Science Technology, which was among first introduce officially protected services. Launched November 2023, university-wide student survey sampled 680 students from campus Guangzhou Mainland China. results indicate significant usage services very high level intention continue use. perceive contribute positively their learning career development. Significant variations were found according gender, study, age group, discipline, country/region origin, terms ChatGPT. These offer useful evidence for curriculum reform improvement AI literacy institutions.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

AI-driven education: a comparative study on ChatGPT and Bard in supply chain management contexts DOI Creative Commons
Raghu Raman, Aswathy Sreenivasan,

M. Suresh

et al.

Cogent Business & Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Oct. 18, 2024

This study conducts a comparative analysis of two prominent generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, ChatGPT and Bard, specifically in the context supply chain management. Using dataset 150 certified professional questions, models are evaluated on basis accuracy, relevance, clarity, t tests employed to assess differences between tools. outperforms Bard both accuracy with statistically significant results, whereas demonstrated slight edge readability, scoring higher Flesch readability ease scale. Both exhibited moderate high cosine similarity for majority indicating closely aligned outputs. However, variations their performance arose from underlying architectures – ChatGPT's iterative improvement process balances utility safety, is designed stricter safeguards minimize misuse. These findings have important implications integration GAI tools educational settings, such as developing curricula training materials requiring relevance. Additionally, results suggest broader applications decision-making, operational efficiency improvements, enhanced stakeholder communication. The also highlights importance continuous model adaptation ensure ethical, safe, effective use AI technologies settings. Future research could explore how real-time feedback loops impact diverse datasets influence relevance across different industries, further advancing role complex domains

Language: Английский

Citations

0