Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1)
Published: Nov. 6, 2024
Abstract
Prior
literature
has
debated
whether
syntax
is
separable
from
semantics
in
the
brain.
Using
functional
magnetic
resonance
imaging
and
multi-voxel
pattern
analysis,
our
previous
studies
investigated
brain
activity
during
morpho-syntactic
versus
semantic
processing.
These
only
detected
specialization
activation
patterns
no
syntactic
5-
to
6-year-old
7-
8-year-old
children.
To
examine
if
older
children
who
have
mastered
skills
would
show
for
syntax,
current
study
examined
64
9-
10-year-old
using
same
design
analyses.
We
observed
that
left
IFG
pars
opercularis
was
sensitive
but
not
information,
supporting
hypothesis
this
region
serves
as
a
core
syntax.
In
addition,
STG
which
been
implicated
integration
of
well
MTG
triangularis
semantics,
were
both
information
with
evidence
specialization.
findings
suggest
lexicalized
view
argues
semantically
regions
are
also
critical
processing
language
comprehension.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: June 22, 2024
Abstract
Human
language
comprehension
is
remarkably
robust
to
ill-formed
inputs
(e.g.,
word
transpositions).
This
robustness
has
led
some
argue
that
syntactic
parsing
largely
an
illusion,
and
incremental
more
heuristic,
shallow,
semantics-based
than
often
assumed.
However,
the
available
data
are
also
consistent
with
possibility
humans
always
perform
rule-like
symbolic
simply
deploy
error
correction
mechanisms
reconstruct
when
needed.
We
put
these
hypotheses
a
new
stringent
test
by
examining
brain
responses
a)
stimuli
should
pose
challenge
for
reconstruction
but
allow
complex
meanings
be
built
within
local
contexts
through
associative/shallow
processing
(sentences
presented
in
backward
order),
b)
grammatically
well-formed
semantically
implausible
sentences
impede
heuristic
processing.
Using
novel
behavioral
paradigm,
we
demonstrate
backward-
indeed
recovery
of
grammatical
structure
during
comprehension.
Critically,
backward-presented
elicit
relatively
low
response
areas,
as
measured
fMRI.
In
contrast,
areas
similar
magnitude
naturalistic
(plausible)
sentences.
other
words,
ability
build
structures
both
necessary
sufficient
fully
engage
network.
Taken
together,
results
provide
strongest
date
support
generalized
reliance
human
on
parsing.
Significance
statement
Whether
relies
predominantly
structural
(syntactic)
cues
or
meaning-
related
(semantic)
remains
debated.
shed
light
this
question
areas’
where
semantic
pitted
against
each
other,
using
find
respond
weakly
composition
cannot
parsed
syntactically—as
confirmed
paradigm—and
they
strongly
sentences,
like
famous
‘Colorless
green
ideas
sleep
furiously’
sentence.
These
findings
accounts
suggest
can
foregone
favor
shallow
Brain and Language,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
264, P. 105549 - 105549
Published: Feb. 20, 2025
Although
there
is
a
sizeable
body
of
literature
on
sentence
comprehension
and
processing
both
in
healthy
disordered
language
users,
the
production
remains
much
more
sparse.
Linguistic
computational
descriptions
expressive
syntactic
deficits
aphasia
are
especially
rare.
In
addition,
neuroimaging
(psycho)
linguistic
literatures
operate
largely
separately.
this
paper,
I
will
first
lay
out
theoretical
land
with
regard
to
psycholinguistic
models
production.
then
provide
brief
narrative
overview
large-scale
meta-analysis
as
it
pertains
computation,
followed
by
an
attempt
integrate
findings
from
functional
clinical
neuroimaging.
Finally,
surrounding
propose
path
forward
close
some
existing
gaps.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 19, 2025
Abstract
The
cerebellum’s
capacity
for
neural
computation
is
arguably
unmatched.
Yet
despite
evidence
of
cerebellar
contributions
to
cognition,
including
language,
its
precise
role
remains
debated.
Here,
we
systematically
evaluate
language-responsive
regions
using
precision
fMRI.
We
identify
four
that
respond
language
across
modalities
(Experiments
1a-b,
n=754).
One
region—spanning
Crus
I/II/lobule
VIIb—is
selective
relative
diverse
non-linguistic
tasks
2a-f,
n=732),
and
the
rest
exhibit
mixed-selective
profiles.
Like
neocortical
system,
language-selective
region
engaged
by
sentence-level
meanings
during
comprehension
production
3a-c,
n=105),
but
it
less
sensitive
than
neocortex
individual
word
grammatical
structure.
Finally,
all
regions,
especially
I/II/VIIb,
are
functionally
connected
system
(Experiment
4,
n=85).
propose
these
constitute
components
extended
network,
with
one
supporting
semantic
processing,
other
three
plausibly
integrating
information
from
regions.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
122(12)
Published: March 17, 2025
What
constitutes
a
language?
Natural
languages
share
features
with
other
domains:
from
math,
to
music,
gesture.
However,
the
brain
mechanisms
that
process
linguistic
input
are
highly
specialized,
showing
little
response
diverse
nonlinguistic
tasks.
Here,
we
examine
constructed
(conlangs)
ask
whether
they
draw
on
same
neural
as
natural
or
instead
pattern
domains
like
math
and
programming
languages.
Using
individual-subject
fMRI
analyses,
show
understanding
conlangs
recruits
areas
language
comprehension.
This
result
holds
for
Esperanto
(n
=
19
speakers)
four
fictional
[Klingon
10),
Na’vi
9),
High
Valyrian
3),
Dothraki
3)].
These
findings
suggest
critical
allow
them
representations
computations,
implemented
in
left-lateralized
network
of
areas.
The
differentiate
languages—including
recent
creation
by
single
individual,
often
an
esoteric
purpose,
small
number
speakers,
fact
these
typically
learned
adulthood—appear
not
be
consequential
reliance
cognitive
mechanisms.
We
argue
shared
feature
is
symbolic
systems
capable
expressing
open-ended
range
meanings
about
our
outer
inner
worlds.
Cognitive Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 19
Published: April 15, 2025
This
paper
asks
what
predictive
processing
models
of
brain
function
can
learn
from
the
success
transformer
architectures.
We
suggest
that
reason
architectures
have
been
successful
is
they
implicitly
commit
to
a
non-Markovian
generative
model
-
in
which
we
need
memory
contextualize
our
current
observations
and
make
predictions
about
future.
Interestingly,
both
notions
working
cognitive
science
rely
heavily
upon
concept
attention.
will
argue
move
beyond
Markov
crucial
construction
capable
dealing
with
much
sequential
data
certainly
language
brains
contend
with.
characterize
two
broad
approaches
this
problem
deep
temporal
hierarchies
autoregressive
transformers
being
an
example
latter.
Our
key
conclusions
are
benefit
their
use
embedding
spaces
place
strong
metric
priors
on
implicit
latent
variable
utilize
direct
form
attention
highlights
most
relevant,
not
only
recent,
previous
elements
sequence
help
predict
next.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 30, 2022
Abstract
Despite
long
knowing
what
brain
areas
support
language
comprehension,
our
knowledge
of
the
neural
computations
that
these
frontal
and
temporal
regions
implement
remains
limited.
One
important
unresolved
question
concerns
functional
differences
among
populations
comprise
network.
Leveraging
high
spatiotemporal
resolution
intracranial
recordings,
we
examined
responses
to
sentences
linguistically
degraded
conditions
discovered
three
response
profiles
differ
in
their
dynamics.
These
appear
reflect
different
receptive
windows
(TRWs),
with
average
TRWs
about
1,
4,
6
words,
as
estimated
a
simple
one-parameter
model.
Neural
exhibiting
are
interleaved
across
network,
which
suggests
all
have
direct
access
distinct,
multi-scale
representations
linguistic
input—a
property
may
be
critical
for
efficiency
robustness
processing.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 3, 2024
Abstract
The
field
of
human
cognitive
neuroscience
is
increasingly
acknowledging
inter-individual
differences
in
the
precise
locations
functional
areas
and
corresponding
need
for
individual-level
analyses
fMRI
studies.
One
approach
to
identifying
networks
within
individual
brains
based
on
robust
extensively
validated
‘localizer’
paradigms—contrasts
conditions
that
aim
isolate
some
mental
process
interest.
Here,
we
present
a
new
version
localizer
fronto-temporal
language-selective
network.
This
similar
commonly-used
reading
sentences
nonword
sequences
(Fedorenko
et
al.,
2010)
but
uses
speeded
presentation
(200ms
per
word/nonword).
Based
direct
comparison
between
standard
(450ms
word/nonword)
versions
language
24
participants,
show
single
run
(3.5
min)
highly
effective
at
areas:
indeed,
it
more
than
given
leads
an
increased
response
critical
(sentence)
condition
decreased
control
(nonwords)
condition.
may
therefore
become
choice
network
neurotypical
adults
or
special
populations
(as
long
as
they
are
proficient
readers),
especially
when
time
essence.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: June 20, 2024
Abstract
Syntax,
the
abstract
structure
of
language,
is
a
hallmark
human
cognition.
Despite
its
importance,
neural
underpinnings
remain
obscured
by
inherent
limitations
non-invasive
brain
measures
and
near
total
focus
on
comprehension
paradigms.
Here,
we
address
these
with
high-resolution
neurosurgical
recordings
(electrocorticography)
controlled
sentence
production
experiment.
We
uncover
three
syntactic
networks
that
are
broadly
distributed
across
traditional
language
regions,
but
focal
concentrations
in
middle
inferior
frontal
gyri.
In
contrast
to
previous
findings
from
studies,
process
syntax
mostly
exclusion
words
meaning,
supporting
cognitive
architecture
distinct
system.
Most
strikingly,
our
data
reveal
an
unexpected
property
syntax:
it
encoded
independent
activity
levels.
propose
this
“low-activity
coding”
scheme
represents
novel
mechanism
for
encoding
information,
reserved
higher-order
cognition
more
broadly.