Researchers propose preregistration in taxonomy to enhance transparency and credibility and reduce subjectivity DOI Creative Commons
Zhi‐Qiang Zhang

Megataxa, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 10(1), P. 15 - 16

Published: April 27, 2023

A new opinion piece published in Megataxa today (Conix et al. 2023) calls for preregistration the field of taxonomy and discusses its potential benefits objections. Preregistration is a practice researchers to document their hypotheses, design methods proposed studies public repository before they start study collect data (Nosek 2018). It believed that can help reduce bias, increase transparency, improve (especially replicability) research (e.g. Nosek 2018; Krypotos 2022), including exploratory such as some aspects biodiversity discovery (Dirnagl 2020). While has been already employed other fields social sciences Camerer 2016, 2018) ecology/evolution Kelly 2019), it yet adopted taxonomy. Conix (2023) argue could be beneficial taxonomy, given challenges faces, subjectivity, disagreement, credibility:

Language: Английский

Some Data Indicating that Editors and Reviewers Do Not Check Preregistrations during the Review Process DOI Open Access
Moin Syed

Published: Dec. 8, 2023

If a study is preregistered, but nobody checks it during review, does mean anything? The purpose of this preregistered was to better understand how editors and reviewers engage with preregistration plans the review process. article set retrieved from PLOS family journals, which a) are cross-disciplinary, b) open access, c) have relatively high frequency studies, d) most importantly, in 2019 began publishing manuscript reviews alongside published articles. A total 693 articles were identified via initial search, reduced 201 that met criteria. For each article, history coded for whether or mentioned preregistration, accessed made specific mention relation between reporting paper. Analyses conducted at level (i.e., did any reviewer editor mention/access/compare; n = 201) editor/reviewer overall, many editors/reviewers 689). In 43% least one only 14% someone access 10% make clear statement about manuscript. At things look much worse, 18% mentioning 5% accessing 3% discussing These data suggest very low levels engagement process, undermining its effectiveness.

Language: Английский

Citations

5
A straightforward workflow to explore species diversity using the Patagonian lizards of the Diplolaemus genus (Iguania: Leiosauridae) as a study case, with the description of a new species DOI
Juan Vrdoljak, Kevin I. Sánchez,

Andrea González-Marín

et al.

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 108274 - 108274

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
An oak is an oak, or not? Understanding and dealing with confusion and disagreement in biological classification DOI Creative Commons
Vincent Cuypers, Thomas A. C. Reydon

Biology & Philosophy, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 38(5)

Published: Sept. 23, 2023

Abstract Human interaction with the living world, in science and beyond, always involves classification. While it has been a long-standing scientific goal to produce single all-purpose taxonomy of life cater for this need, classificatory practice is often subject confusion disagreement, many philosophers have advocated forms pluralism. This entails that multiple classifications should be allowed coexist, whichever classification best, context-dependent. In paper, we discuss some practical consequences pluralism, particular regard how one supposed find best given context. We do so by means case study concerning oaks, pedunculate oak ( Quercus robur L.) sessile petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), two important putative species present several challenges; applying recent philosophical framework conceptualizing classification, so-called Grounded Functionality Account (GFA) (natural) kinds. show GFA elucidates issues related gives directions optimize practices, implications taxonomy.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Taxonomic disagreement about ranks in gray-area taxa: A vignette study DOI
Stijn Conix, Vincent Cuypers, Frank E. Zachos

et al.

BioScience, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 73(10), P. 728 - 737

Published: Sept. 28, 2023

Abstract When producing species classifications, taxonomists are often confronted with gray-area cases. For example, because of incipient or shallow divergence, it can be scientifically valid both to split groups organisms into separate and lump them together one species. It has been claimed that, in such cases, the ranking decision is, part, subjective may differ between differences their conceptions even conservation values. In present article, we use a vignette study empirically test this claim explore drivers taxonomic decision-making three fictional scenarios, asked opinion sample on slightly different versions an abstract containing status. The cases were explicitly designed represent related potential decisions, as information status, kinds additional evidence, presence absence gene flow. general, our results suggest that tend disagree at least moderately about species-ranking decisions when they presented same data. We did not find evidence concepts values strong disagreement. Instead, operational concerns, data, seemed more important.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Researchers propose preregistration in taxonomy to enhance transparency and credibility and reduce subjectivity DOI Creative Commons
Zhi‐Qiang Zhang

Megataxa, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 10(1), P. 15 - 16

Published: April 27, 2023

A new opinion piece published in Megataxa today (Conix et al. 2023) calls for preregistration the field of taxonomy and discusses its potential benefits objections. Preregistration is a practice researchers to document their hypotheses, design methods proposed studies public repository before they start study collect data (Nosek 2018). It believed that can help reduce bias, increase transparency, improve (especially replicability) research (e.g. Nosek 2018; Krypotos 2022), including exploratory such as some aspects biodiversity discovery (Dirnagl 2020). While has been already employed other fields social sciences Camerer 2016, 2018) ecology/evolution Kelly 2019), it yet adopted taxonomy. Conix (2023) argue could be beneficial taxonomy, given challenges faces, subjectivity, disagreement, credibility:

Language: Английский

Citations

0