Changing Better by Sharing Abandoned Work (Relevant May Not Be Enough)
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 9, 2025
Language: Английский
The Manifold Impacts of Management Research
Matthias Wenzel,
No information about this author
Philip Gylfe,
No information about this author
Saku Mantere
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 14, 2025
Abstract
Management
scholarship's
apparent
lack
of
impact
is
a
misconception
based
on
the
presumption
that
involves
direct
and
visible
influence
papers
or
research
projects
management
practice.
Theory‐building
impacts
practice
in
diverse,
sometimes
indirect
unnoticed,
manifold
ways.
Supported
by
intermediaries
such
as
education,
media,
consulting,
emerge
through
interest‐driven
knowledge
production
contributes
to
wider
uptake
reproduction
theory's
main
ideas
assumptions.
We
draw
Jürgen
Habermas's
theory
human
interests,
aiming
expand
how
from
scholarship
can
be
understood,
what
forms
it
might
take
part
kinds
knowledge‐constitutive
interests
are
pursued
theory‐building.
elaborate
these
different
forms,
building
pluralist
framework
we
call
‘programmatic’
‘hybrid’
types
impact.
advance
argument
diverse
theory‐building
contribute
our
field's
distinct,
yet
complementary
Language: Английский
Misrepresenting Methodology: A Critique of Epistemological Engineering in Social Science Research
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 2, 2024
Among
the
most
pervasive
issues
currently
debated
in
social
sciences
pertains
to
scientific
misconduct.
The
discourse
on
misconduct
has
burgeoned
last
three
decades
and
come
permeate
multiple
arenas,
including
academia,
industry,
public
policy.
While
interest
this
area
imparted
critical
insights
into
understanding
regulating
phenomenon,
some
commentators
have
argued
that
it
is
time
expand
scope
of
what
acts
precisely
qualify
as
misconduct—beyond
its
conventional
definition
conflates
term
with
fabrication,
falsification,
plagiarism.
In
responding
line
critique,
article
focuses
a
neglected
aspect
misconduct,
though
one
which
particularly
prevalent
science
research—namely,
case
researchers
offering
disingenuous
claims
related
study's
methodology.
To
explicate
how
form
materializes
action,
revisits
Bruno
Latour's
careful
tracing
scientists
laboratories.
Through
his
analysis,
Latour
captures
disjuncture
rhetoric
practice
methodology
empirical
research.
Integrating
critique
concept
agential
realism,
we
present
philosophically
grounded
avenue
by
resolve
future
Language: Английский