Objectives:
Physical
distancing
and
handwashing
can
be
important
infection
prevention
measures
during
an
infectious
disease
outbreak
such
as
the
Covid-19
pandemic.
To
stimulate
these
behaviours,
knowledge
of
psychosocial
determinants
well
contextual
factors
is
vital.
We
present
longitudinal,
within-person
analyses
impact
for
behaviour.
Design:
used
individual-level
data
(186,490
participants
completing
971,899
surveys)
from
Corona
Behavioural
Unit
Cohort,
a
dynamic
cohort
study
conducted
26
months
pandemic
in
Netherlands.
Methods:
Fixed-effects
models
were
employed
to
estimate
associations
between
behaviour,
combined
with
main
moderating
effects
factors.
Results:
Pandemic
severity
was
associated
more
while
duration
had
little
effect.
Within-person
changes
response
efficacy
most
relevant
both
self-efficacy,
descriptive
norms
perceived
infecting
others
affected
behaviour
indirectly.
These
stable
over
time.
Associations
larger
cross-sectional
models,
indicating
tend
overestimate
effects.Conclusions:
Our
highlights
importance
longitudinal
detect
possible
causal
associations.
The
results
suggest
that
outbreak,
government
public
health
professionals
should
clearly
communicate
(e.g.,
hospitalization
rates)
effectiveness
recommended
reducing
risk;
seek
improve
people’s
capabilities
opportunities
adhere
guidelines,
example
by
modifying
environment.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
18(7), P. e0289294 - e0289294
Published: July 31, 2023
This
'cohort
profile'
aims
to
provide
a
description
of
the
study
design,
methodology,
and
baseline
characteristics
participants
in
Corona
Behavioral
Unit
cohort.
cohort
was
established
response
COVID-19
pandemic
by
Dutch
National
Institute
for
Public
Health
Environment
(RIVM)
regional
public
health
services.
The
aim
investigate
adherence
support
prevention
measures,
psychosocial
determinants
behaviors,
well-being,
vaccination,
media
use.
also
examined
specific
motivations
beliefs,
such
as
which
were
collected
through
either
closed-ended
items
or
open
text
responses.
In
April
2020,
89,943
aged
16
years
older
recruited
from
existing
nation-wide
panels.
Between
May
2020
September
2022,
99,676
additional
online
social
platforms
mailing
lists
higher
education
organizations.
Participants
who
consented
initially
invited
every
three
weeks
(5
rounds),
then
six
(13
since
summer
2022
12
(3
rounds).
To
date,
66%
female,
30%
39
younger,
54%
completed
two
more
questionnaires,
with
an
average
9.2
(SD
=
5.7)
questionnaires.
has
published
detailed
insights
into
longitudinal
patterns
related
preventive
well
peoples'
mental
wellbeing
relation
stringency
these
measures.
results
have
informed
policy
making
communication
Netherlands
throughout
pandemic.
data
will
continuously
be
used
examine
outcomes
scientific
analyses,
inform
future
preparedness
plans.
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 1, 2024
Abstract
Background
As
only
a
few
studies
have
examined
the
impact
of
COVID-19
pandemic
on
mental
health
outpatient
system
so
far,
aim
COVID
Ψ
Outpatient
Survey
was
to
gain
insight
from
providers
in
Germany
regarding
changes
utilization;
associated
problems
and
challenges;
telemedicine
services;
interactions
with
inpatient
nursing
home
experiences
post-COVID
syndromes.
Methods
Between
July
September
2021,
we
invited
351
randomly
selected
specialists
take
part
online
survey
via
e-mail.
Additionally,
extended
an
invitation
professional
associations
encourage
their
members
participate.
N
=
105
physicians
most
regions
took
survey.
Results
participants
reported
utilization
during
high
incidence
phases
(HIP)
using
pre-formulated
categories:
For
first
HIP
spring
2020,
31%
decrease
>
20%
5%
increase
patient
contacts.
third
4%
contacts,
while
30%
20%.
Participants
chose
“patient’s
fears
infection”
“providers
protection
measures”
as
reasons
for
decreases,
“pandemic
related
anxieties”,
“economic
stressors”,
“capacity
reductions
system”
increases
contact.
Many
introduced
services.
A
majority
consultations
syndromes
already
2021.
Conclusions
The
hinted
at
utilization,
multiple
but
well
good-practice-solutions
pandemic.
Medicina,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
61(4), P. 770 - 770
Published: April 21, 2025
Background
and
Objectives:
Spirituality
loneliness
are
widely
recognized
as
important
aspects
of
holistic
healthcare.
This
observational
study
was
conducted
among
hospitalized
patients
with
chronic
illnesses
in
a
medical
ward
during
three
waves
the
epidemic
Taiwan,
from
April
2022
to
March
2023,
examine
changes
spiritual
needs
loneliness.
Materials
Methods:
These
were
classified
first
wave
(outbreak
period,
July
2022);
second
(mitigation
August
November
third
(December
2023).
The
Spiritual
Needs
Scale
Loneliness
used
assess
enrolled
across
different
epidemic.
Results:
We
found
that
higher
outbreak
period
(F
=
9.847,
p
<
0.001)
compared
other
periods.
In
addition,
conclusion
45.764,
two
Age
(r
0.261,
Charlson
comorbidity
index
0.193,
0.01)
significantly
positively
correlated
needs.
Furthermore,
number
daily
confirmed
COVID-19
cases
−0.392,
negatively
Conclusions:
Hospitalized
experienced
heightened
outbreak,
while
increased
waned.
study’s
prospective
design
is
strength,
but
incorporating
additional
temporal
measures
between
periods
would
have
enhanced
findings.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: March 21, 2024
Abstract
This
article
examines
the
mediating
role
of
ethical
issues
and
healthcare
on
relationship
between
Metaverse
mental
health.
It
also
investigates
impact
healthcare.
is
based
quantitative
methodology.
Using
a
purposive
sampling
technique,
close-ended
questionnaire
was
used
to
collect
data
from
392
nurses
doctors
across
Pakistan,
China,
Saudi
Arabia.
The
Partial
Least
Squares
Structural
Equation
Modelling
technique
for
analysis.
findings
show
significant
results
do
not
support
In
addition,
positive
Similarly,
study
has
many
implications
technology
developers,
scientists,
policymakers,
providers.
Social Indicators Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
Abstract
Little
research
has
examined
the
role
of
social
class
in
long-term
impact
COVID-19
pandemic
on
mental
well-being.
This
4-year
longitudinal
study
South
Korea
(
N
=
86,872;
875,967
responses)
assessed
well-being
before
(January
2019
to
January
2020)
and
during
2020
2023)
determine
whether
change
this
period
differed
by
class.
We
expanded
investigation
consider
transitions
class,
distancing
measures,
mechanisms
underlying
changes
according
pandemic.
In
particular,
we
moderating
effects
within-person
using
conducting
multilevel
modeling-based
analyses
four
approaches.
First,
found
that,
while
higher-class
individuals
maintained
an
average
that
was
higher
than
lower-class
individuals,
they
also
experienced
a
steeper
decline
over
course
Relative
their
pre-COVID-19
levels,
significant
decrease
first,
second,
third
years
COVID-19,
showing
no
sign
recovery
until
neared
its
end.
Second,
pattern
persisted
without
regard
for
critical
following
pandemic:
remaining
both
periods
declines
relative
baseline.
Third,
faced
larger
difficulties
maintaining
well-being,
particularly
with
respect
less
affected.
Fourth,
perceived
daily
life
mediated
observed
difference
declines,
greater
lives
due
did,
resulting
Taken
together,
these
findings
indicate
transformed
components
are
essential
psychological
health
well-off,
providing
novel
insights
into
power
experiences
going
beyond
absolute
gap
been
well-established
cross-sectional
studies.
indicates
need
class-targeted
interventions
policies
support
across
all
socioeconomic
strata
future
crises.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: Jan. 13, 2024
In
this
qualitative
study
we
observed
in-depth
the
impact
of
visiting
restriction
policy
(VRP,
i.e.
number
visitors
allowed
at
home)
on
well-being
and
compliance
during
COVID-19
pandemic
to
regulate
infection
rates.
Journal of Psychiatric Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
172, P. 200 - 209
Published: Feb. 15, 2024
Aims
of
the
present
study
were
to
prospectively
assess
psychosocial
functioning
trajectories
during
COVID
pandemic
and
possible
impact
sociodemographic
variables,
as
well
COVID-19
pandemic-related
factors,
on
these
trajectories,
in
a
sample
patients
with
pre-existing
severe
mental
disorders.
Moreover,
we
aimed
at
identifying
predictors
impairment
over
period
9
months
pandemic.
Patients
recruited
3rd
wave
(T0,
March-April
2021)
while
strict
containment
measures
applied
Italy,
reassessed
after
3
(T1,
June-July
2021),
6
from
T1
(T2-
November-December
4th
A
300
subject
(out
527
subjects
baseline)
completed
T2
evaluation.
assessed
by:
Work
Social
Adjustment
Scale
(WSAS)
for
functioning,
Generalized
Anxiety
Disorder
7-Item
(GAD-7)
anxiety
symptoms,
Patient
Health
Questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9)
depressive
symptoms
Impact
Events
Scale-Revised,
post-traumatic
symptoms.
Cluster
analyses
identified
4
functioning:
High,
Stable
Functioning
group
(N
=
77),
Improvement
62),
Progressive
Impairment
83)
Persistent
Severe
78)
respectively.
We
found
that
higher
WSAS
score
T0
(B
0.43,
p
<
.001),
PHQ
scores
baseline
>10
2.89,
.05),
not
living
alone
was
be
protective
factor
-2.5,
.05).
Results
provides
insights
into
vulnerability
individuals
psychiatric
disorders
times
crisis.
Study
findings
can
contribute
better
understanding
specific
needs
this
population
inform
interventions
support
strategies.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 30, 2024
Abstract
Purpose
Using
data
on
Norwegian
adolescents,
this
study
aimed
to
explore
changes
in
mental
health,
quality
of
life,
somatic
health
complaints
and
loneliness
into
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
also
considering
according
socioeconomic
position
(SEP).
Methods
The
involved
a
cross-sectional
comparative
design
with
from
Young-HUNT4
(2017–2019)
(n
=
4347)
Young-HUNT
COVID
(May/June
2021)
2033),
aged
16–19
years.
Additionally,
longitudinal
1565),
13–15
years,
follow-up
were
explored.
impact
SEP
was
investigated
through
regression
analyses
investigating
prevalence
high
low
groups.
Results
In
comparison,
boys
girls
reported
higher
levels
distress
(boys
only)
pandemic
compared
before,
while
general
life
remained
stable.
Longitudinally,
all
factors
changed
adversely
except
for
boys.
Comparing
younger
(13–15
years)
older
(16–19
adolescents
Young-HUNT4,
demonstrated
same
adverse
pattern
as
sample.
Poor
poor
more
prevalent
group.
group,
distress,
worsened
improved
during
period.
Conclusion
Except
boys,
did
not
deteriorate
period,
although
increased
both
sexes.
seemed
cope
better
than
where
well-being
even
improved.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 13, 2023
Abstract
Background
Internationally,
the
COVID-19
pandemic
went
along
with
significant
shifts
in
utilization
of
mental
healthcare
inpatient
and
outpatient
offerings.
As
only
a
few
studies
have
examined
situation
health
systems
Europe
so
far,
COVID
Ψ
Outpatient
Survey
surveyed
providers
Germany
regarding
changes
utilization;
associated
problems,
challenges
contributing
factors;
telemedicine
services;
interactions
nursing
home
experiences
post-COVID
syndromes.
Methods
N
=
105
specialists
all
regions
took
part
online
survey.
It
consisted
combination
pre-formulated
free
text
responses.
Results
For
first
high
incidence
phase
(HIP)
spring
2020,
31%
survey
participants
reported
decrease
>
20%
5%
an
increase
contacts.
third
HIP
2021,
4%
number
contacts,
while
30%
indicated
20%.
Often
suggested
reasons
for
initial
decreases
were
patients
fears
infection
protection
measures,
later
increases
lockdown-related
anxieties
economic
stressors,
capacity
reductions
system.
The
related
both
system
to
multiple
complications.
Telemedicine
offerings
introduced
by
many
already
summer
2021
majority
consultations
Conclusions
hints
at
utilization,
problems
but
as
well
good-practice-solutions
during
pandemic.
future
crises
better
surveillance
is
recommended.