Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
17(5), P. 1060 - 1075
Published: Aug. 8, 2011
Abstract
Aim
A
range
of
approaches
and
philosophies
underpin
national‐level
strategies
for
managing
invasive
alien
plants.
This
study
presents
a
strategy
the
management
taxa
that
both
have
value
do
harm.
Location
South
Africa.
Methods
Insights
were
derived
from
examining
Australian
Acacia
species
in
Africa
(
c
.
70
introduced,
mostly
>
150
years
ago;
some
commercial
other
values;
14
are
invasive,
causing
substantial
ecological
economic
damage).
We
consider
options
combining
available
tactics
practices.
defined
(1)
categories
based
on
invaded
area
(a
surrogate
impact)
benefits
generated
(2)
regions
habitat
suitability
degree
invasion.
For
each
category
region,
we
identified
strategic
goals
proposed
combinations
practices
to
move
system
desired
direction.
Results
six
combination
would
apply
eight
categories.
further
could
be
strategically
combined
achieve
these
five
discrete
regions.
When
used
appropriate
combinations,
prospect
achieving
goal
will
maximized.
As
outcomes
cannot
accurately
predicted,
must
adaptive,
requiring
continuous
monitoring
assessment,
realignment
if
necessary.
Main
conclusions
Invasive
continue
spread
cause
undesirable
impacts,
despite
considerable
investment
into
management.
is
because
various
historically
been
uncoordinated
what
can
best
described
as
hope.
Our
offers
possible
chance
goals,
it
first
address
positive
negative
impacts.
Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
14(7), P. 702 - 708
Published: May 19, 2011
Biological
invasions
cause
ecological
and
economic
impacts
across
the
globe.
However,
it
is
unclear
whether
there
are
strong
patterns
in
terms
of
their
major
effects,
how
vulnerability
different
ecosystems
varies
which
ecosystem
services
at
greatest
risk.
We
present
a
global
meta-analysis
199
articles
reporting
1041
field
studies
that
total
describe
135
alien
plant
taxa
on
resident
species,
communities
ecosystems.
Across
studies,
plants
had
significant
effect
11
24
types
impact
assessed.
The
magnitude
direction
varied
both
within
between
impact.
On
average,
abundance
diversity
species
decreased
invaded
sites,
whereas
primary
production
several
processes
were
enhanced.
While
N-fixing
greater
N-cycling
variables,
they
did
not
consistently
affect
other
types.
was
significantly
island
mainland
Overall,
heterogeneous
unidirectional
even
particular
Our
analysis
also
reveals
by
time
changes
nutrient
cycling
detected,
likely
to
have
already
occurred.
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
18(5), P. 1725 - 1737
Published: Dec. 30, 2011
Abstract
With
the
growing
body
of
literature
assessing
impact
invasive
alien
plants
on
resident
species
and
ecosystems,
a
comprehensive
assessment
relationship
between
traits
environmental
settings
invasion
characteristics
impacts
is
needed.
Based
287
publications
with
1551
individual
cases
that
addressed
167
plant
belonging
to
49
families,
we
present
first
global
overview
frequencies
significant
non‐significant
ecological
their
directions
15
outcomes
related
responses
populations,
species,
communities
ecosystems.
Species
community
tend
decline
following
invasions,
especially
those
for
plants,
but
abundance
richness
soil
biota,
as
well
concentrations
nutrients
water,
more
often
increase
than
decrease
invasion.
Data
mining
tools
revealed
exert
consistent
some
(survival
activity
animals,
productivity,
mineral
nutrient
content
in
tissues,
fire
frequency
intensity),
whereas
at
level,
such
richness,
diversity
resources,
significance
determined
by
interactions
biome
invaded.
The
latter
are
most
likely
be
impacted
annual
grasses,
wind
pollinated
trees
invading
mediterranean
or
tropical
biomes.
One
clearest
signals
this
analysis
far
cause
animal
islands
rather
mainland.
This
study
shows
there
no
universal
measure
pattern
observed
depends
examined.
Although
strongly
context
dependent,
traits,
life
form,
stature
pollination
syndrome,
may
provide
means
predict
impact,
regardless
particular
habitat
geographical
region
Annual Review of Environment and Resources,
Journal Year:
2010,
Volume and Issue:
35(1), P. 25 - 55
Published: Oct. 22, 2010
Invasive
species
are
a
major
element
of
global
change
and
contributing
to
biodiversity
loss,
ecosystem
degradation,
impairment
services
worldwide.
Research
is
shedding
new
light
on
the
ecological
economic
consequences
invasions.
New
approaches
emerging
for
describing
evaluating
impacts
invasive
species,
translating
these
into
monetary
terms.
The
harmful
effects
invasions
now
widely
recognized,
multiscale
programs
in
place
many
parts
world
reduce
current
future
impacts.
There
has
been
an
upsurge
scientific
research
aimed
at
guiding
management
interventions.
Among
activities
that
receiving
most
attention
have
promise
reducing
problems
risk
assessment,
pathway
vector
management,
early
detection,
rapid
response,
mitigation
restoration.
Screening
protocols
introductions
becoming
more
accurate
shown
cost-effective.
Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
17(5), P. 788 - 809
Published: Aug. 8, 2011
Abstract
Aim
Woody
plants
were
not
widely
considered
to
be
important
invasive
alien
species
until
fairly
recently.
Thousands
of
trees
and
shrubs
have,
however,
been
moved
around
the
world.
Many
have
spread
from
planting
sites,
some
are
now
among
most
widespread
damaging
organisms.
This
article
presents
a
global
list
shrubs.
It
discusses
taxonomic
biases,
geographical
patterns,
modes
dispersal,
reasons
for
introductions
key
issues
regarding
invasions
non‐native
woody
Location
Global.
Methods
An
exhaustive
survey
was
made
regional
national
databases
literature.
Correspondence
with
botanists
ecologists
our
own
observations
in
many
parts
world
expanded
list.
Presence
determined
each
15
broad
regions.
The
main
introduction
dissemination
species.
Results
comprises
622
(357
trees,
265
29
plant
orders,
78
families,
286
genera).
Regions
largest
number
are:
Australia
(183);
southern
Africa
(170);
North
America
(163);
Pacific
Islands
(147);
New
Zealand
(107).
Species
introduced
horticulture
dominated
(62%
species:
196
187
shrubs).
next
forestry
(13%),
food
(10%)
agroforestry
(7%).
Three
hundred
twenty‐three
(52%)
currently
known
only
one
region,
another
126
(20%)
occur
two
Only
38
(6%)
very
(invasive
six
or
more
regions).
Over
40%
tree
over
60%
shrub
bird
dispersed.
Main
conclusions
between
0.5%
0.7%
world’s
outside
their
natural
range,
but
rapidly
increasing
importance
objectively
compiled
presented
here
provides
snapshot
current
dimensions
phenomenon
will
useful
screening
new
potential.
Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2010,
Volume and Issue:
16(1), P. 95 - 108
Published: Jan. 1, 2010
Abstract
Aim
Invasive
alien
species
(IAS)
pose
a
significant
threat
to
biodiversity.
The
Convention
on
Biological
Diversity’s
2010
Biodiversity
Target,
and
the
associated
indicator
for
IAS,
has
stimulated
globally
coordinated
efforts
quantify
patterns
in
extent
of
biological
invasion,
its
impact
biodiversity
policy
responses.
Here,
we
report
outcome
indicators
invasion
at
global
scale.
Location
Global.
Methods
We
developed
four
pressure‐state‐response
framework,
i.e.
number
documented
IAS
(pressure),
trends
(state)
international
agreements
national
adoption
relevant
reducing
threats
(response).
These
measures
were
considered
best
suited
providing
representative,
standardized
sustainable
by
2010.
Results
show
that
is
underestimate,
because
value
negatively
affected
country
development
status
positively
research
effort
information
availability.
Red
List
Index
demonstrates
pressure
driving
declines
diversity,
with
overall
apparently
increasing.
response
trend
nonetheless
been
positive
last
several
decades,
although
only
half
countries
are
signatory
Diversity
(CBD)
have
IAS‐relevant
legislation.
Although
driven
response,
this
clearly
not
sufficient
and/or
adequately
implemented
reduce
impact.
Main
conclusions
For
biodiversity,
Target
thus
achieved.
results
provide
clear
direction
bridging
current
divide
between
available
needed
management
prevention
control
IAS.
It
further
highlights
need
ensure
effectively
implemented,
such
it
translates
into
reduced
beyond
Diversity and Distributions,
Journal Year:
2011,
Volume and Issue:
17(5), P. 1015 - 1029
Published: Aug. 8, 2011
Abstract
Aim
The
biophysical
impacts
of
invasive
Australian
acacias
and
their
effects
on
ecosystem
services
are
explored
used
to
develop
a
framework
for
improved
restoration
practices.
Location
South
Africa,
Portugal
Chile.
Methods
A
conceptual
model
responses
the
increasing
severity
(density
duration)
invasions
was
developed
from
literature
our
knowledge
how
these
affect
options
restoration.
Case
studies
identify
similarities
differences
between
three
regions
severely
affected
by
acacias:
Acacia
dealbata
in
Chile,
longifolia
saligna
Africa.
Results
have
wide
range
ecosystems
that
increase
with
time
disturbance,
transform
alter
reduce
service
delivery.
shared
trait
is
accumulation
massive
seed
banks,
which
enables
them
become
dominant
after
disturbances.
Ecosystem
trajectories
recovery
potential
suggest
there
important
thresholds
state
resilience.
When
crossed,
radically
altered;
many
cases,
autogenic
(self‐driven
self‐sustaining)
pre‐invasion
condition
inhibited,
necessitating
active
intervention
restore
composition
function.
Main
conclusions
demonstrates
degree,
nature
reversibility
degradation
identifies
key
actions
needed
desired
states.
Control
operations,
particularly
restoration,
require
substantial
short‐
medium‐term
investments,
can
losses
biodiversity
services,
costs
society
long
term.
Increasing
effectiveness
will
further
research
into
linkages
This
should
involve
scientists,
practitioners
managers
engaged
plant
control
programmes,
together
as
both
investors
in,
beneficiaries
of,
more
effective
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
28(5), P. 1188 - 1194
Published: April 29, 2014
Abstract
Non‐native
species
cause
changes
in
the
ecosystems
to
which
they
are
introduced.
These
changes,
or
some
of
them,
usually
termed
impacts;
can
be
manifold
and
potentially
damaging
biodiversity.
However,
impacts
most
non‐native
poorly
understood,
a
synthesis
available
information
is
being
hindered
because
authors
often
do
not
clearly
define
impact.
We
argue
that
explicitly
defining
impact
will
promote
progress
toward
better
understanding
implications
biodiversity
caused
by
species;
help
disentangle
aspects
scientific
debates
about
due
disparate
definitions
represent
true
discord;
improve
communication
between
scientists
from
different
research
disciplines
scientists,
managers,
policy
makers.
For
these
reasons
based
on
examples
literature,
we
devised
seven
key
questions
fall
into
4
categories:
directionality,
classification
measurement,
ecological
socio‐economic
scale.
should
formulating
clear
practical
suit
specific
scientific,
stakeholder,
legislative
contexts.
Definiendo
el
Impacto
de
las
Especies
No‐Nativas
Frontiers in Plant Science,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: Sept. 29, 2014
Invasions
by
alien
plants
provide
a
unique
opportunity
to
examine
competitive
interactions
among
plants.
While
resource
competition
has
long
been
regarded
as
major
mechanism
responsible
for
successful
invasions,
given
well-known
capacity
many
invaders
become
dominant
and
reduce
plant
diversity
in
the
invaded
communities,
few
studies
have
measured
directly
or
assessed
its
importance
relatively
that
of
other
mechanisms,
at
different
stages
an
invasion
process.
Here,
we
review
evidence
comparing
ability
invasive
species
vs.
co-occurring
native
plants,
along
range
environmental
gradients,
showing
superior
over
species,
while
congeners
are
not
necessarily
competitively
congeners,
nor
dominants
better
competitors
than
dominants.
We
discuss
how
outcomes
depend
on
number
factors,
such
heterogeneous
distribution
resources,
stage
process,
well
phenotypic
plasticity
evolutionary
adaptation,
which
may
result
increased
decreased
both
species.
Competitive
advantages
natives
often
transient
only
important
early
It
remains
unclear
is
relative
mechanisms
(competition
avoidance
via
phenological
differences,
niche
differentiation
space
associated
with
phylogenetic
distance,
recruitment
dispersal
limitation,
indirect
competition,
allelopathy).
then
identify
conceptual
methodological
issues
characterizing
future
research
needs,
including
examinations
dynamics
impact
global
changes
between
New Phytologist,
Journal Year:
2012,
Volume and Issue:
196(2), P. 383 - 396
Published: Sept. 3, 2012
The
literature
on
biological
invasions
is
biased
in
favour
of
invasive
species--those
that
spread
and
often
reach
high
abundance
following
introduction
by
humans.
It
is,
however,
also
important
to
understand
previous
stages
the
introduction-naturalization-invasion
continuum
('the
continuum'),
especially
factors
mediate
naturalization.
emphasis
invasiveness
partly
because
most
are
only
recognized
once
species
occupy
large
adventive
ranges
or
start
spread.
Also,
many
studies
lump
all
alien
species,
fail
separate
introduced,
naturalized
populations
species.
These
biases
impede
our
ability
elucidate
full
suite
drivers
invasion
predict
dynamics,
different
progression
along
sections
continuum.
A
better
understanding
determinants
naturalization
potential
invaders.
Processes
leading
act
differently
regions
global
biogeographical
patterns
plant
result
from
interaction
population-biological,
macroecological
human-induced
factors.
We
explore
what
known
about
how
plants
interact
at
various
scales,
their
importance
varies
Research
explicitly
linked
particular
can
generate
new
information
appropriate
for
improving
management
if,
example,
potentially
identified
before
they
exert
an
impact.