Open qualitative data: a worked example of qualitative data sharing from an interview study on loneliness in young adulthood DOI
Ann‐Marie Creaven, Emma Kirwan

Qualitative Research in Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 25

Published: Nov. 26, 2024

Open data is increasingly a priority for research funders and availability statements are commonly required submissions to peer-reviewed journals. Although much of the recent momentum data-sharing has arisen from 'replication crisis' affecting experimental psychology, qualitative can also be shared, although different considerations apply this practice. Despite considerable discussion about data-sharing, there less how share novel interview in psychology. In article, we describe our motivations experiences archiving study exploring loneliness young adulthood. We discuss ethical issues that pertained process, particularly relating consent, practical arose as relative novices data-sharing. conclude with reflections hope will instructive researchers attempting reconcile arguments open epistemological, ethical, pragmatic realities research.

Language: Английский

A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review DOI Creative Commons

Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10

Published: Feb. 11, 2025

This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance ethical conduct scientific to maintain integrity, credibility, societal relevance has been highlighted. findings revealed growing awareness issues, as evidenced by the development numerous guidelines, codes conduct, oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including lack standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding factors contributing unethical behavior, unclear definitions violations. To address these this recommends promoting transparency data sharing, enhancing education, training programs, establishing robust mechanisms identify encouraging collaborative open practices. emphasizes need restore public confidence science, protect its positive impact, effectively global challenges, while upholding principles social responsibility justice. is crucial maintaining conserving resources, safeguarding both participants public.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data DOI Creative Commons
James M. DuBois, Jessica Mozersky, Meredith Parsons

et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 120(43)

Published: Oct. 13, 2023

In January 2023, a new NIH policy on data sharing went into effect. The applies to both quantitative and qualitative research (QR) such as from interviews or focus groups. QR are often sensitive difficult deidentify, thus have rarely been shared in the United States. Over past 5 y, our team has engaged stakeholders sharing, developed software support deidentification, produced guidance, collaborated with ICPSR repository pilot deposit of 30 datasets. this perspective article, we share important lessons learned by addressing eight clusters questions issues where, when, what share; how deidentify high-quality secondary use; budgeting for sharing; permissions needed data. We also offer brief assessment state preparedness repositories, journals, textbooks sharing. While could yield benefits community, quickly need develop enforceable standards, expertise, resources responsible Absent these resources, risk violating participant confidentiality wasting significant amount time funding that not useful either use transparency verification.

Language: Английский

Citations

12
Open-Science Guidance for Qualitative Research: An Empirically Validated Approach for De-Identifying Sensitive Narrative Data DOI Creative Commons
Rebecca Campbell, McKenzie Javorka, Jasmine Engleton

et al.

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 6(4)

Published: Oct. 1, 2023

The open-science movement seeks to make research more transparent and accessible. To that end, researchers are increasingly expected share de-identified data with other scholars for review, reanalysis, reuse. In psychology, practices have been explored primarily within the context of quantitative data, but demands qualitative becoming prevalent. Narrative far challenging de-identify fully, because methods often used in studies marginalized, minoritized, and/or traumatized populations, sharing may pose substantial risks participants if their information can be later reidentified. date, there has little guidance literature on how data. address this gap, we developed a methodological framework remediating sensitive narrative This multiphase process is modeled common qualitative-coding strategies. first phase includes consultations diverse stakeholders sources understand reidentifiability data-sharing concerns. second outlines an iterative recognizing potentially identifiable constructing individualized remediation strategies through group review consensus. third multiple assessing validity de-identification analyses (i.e., whether remediated transcripts adequately protect participants’ privacy). We applied set 32 interviews sexual-assault survivors. provide case examples blurring redaction techniques names, dates, locations, trauma histories, help-seeking experiences, about dyadic interactions.

Language: Английский

Citations

11
Open Science in Qualitative Evaluation: Considerations and Opportunities DOI Creative Commons
Crystal N. Steltenpohl, Laurel Standiford Reyes, Mary A. Pei

et al.

New Directions for Evaluation, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 22, 2025

ABSTRACT This article discusses how open science principles—often rooted in quantitative epistemologies—and qualitative evaluation practices can complement each other and explores strategies for evaluators researchers to consider adopting their practices. Although the approaches knowledge creation may be perceived as being conflict, many values viewed different expressions of shared goals rigor transparency. We describe like data, process, outcome sharing activities that already align with encourage preregistration, registered reports, replication possible areas expand into. also contribute conversations about transparency, community engagement, evaluating effectiveness, avoiding harm. A flexible, additive approach research projects allow all parties draw on other's strengths more rigorous, comprehensive, transparent, community‐centered work. Finally, we suggest a few starting places who are interested incorporating conducting evaluations.

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Archiving difficult realities: a systematic investigation of records related to sexual violence in US college and university archives DOI
Ana Roeschley, Julie Miller,

Alison Nikitopoulos

et al.

Archival Science, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(3), P. 387 - 414

Published: March 21, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
The Archival Phase in Feminist Organizations: Methodological Suggestions DOI Creative Commons
Hedva Eyal, Sarai B. Aharoni, Ruth Preser

et al.

International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 23

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

The article is based on a series of interviews (61) and multi-sited ethnography conducted during 2019–2021 which traced archival records 20 feminist organizations in Israel: local women’s peace (FPAs) Rape Crisis Centres (RCCs). We describe the study complex methodological concerns meta-questions relating to community archives relation content (types testimonials or records), method organization (archival practices like cataloging digitization) activists’ perspectives concerning future preservation access. In order overcome these challenges, we suggest six principles may apply civil society that were established between 1970s–1990s: importance identifying researchers’ positionality vis a-vis archive; politics knowledge intersectional identities; avoiding judgment informal practices; who sets rules; silence self-silencing; recognition invisible labor.

Language: Английский

Citations

1
Meeting open science needs at PLOS mental health DOI Open Access
Karli Montague-Cardoso, Marcel LaFlamme

PLOS mental health., Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 1(4), P. e0000143 - e0000143

Published: Sept. 18, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1
A Transparency Checklist for Qualitative Research DOI Open Access

Lori Frohwirth,

Sebastian Karcher,

Tamrin Ann Lever

et al.

Published: April 12, 2023

Background: Transparency is increasingly recognized as an important goal for research. But while tools and guidance transparency reproducibility abound scholars working quantitatively, relatively few such exist qualitative researchers. Methods: This paper describes the development use of a checklist The provides researchers with comprehensive list documents information to collect archive during course research project suggestions which these can be shared enhance project. Drawing on rich tradition checklists outside academia, built improve quality work facilitate communication in teams, rather than serve tool external assessments. Results: We describe projects conducted at nonprofit organization conducting policy-driven sexual reproductive health. In practice, proves valuable not just planning make materials data available, but also both coordinating organizing larger, team-based maximizing cannot shared.Conclusion: Wider adoption has potential by supporting sharing materials, standardizing rigorous models collection analysis, making consent language interview guides more broadly allowing improved learning across projects.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Protecting Sensitive Data Early in the Research Data Lifecycle DOI Creative Commons
Sebastian Karcher, Sefa Secen, Nicholas Weber

et al.

Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 13(2)

Published: Dec. 6, 2023

How do researchers in fieldwork-intensive disciplines protect sensitive data the field, how they assess their own practices, and arrive at them? This article reports results of a qualitative study with 36 semi-structured interviews multi-method political science humanitarian aid/migration studies. We find that frequently feel ill-prepared to handle management field formal institutions provide little support. Instead, use patchwork sources devise strategies for protecting informants data. argue this carries substantial risks security as well potential later sharing re-use. conclude some suggestions effectively supporting research without unduly adding burden on conducting it.

Language: Английский

Citations

3
Open qualitative data: a worked example of qualitative data sharing from an interview study on loneliness in young adulthood DOI
Ann‐Marie Creaven, Emma Kirwan

Qualitative Research in Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 25

Published: Nov. 26, 2024

Open data is increasingly a priority for research funders and availability statements are commonly required submissions to peer-reviewed journals. Although much of the recent momentum data-sharing has arisen from 'replication crisis' affecting experimental psychology, qualitative can also be shared, although different considerations apply this practice. Despite considerable discussion about data-sharing, there less how share novel interview in psychology. In article, we describe our motivations experiences archiving study exploring loneliness young adulthood. We discuss ethical issues that pertained process, particularly relating consent, practical arose as relative novices data-sharing. conclude with reflections hope will instructive researchers attempting reconcile arguments open epistemological, ethical, pragmatic realities research.

Language: Английский

Citations

0