Brain,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
143(9), P. 2742 - 2756
Published: June 24, 2020
Abstract
In
multiple
sclerosis,
treatment
start
or
switch
is
prompted
by
evidence
of
disease
activity.
Whilst
immunomodulatory
therapies
reduce
activity,
the
time
required
to
attain
maximal
effect
unclear.
this
study
we
aimed
develop
a
method
that
allows
identification
manifest
fully
and
clinically
sclerosis
treatments
(‘therapeutic
lag’)
on
clinical
activity
represented
relapses
progression-of-disability
events.
Data
from
two
registries,
MSBase
(multinational)
OFSEP
(French),
were
used.
Patients
diagnosed
with
minimum
1-year
exposure
treatment,
3-year
pretreatment
follow-up
yearly
review
included
in
analysis.
For
analysis
disability
progression,
all
events
subsequent
5-year
period
included.
Density
curves,
representing
incidence
6-month
confirmed
progression
events,
separately
constructed
for
each
sufficiently
therapy.
Monte
Carlo
simulations
performed
identify
first
local
derivative
after
start;
point
stabilization
effect,
maximum
was
observed.
The
developed
discovery
cohort
(MSBase),
externally
validated
separate,
non-overlapping
(OFSEP).
A
merged
MSBase-OFSEP
used
analyses.
Annualized
relapse
rates
compared
before
following
commencement
We
identified
11
180
eligible
epochs
4088
progression.
External
validation
four
therapies,
no
significant
difference
bootstrapped
mean
differences
therapeutic
lag
duration
between
registries.
calculated
10
ranged
12
30
weeks.
seven
70
Significant
pre-
versus
post-treatment
annualized
rate
present
apart
intramuscular
interferon
beta-1a.
conclusion
have
developed,
validated,
objectively
quantify
different
patients
more
than
3
years
onset.
Objectively
defined
periods
expected
insights
into
evaluation
response
randomized
trials
may
guide
decision-making
who
experience
early
on-treatment
This
will
subsequently
be
applied
studies
evaluate
patient
characteristics
lag.
Brain,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
140(9), P. 2426 - 2443
Published: June 29, 2017
Timely
initiation
of
effective
therapy
is
crucial
for
preventing
disability
in
multiple
sclerosis;
however,
treatment
response
varies
greatly
among
patients.
Comprehensive
predictive
models
individual
are
lacking.
Our
aims
were:
(i)
to
develop
algorithms
using
demographic,
clinical
and
paraclinical
predictors
patients
with
(ii)
evaluate
accuracy,
internal
external
validity
these
algorithms.
This
study
evaluated
27
seven
disease-modifying
therapies
MSBase,
a
large
global
cohort
study.
Treatment
was
analysed
separately
progression,
regression,
relapse
frequency,
conversion
secondary
progressive
disease,
change
the
cumulative
disease
burden,
probability
discontinuation.
Multivariable
survival
generalized
linear
were
used,
together
principal
component
analysis
reduce
model
dimensionality
prevent
overparameterization.
Accuracy
prediction
tested
its
separate,
non-overlapping
cohort.
External
geographically
distinct
cohort,
Swedish
Multiple
Sclerosis
Registry.
In
training
(n
=
8513),
most
prominent
modifiers
comprised
age,
duration,
course,
previous
activity,
disability,
predominant
phenotype
therapy.
Importantly,
magnitude
direction
associations
varied
outcomes.
Higher
progression
during
injectable
predominantly
associated
greater
at
start
For
fingolimod,
natalizumab
or
mitoxantrone,
it
mainly
lower
pretreatment
activity.
The
regression
pre-baseline
Relapse
incidence
age
relapsing
strength
varying
therapies.
1196)
resulting
high
(>80%)
first
year
outcomes,
moderate
Years
2–4
low
validation
showed
similar
results,
demonstrating
burden
We
conclude
that
information
helps
predict
time
their
commencement.
Multiple Sclerosis Journal,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
26(1), P. 118 - 122
Published: Dec. 13, 2018
The
care
of
multiple
sclerosis
(MS)
in
France
is
based
on
two
complementary
interlinked
networks:
MS
expert
centers
university
hospitals
and
regional
networks
neurologists.
routine
use
European
database
for
(EDMUS)
all
those
has
paved
the
way
constitution
a
national
registry,
designated
as
Observatoire
Français
de
la
Sclérose
En
Plaques
(OFSEP).
It
promotes
prospective,
standardized,
high-quality,
multimodal
collection
data.
On
June
2018,
there
were
68.097
files,
with
71.1%
females,
representing
761,185
person-years.
This
huge
open
to
scientific
community
might
contribute
exploring
unresolved
issues
unmet
needs
MS.
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
90(4), P. 458 - 468
Published: Jan. 13, 2019
Oral
immunotherapies
have
become
a
standard
treatment
in
relapsing-remitting
multiple
sclerosis.
Direct
comparison
of
their
effect
on
relapse
and
disability
is
needed.We
identified
all
patients
with
sclerosis
treated
teriflunomide,
dimethyl
fumarate
or
fingolimod,
minimum
3-month
persistence
follow-up
the
global
MSBase
cohort
study.
Patients
were
matched
using
propensity
scores.
Three
pairwise
analyses
compared
annualised
rates
hazards
accumulation,
improvement
discontinuation
(analysed
negative
binomial
models
weighted
conditional
survival
models,
censoring).The
eligible
cohorts
consisted
614
(teriflunomide),
782
(dimethyl
fumarate)
2332
(fingolimod)
patients,
followed
over
median
2.5
years.
Annualised
lower
fingolimod
teriflunomide
(0.18
vs
0.24;
p=0.05)
(0.20
0.26;
p=0.01)
similar
(0.19
0.22;
p=0.55).
No
differences
accumulation
(p≥0.59)
(p≥0.14)
found
between
therapies.
In
≥3-month
persistence,
subsequent
discontinuations
less
likely
than
(p<0.001).
Discontinuation
(p=0.68).The
frequency
was
superior
to
fumarate.
The
three
oral
therapies
outcomes
during
initial
years
treatment.
Persistence
two
comparator
drugs.
JAMA Neurology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
80(8), P. 789 - 789
Published: June 12, 2023
Importance
Ocrelizumab,
a
humanized
monoclonal
antibody
targeted
against
CD20+
B
cells,
reduces
the
frequency
of
relapses
by
46%
and
disability
worsening
40%
compared
with
interferon
beta
1a
in
relapsing-remitting
multiple
sclerosis
(MS).
Rituximab,
chimeric
anti-CD20
agent,
is
often
prescribed
as
an
off-label
alternative
to
ocrelizumab.
Objective
To
evaluate
whether
effectiveness
rituximab
noninferior
ocrelizumab
MS.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
was
observational
cohort
study
conducted
between
January
2015
March
2021.
Patients
were
included
treatment
group
for
duration
therapy
recruited
from
MSBase
registry
Danish
MS
Registry
(DMSR).
Included
patients
had
history
treated
or
rituximab,
minimum
6
months
follow-up,
sufficient
data
calculate
propensity
score.
comparable
baseline
characteristics
1:6
matched
score
on
age,
sex,
duration,
(Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale),
prior
relapse
rate,
therapy,
disease
activity
(relapses,
accumulation,
both),
magnetic
resonance
imaging
lesion
burden
(missing
values
imputed),
country.
Exposure
Treatment
after
2015.
Main
outcomes
Measures
Noninferiority
comparison
annualized
rate
(ARRs),
prespecified
noninferiority
margin
1.63
ratio.
Secondary
end
points
6-month
confirmed
accumulation
pairwise-censored
groups.
Results
Of
6027
who
total
1613
(mean
[SD]
age;
42.0
[10.8]
years;
1089
female
[68%])
fulfilled
inclusion
criteria
analysis
(898
MSBase,
715
DMSR).
A
710
(414
296
DMSR)
186
(110
76
Over
pairwise
censored
mean
(SD)
follow-up
1.4
(0.7)
years,
ARR
ratio
higher
than
those
(rate
ratio,
1.8;
95%
CI,
1.4-2.4;
ARR,
0.20
vs
0.09;
P
&lt;
.001).
The
cumulative
hazard
among
(hazard
2.1;
1.5-3.0).
No
difference
risk
observed
sensitivity
analyses.
Conclusion
In
this
comparative
study,
results
did
not
show
As
administered
everyday
practice,
associated
efficacy
at
uniform
doses
intervals
being
further
evaluated
randomized
clinical
trials.
Frontiers in Immunology,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: March 12, 2018
Multiple
Sclerosis
(MS)
is
an
inflammatory
disorder
of
the
central
nervous
system
where
evidence
implicates
aberrant
adaptive
immune
response
in
accrual
neurological
disability.
The
phase
disease
responds
to
immunomodulation
varying
degrees
efficacy,
however
no
therapy
has
been
proven
arrest
progression
Recently,
more
intensive
therapies,
including
immunoablation
with
autologous
haematopoietic
stem
cell
transplantation
(AHSCT)
have
offered
as
a
treatment
option
retard
disease,
prior
patients
becoming
irreversibly
disabled.
Empirical
clinical
observations
support
notion
that
reconstitution
occurs
following
AHSCT
associated
sustained
therapeutic
benefit,
neither
pathogenesis
MS
nor
mechanism
by
which
results
benefit
clearly
delineated.
Although
antigenic
target
not
defined,
accumulated
data
suggest
immunotolerant
state
through
deletion
pathogenic
clones
combination
direct
ablation
and
induction
lymphopenic
driving
replicative
senescence
clonal
attrition.
Restoration
immunoregulation
evidenced
changes
regulatory
T
populations
normalisation
genetic
signatures
homeostasis.
Furthermore,
some
exists
may
induce
rebooting
thymic
function
regeneration
diversified
naïve
repertoire
equipped
appropriately
modulate
future
challenge.
In
this
review,
we
discuss
immunological
mechanisms
focusing
on
AHSCT,
means
recalibrating
dysfunctional
observed
MS.
Multiple Sclerosis Journal,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
26(1), P. 79 - 90
Published: Aug. 9, 2019
Background:
The
risk
factors
for
conversion
from
relapsing-remitting
to
secondary
progressive
multiple
sclerosis
remain
highly
contested.
Objective:
aim
of
this
study
was
determine
the
demographic,
clinical
and
paraclinical
features
that
influence
sclerosis.
Methods:
Patients
with
adult-onset
relapsing–remitting
at
least
four
recorded
disability
scores
were
selected
MSBase,
a
global
observational
cohort.
objectively
defined
evaluated
time
points
per
patient
using
multivariable
marginal
Cox
regression
models.
Sensitivity
analyses
performed.
Results:
A
total
15,717
patients
included
in
primary
analysis.
Older
age
(hazard
ratio
(HR)
=
1.02,
p
<
0.001),
longer
disease
duration
(HR
1.01,
0.038),
higher
Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale
score
1.30,
more
rapid
trajectory
2.82,
0.001)
greater
number
relapses
previous
year
1.07,
0.010)
independently
associated
an
increased
Improving
0.62,
0.039)
disease-modifying
therapy
exposure
0.71,
0.007)
lower
risk.
Recent
cerebral
magnetic
resonance
imaging
activity,
evidence
spinal
cord
lesions
oligoclonal
bands
cerebrospinal
fluid
not
conversion.
Conclusion:
Risk
increases
age,
illness
worsening
decreases
improving
disability.
Therapy
may
delay
onset
progression.
Neurology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
96(5)
Published: Dec. 28, 2020
Objective
To
test
the
hypothesis
that
immunotherapy
prevents
long-term
disability
in
relapsing-remitting
multiple
sclerosis
(MS),
we
modeled
outcomes
14,717
patients.
Methods
We
studied
patients
from
MSBase
followed
for
≥1
year,
with
≥3
visits,
visit
per
and
exposed
to
MS
therapy,
a
subset
of
≥15-year
follow-up.
Marginal
structural
models
were
used
compare
cumulative
hazards
12-month
confirmed
increase
decrease
disability,
Expanded
Disability
Status
Scale
(EDSS)
step
6,
incidence
relapses
between
treated
untreated
periods.
continuously
readjusted
patient
age,
sex,
pregnancy,
date,
disease
course,
time
first
symptom,
prior
relapse
history,
MRI
activity.
Results
A
total
studied.
During
periods,
less
likely
experience
(hazard
ratio
0.60,
95%
confidence
interval
[CI]
0.43–0.82,
p
=
0.0016),
worsening
(0.56,
0.38–0.82,
0.0026),
progress
EDSS
6
(0.33,
0.19–0.59,
0.00019).
Among
1,085
follow-up,
(0.59,
0.50–0.70,
10−9)
(0.81,
0.67–0.99,
0.043).
Conclusion
Continued
treatment
immunotherapies
reduces
accrual
by
19%–44%
(95%
CI
1%–62%),
risk
need
walking
aid
67%
41%–81%),
frequency
40–41%
18%–57%)
over
15
years.
This
study
provides
evidence
disease-modifying
therapies
are
effective
improving
long
term.
Classification
Evidence
Class
IV
that,
MS,
exposure
neurologic
disability.