First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Autism Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 23, 2025
ABSTRACT
Emerging
evidence
suggests
that
observers
tend
to
form
less
favorable
first
impressions
toward
autistic
people
than
non‐autistic
people.
These
negative
may
be
associated
with
immediate
behavioral
responses,
as
well
long‐lasting
attitudes
those
being
observed
negatively
impact
their
psychosocial
wellbeing.
This
systematic
review
and
meta‐analysis
synthesized
the
existing
literature
has
compared
investigate
whether
are
influenced
by:
(1)
type
of
impression
measure,
(2)
modality
stimulus
presentation,
(3)
characteristics
and/or
participants.
Key
inclusion
criteria
were:
one
or
more
groups
provided
ratings,
stimuli
were
presented
in
either
audio‐only,
video‐only,
audio–video,
still
image,
speech
transcript
format,
individuals
compared.
A
search
identified
a
final
sample
21
articles,
which
included
221
effects
for
analyses.
Findings
showed
generally
across
all
presentation
modalities
other
transcript,
effect
sizes
typically
moderate
large.
Differences
pronounced
ratings
interpersonal
attraction
social
communication
rather
psychological
personality
traits.
There
was
also
some
observers,
such
autism
knowledge
quality
contact
people,
impressions.
findings
provide
insight
into
critical
role
play
influencing
interaction
between
individuals.
Language: Английский
Exploring the construct validity of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire: A factor analytic study
Autism,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 5, 2024
‘Camouflaging’
is
a
set
of
strategies
used
by
autistic
people
to
hide
or
compensate
for
their
characteristics
fit
into
predominantly
non-autistic
social
environments.
Many
researchers
have
the
Camouflaging
Autistic
Traits
Questionnaire
(CAT-Q)
measure
camouflaging.
However,
there
been
questions
about
construct
validity
CAT-Q
as
measurement
The
present
study
examined
extent
which
items
were
distinguishable
from
other
theoretically
and
empirically
related
measures
anxiety,
fear
negative
evaluation
traits.
adults
(
N
=
308)
completed
traits
measures.
small-to-large
positive
associations
between
camouflaging
r
0.14–0.65)
not
indicative
collinearity.
Three
exploratory
factor
analyses,
in
factor-analysed
together
with
respectively,
showed
that
generally
loaded
onto
different
factors
items,
exception
Assimilation
subscale
cross-loaded
mostly
items.
Overall,
positively
associated
with,
but
also
differentiated
from,
most
providing
support
measure’s
validity.
Lay
abstract
describe
having
mask
‘camouflage’
selves
certain
settings.
engage
some
questioned
whether
it
experiences
behaviours
being
negatively
judged
In
our
study,
we
analysed
check
indeed
similar
these
experiences.
To
do
this,
asked
308
complete
questionnaires
features.
Then,
put
all
each
three
separate
analyses
(called
analyses)
see
how
would
group
together.
These
us
are
cluster
We
found
grouped
separately
measures’
suggesting
differs
Only
one
subscales
clustered
anxiety
may
need
be
teased
out
better
future.
Generally,
findings
show
can
use
among
people.
Language: Английский
CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
The
purpose
of
this
article
is
to
present
a
theory
therapy
for
stuttering,
its
related
assumptions,
and
findings
from
associated
empirical
studies.
Specifically,
we
propose
the
Blank
Center
CARE™
Model
Treatment
(CT)
which
differs
current,
widely
employed
fluency
model
treatment
(FT).
CT
reflects
authors’
belief
in
need
move
away
fluency-focused
or
seemingly
ableist
treatments
(i.e.,
any
approach
that
attempts
correct,
cure,
fix
disabling
condition)
stuttering.
authors
shift
toward
addresses
whole-person
wellness
considers
stuttering
outside
framework
shaping
modification.
In
support
such
considerations,
provides
preliminary
both
non-clinical
clinical
studies
using
children
adults.
Although
preliminary,
these
appear
lend
needs
change.
essence,
change
zeitgeist
regarding
may
contribute
an
paradigm
FT
management
Language: Английский
What We Know and Do Not Know About Camouflaging, Impression Management, and Mental Health and Wellbeing in Autistic People
Valeria Khudiakova,
No information about this author
Mishel Alexandrovsky,
No information about this author
Wei Ai
No information about this author
et al.
Autism Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 24, 2024
Camouflaging
is
an
impression
management
strategy
employed
by
some
autistic
people,
widely
seen
as
a
response
to
the
pervasive
stigma
surrounding
autism
in
society.
Autistic
narratives
and
lived
experiences
consistently
link
camouflaging
anxiety,
depression,
suicide
risks,
burnout.
Quantitative
research
yet
determine
nature
of
these
relationships,
with
significant
portion
recent
studies
providing
inconsistent
evidence.
While
can
be
compelled
survival
social
environments,
it
might
also
contribute
positive
outcomes
such
securing
employment
forming
implicating
complex
interrelationship
mental
health
wellbeing.
We
advocate
for
using
transactional
framework
understand
wellbeing
address
inconsistencies
research.
Through
examining
transactions
among
person's
individual
cognitive
characteristics,
behavior
modification
strategies,
particular
contexts
they
find
themselves
in,
this
guides
new
empirical
directions
delineate
relationships
between
camouflaging,
management,
health,
There
need
develop
multiple
measures
that
motivations,
ability,
effortfulness,
perceived
effectiveness
examine
how
behaviors
are
different
environments.
Research
should
focus
on
intersectionality,
sociocultural
influences,
diverse
voices
study
context-sensitive
across
population.
Language: Английский