People with autistic traits are more likely to engage with misinformation and conspiracy theories in a simulated social media context DOI
Neophytos Georgiou, Ryan Balzan, Paul Delfabbro

et al.

Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 20

Published: Dec. 24, 2024

Background People with higher levels of autistic traits are shown to be more likely endorse conspiracy theories and misinformation on traditional methods measurement (e.g., self-report). However, such research has been limited by the lack a naturalistic measure theory endorsement that resembles social media platforms.

Language: Английский

Leaders' power construal influences malevolent creativity: The mediating role of organizational conspiracy beliefs DOI Creative Commons
Kyriaki Fousiani, Shuang Xu, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen

et al.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 98(1)

Published: Jan. 20, 2025

Abstract How employees perceive their leaders' power can influence view and treatment of organizations. This study examines how employees' perceptions construal—primarily as responsibility (PaR) or primarily opportunity (PaO)—influence employee malevolent creativity towards the organization, with organizational conspiracy beliefs mediating this relationship. We hypothesized that when is perceived responsibility, it diminishes endorsement and, in turn, reduces creativity. Conversely, perceiving mainly was expected to amplify subsequently Study 1, a three‐wave among employees, showed increased PaO positively related through beliefs. Moreover, PaR negatively 2 (preregistered) experimentally tested these relationships provided support for all hypotheses. 3 (also preregistered) manipulated exposure theories (the mediator) address ‘measurement‐of‐mediation’ issue found increase demonstrates adverse consequences leader's construal employee's

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Conspiracy beliefs and democratic backsliding: Longitudinal effects of election conspiracy beliefs on criticism of democracy and support for authoritarianism during political contests DOI Creative Commons
Emma F. Thomas, Alexander W. O’Donnell, Danny Osborne

et al.

Political Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 22, 2025

Abstract There are widespread concerns that conspiracy theories undermine democracies. But do beliefs increase criticism of democracy and/or support for authoritarianism? Or antidemocratic people more likely to endorse beliefs? To answer these important questions, we collected longitudinal data during two concurrent democratic elections—the 2020 US Presidential Election ( N = 609) and the General in New Zealand 603). Random intercept cross‐lagged panel models tested whether affect general, as well authoritarianism, both direct representative democracy, specifically. was little evidence temporally preceded changes attitudes toward or any specific form government. Instead, who supported authoritarianism subsequently endorsed stronger beliefs. The results suggested that, context electoral contests (e.g., elections), rather than fostering views.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

“Who Islamises us?”: Does political ideology moderate the effects of exposure to different Great Replacement Conspiracy explanations on radical collective action against different targets? DOI Creative Commons
Hakan Çakmak, Valentin Mang, Feiteng Long

et al.

British Journal of Social Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 64(2)

Published: Feb. 11, 2025

Abstract Conspiracy theories against outgroups (e.g., the Great Replacement [GRC]) are believed to fuel radicalisation. Two experimental studies with British and American samples ( N total = 1690) examined how different GRC narratives political ideologies influence radical collective action Muslims ideologically opposed elites. We predicted that Muslim conspirator left‐wing (vs. control) would increase intentions among right‐wingers (Hypothesis 1). also narrative other conditions) elites 2a), do same 2b). Furthermore, we stronger towards right‐wing left‐wingers when exposed condition 3). Despite limited support for these hypotheses, both showed exposure any increased Muslims, suggesting group does not play a strong role in anti‐Muslim The lack of statistically significant effects on targets may be due conservative hypothesis testing. Theoretical societal implications discussed, providing critical conceptual methodological avenues future research conspiracy

Language: Английский

Citations

0

All you'll feel is doom and gloom: Multiple perspectives on the associations between economic anxiety and conspiracy beliefs DOI Creative Commons
Magdalena Adamus, María Chayinska, Jakub Šrol

et al.

Political Psychology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 17, 2025

Abstract The article investigates whether and how adherence to conspiracy beliefs (CBs) about COVID‐19 pandemic might be associated with (and cause) economic anxiety over various cultural settings time. First, we examined the extent which CBs predicted using European Social Survey data, round 10, from 17 countries (Study 1). Second, data a balanced (in terms of age, gender, education, region) Slovak sample, employed cross‐lagged panel analysis determine direction association between 2). Study 1 revealed that was significantly higher levels across contexts. 2 compellingly showed increased sense time, whereas reverse causal path consistently nonsignificant. This work provides evidence may increasingly adverse subjective appraisals realities. We discuss our results can contribute understanding curbing could also alleviate anxiety. Finally, recommend research agenda better understand psychological boundary mechanisms accounting for these effects.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Bridging the Cognitive/Collective and Supply/Demand Divides in Conspiracy Theory Research DOI Creative Commons
Efe Peker,

Frédérick Guillaume Dufour

Social Science Quarterly, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 106(2)

Published: Feb. 21, 2025

ABSTRACT Objectives Despite the fast growth of social scientific literature on conspiracy theories, fragmentation rather than dialogue is norm across disciplines. One such division between individual/cognitive versus sociopolitical dimensions beliefs, which are often studied in isolation. This article aims to contribute bridging gap. Methods We carry out a selective review post‐2010 that approaches theories from (social) psychological and political sociological perspectives highlight compare their main inquiries findings. Results The examination finds scholarship, deals with individual group‐based variables, more attuned studying public “demand” for theories. By contrast, research collective phenomena as populism movements inclined elucidate “supply” side equation. Conclusions In addition quantitative‐qualitative rift already identified literature, theory scholarship also shaped by divides pertain level analysis supply demand sides “market” dynamics. argues closer micro (individual), meso (interpersonal), macro (national/global) levels integrate factors nourishing narratives.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Applying Appraisal Theories to Understand Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Conspiracy Theories DOI Creative Commons
Lotte Pummerer, Theofilos Gkinopoulos, Karen M. Douglas

et al.

Psychological Inquiry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 35(3-4), P. 159 - 178

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Beliefs in conspiracy theories are related to a diverse set of emotional and behavioral consequences. At the same time, theoretical model detailing when theory is more likely elicit confrontation compared withdrawal, indirect aggression or community-building missing. We argue that appraisals provide missing link between beliefs their consequences, proposing Appraisal Model Conspiracy Theories (AMCT). Based on appraisal emotions, we outline how focus different features vary situations which they embedded (i.e., secrecy vs. gained knowledge; powerlessness option confrontation; harm oneself others) facilitate specific appraisals, resulting outcomes. also AMCT helps reconcile inconsistent research by providing better predictions about

Language: Английский

Citations

1

On the Subjectivity of Conspiracy Theory Appraisals DOI
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen

Psychological Inquiry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 35(3-4), P. 179 - 182

Published: Oct. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

The role of group (in)efficacy in controlling deviance on group cohesion and on social identity management strategies: Social control identity motivated model DOI
Isabel R. Pinto, José M. Marques

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 2, 2024

The social control identity motivated (SCIM) model proposes that perceived failure of group mechanisms in punishing deviance increases the threat associated with emergence groups. Based on this assumption, explains psychosocial processes involved consequences for cohesion and management strategies a match or mismatch between implemented formal members expect to be based motivation processes. This members’ commitment reinforcement ingroup order status quo (in case match), need cope inefficacy mismatch). In response control, individuals may engage various identity-motivated processes, including disinvestment from ingroup, informal responses, efforts strengthen ingroup’s normative system through innovation reinforcement. By accounting interplay expectations, SCIM intends contribute understanding protective deviance, by highlighting (in)efficacy shapes dynamic. is justified both direct indirect empirical support, we discuss potential model’s applicability, as well additional research understand determinants each type response, thus leaving open refinement.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Destructive belief systems and violent behavior within and between groups and identities DOI
Amber M. Gaffney, Michael A. Hogg, Dominic Abrams

et al.

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 13, 2024

This special issue celebrates 25 years of the Sage journal Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. In this article, we use examples current sociopolitical climate to highlight importance scientific inquiry into group processes intergroup relations. Ingrained identities that arise from groups are responsible for causing wars, protests, community clashes with law enforcement, violence, change, major public health crises, societal change. However, just as blame goes groups, collectives can be harnessed solutions. contains 13 articles showcase diversity research in Relations, all which contribute theory advancement application science real world issues.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Conspiracy mentality in autistic and non-autistic individuals DOI Creative Commons
Sanne Roels, Sander Begeer, Anke M. Scheeren

et al.

Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 14

Published: Sept. 10, 2024

Belief in conspiracy theories has emerged across times and cultures. While previous accounts attributed beliefs to mental health conditions, accumulating research suggests that are common among the general population. In present study we examined whether mentality - is, a predisposition believe differed between group of autistic adults population sample.

Language: Английский

Citations

0