Revista signos,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
56(113), P. 697 - 722
Published: Dec. 15, 2023
Este
artÃculo
tiene
como
objetivo
caracterizar
las
estrategias
discursivas
de
legitimación
en
tuits
relativos
a
franjas
electorales
televisadas
los
plebiscitos
constitucionales
Chile
(2020-2022),
desde
una
perspectiva
crÃtica
que
integra
principios
estudios
crÃticos
del
discurso,
especÃficamente,
el
estudio
la
(van
Leeuwen,
2007;
Reyes,
2011;
Hansson
&
Page,
2022)
y
marco
conceptual
sistema
hÃbrido
medios
(Chadwick,
2017).
corte
cualitativo
analiza
muestra
aleatoria
extraÃda
un
corpus
aproximadamente
100.000
marcados
con
etiqueta
#Franjaelectoral
publicados
periodos
campaña
plebiscito
entrada
(2020)
salida
(2022)
por
nueva
constitución
Chile.
Se
analizaron
detalle
50
cada
periodo
para
utilizadas
estos
textos
contrastar
ambas
campañas.
encontraron
diversas
descritas
literatura
analizados
justificar
su
postura
relación
procesos
relacionados
La
estrategia
más
frecuente
es
evaluación
moral,
relacionada
principalmente
valoración
franja
electoral
proceso
constitucional;
seguida
autorización
remite
figuras
públicas
experiencia;
racionalización
cuestiona
argumentos
adversarios
y,
finalmente,
mitopoiesis,
polÃticos
anteriores
servirÃan
acción
eleccionarios.
Discourse Context & Media,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
58, P. 100770 - 100770
Published: March 23, 2024
As
government
officeholders
face
criticism
for
misconduct
or
policy
failures,
they
are
tempted
to
communicate
in
self-defensive
ways.
In
this
paper,
I
draw
attention
how
strategic
blame
avoidance
may
involve
coercive
impoliteness,
that
is,
the
use
of
expressions
attack
(potential)
critics
with
an
aim
forcing
them
withhold
their
(future)
criticism.
Taking
a
discourse-historical
approach
political
rhetoric,
present
illustrative
examples
institutional
messaging
from
United
States,
Kingdom,
Estonia,
and
Russia
demonstrate
these
attacks
be
accomplished
subtle
ways,
such
as
via
sarcasm
mock
politeness.
discuss
ethical
implications
uses
impoliteness
communication
democratic
debates
over
public
issues.
The
paper
contributes
study
games,
language
aggression,
incivility
(digitally)
mediated
contexts.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 208 - 228
Published: Jan. 12, 2025
Abstract
Blame
games—symbolic
struggles
over
the
blameworthiness
or
otherwise
of
some
individual
collective
actor—are
ubiquitous
in
modern
political
life.
When
people
talk
write
about
blame
issues
contexts,
they
may
seek
to
construct
competing
representations
character
traits
actors,
rights
and
obligations
consequences
their
actions.
In
this
chapter,
examples
from
conflict
surrounding
highly
controversial
Brexit
policy
British
press
are
analyzed
illustrate
how
interpret
both
offensive
defensive
rhetorical
moves
actors
perspective
morality.
It
is
demonstrated
can
be
terms
these
reveal
certain
(often
unexpressed)
understandings
morality
that
opposing
sides
appealing
to.
The
chapter
concludes
by
outlining
a
set
normative
underpinnings
for
further
analysis
discursive
games.
Corpora,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
20(1), P. 105 - 134
Published: April 1, 2025
This
study
compared
the
use
of
‘targeted
attitudes’
in
The
Wall
Street
Journal’
s
(wsj)
economic
news
Chinese
companies
its
English
edition
and
edition.
included
two
corpora
comprising
1,480
articles
from
wsj’s
editions
(2020–2023).
To
identify
targeted
attitudes
towards
enterprises
these
corpora,
this
applied
Attitude
system
Appraisal
System
(
Martin
White,
2005
;
Bednarek,
2008
).
Furthermore,
a
swot-based
taxonomy
Wheelen
et
al.,
2017
)
was
used
to
categorise
both
internal
external
factors
as
attitude
targets.
A
corpus
analysis
revealed
significant
(ll≥3.84;
p<0.05)
frequency
differences
between
editions.
portray
holistically.
greater
amount
Inclination
Propriety
were
convey
firms’
aspirations,
environmental
efforts,
illegal
behaviours.
Capacity
evaluate
impacts
socio-political
on
firms.
Conversely,
Appreciation
value
corporate
assets.
These
findings
imply
how
wsj
tailors
coverage
cater
expectations
different
expert
audiences
during
China’s
fluctuations.
Discourse Context & Media,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
57, P. 100757 - 100757
Published: Feb. 1, 2024
During
major
crises,
such
as
the
Covid-19
pandemic,
government
officeholders
issue
commands
to
change
people's
behaviour
(e.g.,
'Stay
at
home!')
and
express
thanks
acknowledge
efforts
of
others
build
solidarity.
We
use
specialised
datasets
replies
social
media
posts
by
ministers
in
United
Kingdom
during
lockdowns
explore
how
people
react
their
messages
that
contain
directive
speech
acts
thanking.
Empirically,
our
corpus-assisted
analysis
evaluative
language
blaming
shows
far
from
promoting
team
spirit,
thanking
may
elicit
least
much,
if
not
more
than
commands.
Methodologically,
we
demonstrate
analyse
communication
dialogically
gain
nuanced
insights
about
online
feedback
citizens.
Discourse Context & Media,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
58, P. 100772 - 100772
Published: April 1, 2024
Public
debates
are
rife
with
overt
blame
attributions—the
explicit
assignment
of
moral
responsibility
for
problems
in
society
to
individuals
and
groups.
The
present
study
develops
a
framework
identifying
discursive
attribution
strategies
the
journalistic
mediation
through
use
causality
construction,
which
enables
an
understanding
how
is
attributed
implicitly.
I
draw
on
qualitative
quantitative
discourse
analysis
migration
frames
distinguish
three
types
perceived
migration-related
problems:
security-based,
economic,
cultural.
make
further
distinction
based
whether
these
causally
explained
by:
(1)
reference
migrants'
alleged
culture
religion
or
(2)
socioeconomic
conditions
they
experience
recipient
country.
advances
our
by
drawing
attention
subtle
ways
groups
held
responsible
processes
context
influences
mediated
attribution.
Discourse Context & Media,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
59, P. 100785 - 100785
Published: May 8, 2024
How
do
people
negotiate
blame
for
racism?
In
this
article
we
focus
on
how
participants
manage
the
blameworthiness
of
racism—as
a
problem
in
society,
and
relation
to
specific
racist
incidents—by
scrutinising
sources
racism
are
formulated
broadcast
media.
This
research
develops
our
understanding
is
constructed
society
as
well
functions
allocate
responsibility
different
parties.
By
examining
conversational
topic
blaming
social
action,
analysis
important
into
understood
at
time
history
considers
what
consequences
might
be
allocated
it.
Communication Research,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
51(5), P. 467 - 495
Published: Nov. 25, 2023
This
article
introduces
an
original
theoretical
model
for
understanding
how
the
linguistic
framing
of
political
protest
messages
influences
blame
spreads
in
social
media.
Our
retweetability
posits
that
way
which
basis
and
focus
are
linguistically
construed
affects
people’s
perception
strength
criticism
message
its
likelihood
to
be
reposted.
Two
online
experiments
provide
empirical
support
model.
We
find
attacks
on
a
person’s
character
perceived
as
more
critical
than
blaming
focused
negative
outcomes
their
actions,
judgements
sanction
have
greater
impact
those
esteem.
The
study
also
uncovers
“retweetability
paradox”—in
contrast
earlier
studies,
we
not
likely
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 159 - 181
Published: July 9, 2024
Abstract
To
hold
on
to
power,
officeholders
may
try
use
language
in
ways
that
would
impair
the
public
understanding
of
harmful
events
and
their
causes,
derail
debates
over
blame
issues.
It
is
therefore
necessary
develop
an
approach
governmental
avoidance
focuses
critical
awareness—citizens’
improved
social
political
functions
with
a
special
consideration
how
various
discursive
strategies
persuasion
are
used
within
struggles
for
power.
This
chapter
presents
conceptual
framework
integrates
contemporary
methods
discourse
studies—an
important
source
awareness—with
current
knowledge
administrative
avoidance.
shows
we
could
look
beyond
officeholders’
well-known
presentational
such
as
denials
justifications
understand
more
broadly
blame-takers
deeds
represented
text
talk
particular
modify
perception
blame.