Does the birth plan match what is relevant to women? Preferences of Spanish women when giving birth DOI Creative Commons
Isabel Artieta‐Pinedo, Carmen Paz‐Pascual, Arturo García-Álvarez

et al.

BMC Women s Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Jan. 15, 2024

Abstract Background To support women in making shared decisions, it is important to know what relevant them. The aim explore which of the options included birth plans (BP) are most interest women, and more controversial. In addition, possible association this variability with personal characteristics. Methods data part a cross-sectional descriptive study, carried out xxx, on clinimetric characteristics two instruments measure women’s needs labour postpartum. Women were recruited consecutively by their midwives during pregnancy check-ups, receive link digital questionnaire allowed provide links questionnaires other pregnant women. asked determine level agreement statements about environment, accompaniment, pain relief, medical intervention neonatal care. relationship between each statement, socio-demographic variables fear childbirth (W-DEQ-A) was analysed using combination statistics analyse frequencies, regression models test effect those items greatest variability. Results Two hundred forty-seven responded. More than 90% preferred hospital delivery, information control over intervention, accompanied partner continuous skin-to-skin contact newborn. There questions attach less importance or show greater variability, related clinical aspects, like foetal monitoring, placenta cord clamping… Various factors variability; parity, nationality, educational level, risk factor important. Conclusions Some referring need for participation practically unanimous among while technical interventions generate That should make us think ones require decision after be directly. choice interventional deliveries strongly associated childbirth.

Language: Английский

About EMAeHealth: What do women value in a Maternal Education app?. A sequential mixed-method study on user perspective (Preprint) DOI
Maite Espinosa, Isabel Artieta‐Pinedo, Carmen Paz‐Pascual

et al.

Published: March 6, 2025

BACKGROUND EHealth can help healthcare service users take a more active role in decision-making and professionals guide the patient this process. Even though usability health literacy strategies should development of mHealth apps, number digital apps publishing their evaluation results is still small OBJECTIVE The aim study was to explore perceptions EMAeHealth app about its acceptance, usability, strengths weaknesses for implementation. METHODS This an exploratory sequential mixed-method research study, where qualitative followed by quantitative study. Qualitative were collected through individual semi-structured interviews between January March 2024. Participants identified purposive sampling. Saturation reached once 10 had been carried out. In part, 106 out 400 responded anonymous online survey created ad hoc December 2024 based on RESULTS Two categories drawn up during analysis: (1) “The best thing app”, with accessibility, quantity, quality, good organization information credibility source among reasons positive evaluation. (2) “What could be improved”: here, participants considered potential become essential if new functions related provision incorporated linking it records, as well making individualized some different aspects such receiving notifications. Women commented lack opportunities share experiences other women same situation consequently opportunity develop networks. gave similar results, both assessments areas improvement CONCLUSIONS Although value accessibility reliability designed public positively, seen, combination intervention face-to-face care and, above all, individualization adaptation information, notifications or recommendations culture, situation, stage each woman

Language: Английский

Citations

0
Emotional Coping Strategies for Informal Caregivers of Hospitalized Patients: A Study of Distress and Overload DOI Creative Commons
Daniel Oleas,

Christian Yong Peña,

Xóchitl Garza Olivares

et al.

Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: Volume 17, P. 725 - 734

Published: Feb. 1, 2024

Purpose: Informal caregivers constitute a vulnerable population group that has forsaken their activities and life projects with the sole purpose of caring for dependent individual without receiving any form compensation in return.Emotionally, this been neglected by both state family members, exacerbating distress levels among them.The objective is to analyze impact emotional coping strategies on experiences burden adult informal tending hospitalized individuals. Sample Methods:The role caregiver psychological was examined 460 from Guayaquil, Ecuador, who participated an online survey.The instruments used included Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS 21), Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI), Emotional Coping Questionnaire (Cuestionario de Afrontamiento Emocional).The analysis involved multiple regression iteratively select variables, aiming build simpler more explanatory model.Results: Employing stepwise model selection procedure, it found 16.5% variance depression, 19.5% anxiety, 19.8% stress, 32% were predicted specific strategies.Additionally, estimated participants' gender, greater observed males due societal expectations. Conclusion:This study underscores importance experience suggests interventions should focus developing adaptive manage stress associated caregiving.

Language: Английский

Citations

2
Does the birth plan match what is relevant to women? Preferences of Spanish women when giving birth DOI Creative Commons
Isabel Artieta‐Pinedo, Carmen Paz‐Pascual, Arturo García-Álvarez

et al.

BMC Women s Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Jan. 15, 2024

Abstract Background To support women in making shared decisions, it is important to know what relevant them. The aim explore which of the options included birth plans (BP) are most interest women, and more controversial. In addition, possible association this variability with personal characteristics. Methods data part a cross-sectional descriptive study, carried out xxx, on clinimetric characteristics two instruments measure women’s needs labour postpartum. Women were recruited consecutively by their midwives during pregnancy check-ups, receive link digital questionnaire allowed provide links questionnaires other pregnant women. asked determine level agreement statements about environment, accompaniment, pain relief, medical intervention neonatal care. relationship between each statement, socio-demographic variables fear childbirth (W-DEQ-A) was analysed using combination statistics analyse frequencies, regression models test effect those items greatest variability. Results Two hundred forty-seven responded. More than 90% preferred hospital delivery, information control over intervention, accompanied partner continuous skin-to-skin contact newborn. There questions attach less importance or show greater variability, related clinical aspects, like foetal monitoring, placenta cord clamping… Various factors variability; parity, nationality, educational level, risk factor important. Conclusions Some referring need for participation practically unanimous among while technical interventions generate That should make us think ones require decision after be directly. choice interventional deliveries strongly associated childbirth.

Language: Английский

Citations

0