Parental vaccine hesitancy: recent evidences support the need to implement targeted communication strategies
Cecilia Cagnotta,
No information about this author
Nicoletta Lettera,
No information about this author
Mirko Cardillo
No information about this author
et al.
Journal of Infection and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
18(2), P. 102648 - 102648
Published: Jan. 5, 2025
In
2018,
Europe
experienced
a
surge
in
measles
cases,
revealing
the
consequences
of
suboptimal
immunization
coverage.
This
trend
was
exacerbated
by
long-standing
vaccine
hesitancy.
Parental
attitudes
toward
childhood
vaccines
have
increasingly
shifted,
influenced
ethical,
religious,
and
safety
concerns.
Vaccines
hesitancy
has
substantially
increased
after
Covid-19
pandemic.
Using
PubMed,
we
reviewed
cross-sectional
studies,
published
during
years
2023-2024,
related
to
parents'
hesitancy,
with
aim
provide
an
overview
its
prevalence,
underlying
reasons
for
public
health.
Data
summarised
highlight
various
factors
contributing
These
include
socio-demographic
factors,
impact
pandemic,
widespread
misinformation,
particularly
through
social
media.
Several
studies
show
that
is
often
linked
lower
education
levels,
decreased
trust
healthcare
systems.
The
pandemic
this
issue.
article
underscores
need
targeted
communication
strategies
address
focusing
on
specific
populations,
such
as
those
low-income
settings
or
limited
access
information.
It
emphasizes
importance
countering
misinformation
improve
vaccination
rates
health
outcomes.
Language: Английский
Vaccine Hesitancy Among Family Doctors and Family Health Workers: Prevalence and Associated Factors
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
31(1)
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Aims
The
aim
of
the
study
was
to
determine
prevalence
vaccine
hesitancy
among
family
doctors
and
health
workers
regarding
vaccines
included
in
childhood
vaccination
calendar
identify
factors
that
may
be
associated
with
participants.
Methods
A
total
131
people,
76
55
Bilecik
province
its
districts,
representing
89.7%
population,
were
cross‐sectional
study.
data
collection
period
01−31
March
2024.
Data
collected
online.
All
participants
asked
complete
a
socio‐demographic
form,
their
intention
vaccinate
children
for
each
14
Turkey,
form
asking
about
variables
hesitancy.
Participants
categorised
according
grouped
into
acceptance,
statistical
analyses
performed
between
groups.
Results
It
found
19.1%
had
at
least
one
age
years
experience
higher
than
those
acceptance.
In
addition,
rate
ambivalence
significantly
these
who
(
p
<
0.05).
belief
should
only
vaccinated
against
serious
diseases
is
ambivalent
accepting
respondents
are
not
safest
ways
protect
infectious
agents,
have
become
better
more
effective
through
scientific
research,
do
strengthen
immune
system
ambivalents
acceptors
Conclusions
conclusion,
results
this
indicate
common
healthcare
workers,
such
as
age,
working
years,
having
children,
individuals
hold
various
misconceptions
vaccines.
Language: Английский