European Journal of Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
This
study
compared
the
flexural
strength,
surface
hardness,
and
roughness
of
conventional,
milled,
three-dimensional
(3D)-printed
provisional
restorations.
Coatings,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(2), P. 230 - 230
Published: Feb. 14, 2025
Background:
The
adoption
of
3D
printing
in
restorative
dentistry
is
increasing,
with
the
post-curing
duration
a
material
being
identified
as
key
determinant
its
performance.
This
study
evaluated
effect
post-polymerization
time
on
flexural
strength
(FS)
and
Vickers
microhardness
(VHN)
3D-printed
composite.
Methods:
Specimens
Formlabs
Permanent
Crown
Resin
were
printed
divided
into
four
groups
according
to
their
time:
no
20,
40,
60
min
time.
Flexural
testing
was
carried
out
using
three-point
test
40
bar-shaped
specimens
(n
=
10/group),
followed
by
fractography
observations
under
scanning
electron
microscope
(SEM).
Vicker
also
conducted
disk-shaped
10/group).
inorganic
filler
content
measured
ash
method,
morphology
characterized
an
SEM.
Statistical
analyses
performed
adjusted
ANOVA
regression
tests.
Results:
highest
median
FS
values
observed
at
(133.07
MPa),
significant
differences
across
all
(p
<
0.0001).
VHN
found
(32.09
VHN),
between
A
positive
correlation
(rho
0.7488;
p
0.0001)
hardness
changing
durations.
resin
composite
had
average
66.82%
based
weight.
Conclusions:
With
limitation
current
vitro
setup,
shown
lead
best
post-printing
polymerization
significantly
affects
Resin.
Further
research
should
explore
effects
different
compositions,
clinical
conditions,
curing
protocols
enhance
general
applicability
these
findings.
Clinical
implications:
Extending
does
not
inherently
result
improved
properties.
considered
adjustment
can
impact
mechanical
properties
Macromolecular Bioscience,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 9, 2025
Abstract
As
one
of
the
3D
printing
technologies,
digital
light
processing
(DLP)
technology
has
been
widely
applied
in
biomedical
engineering.
The
principles
and
advantages
DLP
are
compared
with
other
while
characteristics
applicable
fields
each
technique
analyzed.
applications
tissue
engineering,
medical
devices
pharmaceutical
field
classified
summarized.
Besides,
prospects
challenges
engineering
discussed.
With
continuous
advancement,
will
play
an
increasingly
important
role
personalized
medicine
regenerative
medicine.
BMC Oral Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: April 15, 2025
Abstract
Background
Controversial
properties
and
performance
of
commercially
available
3D-printed
resin
composite
for
permanent
restorations.
So,
the
purpose
this
study
was
to
assess
flexural
strength,
microhardness,
wear,
color
stability
versus
milled
nanohybrid
composites
restoration.
Methods
A
total
70
samples
were
used;
38
bar-shaped
(14
mm
⋅
2
mm)
32
disc-shaped
(10
Tetric
CAD
™
blocks
(TC)
Flexcera
Smile
Ultra
plus
(FSU)
fabricated
(
n
=
35).
Flexural
tested
using
3-point
bending
test.
The
Vickers
test
used
microhardness
evaluation.
Volumetric
wear
analysis
changes
assessed
after
simulated
aging
via
Geomagic
Control
X
software
a
Vita
Easyshade
spectrophotometer,
respectively.
Color
calculated
CIEDE2000
formula.
paired
t-test
dependent
variable
analysis,
Mann‒Whitney
U
independent
variables
(α
0.05).
Results
TC
resulted
in
significantly
higher
strength
(247.7
±
29.1
MPa)
(94.6
3
gf/um
)
than
did
FSU
(97.2
10.2
MPa
31
4.6
2,
respectively)
P
<
0.0001).
Compared
with
(–36.3
),
lower
rates
(–17.6
)(
had
ΔE00
value
2.4
0.5,
whereas
2.1
0.7
0.532),
no
significant
difference
between
groups,
but
both
values
above
acceptability
limit
(1.8).
Conclusions
composites,
have
better
properties.
Clinical
relevance
Milled
exhibit
superior
resistance,
making
them
potentially
more
durable
clinical
dental
restorations
compared
composites.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 28, 2025
ABSTRACT
Objective
To
compare
the
mechanical,
chemical,
and
surface
properties
of
three
materials
used
for
provisional
restorations,
manufactured
with
additive
(3D‐printing),
subtractive
(milling),
conventional
techniques.
Materials
Methods
Three
material
groups
were
tested:
(a)
GC
TempPRINT,
(3D‐printed/3DP),
(b)
VITA
CAD‐Temp,
(milled/ML),
(c)
Telio
CS
C&B,
(conventional
self‐cured/CC).
Each
group
consisted
20
beam‐shaped
specimens
(25
×
2
mm)
a
three‐point
flexural
strength
test
5
discs
(Ø:15
mm,
h:
roughness,
gloss,
degree
conversion,
hardness
measurements.
Data
analyzed
using
one‐way
ANOVA
Holm‐Sidak
multiple
comparison
tests
(
α
=
0.05).
Results
The
ranking
statistically
significant
differences
p
<
0.05)
was:
3DP
>CC
>
ML
(Sdr
roughness
parameter),
(gloss)
3DP>
CC
(gloss,
strength).
Clinical
Significance
tested
showed
in
all
properties.
These
may
affect
their
clinical
performance
should
be
taken
into
consideration
application.
European journal of medical research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
29(1)
Published: April 24, 2024
Yttrium-stabilized
zirconia
(YSZ)
and
alumina
are
the
most
commonly
used
dental
esthetic
crown
materials.
This
study
aimed
to
provide
detailed
information
on
comparison
between
yttrium-stabilized
alumina,
two
materials
often
for
crowns
in
dentistry.
The International Journal of Prosthodontics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37(7), P. S203 - S207
Published: Feb. 21, 2024
Aim:
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
evaluate
the
flexural
strength
properties
three
different
aged
and
nonaged
3D-printed
resins
built
by
3D
printing
systems
used
in
dental
applications.Materials
Methods:
Bars
(2
×
2
25
mm)
were
additively
fabricated
using
a
printer
crown
(Saremco
Crowntec,
Senertek
P-Crown
V2,
V3)
per
manufacturers'
recommendations.Each
subgroup
divided
into
subgroups
(n
=
10
bars
group).Thermocycling
procedures
(5º
55ºC;
5,000
cycles)
performed
under
favorable
conditions
for
from
each
material.Flexural
(MPa)
measured
all
samples
universal
test
machine.Results:
When
both
are
compared,
significant
differences
found
measurements
(P
<
.001).The
highest
observed
Saremco
Crowntec
group,
while
lowest
P
Crown
V2
group.The
V3
displayed
no
difference
between
their
groups
>
.05),while
.039)showed
its
groups.Conclusions:
showed
groups,
had
strength.The
artificial
aging
process
decreased
values
resin
groups.
Digital Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Objective
This
study
aimed
to
provide
valuable
insights
into
the
current
research
status
and
gaps
in
digital
intraoral
scanner
literature
dentistry.
Methodology
Scopus
Search
Query
TITLE-ABS-KEY
(intraoral
AND
scanners
(dentistry
OR
dentistry)).
The
search
query
used
for
bibliometric
analysis
was
“TITLE-ABS-KEY
dentistry)).”
indicates
that
focused
on
documents
which
title,
abstract,
or
keywords
contained
terms
“intraoral,”
“scanners,”
either
“dentistry”
“digital
dentistry.”
Results
covers
a
timespan
from
1998
2023
includes
331
sourced
136
publications.
annual
growth
rate
of
this
field
is
reported
be
15.9%,
indicating
steady
increase
over
time.
Among
top
sources,
“Journal
Esthetic
Restorative
Dentistry”
Prosthetic
have
highest
number
articles,
their
significance
field.
Some
notable
authors
corresponding
statistics
include
WÖSTMANN
B,
with
15
articles
fractionalized
value
3.16,
SCHLENZ
MA,
14
2.91.
United
States
has
significant
presence
Germany
closely
follows
this,
demonstrating
contribution
scientific
community.
Conclusions
dentistry
provided
state
scholarly
publications
sheds
light
trends,
patterns,
advancements
use
these
dental
practice.