Cannabis,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Objective:
An
increase
in
medical
cannabis
and
prescribed
cannabinoids
use
for
chronic
pain
management
has
been
observed
Canada
the
past
years.
This
study
aimed
to:
1)
Describe
clinicians’
perceived
risk
associated
with
of
pain;
2)
Identify
sociodemographic
professional
factors
adverse
effects.
Method:
A
web-based
cross-sectional
was
conducted
Quebec,
2022.
convenience
sample
207
clinicians
recruited
(physicians/pharmacists/nurse
practitioners).
They
were
asked
to
rate
effects
(e.g.,
smoke,
or
oil)
nabilone)
on
a
scale
0
10
(0:
no
risk,
10:
very
high
risk),
respectively.
Multiple
linear
regression
performed
identify
risk.
Results:
Average
5.93
±
2.08
(median:6/10)
5.76
1.81
(median:6/10).
Factors
higher
working
primary
care
(β
=
1.38,
p
.0034)
another
setting
1.21,
.0368)
as
compared
hospital
setting.
As
cannabinoids,
being
pharmacist
1.14,
.0452),
0.83,
.0408)
reporting
more
continuing
education
about
0.02,
.0416)
No
sex
differences
found
terms
Conclusions:
Considering
clinician’s
experience
provide
insights
these
professionals
are
at
forefront
patient
when
they
encounter
Journal of Primary Health Care,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(2), P. 135 - 146
Published: March 2, 2023
Introduction
The
New
Zealand
Medicinal
Cannabis
Scheme
(NZMCS)
was
established
in
April
2020
with
the
aim
of
expanding
access
to
quality
controlled
medicinal
cannabis
products
and
developing
a
domestic
industry.
Yet,
two
years
later,
many
patients
report
challenges
utilising
NZMCS,
including
physicians'
reluctance
provide
prescriptions
for
products.
Aim
To
explore
barriers
facilitators
prescribing
Zealand.
Methods
We
conducted
semi-structured
interviews
31
physicians
(general
practitioners,
specialists,
clinicians)
who
had
discussed
last
6
months.
Results
Physicians
reported
principal
barrier
limited
clinical
evidence
support
therapy.
Further
included:
perceived
lack
knowledge
cannabis;
concerns
over
professional
reputation;
social
stigma;
price
Conversely,
factors
that
facilitated
included
patients'
some
desire
avoid
having
engage
private
clinics;
timing
prescription
requests
(ie
considering
after
other
treatments
been
exhausted).
Discussion
research
medications,
education
training,
information
would
deliver
more
informed
advice
enhance
confidence
therapies.
Harm Reduction Journal,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Jan. 15, 2025
Canadian
Veterans
experiencing
chronic
pain
report
concerns
about
accessing
accurate
information
on
the
risks
associated
with
medical
cannabis
(MC)
use.
The
Lower
Risk
Cannabis
Use
Guidelines
(LRCUG)
were
developed
to
equip
individuals
who
use
recreationally
safer-use
strategies.
Many
of
harm
reduction
recommendations
for
recreational
are
relevant
and
important
considerations
MC
primary
objective
our
study
was
assess
Veterans'
awareness
interest
in
LRCUG,
engagement
potential
higher-risk
behaviours.
Armed
Forces
living
(N
=
582)
recruited
online
through
Chronic
Pain
Centre
Excellence
Veterans.
Participants
completed
measures
on:
(never,
past,
current
use),
sources
knowledge,
mental
health,
receiving
LRCUG.
Chi-Square
post-hoc
analyses
characterized
sample
assessed
demographic
differences
based
status
Engagement
behaviours
aligned
LRCUG
recommendations,
detailed
descriptively.
currently
more
likely
be
unemployed
(z
3.62,
p
<
.01),
released
as
a
Non-Commissioned
Officer
-3.83,
unable
work
due
disability
-3.43,
.01)
than
do
not
Less
30%
aware
greater
among
(n
356).
that
contradicted
ranged
from
~
9%
85%.
Approximately
experienced
co-morbid
health
concerns,
yet
their
purposes
(LRCUG
recommendation
#7).
Additionally,
almost
85%
engaged
daily
#5).
majority
two
or
(60.2%;
#12).
Almost
half
all
received
healthcare
provider
internet.
Our
suggests
importance
safer
guidelines
tailored
Development
lower-risk
can
support
prescribing
practitioners
needed
better-informed
decisions,
patients'
needs
circumstances.
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. 13 - 13
Published: April 2, 2025
Background:
Medical
cannabis
continues
to
generate
interest
as
a
potential
therapeutic
option,
yet
its
acceptance
in
clinical
practice
faces
challenges,
including
regulatory
barriers,
social
stigma,
and
gaps
scientific
evidence.
Methods:
This
study
explores
the
perspectives
of
Greek
medical
doctors
pharmacists
on
cannabis—key
stakeholders
application—through
semi-structured
interviews
with
12
participants
from
each
profession.
Results:
expressed
range
views
cannabis,
many
acknowledging
while
emphasizing
need
for
rigorous,
disease-specific
research.
highlighted
lack
consistent
trials,
concerns
about
drug
interactions,
fine
line
between
use
misuse.
Pharmacists
echoed
these
concerns,
citing
inconsistencies
standardized
dosing.
Both
groups
agreed
that
stigma
misinformation
hinder
adoption,
advocating
targeted
education
transparent
research
communication.
Participants
indicated
barriers
also
pose
calls
harmonized
policies
phased
market
entry
approaches.
Effective
communication
strategies,
digital
outreach
clear
messaging,
were
suggested
differentiate
recreational
improve
trust
among
healthcare
providers
patients.
urgent
collaboration
policymakers,
researchers,
professionals
establish
credible
option.
Conclusion:
The
insights
gained
provide
actionable
recommendations
bridge
existing
emphasize
responsible,
evidence-based
approach
Medicines,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
12(2), P. 12 - 12
Published: May 9, 2025
Background:
The
introduction
of
medical
cannabis
in
Greece
marks
a
shift
healthcare
policy,
yet
patient
attitudes
remain
underexplored.
Methods:
This
qualitative
study
examines
the
market
readiness
for
through
semi-structured
interviews
with
24
participants-12
users
cannabidiol
(CBD)-based
formulations
and
12
cannabis-naive
individuals.
Results:
CBD-experienced
patients
generally
perceive
cannabis-based
treatments
as
beneficial
managing
musculoskeletal
pain,
migraines,
anxiety,
stress
sleep
disturbances,
despite
concerns
over
product
quality,
cost
limited
guidance.
Medical
participants
express
skepticism
due
to
stigma
perceived
insufficient
evidence
but
acknowledge
potential
therapeutic
value
within
regulated
framework.
highlights
need
better
education,
physician
training
clear
regulatory
guidelines
support
responsible
entry.
Conclusions:
These
findings
offer
important
insights
policymakers,
providers
pharmaceutical
industry,
emphasizing
structured,
evidence-based
approach
integration
Greece.
Further
research
is
needed
assess
long-term
experiences
evolving
impact
changes
on
dynamics.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. e0295858 - e0295858
Published: March 7, 2024
Background
In
Canada,
cannabis
legalization
altered
the
way
that
public
can
access
for
medical
purposes.
However,
Canadians
still
struggle
with
finding
healthcare
professionals
(HCPs)
who
are
involved
in
counselling
and
authorization.
This
raises
questions
about
barriers
causing
this
breakdown
care.
Our
study
explored
perceptions
of
primary
care
providers
regarding
their
practice.
Methods
Semi-structured
interviews
were
conducted
by
Zoom
HCPs
Newfoundland
Labrador
(NL)
to
discuss
experiences
non-medical
Family
physicians
nurse
practitioners
practicing
NL
included.
The
interview
guide
coding
template
developed
using
Theoretical
Domains
Framework
(TDF).
A
thematic
analysis
across
TDF
was
then
conducted.
Results
Twelve
participants
diverse
demographic
backgrounds
experience
levels
interviewed.
Five
main
themes
emerged
including,
knowledge
acquisition,
internal
influences,
patient
external
HCP
systemic
influences.
domain
resulting
greatest
representation
codes
environmental
context
resources.
Interpretation
findings
suggested
have
significant
gaps
authorizing
cannabis,
which
limited
practice
competence
confidence
area.
Referring
patients
clinics,
while
enforcing
harm-reduction
strategies,
an
interim
option
developing
guidelines
educational
resources
as
prominent
facilitators
promote
authorization
within
system.
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(1), P. 113 - 120
Published: Jan. 15, 2024
Background:
Cannabidiol
(CBD)
is
one
of
the
main
cannabinoids
present
in
cannabis
plant.
The
demand
for
CBD
grew
over
time
with
more
individuals
consuming
products
due
to
its
potential
therapeutic
properties.
Objectives:
To
assess
knowledge
and
perceptions
Maltese
members
public
health
care
professionals
(HCPs)
about
CBD,
Methods:
Surveys
aiming
perception
HCPs
were
developed,
validated
disseminated.
Results:
Four
hundred
150
completed
questionnaires.
Ninety-six
percent
participants
(n=384)
agreed
that
has
a
effect.
Respondents
from
general
mostly
knowledgeable
use,
had
positive
relation
like
HCPs,
feel
comfortable
if
recommended
by
HCPs.
not
so
certain
aspects
on
CBD.
One
twelve
aware
there
only
FDA/EMA
approved
CBD-based
product.
would
prescribing
pain
insomnia
majority
them
(55%;
n=83)
believe
an
analgesic
Social
stigma
associated
use
judgement
barriers
use.
Conclusion:
Increased
research,
availability
information
guidelines
related
might
lead
increased
willingness
recommend
decrease
use.
Keywords:
Cannabidiol,
perceptions,
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 9, 2024
Abstract
As
a
wide
group
of
medicines,
the
effectiveness
and
safety
‘medical
cannabis’
products
is
likely
to
vary
in
relation
product-specific
dimensions
such
as
potency,
dosage,
route
administration,
cannabinoid
composition.
Systematic
reviews
can
perform
crucial
role
analysing
synthesising
outcomes
medical
cannabis
interventions
found
empirical
research.
We
analysed
23
contemporary
systematic
on
discern
extent
which
this
body
work
aimed
capture,
ultimately
captured,
differing
by
treatment.
further
highlighted
methodological
reasons
given
authors
for
an
inability
describe
granular
level
information.
that
minority
explicitly
subgroup
analysis
determine
differences
treatment
cannabis,
with
even
fewer
subsequently
doing
so.
Authors’
stated
concerned
either
overly
large
or
small
levels
variation
characteristics,
compositions,
administrations
used,
rendering
analyses
methodologically
inappropriate
inapplicable.
Furthering
reviews’
abilities
capture
information
treatments
will
require
standardisation
studies.