Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
17(6)
Published: June 1, 2024
Cardiovascular
diseases
remain
a
significant
health
burden,
with
imaging
modalities
like
echocardiography,
cardiac
computed
tomography,
and
magnetic
resonance
playing
crucial
role
in
diagnosis
prognosis.
However,
the
inherent
heterogeneity
of
these
poses
challenges,
necessitating
advanced
analytical
methods
radiomics
artificial
intelligence.
Radiomics
extracts
quantitative
features
from
medical
images,
capturing
intricate
patterns
subtle
variations
that
may
elude
visual
inspection.
Artificial
intelligence
techniques,
including
deep
learning,
can
analyze
to
generate
knowledge,
define
novel
biomarkers,
support
diagnostic
decision-making
outcome
prediction.
thus
hold
promise
for
significantly
enhancing
prognostic
capabilities
imaging,
paving
way
more
personalized
effective
patient
care.
This
review
explores
synergies
between
following
workflow
introducing
concepts
both
domains.
Potential
clinical
applications,
limitations
are
discussed,
along
solutions
overcome
them.
Radiology Artificial Intelligence,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
6(4)
Published: May 8, 2024
Radiomics
is
a
promising
and
fast-developing
field
within
oncology
that
involves
the
mining
of
quantitative
high-dimensional
data
from
medical
images.
has
potential
to
transform
cancer
management,
whereby
radiomics
can
be
used
aid
early
tumor
characterization,
prognosis,
risk
stratification,
treatment
planning,
response
assessment,
surveillance.
Nevertheless,
certain
challenges
have
delayed
clinical
adoption
acceptability
in
routine
practice.
The
objectives
this
report
are
(
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 2, 2024
Although
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
methods
hold
promise
for
medical
imaging-based
prediction
tasks,
their
integration
into
practice
may
present
a
double-edged
sword
due
to
bias
(i.e.,
systematic
errors).AI
algorithms
have
the
potential
mitigate
cognitive
biases
in
human
interpretation,
but
extensive
research
has
highlighted
tendency
of
AI
systems
internalize
within
model.This
fact,
whether
intentional
or
not,
ultimately
lead
unintentional
consequences
clinical
setting,
potentially
compromising
patient
outcomes.This
concern
is
particularly
important
imaging,
where
been
more
progressively
and
widely
embraced
than
any
other
field.A
comprehensive
understanding
at
each
stage
pipeline
therefore
essential
contribute
developing
solutions
that
are
not
only
less
biased
also
applicable.This
international
collaborative
review
effort
aims
increase
awareness
imaging
community
about
importance
proactively
identifying
addressing
prevent
its
negative
from
being
realized
later.The
authors
began
with
fundamentals
by
explaining
different
definitions
delineating
various
sources.Strategies
detecting
were
then
outlined,
followed
techniques
avoidance
mitigation.Moreover,
ethical
dimensions,
challenges
encountered,
prospects
discussed.
European Radiology Experimental,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
8(1)
Published: May 14, 2024
Overall
quality
of
radiomics
research
has
been
reported
as
low
in
literature,
which
constitutes
a
major
challenge
to
improve.
Consistent,
transparent,
and
accurate
reporting
is
critical,
can
be
accomplished
with
systematic
use
guidelines.
The
CheckList
for
EvaluAtion
Radiomics
(CLEAR)
was
previously
developed
assist
authors
their
radiomic
reviewers
evaluation.
To
take
full
advantage
CLEAR,
further
explanation
elaboration
each
item,
well
literature
examples,
may
useful.
main
goal
this
work,
Explanation
Elaboration
Examples
CLEAR
(CLEAR-E3),
improve
CLEAR's
usability
dissemination.
In
international
collaborative
effort,
members
the
European
Society
Medical
Imaging
Informatics-Radiomics
Auditing
Group
searched
identify
representative
examples
item.
At
least
two
demonstrating
optimal
reporting,
were
presented
All
selected
from
open-access
articles,
allowing
users
easily
consult
corresponding
full-text
articles.
addition
these,
item's
expanded
elaborated.
For
easier
access,
resulting
document
available
at
https://radiomic.github.io/CLEAR-E3/
.
As
complementary
effort
we
anticipate
that
initiative
will
greater
ease
transparency,
editors
reviewing
manuscripts.Relevance
statement
Along
original
checklist,
CLEAR-E3
expected
provide
more
in-depth
understanding
items,
concrete
evaluating
research.Key
points•
aims
research,
manuscripts.•
Based
on
positive
by
EuSoMII
Group,
item
elaborated
CLEAR-E3.•
accessed
European Radiology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 9, 2025
Abstract
Objectives
To
investigate
how
studies
determine
the
sample
size
when
developing
radiomics
prediction
models
for
binary
outcomes,
and
whether
meets
estimates
obtained
by
using
established
criteria.
Methods
We
identified
that
were
published
from
01
January
2023
to
31
December
in
seven
leading
peer-reviewed
radiological
journals.
reviewed
justification
methods,
actual
used.
calculated
compared
used
three
criteria
proposed
Riley
et
al.
investigated
which
characteristics
factors
associated
with
sufficient
Results
included
116
studies.
Eleven
out
of
one
hundred
sixteen
justified
size,
6/11
performed
a
priori
calculation.
The
median
(first
third
quartile,
Q1,
Q3)
total
is
223
(130,
463),
those
training
are
150
(90,
288).
(Q1,
difference
between
minimum
according
−100
(−216,
183),
differences
more
restrictive
approach
based
on
−268
(−427,
−157).
presence
external
testing
specialty
topic
size.
Conclusion
Radiomics
often
designed
without
justification,
whose
may
be
too
small
avoid
overfitting.
Sample
encouraged
model.
Key
Points
Question
critical
help
minimize
overfitting
model,
but
overlooked
underpowered
research
.
Findings
Few
justified,
calculated,
or
reported
their
most
them
did
not
meet
recent
formal
Clinical
relevance
justification.
Consequently,
many
It
should
justify,
perform,
report
considerations
European Radiology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 10, 2025
Abstract
Objectives
Conduct
a
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
on
the
application
of
Radiomics
Quality
Score
(RQS).
Materials
methods
A
search
was
conducted
from
January
1,
2022,
to
December
31,
2023,
for
reviews
which
implemented
RQS.
Identification
articles
prior
2022
via
previously
published
review.
scores
individual
radiomics
papers,
their
associated
criteria
scores,
these
all
readers
were
extracted.
Errors
in
RQS
noted
corrected.
The
papers
matched
with
publication
date,
imaging
modality,
country,
where
available.
Results
total
130
included,
quality
117/130
(90.0%),
98/130
(75.4%),
multiple
reader
data
24/130
(18.5%)
3258
correlated
study
date
publication.
Criteria
scoring
errors
discovered
39/98
(39.8%)
articles.
Overall
mean
9.4
±
6.4
(95%
CI,
9.1–9.6)
(26.1%
17.8%
(25.3%–26.7%)).
positively
year
(Pearson
R
=
0.32,
p
<
0.01)
significantly
higher
after
(year
2018,
5.6
6.1
(5.1–6.1);
≥
10.1
(9.9–10.4);
0.01).
Only
233/3258
(7.2%)
50%
maximum
different
across
modalities
(
Ten
year,
one
negatively
correlated.
Conclusion
adherence
is
increasing
time,
although
vast
majority
studies
are
developmental
rarely
provide
high
level
evidence
justify
clinical
translation
proposed
models.
Key
Points
Question
What
have
achieved
has
it
increased
sufficient?
Findings
extracted
resulted
score
6.4.
time.
Clinical
relevance
Although
many
not
demonstrated
sufficient
translation.
As
new
appraisal
tools
emerge,
current
role
may
change.
European Radiology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 11, 2025
Abstract
Objective
To
provide
up-to-date
European
Society
of
Urogenital
Radiology
(ESUR)
guidelines
for
staging
and
follow-up
patients
with
ovarian
cancer
(OC).
Methods
Twenty-one
experts,
members
the
female
pelvis
imaging
ESUR
subcommittee
from
19
institutions,
replied
to
2
rounds
questionnaires
regarding
techniques
structured
reporting
used
pre-treatment
evaluation
OC
patients.
The
results
survey
were
presented
other
authors
during
group’s
annual
meeting.
lexicon
was
aligned
American
(SAR)-ESUR
lexicon;
a
first
draft
circulated,
then
comments
suggestions
incorporated.
Results
Evaluation
disease
extent
at
diagnosis
should
be
performed
by
chest,
abdominal,
pelvic
CT.
radiological
report
map
specific
mention
sites
that
may
preclude
optimal
cytoreductive
surgery.
For
suspected
recurrence,
CT
[
18
F]FDG
PET-CT
are
both
valid
options.
MRI
can
considered
in
experienced
centres,
as
an
alternative
CT,
considering
high
costs
need
higher
expertise
reporting.
Conclusions
is
modality
choice
preoperative
A
report,
including
debulking,
value
patient
management.
Key
Points
Question
Guidelines
last
published
(OC)
2010;
here,
guidance
on
reporting,
incorporating
advances
field,
provided.
Findings
Structured
reports
out
disease,
highlighting
limit
cytoreduction.
18FDG
options,
considered.
Clinical
relevance
Imaging
initial
(mainly
based
CT),
using
considers
surgical
needs
valuable
treatment
selection
planning.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: July 25, 2024
Large
Language
Models
(LLMs)
are
rapidly
being
adopted
in
healthcare,
necessitating
standardized
reporting
guidelines.
We
present
TRIPOD-LLM,
an
extension
of
the
TRIPOD+AI
statement,
addressing
unique
challenges
LLMs
biomedical
applications.
TRIPOD-LLM
provides
a
comprehensive
checklist
19
main
items
and
50
subitems,
covering
key
aspects
from
title
to
discussion.
The
guidelines
introduce
modular
format
accommodating
various
LLM
research
designs
tasks,
with
14
32
subitems
applicable
across
all
categories.
Developed
through
expedited
Delphi
process
expert
consensus,
emphasizes
transparency,
human
oversight,
task-specific
performance
reporting.
also
interactive
website
(
https://tripod-llm.vercel.app/
)
facilitating
easy
guideline
completion
PDF
generation
for
submission.
As
living
document,
will
evolve
field,
aiming
enhance
quality,
reproducibility,
clinical
applicability
healthcare