International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: Dec. 15, 2024
Abstract
This
study
explores
university
educators’
perspectives
on
their
alignment
with
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
ethics,
considering
activity
theory
(AT),
which
forms
the
theoretical
underpinning
of
this
study.
To
do
so,
37
educators
from
a
higher
education
institution
were
selected
to
write
metaphors
about
AI
ethics
alignment,
out
11
attended
semi-structured
interviews,
in
they
answered
some
questions
and
narrated
experiences.
The
reveals
diverse
often
contradictory
highlighting
general
lack
awareness
inconsistent
application
ethical
principles.
Some
metaphorised
as
fundamental
but
difficult
understand,
while
others
pointed
difficulties
regulating
violations.
findings
highlight
need
for
targeted
professional
development
collaborative
policy
making
multidisciplinary
approach
promote
use
education.
also
calls
stronger
between
personal
standards
institutional
norms
reduce
AI-related
risks
educational
settings.
Discover Sustainability,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: Jan. 13, 2025
As
higher
education
faces
technological
advancement
and
environmental
imperatives,
AI
becomes
a
key
instrument
for
revolutionizing
instructional
methods
institutional
operations.
can
improve
educational
outcomes,
resource
management,
long-term
sustainability
in
education,
according
to
this
study.
The
research
uses
case
studies
best
practices
show
how
AI-driven
innovations
minimize
impact,
enhance
energy
efficiency,
customize
learning,
creating
more
sustainable
inclusive
academic
environment.
document
discusses
ethics,
including
data
privacy,
algorithmic
prejudice,
the
digital
divide.
It
emphasizes
need
strong
ethical
frameworks
use
ethically
make
decisions
with
transparency
fairness.
study
also
robust
rules
infrastructure
promote
integration,
protecting
student
privacy
supporting
fair
access
technologies.
shows
curriculum-building
tools
educate
students
future
concerns
stimulate
innovation.
prospects
difficulties
of
are
critically
examined,
its
potential
change
traditional
roles,
performance,
maintain
profitability.
Actionable
recommendations
educators,
politicians,
leaders
contribute
conversation.
Focusing
on
creates
framework
where
technology
stewardship
intimately
connected,
ensuring
that
institutions
prosper
fast-changing
world.
Journal of International Education in Business,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 3, 2025
Purpose
This
study
explores
the
factors
influencing
artificial
intelligence
(AI)-driven
decision-making
proficiency
(AIDP)
among
management
students,
focusing
on
foundational
AI
knowledge,
data
literacy,
problem-solving,
ethical
considerations
and
collaboration
skills.
The
research
examines
how
these
competencies
enhance
self-efficacy
engagement,
with
curriculum
design,
industry
exposure
faculty
support
as
moderating
factors.
aims
to
provide
actionable
insights
for
educational
strategies
that
prepare
students
AI-driven
business
environments.
Design/methodology/approach
adopts
a
hybrid
methodology,
integrating
partial
least
squares
structural
equation
modeling
(PLS-SEM)
neural
networks
(ANNs),
using
quantitative
collected
from
526
across
five
Indian
universities.
PLS-SEM
model
validates
linear
relationships,
while
ANN
captures
nonlinear
complexities,
complemented
by
sensitivity
analyses
deeper
insights.
Findings
results
highlight
pivotal
roles
of
literacy
problem-solving
in
fostering
self-efficacy.
Behavioral,
cognitive,
emotional
social
engagement
significantly
influence
AIDP.
Moderation
analysis
underscores
importance
design
enhancing
efficacy
constructs.
identifies
most
critical
predictors
AIDP,
respectively.
Research
limitations/implications
is
limited
central
universities
may
require
contextual
adaptation
global
applications.
Future
could
explore
longitudinal
impacts
AIDP
development
diverse
cultural
settings.
Practical
implications
findings
designers,
policymakers
educators
integrate
into
education.
Emphasis
experiential
learning,
frameworks
interdisciplinary
preparing
AI-centric
landscapes.
Social
By
equipping
future
leaders
proficiency,
this
contributes
societal
readiness
technological
disruptions,
promoting
sustainable
contexts.
Originality/value
To
author’s
best
uniquely
integrates
analyze
interplay
shaping
It
advances
theoretical
models
linking
learning
theories
practical
education
strategies,
offering
comprehensive
framework
developing
students.
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
5(2), P. e03774 - e03774
Published: Jan. 7, 2025
Objective:
The
objective
of
this
study
is
to
investigate
the
transformative
potential
generative
AI
in
advancing
Sustainable
Development
Goal
4
(SDG
4),
with
aim
enhancing
equity,
accessibility,
and
quality
higher
education
through
integration
AI-driven
systems
practices.
Theoretical
Framework:
This
research
underpinned
by
Academic
Convergence
(AIAC)
Framework,
which
aligns
theories
such
as
constructivism,
Vygotsky’s
cultural-historical
theory,
Bloom’s
Taxonomy.
These
frameworks
provide
a
solid
basis
for
understanding
interplay
between
personalized
learning,
cognitive
engagement,
stakeholder
collaboration,
ethical
governance
educational
ecosystems.
Method:
methodology
adopted
comprises
Literature-Driven
Conceptual
Framework
approach,
synthesizing
peer-reviewed
studies
across
key
themes:
operational
efficiency,
collaborative
governance.
Data
collection
involved
systematic
literature
reviews
scholarly
articles,
books,
conference
proceedings
within
past
decade.
Results
Discussion:
results
reveal
that
AIAC
promotes
tailored,
adaptive
learning
pathways,
enhances
faculty
roles
AI-enabled
mentors,
optimizes
administrative
workflows
predictive
analytics.
discussion
contextualizes
these
findings
existing
theories,
emphasizing
framework's
ability
mitigate
challenges
algorithmic
bias,
equity
gaps,
data
privacy
concerns.
Limitations
include
need
empirical
validation
addressing
resource
disparities
underprivileged
contexts.
Research
Implications:
practical
theoretical
implications
are
significant
institutions,
policymakers,
practitioners.
fostering
innovative
teaching
practices,
equitable
access
AI-enhanced
tools,
aligning
strategies
labor
market
demands
analytics
Originality/Value:
contributes
introducing
an
scalable
model
integrating
into
education.
Its
value
lies
bridging
digital
divide,
lifelong
positioning
institutions
leaders
sustainable
integration,
ultimately
mission
SDG
4.
İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
10(26), P. 132 - 153
Published: Feb. 25, 2025
Bu
araştırma,
yükseköğretimde
yapay
zekâ
kullanımına
ilişkin
öğrenci
tutumlarını
ve
akademisyen
görüşlerini
karma
yöntem
yaklaşımıyla
incelemeyi
amaçlamaktadır.
Veriler,
400
lisans
öğrencisinden
anket
yoluyla
10
akademisyenle
gerçekleştirilen
yarı
yapılandırılmış
görüşmelerle
toplanmıştır.
Nicel
bulgular,
öğrencilerin
zekâya
yönelik
olumlu
tutum
sergilediğini
göstermiş,
öğrenciler
araçlarını
kullanmada
orta
düzeyde
yetkinlik
bildirmiş
bunları
öncelikle
yaratıcı
yazım,
görsel
oluşturma
dil
öğrenme
amacıyla
kullandıklarını
belirtmişlerdir.
Öğrenciler,
kişiselleştirilmiş
fırsatları
karmaşık
konuları
daha
kolay
anlama
gibi
avantajları
vurgularken,
eğitimde
eşitsizlikler
yanlış
bilgi
riskleri
konusunda
endişelerini
dile
getirmişlerdir.
Nitel
akademisyenlerin
teknolojilerine
karşı
hem
de
temkinli
bir
duruş
göstermiştir.
Akademisyenler,
zekânın
veri
analizi
eğitim
desteğindeki
potansiyelini
kabul
ederken,
temel
becerilerin
zayıflaması
güvenliği
konularında
endişe
duymaktadır.
Yükseköğretimde
kapsamlı
dönüşüm
öngören
akademisyenler,
etkili
etik
kullanımı
için
detaylı
yaklaşımın
gerekliliğini
vurgulamaktadır.
Araştırma,
entegrasyonunun
kaçınılmaz
olduğu,
ancak
uygulama
kurumsal
politika
düzenlemelerin
gerekli
olduğu
sonucuna
varmaktadır.
Frontiers in Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: March 26, 2025
Despite
the
recent
increase
in
research
on
artificial
intelligence
education
(AIED),
studies
investigating
perspectives
of
academic
staff
and
implications
for
future-oriented
teaching
at
higher
institutions
remain
scarce.
This
exploratory
study
provides
initial
insight
into
112
by
focusing
three
aspects
considered
relevant
sustainable,
age
AI:
instructional
design,
domain
specificity,
ethics.
The
results
indicate
that
participants
placed
greatest
importance
AIED
Furthermore,
indicated
a
strong
interest
(mandatory)
professional
development
AI
more
comprehensive
institutional
support.
Faculty
who
perceived
design
as
important
were
likely
to
use
AI-based
tools
their
practice.
However,
relevance
specificity
ethics
did
not
predict
tool
integration,
which
suggests
an
intention–behavior
gap
warrants
further
investigation
factors
such
literacy
structural
conditions
education.
findings
may
serve
basis
discussion
adequate
support
services
learning
AI.
Frontiers in Education,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
10
Published: April 16, 2025
STEM
fields—Science,
Technology,
Engineering,
and
Mathematics—play
crucial
roles
in
advancing
knowledge,
driving
innovation,
addressing
challenges
by
means
of
several
mechanisms
including
research.
Consequently,
curricula
higher
education
institutions
prepare
undergraduate
students
taking
these
fields
to
engage
produce
quality
research
outputs
preparation
for
their
future
careers
or
roles.
The
advent
educational
resources
help
perform
research-related
tasks
artificial
intelligence.
Although
AI
use
is
viewed
as
inappropriate
doing
scholarly
works
due
concerns
about
academic
integrity
the
fear
losing
essential
cognitive
skills,
growing
dependence
among
inevitable.
In
this
regard,
present
study
seeks
empirically
investigate
influence
toward
students’
productivity,
mediating
disposition,
self-efficacy.
Through
literature
review,
a
structural
model
was
proposed
validated.
Initially,
instrument
developed
reflective
constructs
where
items
were
also
generated
using
review.
Eventually,
an
online
survey
conducted
recorded
834
valid
responses
from
students.
Results
revealed
that
seven
hypotheses
model,
six
are
supported
except
causal
path
between
productivity.
paths
dispositions,
self-efficacy
well
three
This
indicates
mediation
linking
findings
imply
strategic
integration
may
foster
not
only
skills
development
but
motivation
confidence,
which
together
could
enhance
overall
productivity
fields.
BMC Nursing,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: April 18, 2025
To
examine
faculty
perceptions
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
chatbots
in
nursing
education,
focusing
on
their
usage
patterns,
perceived
benefits,
and
limitations.
A
cross-sectional
study.
The
study
surveyed
from
Jordan
the
United
States
using
a
self-reported
questionnaire.
Data
were
analyzed
descriptive
statistics
Multivariate
Analysis
Covariance
to
assess
variations
based
AI
chatbot
frequency
characteristics.
Among
474
members,
82.5%
familiar
with
at
least
one
chatbot.
Faculty
generally
acknowledged
benefits
chatbots,
including
enhanced
teaching
experiences,
improved
student
engagement,
support
for
independent
learning,
quick
access
medical
knowledge.
However,
concerns
about
misinformation,
reduced
faculty-student
interaction,
inadequacies
addressing
complex
clinical
scenarios
prevalent.
Legal
ethical
issues,
particularly
risk
misuse
AI-generated
information,
also
highlighted.
Frequent
users
demonstrated
significantly
greater
awareness
both
advantages
limitations
compared
infrequent
users.
challenges
highlighting
role
hands-on
experience
shaping
adoption.
adoption
is
primarily
driven
by
rather
than
limitations,
emphasizing
need
showcase
practical
while
concerns.
enhance
institutions
should
focus
demonstrating
through
targeted
training
guidelines.
Providing
structured
exposure
can
increase
confidence,
reinforcing
usefulness
strategies
mitigate
Future
research
may
effectiveness
programs
behaviors,
providing
valuable
insights
enhancing
integration
education.