European Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
64(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Abstract
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
caused
an
unprecedented
worldwide
crisis
affecting
several
sectors,
including
health,
social
care,
economy
and
society
at
large.
World
Health
Organisation
has
emphasized
that
mental
health
care
should
be
considered
as
one
of
the
core
sectors
within
overall
response.
By
March
2020,
recommendations
for
organization
services
across
Europe
have
been
developed
by
national
international
professional
associations.
Methods
European
Psychiatric
Association
(EPA)
surveyed
a
large
sample
psychiatrists,
namely
“EPA
Ambassadors”,
on
their
clinical
experience
impact
treatment
psychiatric
patients
during
month
April
2020
in
order
to:
a)
identify
report
views
experiences
psychiatrists;
b)
represent
share
these
results
with
policy
makers
level.
Based
issued
associations
our
survey,
we
identified
important
organisational
aspects
peak
first
wave
COVID-19.
Results
While
most
followed
same
principles,
significant
differences
between
countries
emerged
service
delivery,
mainly
relating
to
referrals
outpatients
inpatient
admission,
assessments
people
disorders.
Compared
previous
months,
mean
number
treated
psychiatrists
outpatient
settings
halved
2020.
In
period,
mentally
ill
tested
for,
or
developing,
was
low.
countries,
traditional
face-to-face
visits
were
replaced
online
remote
consultations.
Conclusions
findings
recommend:
1)
implement
guidelines
into
practice
harmonize
Europe;
2)
monitor
outcomes
pre-existing
disorders;
3)
keep
active
using
all
available
options
(for
example
telepsychiatry);
4)
increase
communication
cooperation
different
providers.
American Psychologist,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
75(7), P. 897 - 908
Published: June 22, 2020
Social
distancing
and
"stay-at-home"
orders
are
essential
to
contain
the
coronavirus
outbreak
(COVID-19),
but
there
is
concern
that
these
measures
will
increase
feelings
of
loneliness,
particularly
in
vulnerable
groups.
The
present
study
examined
change
loneliness
response
social
restriction
taken
control
spread.
A
nationwide
sample
American
adults
(N
=
1,545;
45%
women;
ages
18
98,
M
53.68,
SD
15.63)
was
assessed
on
three
occasions:
late
January/early
February
2020
(before
outbreak),
March
(during
President's
initial
"15
Days
Slow
Spread"
campaign),
April
policies
most
states).
Contrary
expectations,
were
no
significant
mean-level
changes
across
assessments
(d
.04,
p
>
.05).
In
fact,
respondents
perceived
increased
support
from
others
over
follow-up
period
.19,
<
.01).
Older
reported
less
overall
compared
younger
age
groups
had
an
during
acute
phase
.14,
Their
however,
leveled
off
after
issuance
stay-at-home
orders.
Individuals
living
alone
those
with
at
least
one
chronic
condition
feeling
lonelier
baseline
did
not
implementation
measures.
Despite
some
detrimental
impact
individuals,
sample,
large
remarkable
resilience
COVID-19.
(PsycInfo
Database
Record
(c)
APA,
all
rights
reserved).
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(10), P. 3740 - 3740
Published: May 25, 2020
It
has
been
three
months
since
the
first
confirmed
case
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
in
Hong
Kong,
and
people
now
have
a
more
complete
picture
extent
pandemic.
Therefore,
it
is
time
to
evaluate
impacts
COVID-19
on
mental
health.
The
current
population-based
study
aimed
depression
anxiety
Kong
during
Respondents
were
randomly
recruited
asked
structured
questionnaire,
including
patient
health
questionnaire-9
(PHQ-9),
generalized
disorder-7
(GAD-7),
global
rating
change
scale
items
related
COVID-19.
Of
500
respondents
included
study,
19%
had
(PHQ-9
score
≥
10)
14%
(GAD
10).
In
addition,
25.4%
reported
that
their
deteriorated
Multiple
logistic
regression
analysis
found
not
experiencing
SARS
outbreak
2003,
being
worried
about
infected
by
COVID-19,
bothered
having
enough
surgical
masks
able
work
from
home
associated
with
poorer
status.
Psychological
support,
such
as
brief,
home-based
psychological
interventions,
should
be
provided
citizens
Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
51(2), P. 201 - 211
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Abstract
Lockdowns
to
control
the
spread
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
have
had
profound
effects
on
everyday
life
worldwide,
but
their
effect
mental
health
remains
unclear
because
available
meta-analyses
and
reviews
rely
mostly
cross-sectional
studies.
We
conducted
a
rapid
review
meta-analysis
longitudinal
studies
natural
experiments
investigating
relationship
between
COVID-19
lockdowns
health.
A
total
25
involving
72
004
participants
58
sizes
were
analyzed.
Using
random
model,
we
found
that
small
symptoms,
g
=
0.17,
s.e.
0.05,
95%
CI
(0.06–0.24),
p
0.001,
positive
psychological
functioning,
−0.12,
0.11,
(−0.33
0.09),
0.27,
not
significant.
Multivariate
analysis
revealed
significant
relatively
for
anxiety
depression,
while
those
social
support,
loneliness,
general
distress,
negative
affect,
suicide
risk
The
results
indicated
substantial
heterogeneity
among
studies,
meta-regression
analyses
no
moderation
mean
age,
gender,
continent,
death
rate,
days
lockdown,
publication
status
or
study
design.
impact
is
in
magnitude
highly
heterogeneous,
suggesting
do
uniformly
detrimental
most
people
are
psychologically
resilient
effects.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Oct. 2, 2020
The
emergence
of
SARS-CoV-2
in
December
2019
prompted
consternation
many
parts
the
world.
Due
to
its
fast
dissemination,
World
Health
Organization
declared
a
pandemic
March
2020.
Aiming
contain
spread
virus,
leaders
countries
restrained
social
movement,
targeting
flatten
curve
contamination
with
distancing.
This
review
aimed
analyze
how
human
behavior
has
changed
throughout
this
period.
We
also
approached
key
components
emotional
reaction
pandemic,
internal
and
external
factors,
such
as
personality
traits,
gender,
media,
economy
governmental
response,
influence
perception
psychological
outcomes
current
scenario.
Moreover,
we
explored
depth
groups
at
increased
risk
suffering
mental
health
burden
secondary
these
circumstances.
These
include
healthcare
professionals,
elderly
individuals,
children,
college
students,
black
subjects,
latin
LGBTQ+
communities,
economically
disadvantaged
groups,
homeless,
prisoners,
rural
population
psychiatric
patients.
discussed
several
measures
that
might
minimize
impact
derived
from
It
is
crucial
authorities,
government
articulate
assist
vulnerable
promote
support
strategies.
it
fundamental
provided
accurate
information
concerning
COVID-19
pandemic.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Nov. 5, 2020
Depression
is
a
disabling
illness
which
increases
the
risk
of
suicide.
The
Corona
Virus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
led
to
rise
in
fear,
anxiety,
stress,
and
depression
among
population:
these,
university
undergraduates
from
countries
severely
affected
by
COVID-19
are
some
most
vulnerable
all,
as
they
face
strict
lockdown
measures
have
fewer
resources
cope
with
it.
aim
this
study
was
analyze
levels
fear
COVID-19,
during
Ecuador,
test
these
possible
predictors
using
model
taken
our
scientific
literature.
A
total
640
(72%
women)
between
18
47
years
old
(M
=
21.69;
S.D
4.093)
were
surveyed.
resulting
mean
found
for
above
considered
non-pathological.
Women
showed
higher
than
men.
statistical
prediction
good
fit.
This
could
be
related:
both
directly
positively
indirectly,
result
two
factors,
mediated
anxiety.
Our
concludes
highlighting
important
role
that
complex
relationships
anxiety
can
play
development
symptoms
how
into
account
programs
aimed
at
preventing
alleviating
disorder.
We
propose
general
reducing
stress
suggest
specific
designed
control
overcome
undergraduates.
European Eating Disorders Review,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
28(3), P. 239 - 245
Published: April 28, 2020
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19),
emerged
only
a
few
months
ago
in
China,
is
now
global
pandemic
(see
Figures
1
and
2).
The
significant
medical
complications,
morbidity
the
rapid
international
spread
have
led
to
swift
adoption
of
important
public
health
political
measures
across
world.
Most
countries
chosen
isolate
positive
cases
those
they
are
close
contact
with,
limit
social
interactions
reduce
transmission.
overall
consequences
COVID-19
on
health,
humanitarian
economic
domains
remain
unknown.
As
April
15,
2020,
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
reported
1,914,916
confirmed
infection
(with
123,010
deaths)
extending
almost
all
globe
(https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200415-sitrep-86-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=c615ea20_2).
Besides
that
this
having
(Onder,
Rezza
&
Brusaferro,
2020),
it
stands
an
impact
mental
(Fiorillo
Gorwood,
2020;
Li,
Wang,
Xue,
Zhao,
Zhu,
Torales
et
al.,
including
state
patients
who
suffering
from
infection,
family
members
lost
loved
ones
due
disease,
professionals,
general
population
had
problem
before
pandemic,
seen
their
symptoms
increase
and/or
treatment
disrupted
(Duan
Kang
Xiang
Wang
2020).
Several
studies
Asia
reporting
higher
prevalence
post-traumatic
stress
disorders
(PTSD)
after
within
(Liu
Pan
2020)
problems
with
anxiety
depression
(Nguyen
Qiu
Cao
Di,
Ye
Wei,
effect
eating
disorder
(ED)
remains
These
at
high
physical
risk
[for
example,
frailty
anorexia
nervosa
(AN),
electrolyte
disturbances
bulimia
(BN),
cardiovascular
binge
(BED)],
psychological
confinement
distress
caused
by
uncertainty
decrease
usual
(Dalle
Grave,
We
might
anticipate
severity
ED
symptomatology
carer
burden
will
increase,
as
may
not
be
possible
readily
implement
according
evidence-based
guidelines
(Peckmezian
Paxton,
van
den
Berg
2019).
Concerns
about
fitness
during
serve
precipitating
factor
for
development
vulnerable
individuals.
Further
factors
also
contribute
likelihood
developing
ED,
such
increased
time
spent
using
social-media
toxic
influence
objectification
thin
ideal.
Isolation
loneliness
common
AN
exaggerated
imposed
quarantine.
Problems
emotional
regulation
trigger
(binge
episodes
consequent
purging
behaviors)
(Manasse
2018),
while
consequence
external
control
reduced
food
intake
(Masheb,
Dorflinger,
Rolls,
Mitchell,
Grilo,
2016).
Maladaptive
reactions
under
lead
aggression
fragmentation
splitting.
In
pilot
study
Unit
Department
Psychiatry,
University
Hospital
Bellvitge
(Barcelona,
Spain),
we
used
survey
monitor
first
two
weeks
confinement.
A
total
32
[13
AN,
10
BN),
5
other
specified
feeding
or
(OSFED)
4
BED],
mean
age
29.2
years
old
(range
16–49),
most
them
females
(N
=
29;
90.6%),
took
part
telephone
survey.
presented
worries
uncertainties
lives,
themselves
ones,
negative
work,
treatment.
Almost
38%
(12
out
32)
impairments
56.2%
(18
additional
symptoms,
whom,
four
noted
made
difficult
grazing
behavior
eating.
context
COVID-19,
many
settings,
urgent
visits
inpatient
treatments
settings
severe
provided
and—where
possible—online
(instead
face-to-face)
been
recommended.
Restrictions
include
closure
day
hospitals
outpatient
facilities
(e.g.,
Spain,
Austria,
USA
UK).
However,
countries,
there
has
implementation
technological
interventions
order
provide
telemedicine
counseling
online
(including
psychoeducation),
known
delays
starting
appropriate
newly
referred
can
worsening
symptomatology.
This
allow
treated
period.
Also,
communication
between
care
providers
support
system
(families
friends)
managed
individual
group
methods
telecommunication.
latter
overcomes
confidentiality,
general,
rather
than
individual,
matters
discussed.
It
allows
families
get
reduces
stigma
feel.
Online-
e-health
developed
tested
over
20
worldwide
available
implementation,
but
more
research
necessary
(Anastasiadou
2018;
Anderson
2017;
Barakat
2019;
Vollert
Zerwas
2017).
some
aspects
assessment
challenging
without
face-to-face
form
surrogate
measure
(Keshen
McLean
20192019),
especially
extreme
severely
underweight,
non-suicidal
self-injury,
self-destructive
patients).
these
cases,
hospitalisation
necessary,
safeguarding
patient,
professionals
following
section,
describe
challenges
solutions
managing
community
COVID-19.
information
comes
multifamily
chat
consisting
diagnosis
(n
8)
carers
UK.
was
anonymous,
although
patient/carer
usernames
were
labelled
P
C,
respectively.
topic
focused
how
coping
rapidly
changing
environment.
recognised
being
negatively
associated
health.
themes
Table
1):
P1:
"I
don't
like
phone
video
calling…
I
want
see
myself,
do
person
I'm
talking
to.
you
same
level
non-verbal
communication,
which
really
need.
It's
going
tough!"
P2
"Social
media
unhelpful
different
adverts
popping
up
comments
others.
Which
makes
isolation
feel
worse
[…]
For
reason,
won't
use
try
protect
my
health."
P4:
"…you
filter
so
people
helpful
content
seen.
found
great
stay
connected."
C5:
"i
think
thoughts,
i
concentrate
look
things
are.
carer,
its
easy
isolated
generally
whilst
others
empathetic,
it's
hard
truly
understand.
When
finding
hard,
connect
pages
know
help."
P4
offering
listening
ear
feeling
particularly
anxious
presently.
me
little
connected
when
able
talk
through
issues."
P5
I've
very
socially
long
find
fuels
depression.
joined
project
help
elderly
vulnerable"
P6:
threatened
(by
C-19
example!),
go
into
'drive'
mode
take
world
everything
everyone.
Eating
usually
casualty
behaviour."
P2:
"…I
agree
challenge
struggle
lot
change
days
push
myself
kind
maybe
watching
film."
P5:
worried
if
can't
any
appointments
miss
weigh
ins
constantly
knowing
weight
one
another
hard.
Also
carrying
restaurants
etc
well
come
stop…
affect
recovery."
"…My
gone
virtual.
completely
understand
course
action,
certainly
lack
something
both
terms
therapeutic
physically
etc.
accountability
seems
far
lower,
ways
incentive
ensure
unsettling
(and
kids
for)
weighs
opposite
direction.
time."
C2:
"My
daughter
finds
cooking
reliever
she
much
her
hands
home
question
allowing
thing
does
itself
become
compulsion
unhelpful."
Balancing
needs
P3:
"…[I]…
structure
routine
whereas
husband
challenging"
P7:
plan
non-ED
activities
carer.
Hopefully
period
good
bonding
experience
behaviours
safe
environment
support"
"…definitely
idea
ahead
-
unknown
extremely
best
times."
C8:
"Thanks
[patient]
reminder
our
appreciate
planning
keep
busy
chaotic
Handling
dramatic
shift
prompted
discussion
strategies
connected.
ambivalent
calls.
calls
heightened
awareness
bodily
self,
self-criticism
perceived
harmful
recovery.
Some
coped
modifying
what
visible
accounts
sought
comfort
viewing
recovery-focused
peer-support
accounts.
believed
safer
potentially
triggering
forms
communication.
Carers
demonstrated
strong
around
issues
themselves.
resourceful
learning
sharing
ideas
remote
methods.
Helping
highlighted
providing
sense
purpose
carers.
Reaching
friends
need
wider
neighborhood)
counteract
loneliness.
recognition
among
tendency
put
others'
own
affected
ability
manage
Strategies
self-care
relaxing
distractions,
reading/television/photography)
discussed
dealing
overwhelming
feelings
sudden
daily
life.
did
report
family/friends/neighbours/support
groups.
Fears
reduction
patients'
clinical
teams
strongly
expressed
group.
prepare
panic
loss
already
felt
escalation
Although
access
therapy,
agreed
(i.e.,
weigh-ins)
would
require
self-management
patients.
Patients
alike
feared
deterioration
There
instability
reliance
thoughts
behaviours.
particular,
potential
recovery
obsessive
exercise
cooking)
critical
home.
crucial
way
preventing
boredom,
often
preoccupations.
described
role
management
one's
They
shared
creative
creating
meal
plans
undertaking
constructing
restaurant
home).
"Stay
home"
self-isolation
resulting
dynamics.
individuals
(for
stability)
flexibility
adjust
whole
family,
children,
challenging.
evidently
balance
multiple
giving
work
adjustment,
whether
working
home,
employment,
workload.
Pandemics
pose
double
(Aoun,
Joundi,
El
Gerges,
Li
Raven,
Wurie,
Witter,
2018).
recent
China
workers
(nurses,
physicians)
exposed
showed
distress,
depression,
insomnia
(Lai
Symptom
pronounced
nurses,
women
frontline
Quarantine
anger,
confusion,
suicide.
increases
duration
quarantine
persist
(Brooks
concerns
becoming
infected
themselves,
causing
units
understaffed
infecting
Self-care,
teamwork,
networking
cooperation
crucial.
stress:
(i)
colleagues
own/other
centers,
(ii)
team
supervision,
(iii)
appreciation
clients/superiors/society
(iv)
doing
meaningful
(Binder
Finally,
situation,
where
fears
involved,
disconnect
Self-care
includes
structuring
day,
healthy
lifestyle
accessing
professional
(Counselling
Development
Centre,
Greenberg,
Docherty,
Gnanapragasam,
Wessely,
repercussions
produce
substantial
changes
diagnostic
strategies.
highlights
core
connection
pain
central
sometimes
forgotten
pre-existing
problems.
Patients,
EDs,
poor
insight
illness
social–emotional
difficult,
delay
help-seeking.
Likewise,
fact
even
relevant
is,
addition
dual
comorbidity
pathologies,
complicates
progression
main
recommendations
S1,
supplementary
online,
translation
languages).
Necessity,
mother
invention,
again
proved
step
models.
Thus,
current
enforced
immersion
new
widespread
efficient
effective,
mixed
connection.
Because
forced
overcome
fear
novelty
uncertainty,
choice
personalized
palette
whom.
thank
CERCA
Programme/
Generalitat
de
Catalunya
institutional
support.
partially
supported
Instituto
Salud
Carlos
III
(PI17/01167
SLT006/17/00246).
CIBEROobn
CIBERSAM
initiatives
ISCIII
Spain.
Dr.
Monica
Leslie,
Isabel
Sánchez,
Baenas,
Nadine
Riesco,
Paolo
PP
Machado,
Jon
Arcelus,
Walter
Bouman,
Jue
Chen,
Nathalie
T.
Godart,
Anna
Keski-Rahkonen,
Youl-Ri
Kim,
Anders
Hakansson,
Tetyana
Ilnytska,
Jan
Rosenvinge,
Daniel
Stein,
Mikhail
F.
Borisenkov,
Sergey
Popov,
Ferenc
Túry,
Brigita
Bax
Robert
Voren,
translations
suggestions
recommended
material.
S1
STRATEGIES
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
IN
FRONT
OF
Please
note:
publisher
responsible
functionality
supporting
supplied
authors.
Any
queries
(other
missing
content)
should
directed
corresponding
author
article.
Globalization and Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
17(1)
Published: Jan. 5, 2021
Abstract
During
global
pandemics,
such
as
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19),
crisis
communication
is
indispensable
in
dispelling
fears,
uncertainty,
and
unifying
individuals
worldwide
a
collective
fight
against
health
threats.
Inadequate
can
bring
dire
personal
economic
consequences.
Mounting
research
shows
that
seemingly
endless
newsfeeds
related
to
COVID-19
infection
death
rates
could
considerably
increase
the
risk
of
mental
problems.
Unfortunately,
media
reports
include
infodemics
regarding
influence
on
may
be
source
adverse
psychological
effects
individuals.
Owing
partially
insufficient
practices,
news
organizations
across
globe
have
played
minimal
roles
battling
infodemics.
Common
refrains
raging
QAnon
conspiracies,
false
misleading
“Chinese
virus”
narrative,
use
disinfectants
“cure”
COVID-19.
With
potential
deteriorate
health,
fueled
by
kaleidoscopic
range
misinformation
dangerous.
there
shortage
how
improve
organization
channels.
This
paper
identifies
ways
legacy
social
media-based
result
concerns.
discusses
possible
solutions
adopt
mitigate
negative
influences
health.
Emphasizing
need
for
entities
forge
fact-based,
person-centered,
collaborative
response
reporting,
this
encourages
resources
focus
core
issue
slow
or
stop
transmission
effectively.
European Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
63(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2020
Abstract
Background
The
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
is
an
unprecedented
traumatic
event
influencing
the
healthcare,
economic,
and
social
welfare
systems
worldwide.
In
order
to
slow
infection
rates,
lockdown
has
been
implemented
almost
everywhere.
Italy,
one
of
countries
most
severely
affected,
entered
“lockdown”
on
March
8,
2020.
Methods
COvid
Mental
hEalth
Trial
(COMET)
network
includes
10
Italian
university
sites
National
Institute
Health.
whole
study
three
different
phases.
first
phase
online
survey
conducted
between
May
2020
in
population.
Recruitment
took
place
through
email
invitation
letters,
media,
mailing
lists
universities,
national
medical
associations,
associations
stakeholders
(e.g.,
users/carers).
evaluate
impact
depressive,
anxiety
stress
symptoms,
multivariate
linear
regression
models
were
performed,
weighted
for
propensity
score.
Results
final
sample
consisted
20,720
participants.
Among
them,
12.4%
respondents
(
N
=
2,555)
reported
severe
or
extremely
levels
depressive
17.6%
3,627)
symptoms
41.6%
8,619)
feel
at
least
moderately
stressed
by
situation
DASS-21.
According
models,
significantly
worsened
from
week
April
9–15
30
4
p
<
0.0001).
Moreover,
female
people
with
pre-existing
mental
health
problems
higher
risk
developing
depression
Conclusions
Although
physical
isolation
represent
essential
public
measures
containing
spread
COVID-19
pandemic,
they
are
a
serious
threat
well-being
general
As
integral
part
response,
needs
should
be
addressed.
Psychiatry Investigation,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(6), P. 491 - 505
Published: June 15, 2020
As
the
coronavirus
(COVID-19)
pandemic
sweeps
across
world,
it
is
causing
widespread
concern,
fear
and
stress,
all
of
which
are
natural
normal
reactions
to
changing
uncertain
situation
that
everyone
finds
themselves
in.In
this
general
review,
we
examined
literature
about
psychological
effects
COVID-19
pandemia.
In
total
65
papers
were
reviewed
using
Medline
computer
database.
Only
publications
in
English
selected.Children
likely
be
experiencing
worry,
anxiety
older
people
also
those
with
underlying
health
conditions,
having
been
identified
as
more
vulnerable
COVID-19,
can
extremely
frightening
very
fear-inducing.
China
several
other
countries
took
strict
isolation
measures.
Medical
staff
affiliated
healthcare
workers
(staff)
under
both
physical
pressure.The
exceptional.
Its
effect
will
imprinted
on
each
individual
involved.
Extensive
stressors
emerge
or
become
worsened.
Many
medical
harmfully
psychologically
affected.