The Integration of Clinical Trials With the Practice of Medicine
JAMA,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
332(2), P. 153 - 153
Published: June 3, 2024
Optimal
health
care
delivery,
both
now
and
in
the
future,
requires
a
continuous
loop
of
knowledge
generation,
dissemination,
uptake
on
how
best
to
provide
care,
not
just
determining
what
interventions
work
but
also
ensure
they
are
provided
those
who
need
them.
The
randomized
clinical
trial
(RCT)
is
most
rigorous
instrument
determine
works
care.
However,
major
issues
with
trials
enterprise
lack
integration
delivery
compromise
medicine's
ability
serve
society.
Language: Английский
Fostering Supportive Online Communities: Exploring Bystander Intervention in Cyberbullying Prevention
Muhammad Shoaib,
No information about this author
Irshad Ahmed Abbasi
No information about this author
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 20, 2025
Abstract
Cyberbullying
can
profoundly
impact
individuals'
mental
health,
leading
to
increased
feelings
of
anxiety,
depression,
and
social
isolation.
Psychological
research
suggests
that
cyberbullying
victims
may
experience
long-term
psychological
consequences,
including
diminished
self-esteem
academic
performance.
The
widespread
use
media
platforms
among
university
students
has
raised
major
concerns
over
cyberbullying,
which
have
detrimental
effects
on
student
well-being
We
designed
CBNet,
a
convolutional
neural
network
(CNN)-based
model
for
detecting
groups.
developed
comprehensive
dataset
collected
from
several
popular
students.
Our
results
demonstrate
CBNet
notably
outperforms
both
the
traditional
machine
learning
approaches
RNN-based
presents
an
outstanding
value
precision,
recall,
F1-score
overall,
with
Area
Under
ROC
Curve
significantly
higher
than
0.99.
Combined
fact
issue
always
remains
relevant,
these
suggest
high
feasibility
our
suggested
approach
detection
incidents.
Given
results,
could
be
used
as
preventative
tool
educators,
administrators,
community
managers
combat
behavior
make
online
safer
more
welcoming
This
work
importance
advanced
real-world
problems
contributes
creation
greater
digital
in
students’
communities.
By
employing
institutions
take
proactive
measures
mitigate
harmful
cultivate
positive
culture
conducive
success
flourishing.
Language: Английский
Introducing the Team Card: Enhancing governance for medical Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the age of complexity
PLOS Digital Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
4(3), P. e0000495 - e0000495
Published: March 4, 2025
This
paper
introduces
the
Team
Card
(TC)
as
a
protocol
to
address
harmful
biases
in
development
of
clinical
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
systems
by
emphasizing
often-overlooked
role
researchers'
positionality.
While
bias
medical
AI,
particularly
Clinical
Decision
Support
(CDS)
tools,
is
frequently
attributed
issues
data
quality,
this
limited
framing
neglects
how
worldviews-shaped
their
training,
backgrounds,
and
experiences-can
influence
AI
design
deployment.
These
unexamined
subjectivities
can
create
epistemic
limitations,
amplifying
increasing
risk
inequitable
applications
settings.
The
TC
emphasizes
reflexivity-critical
self-reflection-as
an
ethical
strategy
identify
stemming
from
subjectivity
research
teams.
By
systematically
documenting
team
composition,
positionality,
steps
taken
monitor
unconscious
bias,
TCs
establish
framework
for
assessing
diversity
within
teams
impacts
development.
Studies
across
business,
science,
organizational
contexts
demonstrate
that
improves
outcomes,
including
innovation,
decision-making
overall
performance.
However,
diversity-diverse
ways
thinking
problem-solving-must
be
actively
cultivated
through
intentional,
collaborative
processes
mitigate
effectively.
embedding
into
practices,
may
enhance
model
performance,
improve
fairness
offer
empirical
basis
evaluating
influences
mitigation
efforts
over
time.
represents
critical
step
toward
developing
inclusive,
ethical,
effective
care.
A
publicly
available
prototype
presenting
our
accessible
at
https://www.teamcard.io/team/demo.
Language: Английский
Interdisciplinary collaboration in critical care alarm research: A bibliometric analysis
International Journal of Medical Informatics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
181, P. 105285 - 105285
Published: Nov. 7, 2023
Alarm
fatigue
in
nurses
is
a
major
patient
safety
concern
the
intensive
care
unit.
This
caused
by
exposure
to
high
rates
of
false
and
non-actionable
alarms.
Despite
decades
research,
problem
persists,
leading
stress,
burnout,
harm
resulting
from
true
missed
events.
While
engineering
approaches
reduce
alarms
have
spurred
hope,
they
appear
lack
collaboration
between
engineers
produce
real-world
solutions.
The
aim
this
bibliometric
analysis
was
examine
relevant
literature
quantify
level
authorial
nurses,
physicians,
engineers.We
conducted
articles
on
alarm
reduction
strategies
critical
published
2010
2022.
Data
were
extracted
at
article
author
level.
percentages
disciplines
per
publication
calculated
study
design,
journal
subject
area,
other
article-level
factors.A
total
155
with
583
unique
authors
identified.
31.73
%
(n
=
185)
had
nursing
background,
publications
using
an
design
46),
e.g.,
model
development,
very
low
involvement
(mean
proportion
1.09
%).
Observational
studies
58)
interventional
33)
higher
mean
52.27
47.75
%,
respectively.
Articles
journals
32)
highest
(80.32
%),
while
those
46)
lowest
(9.00
6
(13.04
%)
having
one
or
more
as
co-authors.Minimal
expertise
research
utilizing
methodologies
may
be
reason
for
successful,
solutions
ameliorate
fatigue.
Fostering
collaborative,
interdisciplinary
culture
can
promote
common
across
fields
yield
sustainable
implementation
technological
healthcare.
Language: Английский
Patient diversity and author representation in clinical studies supporting the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021: a systematic review of citations
Lama Nazer,
No information about this author
Aseel Abusara,
No information about this author
Batoul Aloran
No information about this author
et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Nov. 1, 2023
Abstract
Background
The
generalizability
of
the
Surviving
Sepsis
Campaign
(SSC)
guidelines
to
various
patient
populations
and
hospital
settings
has
been
debated.
A
quantitative
assessment
diversity
representation
in
clinical
evidence
supporting
would
help
evaluate
recommendations
identify
strategic
research
goals
priorities.
In
this
study,
we
evaluated
patients
original
studies,
terms
sex,
race/ethnicity,
geographical
location.
We
also
assessed
sex
among
study
first
last
authors.
Methods
All
studies
cited
support
2021
SSC
adult
guideline
were
identified.
Original
included,
while
editorials,
reviews,
non-clinical
meta-analyses
excluded.
For
eligible
recorded
proportion
male
patients,
percentage
each
represented
racial/ethnic
subgroup
(when
available),
countries
which
they
conducted.
location
World
Bank
classification
was
used
categorize
countries.
Results
included
six
sections,
with
85
based
on
351
studies.
ranged
from
47
62%.
Most
did
not
report
racial/
ethnic
distribution
patients;
when
so,
most
White
(68–77%).
conducted
high-income
(77–99%),
Europe/Central
Asia
(33–66%)
North
America
(36–55%).
Moreover,
first/last
authors
males
(55–93%)
(77–99%).
Conclusions
To
enhance
SCC
guidelines,
stakeholders
should
define
strategies
Though
there
reasonable
reflect
race/ethnicity
locations.
There
lack
contributing
evidence.
Language: Английский
Datawiz-IN: Summer Research Experience for Health Data Science Training
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 29, 2024
Abstract
Background:
Good
science
necessitates
diverse
perspectives
to
guide
its
progress.
This
study
introduces
Datawiz-IN,
an
educational
initiative
that
fosters
diversity
and
inclusion
in
AI
skills
training
research.
Supported
by
a
National
Institutes
of
Health
R25
grant
from
the
Library
Medicine,
Datawiz-IN
provided
comprehensive
data
machine
learning
research
experience
students
underrepresented
minority
groups
medicine
computing.
Methods:
The
program
evaluation
triangulated
quantitative
qualitative
measure
representation,
innovation,
experience.
Diversity
gains
were
quantified
using
demographic
analysis.
Computational
projects
systematically
reviewed
for
productivity.
A
mixed-methods
survey
gauged
participant
on
gained,
support
quality,
challenges
faced,
overall
sentiments.
Results:
first
cohort
14
Summer
2023
demonstrated
quantifiable
increases
with
greater
participation
women
minorities,
evidencing
efficacy
proactive
efforts
engage
talent
typically
excluded
these
fields.
student
interns
conducted
innovative
elucidated
disease
mechanisms,
enhanced
clinical
decision
systems,
analyzed
health
disparities.
Conclusion:
By
illustrating
how
purposeful
catalyzes
offers
model
developing
systems
reflect
true
diversity.
Realizing
full
societal
benefits
requires
sustaining
pathways
historically
voices
help
shape
field.
Language: Английский
L’évaluation dans la recherche en biologie et santé : état des lieux et perspectives
Bruno Clément,
No information about this author
A. Migus,
No information about this author
Patrick Netter
No information about this author
et al.
Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
208(4), P. 423 - 427
Published: Feb. 14, 2024
Bibliometric Analysis of Myelomeningocele Management: National Disease Burden versus Publication Volume
Belinda Shao,
No information about this author
Alphadenti Harlyjoy,
No information about this author
Olivia Kozel
No information about this author
et al.
World Neurosurgery,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
194, P. 123444 - 123444
Published: Dec. 7, 2024
Myelomeningocele
(MMC)
disproportionately
affects
low-resource
areas
and
regions
without
mandatory
folic
acid
fortification.
No
specific
literature
exists
on
the
distribution
of
research
output
regarding
neurosurgical
management
myelomeningocele
worldwide
in
relation
to
regional
disease
burden.
We
aimed
examine
country
origin
patient
population
published
papers
MMC
topics
related
MMC,
determine
whether
these
were
proportionate
A
systematic
search
was
conducted
aspects
care.
The
geographic
examined
against
national
burden
disease.
Bibliometric
analysis
quantified
author
affiliations
stratified
by
World
Bank
income
group
classification
fortification
status,
juxtaposed
with
From
9692
titles,
1843
included,
representing
107,446
patients
2650
authorship
instances.
High-income
countries
(HICs)
constituted
3%
2019's
global
neural
tube
defect
(NTD)
births,
74%
authorships,
83%
represented.
Upper-middle-income
(UMICs)
represented
9%
NTD
16%
patients.
Lower-middle-income
(LMICs)
55%
births
but
only
8.6%
authorships
7%
Low-income
(LICs)
shouldered
32%
contributed
1.3%
1.6%
Countries
75%
54%
authorships.
Postnatal
repair,
hydrocephalus,
postoperative
complications
most
frequently
studied
topics.
concerning
originates
predominantly
from
HICs.
Published
experiences
LICs/LMICs
are
scarce,
even
though
they
constitute
majority
affected
population.
Neurosurgeons
other
health
professionals
must
address
this
mismatch
between
publication
volume
order
inform
practice,
policy,
advocacy
for
care
worldwide.
Language: Английский
Brain network asymmetry; diversity factor in publishing; Williams syndrome
Jill Adams
No information about this author
The Transmitter,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Language: Английский
Diversifying the Impact Factor: Shifting from Mere Citations to True Representation
Editing Practice,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
1
Published: Nov. 24, 2023
The
journal
impact
factor
(JIF)
is
a
pivotal
metric
in
academic
publishing,
offering
glimpse
into
journal's
relevance
within
its
field
by
counting
citations
of
recent
articles.
[1]Many
scholars
rely
on
the
JIF
when
choosing
where
to
submit
their
work,
given
prestige
associated
with
high-impact
journals.However,
this
has
notable
shortcomings.It's
vulnerable
skewing
outlier
papers
that
garner
unusually
high
or
low
citations,
potentially
misrepresenting
overall
impact.
[2]
Additionally,
JIF's
emphasis
may
overlook
research
significant
societal
impacts
but
fewer
citations.
[3]Furthermore,
doesn't
diversity
and
inclusivity,
sidelining
journals
emphasize
diverse
perspectives.
[4]
Consequently,
while
essential,
it
should
be
considered
alongside
other
evaluative
tools
grasp
research's
comprehensive
influence
value.
Language: Английский