Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Journal Year: 2014, Volume and Issue: 7, P. 101 - 107
Published: Jan. 15, 2014
Language: Английский
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Journal Year: 2014, Volume and Issue: 7, P. 101 - 107
Published: Jan. 15, 2014
Language: Английский
Ecology and Society, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 21(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2016
Goatley, C. H. R., R. M. Bonaldo, J. Fox, and D. Bellwood. 2016. Sediments herbivory as sensitive indicators of coral reef degradation. Ecology Society 21(1):29.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08334-210129
Language: Английский
Citations
128Oecologia, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 169(1), P. 187 - 198
Published: Oct. 29, 2011
Language: Английский
Citations
117Ecological Applications, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 23(1), P. 174 - 188
Published: July 31, 2012
Many ecosystems face degradation unless factors that underpin their resilience can be effectively managed. In tropical reef ecosystems, grazing by herbivorous fishes prevent coral-macroalgal phase shifts commonly signal loss of resilience. However, knowledge characteristics most promote is typically experimental, localized, and sparse, which limits broad management applications. Applying sound ecological theory to broad-scale data may provide an alternative basis for ecosystem management. We explore the idea positively related diversity within among functional groups organisms. Specifically, we infer relative vulnerability different subregions Great Barrier Reef (GBR) based on local fish communities. slopes 92 reefs set in three zones continental shelf eight latitudinal sectors GBR were surveyed multiple occasions between 1995 2009. Spatial variation community structure was high driven primarily position. Measures diversity, redundancy, abundance generally higher offshore lower inshore. Two turbid inshore considered vulnerable very low measures herbivore function, this supported occurrence one subregions. Eleven resisted after major coral mortality included some with function. The fact did not necessarily occur when large herbivores scarce indicates other environmental compensated preserve Estimates solely function thus prove conservative, but caution appropriate, since compensatory are largely unknown could eroded unwittingly anthropogenic stresses. Our suggest managing threat successfully will require spatially explicit strategies consider both communities raise or thresholds. A strong positive correlation water clarity species richness suggests quality generic importance ensure services important group herbivores.
Language: Английский
Citations
113Oecologia, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 179(4), P. 1173 - 1185
Published: Aug. 5, 2015
Language: Английский
Citations
98Coral Reefs, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 31(1), P. 55 - 65
Published: Aug. 23, 2011
Language: Английский
Citations
108Oecologia, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 168(4), P. 1079 - 1090
Published: Oct. 18, 2011
Language: Английский
Citations
102Coral Reefs, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 30(2), P. 351 - 362
Published: Feb. 18, 2011
Language: Английский
Citations
101Marine Biology, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 159(5), P. 1143 - 1154
Published: Feb. 16, 2012
Language: Английский
Citations
88Marine Ecology Progress Series, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 467, P. 77 - 88
Published: July 27, 2012
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout JournalEditorsTheme Sections 467:77-88 (2012) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09953 Size matters in competition between corals and macroalgae Renata Ferrari1,*, Manuel Gonzalez-Rivero2, Peter J. Mumby1,2 1Marine Spatial Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Goddard Building, University Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia 2Marine BioSciences, Exeter, Prince Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Corals compete for space, but influence species size on competitive outcome is poorly understood. Using a manipulative experiment, we evaluated effect macroalgal growth rate with an emphasis colony size, identity intensity competition. Coral–macroalgal was studied among 3 Caribbean coral (Porites astreoides, Agaricia agaricites Colpophyllia natans) 2 (Lobophora variegata Halimeda opuntia) 1 yr. Two sizes were used and, smaller class, levels (25 100% contact perimeter). Coral had greatest outcome; large under grew as much controls third did not lose tissue. All small colonies lost 18 22% their original area after year competing macroalgae, insensitive algal species. critical factor algae competitors important corals. In general, results support theory that blooms can inhibit population dynamics by causing bottleneck survivorship classes. KEY WORDS: · Porites astreoides natans Lobophora opuntia Full text pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Ferrari R, Gonzalez-Rivero M, Mumby PJ macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 467:77-88. Export citation Tweet linkedIn Cited Published Vol. 467. Online publication date: October 25, 2012 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; 1616-1599 Copyright © Inter-Research.
Language: Английский
Citations
81Marine Ecology Progress Series, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 597, P. 207 - 220
Published: April 17, 2018
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout JournalEditorsTheme Sections 597:207-220 (2018) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12600 Comparative analysis of foraging behavior and bite mechanics reveals complex functional diversity among Caribbean parrotfishes Thomas C. Adam1,*, Alain Duran2, Corinne E. Fuchs3, Madelyn V. Roycroft4, Maria Rojas2, Benjamin I. Ruttenberg4, Deron Burkepile1,3 1Marine Science Institute, University California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 2Department Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, 3Department Ecology, Evolution Biology 4Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State San Luis Obispo, 93407, *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Parrotfishes are a diverse group herbivores that can influence benthic community dynamics ecosystem function on coral reefs. Different species size classes vary in their feeding ecology impact reef ecosystems distinct ways. We documented differences 9 Keys National Sanctuary (FKNMS). Many key be summarized by assigning groups (e.g. scrapers, excavators, croppers, macroalgae browsers), which differentially responsible for carrying out specific ecological processes. For example, we found Sparisoma viride, Scarus coelestinus, Sc. guacamaia, taeniopterus, vetula feed short turfs with few sediments, while Sp. aurofrenatum, chrysopterum, rubripinne longer sediment-laden addition macroalgae. Further, use types indicate contrasting impacts benthos. Species scrape excavate epilithic endolithic algae, tend tear or crop algae from reef. These behaviors result different rates removal, carbonate erosion, sediment production. Recognizing interact benthos fundamentally ways will enable scientists managers better predict how changes structure parrotfish assemblages may affect communities KEY WORDS: Herbivory · Coral Niche partitioning Bioerosion Turf Macroalgae Ecosystem-based management Functional Full text pdf format Supplementary material PreviousNextCite this article as: Adam TC, Duran A, Fuchs CE, Roycroft MV, Rojas MC, Ruttenberg BI, Burkepile DE parrotfishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 597:207-220. Export citation Mail link Contents Lists Tweet linkedIn Cited Published Vol. 597. Online publication date: June 11, 2018 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; 1616-1599 Copyright © Inter-Research.
Language: Английский
Citations
81