Wildlife Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
50(3), P. 190 - 200
Published: Nov. 10, 2022
Context
Camera
trapping
is
an
effective
tool
for
cost-efficient
monitoring
of
species
over
large
temporal
and
spatial
scales
it
becoming
increasingly
popular
method
investigating
wildlife
communities
trophic
interactions.
However,
camera
targeting
rare
elusive
can
be
hampered
by
low
detection
rates,
which
decrease
the
accuracy
precision
results
from
common
analytical
approaches
(e.g.,
occupancy
modeling,
capture-recapture).
Consequently,
researchers
often
employ
attractants
to
increase
without
accounting
how
influence
among
levels.
Aims
We
aimed
evaluate
influences
a
commonly
used
non-species-specific
olfactory
lure
(i.e.
sardines)
sampling
design
on
four
bobcat
[Lynx
rufus],
coyote
[Canis
latrans],
raccoon
[Procyon
lotor],
eastern
cottontail
[Sylvilagus
floridanus])
that
represented
range
foraging
guilds
in
agricultural
landscape.
Methods
set
180
stations,
each
∼28
days,
during
summer
2019.
cameras
with
one
three
treatments:
(1)
lure,
(2)
no
or
(3)
only
latter
half
survey.
evaluated
at
daily
probability
detection,
independent
sequences
per
triggers
sequence).
Key
The
tended
positively
coyotes
raccoons
but
negatively
influenced
bobcats
cottontails.
varied
detection.
Conclusions
Scent
lures
differentially
within
tropic
levels,
scent
may
vary
scales.
Implications
Our
demonstrate
importance
evaluating
attractant
focal
when
using
data
conduct
multi-species
community
analyses,
variation
strategies
across
cameras,
identifying
appropriate
species-specific
resolution
assessing
data.
Furthermore,
we
highlight
care
should
taken
as
index
relative
abundance
(e.g.
done
prey
species)
there
use
cameras.
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
2(8)
Published: June 19, 2020
Abstract
Camera
traps
(CTs)
are
an
increasingly
popular
method
of
studying
animal
behavior.
However,
the
impact
cameras
on
detected
individuals—such
as
from
mechanical
noise,
odor,
and
emitted
light—has
received
relatively
little
attention.
These
impacts
particularly
important
in
behavioral
studies
conservation
that
seek
to
ascribe
changes
behavior
relevant
environmental
factors.
In
this
article,
we
discuss
three
sources
bias
using
CTs:
(a)
disturbance
caused
by
cameras;
(b)
variation
animal‐detection
parameters
across
camera
models;
(c)
biased
detection
individuals
age,
sex,
classes.
We
propose
several
recommendations
aimed
at
mitigating
responses
CTs
wildlife.
Our
offer
a
platform
for
development
more
rigorous
robust
CT
technology
and,
if
adopted,
would
result
greater
applied
benefits
management.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
15(5), P. 900 - 915
Published: April 11, 2024
Abstract
Estimating
the
abundance
or
density
of
wildlife
populations
is
a
critical
part
species
conservation
and
management,
but
estimates
can
vary
greatly
in
precision
accuracy
according
to
sampling
statistical
methods,
ecological
variation,
sample
size.
We
used
images
moose
(
Alces
americanus
)
from
camera
traps
parameterize
N‐mixture
models
tested
effect
conditions,
spatial
scale
measurement,
criteria
define
independent
detections
on
population
abundance.
compared
model
those
generated
empirically
with
aerial
survey
data,
standard
method
for
many
ungulate.
explored
sensitivity
choice
based
common
criterion
parsimony.
The
two
most
parsimonious
(i.e.
AIC
c
were
considerably
biased,
producing
implausibly
large
imprecise
Most
other
produced
that
ecologically
realistic
relatively
accurate.
by
was
not
overly
sensitive
formulation
models,
at
which
conditions
measured,
detection
extension
Our
results
suggested
parsimony
poor
measure
predictive
model.
recommend
using
suite
generate
predictions
instead
single
top‐ranked
Collecting
processing
data
less
expensive
took
time,
provided
broader
set
insights
into
behaviour
co‐occurrence
competitors
predators.
Wildlife Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
2021(1)
Published: Jan. 25, 2021
Camera
traps
are
widely
used
to
collect
information
on
the
distribution
and
abundance
of
multiple
species
simultaneously.
However,
we
still
lack
important
guidance
for
designing
camera-trap
surveys
monitor
species,
consequences
species-specific
responses
survey
design
strategies
often
overlooked.
Using
data
collected
ten
medium-to-large
North-American
carnivores
in
northern
Minnesota,
USA,
between
2016
2018
(23
337
active
trap-days),
evaluated:
1)
two
different
survey-design
frameworks
(random-
versus
road-based),
2)
lure
types
(salmon
oil
fatty
acid
scent
oil),
3)
placement
(completely
random
randomly-selected
sites
with
feature-based
placement),
4)
timing
(spring
fall)
5)
temporal
trends
daily
encounter
probabilities.
generalized
linear
mixed
models,
found
evidence
differential
all
these
strategies.
For
9
out
10
strong
frameworks:
red
foxes
Vulpes
vulpes,
coyotes
Canis
latrans,
bobcats,
Lynx
rufus,
striped
skunks
Mephitis
mephitis,
wolves
C.
lupus
gray
Urocyon
cinereoargenteus,
had
estimated
frequencies
that
were
9-
106-fold
higher
at
unlured
along
secondary
roads;
black
bears
Ursus
americanus,
martens
Martes
americana
fishers
Pekania
pennanti
15-
>
3600-fold
lured,
randomly
selected
sites.
six
salmon
provided
2-
4-fold
more
encounters
than
oil,
but
feature-basedplacement
only
improved
detections
fishers.
Daily
probabilities
differed
spring
fall
usually
decreased
slightly
within
each
sampling
period
Our
study
confirms
even
similar-sized
or
closely-related
respond
differently
choices.
To
maximize
frequencies,
recommend
multi-species
studies
use
a
mix
include
features
during
statistical
analysis.
Australian Mammalogy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
46(2)
Published: Feb. 1, 2024
Camera-trapping
programs
are
most
effective
when
informed
by
knowledge
of
the
influence
components
camera
setup
such
as
bait
and
type.
I
investigated
two
baits
three
types
on
detection
eight
species
medium-sized
mammals
across
a
10-month
survey.
The
spotted-tailed
quoll
(Dasyurus
maculatus)
was
only
that
favoured
meat
(sardines)
over
peanut-butter
bait.
long-nosed
potoroo
(Potorous
tridactylus),
Parma
wallaby
(Notamacropus
parma),
bandicoot
(Perameles
nasuta)
swamp
(Wallabia
bicolor)
northern
brown
(Isoodon
macrourus),
mountain
brushtail
possum
(Trichosurus
caninus)
feral
cat
(Felis
catus)
showed
no
preference.
Camera
type
influenced
weekly
in
species.
had
lower
at
Reconyx
white-flash
(WF)
compared
with
infra-red
flash
(IR)
Swift
wide-angle
(Sw)
camera.
higher
Sw
WF
IR.
IR
Sw.
findings
have
implications
relation
to
selection
can
lead
more
monitoring,
whether
program
is
directed
one
these
or
spectrum
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14(5)
Published: May 1, 2024
Abstract
Fire
shapes
animal
communities
by
altering
resource
availability
and
species
interactions,
including
between
predators
prey.
In
Australia,
there
is
particular
concern
that
two
highly
damaging
invasive
predators,
the
feral
cat
(
Felis
catus
)
European
red
fox
Vulpes
vulpes
),
increase
their
activity
in
recently
burnt
areas
exert
greater
predation
pressure
on
native
prey
due
to
increased
exposure.
We
tested
how
prescribed
fire
occurrence
extent,
along
with
history,
vegetation,
topography,
distance
anthropogenic
features
(towns
farms),
affected
(detection
frequency)
of
cats,
foxes,
mammal
community
south‐eastern
Australia.
used
camera
traps
quantify
before
after
a
burn
statistically
interacted
these
habitat
variables
affect
activity.
found
little
evidence
influenced
cats
foxes
no
an
effect
kangaroo
or
small
(<800
g)
Medium‐sized
mammals
(800–2000
were
negatively
associated
suggesting
has
negative
impact
short
term.
The
lack
clear
from
likely
positive
outcome
management
perspective.
However,
we
highlight
response
dependent
upon
factors
like
size,
severity,
availability.
Future
experiments
should
incorporate
GPS‐trackers
record
fine‐scale
movements
temperate
ecosystems
immediately
best
inform
within
protected
areas.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(7), P. e0300870 - e0300870
Published: July 18, 2024
Rapid
growth
in
outdoor
recreation
may
have
important
and
varied
effects
on
terrestrial
mammal
communities.
Few
studies
investigated
factors
influencing
variation
observed
responses
of
multiple
species
to
recreation.
We
used
data
from
155
camera
traps,
western
Alberta
(Canada),
a
hierarchical
Bayesian
community
modelling
framework
document
15
recreation,
test
for
differential
between
predators
prey,
evaluate
the
influence
local
context.
Factors
characterizing
context
were
trail
designation
(i.e.,
use
by
motorized
vs
non-motorized),
management
type,
forest
cover,
landscape
disturbance,
season.
three
measures
characterize
pressure:
distance
trail,
density,
an
index
intensity
derived
platform
Strava.
found
limited
evidence
strong
or
consistent
space
use.
However,
was
better
explained
interaction
than
either
their
own.
The
strongest
density
type;
mammals
more
likely
avoid
sites
near
higher
trails
areas
with
restrictive
management.
that
designation,
although
there
not
clear
differences
designated
vs.
non-motorized
Overall,
we
species-
context-dependent.
Limiting
be
reducing
negative
impacts
within
conservation
areas.
show
using
yields
insight
into
human
disturbances
wildlife.
recommend
investigating
how
different
characteristics
(noise,
speed,
visibility)
animal
behaviors.
Multispecies
monitoring
across
landscapes
vary
pressure
can
lead
adaptive
approach
ensuring
coexistence
Ecosphere,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(4)
Published: April 1, 2022
Abstract
Estimating
animal
abundance
and
density
are
fundamental
goals
of
many
wildlife
monitoring
programs.
Camera
trapping
has
become
an
increasingly
popular
tool
to
achieve
these
due
recent
advances
in
modeling
approaches
the
capacity
simultaneously
collect
data
on
multiple
species.
However,
estimating
unmarked
populations
continues
be
problematic
difficulty
implementing
complex
approaches,
low
precision
estimates,
absence
rigor
testing
model
assumptions
their
influence
results.
Here,
we
describe
a
novel
approach
that
uses
still
image
camera
traps
estimate
without
need
for
individual
identification,
based
time
spent
front
(TIFC).
Using
results
from
large‐scale
multispecies
program
with
nearly
3000
cameras
deployed
over
6
years
Alberta,
Canada,
provide
reproducible
methodology
parameters
test
key
TIFC
model.
We
compare
moose
(
Alces
alces
)
estimates
aerial
surveys
TIFC,
including
incorporating
correction
factors
known
assumption
violations.
The
resulting
corrected
comparable
estimates.
discuss
limitations
method
areas
needing
further
investigation,
long‐term
violations
number
necessary
precise
Despite
challenges
high
measurement
error,
can
useful
alternative
or
complementary
when
compared
traditional
methods.
Ecological Solutions and Evidence,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
4(2)
Published: April 1, 2023
Abstract
Forest
harvesting
causes
habitat
loss
and
alteration
can
change
predator–prey
dynamics.
In
Canada,
forest
has
shifted
the
distribution
abundance
of
ungulates
(deer,
elk
moose)
that
prefer
early
seral
forest,
resulting
in
unsustainable
caribou
predation
by
shared
predators
(bears,
cougars
wolves).
Long‐term
solutions
for
recovery
require
management
to
reduce
ungulate
prey
species
within
ranges.
Silviculture
practices
applied
after
directly
affect
amount
forage
available
harvested
areas,
therefore
influence
distribution,
but
few
studies
have
completed
detailed
assessments
on
how
specific
treatments
site
preparation,
planting
stand
tending
use
harvest
blocks.
We
used
camera
traps,
silviculture
data,
GIS‐derived
disturbance
vegetation
data
collected
at
field
sites
investigate
occurrence
blocks
west‐central
Alberta,
Canada.
compared
seasonal
investigated
site‐specific
characteristics,
surrounding
density,
fine‐scale
influenced
Deer,
moose
was
higher
summer
winter.
Elk,
white‐tailed
deer
with
greater
availability
species.
Moose
a
lower
road
density
area,
further
from
seismic
lines
proportion
area.
younger
Mule
densities
lodgepole
pine,
mule
also
had
been
tended.
Our
study
provides
information
response
methods
linking
wildlife
forestry
practices,
providing
practical
scientific
inform
sustainable
forestry.
Translating
this
research
into
landscape
decisions
could
benefit
boreal
biodiversity,
including
threatened
like
caribou,
culturally
economically
important
deer,
moose.
Journal of Applied Ecology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 6, 2025
Abstract
Coexistence
between
humans
and
wildlife
is
necessary
for
many
conservation
goals
but
difficult
to
achieve
in
landscapes
with
increasing
human
populations
species
that
are
often
wary
of
people
may
also
threaten
safety.
In
these
contexts,
coexistence
be
enhanced
by
identifying
geographic
areas
where
animal
movement
particularly
important
changes
use
via
trail
design
could
support
both
We
used
camera
trap
data
monitor
the
spatial
distribution
grizzly
bears
(
Ursus
arctos
),
grey
wolves
Canis
lupus
within
central
Canadian
Rocky
Mountains,
anthropogenic
development
activity
have
gradually
encroached
on
limited
habitat.
quantified
variation
then
incorporated
this
output
into
models
detection
rates
wolves.
interpolated
metrics
throughout
study
area
using
inverse
distance
weighted
averages
from
cameras.
This
approach
supported
a
novel
estimate
cumulative
effects
at
all
nearby
trails
space
use.
our
zone
influence
wolves,
determining
which
no
longer
exhibited
measurable
change
each
The
negative
declined
steeply
such
50%
decrease
immediately
adjacent
would
expected
occur
267
m
576
Weak
effects,
5%
as
strong
effect
trails,
extended
up
1.8
6.1
km
revealing
importance
measures
Synthesis
applications
.
Our
work
shows
how
over
entire
can
alter
rates.
results
identify
target
buffer
distances
protected
near
modelling
framework
land
managers
predict
altering
networks
modifying
affect
advance
coexistence.