The impact of using ChatGPT on academic writing among medical undergraduates DOI Creative Commons
Jingyu Wang, Yuxuan Liao, Shaojun Liu

et al.

Annals of Medicine, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 56(1)

Published: Nov. 18, 2024

Background ChatGPT is widely used for writing tasks, yet its effects on medical students' academic remain underexplored. This study aims to elucidate ChatGPT's impact efficiency and quality among students, while also evaluating attitudes towards use in writing.

Language: Английский

Employment of AI in Higher Education DOI
Rituraj Jain, Kumar J. Parmar, Damodharan Palaniappan

et al.

Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 63 - 90

Published: Jan. 3, 2025

AI deployment in higher learning is consequently changing the dynamics functioning mode of institutions and modes delivery knowledge. This chapter covers prospects, issues strategies associated with adoption an environment teaching: its use, deployment, promotion. Technologies powered by have been adopted to improve management functions interference such as admission, timetabling assessment. University education however should create setups where all students are accorded necessary consideration. It has intended effectively raise awareness educational leaders policymakers on how use for enhancing school development same note minimize risks that may arise because technology. The general aim therefore improve, equitable personalized teaching conditions will help extend capacity sustainably through advancement

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Estimation of rock strength parameters from petrological contents using tree-based machine learning techniques DOI Creative Commons
Javid Hussain, Xiaodong Fu, Jian Chen

et al.

AI in Civil Engineering, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: Feb. 10, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS WITH PEER REVIEW, IMPACT FACTOR AND CITATION INDEX: A RESPONSE TO DOI
Carlo Nike Bianchi, Antonio Di Natale, Pilar A. Sáiz

et al.

Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 109184 - 109184

Published: Feb. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity DOI Creative Commons
Bohdana Doskaliuk, Olena Zimba, Marlen Yessirkepov

et al.

Journal of Korean Medical Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 40(7)

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed various aspects scientific research, including academic publishing and peer review. In recent years, AI tools such as large language models have demonstrated their capability to streamline numerous tasks traditionally handled by human editors reviewers. These applications range from automated grammar checks plagiarism detection, format compliance, even preliminary assessment research significance. While substantially benefits the efficiency accuracy processes, its integration raises critical ethical methodological questions, particularly in lacks subtle understanding complex content that expertise provides, posing challenges evaluating novelty Additionally, there are risks associated with over-reliance on AI, potential biases algorithms, concerns related transparency, accountability, data privacy. This review evaluates perspectives within community integrating publishing. By exploring both AI's limitations, we aim offer practical recommendations ensure is used a supportive tool, supporting but not replacing expertise. Such guidelines essential for preserving integrity quality work while benefiting efficiencies editorial processes.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

El rol de la inteligencia artificial en la detección de tendencias emergentes en publicaciones científicas DOI Creative Commons
Javier Mauricio García Mogollón, William Mauricio Rojas-Contreras, Mauricio Sanabria

et al.

Revista Científica General José María Córdova, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 23(49), P. 63 - 94

Published: Feb. 21, 2025

Por una parte, las revistas enfrentan retos para mantenerse actualizadas y posicionarse en un entorno muy cambiante competitivo, lo que afecta su relevancia citaciones; y, por otra la inteligencia artificial (IA) es cada vez más tecnología clave industria editorial, capacidad de procesar grandes volúmenes datos optimizar procesos. Con el objetivo identificar potencial herramientas IA mejorar los procesos publicaciones científicas, así como tendencias emergentes, este artículo presenta investigación con enfoque mixto, integra revisión sistemática literatura recopila analiza particularmente ciencias sociales. Se revisan plataformas disponibles, evaluando precisión a través revisiones sistemáticas análisis comparativos resultado, se proponen directrices adecuada implementación editoriales.

Citations

0

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing and Research Skills in Kenyan Universities: Opportunities and Challenges DOI Creative Commons
Elizabeth Atieno Obura, Peter Imatari Emoit

Africa Education Review, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 23

Published: March 17, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Early Career Researchers on all Aspects of Peer Review: A Deep Dive Into the Data DOI Creative Commons
David Nicholas, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Abdullah Abrizah

et al.

Learned Publishing, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 38(2)

Published: March 19, 2025

ABSTRACT The Harbingers study of early career researchers (ECRs) and their work life scholarly communications began by studying generational—Millennial—change (H‐1), then moved to pandemic change (H‐2) is now investigating another agent—artificial intelligence (AI). This paper from the constitutes a deep dive into peer review attitudes practices 91 international ECRs all disciplines. Depth interviews were main means which data was collected, questions covered as reviewers, authors readers, are described in own words. Main findings are: (1) proved be highly experienced review; (2) There more trust than distrust it, but there concerns; (3) Peer something that arts humanities unfamiliar with or much concerned about; (4) A sizeable majority thought could improved, anonymity/double‐blind reviewing topping list; (5) view AI will have an impact on it would beneficial; (6) little has changed since last study, except for AI, seen transformative. We believe few studies drilled down so deeply widely respect ECRs.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Academic Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature DOI
Davis Velarde-Camaqui, María Isabel Denegri Velarde, Karina Velarde-Camaqui

et al.

Smart innovation, systems and technologies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 349 - 358

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Language: Английский

Citations

0

GPP 2022: perspectives, sentiments, and feedback from the publications community DOI

Raghuraj Puthige,

Dikran Toroser,

Anisha Mehra

et al.

Current Medical Research and Opinion, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 8

Published: May 9, 2025

To identify the impact and integration of GPP 2022 guidelines on work processes publications developed in pharmaceutical, publishing, agency, academic circles. A cross-sectional survey was conducted for 3 weeks from March 1-22, 2024 among medical publication professionals healthcare researchers. The included questions that have been traditionally challenging workstreams were disseminated through major communications networking groups. results summarized as a percentage each answer rounded to one decimal place. total 100 participants responded whom 67.0% familiar with guidelines. mitigate potential misinterpretation risks, we considered only respondents More than half (55.7%) felt effective addressing ethical considerations; 34.4% agreed provided useful guidance best practices transparency data-sharing. Most (54.5%) authorship contributorship criteria clear 2022. 37.3% extenders added value dissemination research findings; 39.2% aware plain-language summaries 82.4% viewed them vital widespread accessibility. suggests need improve awareness support implementing initiatives aid process. Furthermore, although most extenders, there clarification harmonization extenders.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Harnessing the Potential of AI Tools for Student Thesis Research and Writing: An Appreciative Inquiry DOI Creative Commons
Didacus B. Namanya,

Mennen Pearl C. Talibong

Pan-African journal of education and social sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 6(1), P. 30 - 48

Published: May 12, 2025

This qualitative study examines how students use AI tools for their research and thesis writing, anchored in Constructivist Learning Theory, which holds that learners actively construct knowledge through experience reflection. Utilizing the 4D model of appreciative inquiry, this investigated positive experiences using chatbots to write theses, ideal role AI, methods optimize effects chatbots, approaches promote a culture accepts technology while upholding academic integrity. Using semi-structured interviews focused group discussions with undergraduate currently writing theses. The results indicated appreciated productivity efficiency increases made possible by such as instantaneous feedback quick literary summarization. However, they were also worried about potential on creativity critical thinking. offers insightful information institutions, faculty, students. It suggests establishing clear rules placing faculty training programs guarantee ethical appropriate technologies endeavors.

Language: Английский

Citations

0