Annals of Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
56(1)
Published: Nov. 18, 2024
Background
ChatGPT
is
widely
used
for
writing
tasks,
yet
its
effects
on
medical
students'
academic
remain
underexplored.
This
study
aims
to
elucidate
ChatGPT's
impact
efficiency
and
quality
among
students,
while
also
evaluating
attitudes
towards
use
in
writing.
Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 63 - 90
Published: Jan. 3, 2025
AI
deployment
in
higher
learning
is
consequently
changing
the
dynamics
functioning
mode
of
institutions
and
modes
delivery
knowledge.
This
chapter
covers
prospects,
issues
strategies
associated
with
adoption
an
environment
teaching:
its
use,
deployment,
promotion.
Technologies
powered
by
have
been
adopted
to
improve
management
functions
interference
such
as
admission,
timetabling
assessment.
University
education
however
should
create
setups
where
all
students
are
accorded
necessary
consideration.
It
has
intended
effectively
raise
awareness
educational
leaders
policymakers
on
how
use
for
enhancing
school
development
same
note
minimize
risks
that
may
arise
because
technology.
The
general
aim
therefore
improve,
equitable
personalized
teaching
conditions
will
help
extend
capacity
sustainably
through
advancement
Journal of Korean Medical Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
40(7)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
The
rapid
advancement
of
artificial
intelligence
(AI)
has
transformed
various
aspects
scientific
research,
including
academic
publishing
and
peer
review.
In
recent
years,
AI
tools
such
as
large
language
models
have
demonstrated
their
capability
to
streamline
numerous
tasks
traditionally
handled
by
human
editors
reviewers.
These
applications
range
from
automated
grammar
checks
plagiarism
detection,
format
compliance,
even
preliminary
assessment
research
significance.
While
substantially
benefits
the
efficiency
accuracy
processes,
its
integration
raises
critical
ethical
methodological
questions,
particularly
in
lacks
subtle
understanding
complex
content
that
expertise
provides,
posing
challenges
evaluating
novelty
Additionally,
there
are
risks
associated
with
over-reliance
on
AI,
potential
biases
algorithms,
concerns
related
transparency,
accountability,
data
privacy.
This
review
evaluates
perspectives
within
community
integrating
publishing.
By
exploring
both
AI's
limitations,
we
aim
offer
practical
recommendations
ensure
is
used
a
supportive
tool,
supporting
but
not
replacing
expertise.
Such
guidelines
essential
for
preserving
integrity
quality
work
while
benefiting
efficiencies
editorial
processes.
Revista Científica General José María Córdova,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
23(49), P. 63 - 94
Published: Feb. 21, 2025
Por
una
parte,
las
revistas
enfrentan
retos
para
mantenerse
actualizadas
y
posicionarse
en
un
entorno
muy
cambiante
competitivo,
lo
que
afecta
su
relevancia
citaciones;
y,
por
otra
la
inteligencia
artificial
(IA)
es
cada
vez
más
tecnología
clave
industria
editorial,
capacidad
de
procesar
grandes
volúmenes
datos
optimizar
procesos.
Con
el
objetivo
identificar
potencial
herramientas
IA
mejorar
los
procesos
publicaciones
científicas,
así
como
tendencias
emergentes,
este
artículo
presenta
investigación
con
enfoque
mixto,
integra
revisión
sistemática
literatura
recopila
analiza
particularmente
ciencias
sociales.
Se
revisan
plataformas
disponibles,
evaluando
precisión
a
través
revisiones
sistemáticas
análisis
comparativos
resultado,
se
proponen
directrices
adecuada
implementación
editoriales.
Learned Publishing,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
38(2)
Published: March 19, 2025
ABSTRACT
The
Harbingers
study
of
early
career
researchers
(ECRs)
and
their
work
life
scholarly
communications
began
by
studying
generational—Millennial—change
(H‐1),
then
moved
to
pandemic
change
(H‐2)
is
now
investigating
another
agent—artificial
intelligence
(AI).
This
paper
from
the
constitutes
a
deep
dive
into
peer
review
attitudes
practices
91
international
ECRs
all
disciplines.
Depth
interviews
were
main
means
which
data
was
collected,
questions
covered
as
reviewers,
authors
readers,
are
described
in
own
words.
Main
findings
are:
(1)
proved
be
highly
experienced
review;
(2)
There
more
trust
than
distrust
it,
but
there
concerns;
(3)
Peer
something
that
arts
humanities
unfamiliar
with
or
much
concerned
about;
(4)
A
sizeable
majority
thought
could
improved,
anonymity/double‐blind
reviewing
topping
list;
(5)
view
AI
will
have
an
impact
on
it
would
beneficial;
(6)
little
has
changed
since
last
study,
except
for
AI,
seen
transformative.
We
believe
few
studies
drilled
down
so
deeply
widely
respect
ECRs.
Current Medical Research and Opinion,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 8
Published: May 9, 2025
To
identify
the
impact
and
integration
of
GPP
2022
guidelines
on
work
processes
publications
developed
in
pharmaceutical,
publishing,
agency,
academic
circles.
A
cross-sectional
survey
was
conducted
for
3
weeks
from
March
1-22,
2024
among
medical
publication
professionals
healthcare
researchers.
The
included
questions
that
have
been
traditionally
challenging
workstreams
were
disseminated
through
major
communications
networking
groups.
results
summarized
as
a
percentage
each
answer
rounded
to
one
decimal
place.
total
100
participants
responded
whom
67.0%
familiar
with
guidelines.
mitigate
potential
misinterpretation
risks,
we
considered
only
respondents
More
than
half
(55.7%)
felt
effective
addressing
ethical
considerations;
34.4%
agreed
provided
useful
guidance
best
practices
transparency
data-sharing.
Most
(54.5%)
authorship
contributorship
criteria
clear
2022.
37.3%
extenders
added
value
dissemination
research
findings;
39.2%
aware
plain-language
summaries
82.4%
viewed
them
vital
widespread
accessibility.
suggests
need
improve
awareness
support
implementing
initiatives
aid
process.
Furthermore,
although
most
extenders,
there
clarification
harmonization
extenders.
Pan-African journal of education and social sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. 30 - 48
Published: May 12, 2025
This
qualitative
study
examines
how
students
use
AI
tools
for
their
research
and
thesis
writing,
anchored
in
Constructivist
Learning
Theory,
which
holds
that
learners
actively
construct
knowledge
through
experience
reflection.
Utilizing
the
4D
model
of
appreciative
inquiry,
this
investigated
positive
experiences
using
chatbots
to
write
theses,
ideal
role
AI,
methods
optimize
effects
chatbots,
approaches
promote
a
culture
accepts
technology
while
upholding
academic
integrity.
Using
semi-structured
interviews
focused
group
discussions
with
undergraduate
currently
writing
theses.
The
results
indicated
appreciated
productivity
efficiency
increases
made
possible
by
such
as
instantaneous
feedback
quick
literary
summarization.
However,
they
were
also
worried
about
potential
on
creativity
critical
thinking.
offers
insightful
information
institutions,
faculty,
students.
It
suggests
establishing
clear
rules
placing
faculty
training
programs
guarantee
ethical
appropriate
technologies
endeavors.