An Exploration in the Zones of Business Disruption and Economic Growth DOI
Debasish Roy

Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 80

Published: Sept. 27, 2024

Nowadays, business innovation and disruption; both in tandem, are the two major features of global economy, albeit completely contradictory nature. The first part this research work is aimed at analytical derivations demarcation Zone Business Disruption (ZBD) Economic Growth (ZEG) for 6 sample countries time series study 30 years (1990 – 2019) by considering 2020 as ‘benchmark' year pandemic to estimate quantum disruption a function variables, i.e., Per capita productivity growth rate GDP respectively, second consists formulation Survival Index (BSI) based on attributes Adaptability Disruptions (ABD) Alternative Strategy (ABS) respectively which would help project efficiency level country effectively survive adverse effects disruptions from normative point view.

Language: Английский

Save for a rainy day? How regional household savings constrain entrepreneurship after a natural disaster DOI Creative Commons
Jiabin Zhang, Joeri van Hugten, Wouter Stam

et al.

Small Business Economics, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Oct. 2, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

0

How to avoid profiles of failure when supporting entrepreneurs in an economic crisis DOI
Manuel Chaves Maza, Eugenio M. Fedriani

Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 8, 2024

Purpose In times of economic crisis, many eyes turn to entrepreneurship, which has become a key element the economy. Consequently, interest in supporting entrepreneurs increased. This study aims detect configurations success or failure that may help entrepreneurs’ public orientation. Design/methodology/approach used data from latest crisis region with high levels unemployment. The authors studied 2,210 Andalusia (Spain). From each, analysed 207 variables and applied fuzzy version qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). methodology allowed infer causality between combinations factors positive/negative effects. Findings concluded there are at least two profiles should be avoided when starting business; both refer projects quite attractive sectors: an environment concentration survival rates, not enough education assets turnover is expected. Research limitations/implications It was difficult obtain complete database replicate another region. Moreover, corresponded period results valid for more favourable period. Regarding implications, have been several unsuccessful attempts literature find linear association entrepreneurial success. For instance, regressions do allow us properly relate simultaneous presence/absence various characteristics success/failure; hence, it necessary consider non-linear asymmetric relationships variables. Practical implications most sectors carry considerable risk future business, since “greed clouds judgment”, expectations can outweigh other motivations. Support services filter out candidates insufficient training excessive expectations. Originality/value techniques this consideration explanatory independent each other, subjective aspects some examined.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Do labour productivity, capital productivity and education influence the technical efficiency of entrepreneurial outcomes? Evidence from europe DOI Creative Commons
Pedro Silva, Víctor Moutinho, Pedro Miguel Gaspar

et al.

Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Dec. 10, 2024

Abstract The differences in Labour and Capital Productivity Education Europe were used to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance technical efficiency entrepreneurship activities new firm creation. For this purpose, two distinct methodologies used: non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) parametric Stochastic Frontier (SFA). Firstly, obtain ranking for assessing efficiency, outputs (birth rate total early-stage entrepreneurial activity) combined, four inputs (long-term unemployment rate, household disposable income ratio S80/S20; young people neither employment nor education or training recent graduates) applied. In second step, estimators examine effect capital productivity, labour non-qualified labour, population share on score outcomes. Tobit regression, including random effects mixed models, quantile regression model. results first step reveal that during 2008–2014 after period, 2015–2019, European countries Lithuania, Estonia Netherlands present highest scores according DEA-CRS Applying SFA technique, Belgium, Germany, Malta show levels inefficiency both periods financial crisis. stage demonstrate there was negative significant productivity outcomes crises. This statistical evidence mirrors observed decrease average EU investments fixed capital, structural changes market, level active inactive population, particularly with economic growth, sub-periods between 2008 2019 under consideration.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Entrepreneurial Factors Influencing Recovery from Covid-19: A Country-Level Analysis DOI Creative Commons

Igor Graić,

Uglješa Marjanović,

Vukašin Grozdić

et al.

Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 30(6)

Published: Oct. 26, 2023

This study examines the impact of entrepreneurship ecosystem factors on recovery from COVID-19 pandemic and offers valuable insights to drive growth.By analyzing Serbian dataset Global Entrepreneurship Monitor National Expert Survey in 2022, employs linear regression analysis investigate relationship between Entrepreneurial Framework Conditions post-pandemic recovery.Data were collected through interviews with 40 experts representing government, academia, industry.The Context Index score for Serbia's entrepreneurial environment quality 2022 is 4.6 which positions Serbia middle continuum included country scores.The results have shown that Market openness (β = .474;p < .01)and Achieving UN Sustainable Economic Development Goals .460;p .01)have a direct positive entrepreneurs consequences COVID-19.The limitations are related demographics sample, self-reported data, geographic scope, focusing only Republic Serbia, crosssectional design does not capture dynamic evolving nature process.Given these limitations, future work could incorporate more diverse sample enhance generalizability findings.This research provides important policy recommendations leverage practices economic following pandemic.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

An Exploration in the Zones of Business Disruption and Economic Growth DOI
Debasish Roy

Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 80

Published: Sept. 27, 2024

Nowadays, business innovation and disruption; both in tandem, are the two major features of global economy, albeit completely contradictory nature. The first part this research work is aimed at analytical derivations demarcation Zone Business Disruption (ZBD) Economic Growth (ZEG) for 6 sample countries time series study 30 years (1990 – 2019) by considering 2020 as ‘benchmark' year pandemic to estimate quantum disruption a function variables, i.e., Per capita productivity growth rate GDP respectively, second consists formulation Survival Index (BSI) based on attributes Adaptability Disruptions (ABD) Alternative Strategy (ABS) respectively which would help project efficiency level country effectively survive adverse effects disruptions from normative point view.

Language: Английский

Citations

0