Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
67(2), P. 249 - 281
Published: Dec. 14, 2024
Abstract
Many
challenges
are
involved
in
solving
mechanical
design
optimization
problems
related
to
the
real-world,
such
as
conflicting
objectives,
assorted
variables,
discrete
search
space,
intuitive
flaws,
and
many
locally
optimal
solutions.
A
comparison
of
algorithms
on
a
given
set
can
provide
us
with
insights
into
their
performance,
finding
best
one
use,
potential
improvements
needed
mechanisms
ensure
maximum
performance.
This
motivated
our
attempts
comprehensively
compare
eight
recent
meta-heuristics
15
engineering
problems.
Algorithms
considered
water
wave
optimizer
(WWO),
butterfly
algorithm
(BOA),
Henry
gas
solubility
(HGSO),
Harris
Hawks
(HHO),
ant
lion
(ALO),
whale
(WOA),
sine–cosine
(SCA)
dragonfly
(DA).
Comparative
performance
analysis
is
based
solution
trait
obtained
from
statistical
tests
convergence
plots.
The
results
demonstrate
wide
range
adaptability
for
future
applications.
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
66(9), P. 1439 - 1448
Published: May 24, 2024
Abstract
Optimization
techniques
play
a
pivotal
role
in
enhancing
the
performance
of
engineering
components
across
various
real-world
applications.
Traditional
optimization
methods
are
often
augmented
with
exploitation-boosting
due
to
their
inherent
limitations.
Recently,
nature-inspired
algorithms,
known
as
metaheuristics
(MHs),
have
emerged
efficient
tools
for
solving
complex
problems.
However,
these
algorithms
face
challenges
such
imbalance
between
exploration
and
exploitation
phases,
slow
convergence,
local
optima.
Modifications
incorporating
oppositional
techniques,
hybridization,
chaotic
maps,
levy
flights
been
introduced
address
issues.
This
article
explores
application
recently
developed
crayfish
algorithm
(COA),
assisted
by
artificial
neural
networks
(ANN),
design
optimization.
The
COA,
inspired
foraging
migration
behaviors,
incorporates
temperature-dependent
strategies
balance
phases.
Additionally,
ANN
augmentation
enhances
algorithm’s
accuracy.
COA
method
optimizes
components,
including
cantilever
beams,
hydrostatic
thrust
bearings,
three-bar
trusses,
diaphragm
springs,
vehicle
suspension
systems.
Results
demonstrate
effectiveness
achieving
superior
solutions
compared
other
emphasizing
its
potential
diverse
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
66(8), P. 1230 - 1240
Published: July 5, 2024
Abstract
This
paper
introduces
a
novel
approach,
the
Modified
Electric
Eel
Foraging
Optimization
(EELFO)
algorithm,
which
integrates
artificial
neural
networks
(ANNs)
with
metaheuristic
algorithms
for
solving
multidisciplinary
design
problems
efficiently.
Inspired
by
foraging
behavior
of
electric
eels,
algorithm
incorporates
four
key
phases:
interactions,
resting,
hunting,
and
migrating.
Mathematical
formulations
each
phase
are
provided,
enabling
to
explore
exploit
solution
spaces
effectively.
The
algorithm’s
performance
is
evaluated
on
various
real-world
optimization
problems,
including
weight
engineering
components,
economic
pressure
handling
vessels,
cost
welded
beams.
Comparative
analyses
demonstrate
superiority
MEELFO
in
achieving
optimal
solutions
minimal
deviations
computational
effort
compared
existing
methods.
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 30, 2024
Abstract
This
paper
introduces
and
investigates
an
enhanced
Partial
Reinforcement
Optimization
Algorithm
(E-PROA),
a
novel
evolutionary
algorithm
inspired
by
partial
reinforcement
theory
to
efficiently
solve
complex
engineering
optimization
problems.
The
proposed
combines
the
(PROA)
with
quasi-oppositional
learning
approach
improve
performance
of
pure
PROA.
E-PROA
was
applied
five
distinct
design
components:
speed
reducer
design,
step-cone
pulley
weight
optimization,
economic
cantilever
beams,
coupling
bolted
rim
vehicle
suspension
arm
An
artificial
neural
network
as
metamodeling
is
used
obtain
equations
for
shape
optimization.
Comparative
analyses
other
benchmark
algorithms,
such
ship
rescue
algorithm,
mountain
gazelle
optimizer,
cheetah
demonstrated
superior
in
terms
convergence
rate,
solution
quality,
computational
efficiency.
results
indicate
that
holds
excellent
promise
technique
addressing
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
66(9), P. 1510 - 1518
Published: Aug. 13, 2024
Abstract
In
this
study,
a
novel
multi-cell
crash
box
was
designed
and
produced
using
15
%
short
carbon
fiber
reinforced
polyethylene
terephthalate
(CF15PET),
polylactic
acid
(PLA),
acrylonitrile
butadiene
styrene
(ABS)
filaments
one
of
the
additive
manufacturing
methods,
melt
deposition
method
(FDM).
All
structures’
maximum
force
energy
absorption
performances
have
been
investigated.
As
result
test,
it
determined
that
box,
which
best
meets
high
folding
properties,
expected
features
in
boxes,
has
parts
manufactured
ABS
CF15PET
materials.
According
to
test
result,
found
is
11
higher
than
approximately
4.5
PLA.
It
response
value
5
12
materials
can
be
used
boxes
form
an
idea
about
design
by
designing
analyzing
finite
element
programs.
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
66(10), P. 1557 - 1563
Published: Aug. 8, 2024
Abstract
This
research
is
the
first
attempt
in
literature
to
combine
design
for
additive
manufacturing
and
hybrid
flood
algorithms
optimal
of
battery
holders
an
electric
vehicle.
article
uses
a
recent
metaheuristic
explore
optimization
holder
A
polylactic
acid
(PLA)
material
preferred
during
manufacturing.
Specifically,
both
algorithm
(FLA-SA)
water
wave
optimizer
(WWO)
are
utilized
generate
holder.
The
hybridized
with
simulated
annealing
algorithm.
An
artificial
neural
network
employed
acquire
meta-model,
enhancing
efficiency.
results
underscore
robustness
achieving
designs
car
components,
suggesting
its
potential
applicability
various
product
development
processes.
Materials Testing,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
67(2), P. 330 - 352
Published: Jan. 22, 2025
Abstract
The
current
study
presents
a
novel
gradient-free
metaheuristic
search
algorithm
named
Tactical
Flight
Optimizer
(TFO),
tailored
to
meet
the
growing
need
for
high-performance
optimization
techniques
in
solving
complex
engineering
and
mathematical
problems.
main
contribution
of
this
is
development
method
that
simulates
tactical
air
combat
formations,
offering
sophisticated
alternative
conventional
algorithms.
In
proposed
method,
location
each
agent
updated
based
on
resultant
vector
derived
from
three
updating
vectors.
vectors
incorporate
total
information
stored
by
agents
iteration.
Consequently,
navigation
process
guided
more
logical
mechanism
rather
than
simple
random
process.
performance
TFO
initially
benchmarked
set
constrained
functions.
Subsequently,
it
evaluated
addressing
suite
mechanical
structural
problems,
containing
both
discrete
continuous
decision
variables.
obtained
results
are
compared
with
five
other
well-stablished
techniques.
Acquired
numerical
indicate
can
provide
promising
problems
terms
computational
cost,
accuracy,
stability.
Engineering Computations,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 10, 2025
Purpose
The
fishing
cat's
unique
hunting
strategies,
including
ambush,
detection,
diving
and
trapping,
inspired
the
development
of
a
novel
metaheuristic
optimization
algorithm
named
Fishing
Cat
Optimizer
(FCO).
purpose
this
paper
is
to
introduce
FCO,
offering
fresh
perspective
on
demonstrating
its
potential
for
solving
complex
problems.
Design/methodology/approach
FCO
structures
process
into
four
distinct
phases.
Each
phase
incorporates
tailored
search
strategy
enrich
diversity
population
attain
an
optimal
balance
between
extensive
global
exploration
focused
local
exploitation.
Findings
To
assess
efficacy
algorithm,
we
conducted
comparative
analysis
with
state-of-the-art
algorithms,
COA,
WOA,
HHO,
SMA,
DO
ARO,
using
test
suite
comprising
75
benchmark
functions.
findings
indicate
that
achieved
results
88%
functions,
whereas
SMA
which
ranked
second,
excelled
only
21%
Furthermore,
secured
average
ranking
1.2
across
sets
CEC2005,
CEC2017,
CEC2019
CEC2022,
superior
convergence
capability
robustness
compared
other
comparable
algorithms.
Research
limitations/implications
Although
performs
excellently
in
single-objective
problems
constrained
problems,
it
also
has
some
shortcomings
defects.
First,
structure
relatively
there
are
many
parameters.
value
parameters
certain
impact
Second,
computational
complexity
high.
When
high-dimensional
takes
more
time
than
algorithms
such
as
GWO
WOA.
Third,
although
multimodal
rarely
obtains
theoretical
solution
when
combinatorial
Practical
implications
applied
five
common
engineering
design
Originality/value
This
innovatively
proposes
mimics
mechanisms
cats,
strategies
lurking,
perceiving,
rapid
precise
trapping.
These
abstracted
closely
connected
iterative
stages,
corresponding
in-depth
exploration,
multi-dimensional
fine
developmental
localized
refinement
contraction
search.
enables
efficient
fine-tuning
environments,
significantly
enhancing
algorithm's
adaptability
efficiency.